I am trying to figure out how Clayton managed to give Houston which finished at the bottom last year in RunD a SoS value of 15.0 this year and NE gets a 20.2 who finished top 1/3 in the NFL.
Example, look at Miami's SoS for RBs week 4-5 they play Houston (15.0) and NE (20.2) respectively which is a very large gap. As points of reference in week 7 Miami plays GB and for this year GB RunD has a SoS value of 21.0. Finally JaxRunD is at 15.6 which is worse than Houston's so essentially their RunD is projected at this time to be better than Jax. The NFL min SoS for RunD is 12.4 and a max of 23.0.
2005 Wk 17 - Hou RunD Yds/Gm=143.9 Tds=21 -- 2005 Wk17 SoS RunD value of 19.9 -- 2006 RunD val=15.0
2005 Wk 17 - NE RunD Yds/Gm=98.8 Tds=11 -- 2005 Wk17 SoS RunD value of 15.9 -- 2006 RunD val=20.2
I have asked Clayton, Joe and David about it but so far no answer. Anyone know if this is a mistake or the real projections for this year? Just having a hard time seeing this as being accurate and I am not thinking Mario makes this huge of a change in SoS values.
Example, look at Miami's SoS for RBs week 4-5 they play Houston (15.0) and NE (20.2) respectively which is a very large gap. As points of reference in week 7 Miami plays GB and for this year GB RunD has a SoS value of 21.0. Finally JaxRunD is at 15.6 which is worse than Houston's so essentially their RunD is projected at this time to be better than Jax. The NFL min SoS for RunD is 12.4 and a max of 23.0.
2005 Wk 17 - Hou RunD Yds/Gm=143.9 Tds=21 -- 2005 Wk17 SoS RunD value of 19.9 -- 2006 RunD val=15.0
2005 Wk 17 - NE RunD Yds/Gm=98.8 Tds=11 -- 2005 Wk17 SoS RunD value of 15.9 -- 2006 RunD val=20.2
I have asked Clayton, Joe and David about it but so far no answer. Anyone know if this is a mistake or the real projections for this year? Just having a hard time seeing this as being accurate and I am not thinking Mario makes this huge of a change in SoS values.
