Carolina has a 2 game lead here. Cincy beat them week2 or 3 this seasonDoesn't matter IMO. They need to look for Carson's successor. Good start would be Andrew Luck. Carson's now a poor man's Shaun Hill. (I'm stunned at the rate of his decline)Anyone know who would own the tiebreaker between Carolina/Cincy for #1 pick? JMO Carolina has a good shot of beating the Cardinals IMO this weekend.
Thanks. Can't imagine they'd pass on Luck (Carolina) if the case with Fox likely out after the season (and no allegiance to Claussen whatsoever).Carolina has a 2 game lead here. Cincy beat them week2 or 3 this seasonDoesn't matter IMO. They need to look for Carson's successor. Good start would be Andrew Luck. Carson's now a poor man's Shaun Hill. (I'm stunned at the rate of his decline)Anyone know who would own the tiebreaker between Carolina/Cincy for #1 pick? JMO Carolina has a good shot of beating the Cardinals IMO this weekend.
A General Manager is tops on every bengals fan's christmas list. Never gonna happen.I think there's underachieving from the gm who signed him
Head to head isnt the tiebreak on draft picks. Its strength of schedule.Carolina has a 2 game lead here. Cincy beat them week2 or 3 this seasonDoesn't matter IMO. They need to look for Carson's successor. Good start would be Andrew Luck. Carson's now a poor man's Shaun Hill. (I'm stunned at the rate of his decline)Anyone know who would own the tiebreaker between Carolina/Cincy for #1 pick? JMO Carolina has a good shot of beating the Cardinals IMO this weekend.
TO is correct. Mike Brown sucks... the coaches suck... but I wouldn't be talking #### if I was causing interceptions left and right by being a big alligator armed #####.
Somehow I think the opposite, as the squeaky wheel often gets the grease (i.e., lots of targets)ourmanflint said:Anyone see the bench for TO based on these comments?
The irony behind "throw me the damn ball" is that they were losing when he posted big statistical days and losing when he didn't.Somehow I think the opposite, as the squeaky wheel often gets the grease (i.e., lots of targets)ourmanflint said:Anyone see the bench for TO based on these comments?
Stop for two seconds and think about how if every player was like TO and every time a team didn't perform the way they 'thought' everyone just started saying 'its not my fault the qb sucks' 'its not my fault the oline sucks' 'its not my fault the coaching sucks' 'its not my fault the rb sucks'. That's a recipe for success. The guy is a cancer and you have to be stupid to put him on your team...Your going to get on Owens for sounding off when the Bengals have two wins in a season they expected to make a serious playoff run? I don't get it.
Feels like the matrix. Starting all over. Looking for The One.Until Mike Brown dies, the Bengals will never succeed. There's a chance that his son, Katie Blackburn will hire a GM, hopefully.Everybody's gone after this season...except Mike Brown...10 year rebuilding cycle begins anew.
Is this a typo or humor???Feels like the matrix. Starting all over. Looking for The One.Until Mike Brown dies, the Bengals will never succeed. There's a chance that his son, Katie Blackburn will hire a GM, hopefully.Everybody's gone after this season...except Mike Brown...10 year rebuilding cycle begins anew.
Yup..TO just can`t hold it together for a full season no matter how hard he tries.Raider Nation said:After the game, there was a clip on ESPN of him saying "I can't throw the ball to myself."![]()
It took 14 weeks, but the meltdown is in full effect.
He's coming off COACH OF THE YEAR!!!!!!!!!dickey moe said:"Why does Marvin Lewis still have a job?" is a pretty good question.
Not so fast there, we're already lobbying for him to come back to Baltimore.I wish they would hurry up and fire Marvin Lewis so I can start campaigning for Houston to get him as DC.
There's a chance that his son, Katie Blackburn will hire a GM, hopefully.
Laughed when I read that. Katie actually looks like a boy.There's a chance that his son, Katie Blackburn will hire a GM, hopefully.(she does look-ah like-ah man)
I've heard rumors that Marvin is interested in the Pitt job.Laughed when I read that. Katie actually looks like a boy.There's a chance that his son, Katie Blackburn will hire a GM, hopefully.(she does look-ah like-ah man)
And on Marvin going to Houston, the Hot rumor on Sirius yesterday was Cowher going to Houston.
Maybe Kubs goes back to Denver then?
I can see marvin going to SF....just my opinion.
He's never won ####.
He's never taken personal responsibility for losing.
He is quicker to blame others in the media than he is running on the filed.
He destroys teams and individuals confidence.
He was prolific in an age of prolific recievers, talented, but never unusually so compared to his contemporaries.
In the end he was a journeyman who never won anything. The reason he was a journeyman was because those in the business who know more about him than we ever will, quality coaches, all determined he was not a value.
I know they're going to get run in the first round, but do you really think Tomlin will get fired? Seems a little harsh...I've heard rumors that Marvin is interested in the Pitt job.Laughed when I read that. Katie actually looks like a boy.There's a chance that his son, Katie Blackburn will hire a GM, hopefully.(she does look-ah like-ah man)
And on Marvin going to Houston, the Hot rumor on Sirius yesterday was Cowher going to Houston.
Maybe Kubs goes back to Denver then?
I can see marvin going to SF....just my opinion.
"I'm not sure why we're 2-11 this year," Ochocinco said. "But the thing with me is I've become numb to the situation of losing, being that I've lost for such a long time that I have not been able to point the finger on what it really is."
That seems like a much more noteworthy comment.
Oh, so you think TO and the coaching staff will be staying.He's never won ####.
He's never taken personal responsibility for losing.
He is quicker to blame others in the media than he is running on the filed.
He destroys teams and individuals confidence.
He was prolific in an age of prolific recievers, talented, but never unusually so compared to his contemporaries.
In the end he was a journeyman who never won anything. The reason he was a journeyman was because those in the business who know more about him than we ever will, quality coaches, all determined he was not a value.He is the second most prolific receiver of all-time.
And, the rest of your post is 100% pure conjecture. "He destroys teams and individual confidence". Unless you played on one of the teams and have personal experience, how can you possibly make this statement.
Flame on, haters.
Edit to add: The thread title is misleading. It should be more clear that it is the OP's opinion and not factual.
Kubiak won't be fired. McNair will make him hire a proven DC with no Denver connection and give him one more year.Laughed when I read that. Katie actually looks like a boy.There's a chance that his son, Katie Blackburn will hire a GM, hopefully.(she does look-ah like-ah man)
And on Marvin going to Houston, the Hot rumor on Sirius yesterday was Cowher going to Houston.
Maybe Kubs goes back to Denver then?
I can see marvin going to SF....just my opinion.
While no one can tell the future, the chances of the Bengals not re-signing T.O. are about the same as the sun coming up tomorrow morning. The Bengals dont tolerate public criticism. The organization is run like a mom and pop gas station with so called loyalty being high on the list. With all the other shake-ups (new coach, possibly new qb, HOPEFULLY FINALLY A GM!), the Bengals will be in rebuilding mode and T.O. just aint worth the hassle.He's never won ####.
He's never taken personal responsibility for losing.
He is quicker to blame others in the media than he is running on the filed.
He destroys teams and individuals confidence.
He was prolific in an age of prolific recievers, talented, but never unusually so compared to his contemporaries.
In the end he was a journeyman who never won anything. The reason he was a journeyman was because those in the business who know more about him than we ever will, quality coaches, all determined he was not a value.He is the second most prolific receiver of all-time.
And, the rest of your post is 100% pure conjecture. "He destroys teams and individual confidence". Unless you played on one of the teams and have personal experience, how can you possibly make this statement.
Flame on, haters.
Edit to add: The thread title is misleading. It should be more clear that it is the OP's opinion and not factual.
[lesson]Pitt is the University of Pittsburgh.I know they're going to get run in the first round, but do you really think Tomlin will get fired? Seems a little harsh...I've heard rumors that Marvin is interested in the Pitt job.Laughed when I read that. Katie actually looks like a boy.There's a chance that his son, Katie Blackburn will hire a GM, hopefully.(she does look-ah like-ah man)
And on Marvin going to Houston, the Hot rumor on Sirius yesterday was Cowher going to Houston.
Maybe Kubs goes back to Denver then?
I can see marvin going to SF....just my opinion.
I know they're going to get run in the first round, but do you really think Tomlin will get fired? Seems a little harsh...I've heard rumors that Marvin is interested in the Pitt job.Laughed when I read that. Katie actually looks like a boy.There's a chance that his son, Katie Blackburn will hire a GM, hopefully.(she does look-ah like-ah man)
And on Marvin going to Houston, the Hot rumor on Sirius yesterday was Cowher going to Houston.
Maybe Kubs goes back to Denver then?
I can see marvin going to SF....just my opinion.
Those are very good questions. I'd like an answer from the so-called "football experts" on this too. One thing about the Bengals this year versus last year is that their defense is much worse this year. They've had many injuries in the secondary which has allowed opposing teams to score early and often on them, forcing the Bengals to come from behind in the 2nd half of games. Many times, the Bengals have come close to making the complete comeback, but most times, they've failed. This is a very low percentage way of winning games. Furthermore, because they are throwing alot when trying to stage a comeback, Palmer is forced to make throws that are risky, hence the high number of interceptions.Last year, the Bengals defense was solid (in fact, one of the best), and the offense was very conservative. Palmer was making "safe" throws to move the chains because their running game was very effective.Hoping for some insight here. Not that I understand anything about pro football particularly well, but this is really one thing I'm completely confused by. Here you have the Bengals, who were very good all last year, and made the playoffs. This year they have the same collection of players and coaches, yet they're awful. But not too awful- they're usually competitive in most games. Yet where they were pulling these games out last year, this year they're losing them. On the other hand, take Kansas City. Last year they were dreadful. This year they have a competitive team, and again it's with pretty much the same collection of players and coaches. What are the significant factors we can point to? What makes these teams good one year, bad the next, or vice-versa?
what about when ocho was highly critical of the organization and rather than trade him for an alleged 1st+3rd (that could escalate to another 1st) they signed him to a huge contract? then they let the good soldier housh walk rather than shell out a bit less money.While no one can tell the future, the chances of the Bengals not re-signing T.O. are about the same as the sun coming up tomorrow morning. The Bengals dont tolerate public criticism. The organization is run like a mom and pop gas station with so called loyalty being high on the list. With all the other shake-ups (new coach, possibly new qb, HOPEFULLY FINALLY A GM!), the Bengals will be in rebuilding mode and T.O. just aint worth the hassle.
most of the difference is simple. bengals ran hot, ie were fortunate, in close games last year and have been less fortunate in similar games this year. this is compounded by facing one of the hardest schedules in the league this yr compared to one of the easiest last year.Those are very good questions. I'd like an answer from the so-called "football experts" on this too. One thing about the Bengals this year versus last year is that their defense is much worse this year. They've had many injuries in the secondary which has allowed opposing teams to score early and often on them, forcing the Bengals to come from behind in the 2nd half of games. Many times, the Bengals have come close to making the complete comeback, but most times, they've failed. This is a very low percentage way of winning games. Furthermore, because they are throwing alot when trying to stage a comeback, Palmer is forced to make throws that are risky, hence the high number of interceptions.Last year, the Bengals defense was solid (in fact, one of the best), and the offense was very conservative. Palmer was making "safe" throws to move the chains because their running game was very effective.Hoping for some insight here. Not that I understand anything about pro football particularly well, but this is really one thing I'm completely confused by. Here you have the Bengals, who were very good all last year, and made the playoffs. This year they have the same collection of players and coaches, yet they're awful. But not too awful- they're usually competitive in most games. Yet where they were pulling these games out last year, this year they're losing them. On the other hand, take Kansas City. Last year they were dreadful. This year they have a competitive team, and again it's with pretty much the same collection of players and coaches. What are the significant factors we can point to? What makes these teams good one year, bad the next, or vice-versa?