What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

SSL 4 Teams and Commentary (1 Viewer)

BLOX

Footballguy
Figured I'd get this going.

So far, so good.

QB Romo 8

RB Tomlinson 7, Barber III 8, K. Jones 6, T. Bell 6

WR R. Moss 10, R. Brown 5, Bennett 9, Gonzalez 6

TE Miller 6

K

DEF Miami 9

I'm liking how my team is coming together. I'm pretty well set at RB, but if there's one more left I feel that can maybe put up some numbers for a week or two I'll add them.

My team should stick around for a while, and if things go right I may be able to get pretty far.

Added a very solid DEF with a special teams standout returning kicks. I'll have to recheck the scoring, but I'm pretty sure we get points for TD returns so I'm happy with that. Also was able to get a WR who may have a couple pretty decent weeks "if" he wins the slot WR position in Indy. But he's going to be able to learn from a couple of the best WRs in all of football so I'm confident that this pick is going to pay off. Not too bad after 11 rounds.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Somehow, middle of the draft pick order always seems harder than either extreme. Probably the chance for missed opportunities.

Position...Player name (round) [bye]

QB..........Tom Brady (2)[6]

RB..........Reggie Bush (1)[7], Jerious Norwood (4)[5], Michael Pittman (8)[4]

WR.........TJ Houshmanzadeh (3)[5], Joey Galloway (6)[4]

TE..........Jason Witten (5)[3]

D............Chicago (7)[7]

K............TBD

OK, normally I would not have picked Bush this early, but for the ppr scoring. This guy is dynamic, a crowd pleaser and now has a year of experience under his belt. Deuce is a great back but I see the balance shifting towards Bush, especially after Deuce has worn down the D. Brees will score regularly and I think NO will turn to the running game late for clock control, making Bush a good value pick here. Was weighing two other RBs at this pick that I will discuss later. The two RBs I were considering were MJD who is heavily involved in the passing game at Jax and can smell out the endzone. The negative was the continued presence of Freddy, the return of Leftwich who is a detriment to Jax from what I can see, and a sense that Jax will try to open up the passing game. The other was Rudi Johnson, who is a pure running back, but his lack of involvement in the passing game makes him a lesser value pick at this slot.

For qb, Brady has a lot of ceiling this year, with the addition of Stallworth and Moss. If Mauroney can stay healthy and have involvement in the passing game, along with a great receiving TE or two, Brady's potential outshines everyone's, including Peyton. It will heavily depend upon Stallworth remaining healthy and Moss returning to form. I think Moss is thinking retirement and wants a Pro Bowl year to end on in the next season or two with a Super Bowl ring so he can sell more slurpees in a few years. I turned down two options at this pick, that will be discussed later. Would have considered Edge, but he was snagged off the board two picks ahead. Won't regret this pick at all. Options were Reggie Wayne who I feel is going to become the primary target in Indy. With the loss of Rhodes, I am not sure if the running game will have the prevalence it had last year as Addai will need a breather and there is not a backup of comparable caliber. The other consideration was Andre Johnson who will continue to see most of the targets in Houston.

For wr, TJ is the primary beneficiary of Palmer's ability, as Johnson is almost always covered by the top corner, allowing TJ to matchup against lesser DBs. The lack of involvement of the RB in the passing game, no real catching TE in Cin and loss of WR# and WR4 to free agency/Goodell suspension should send a lot of balls TJ's way. Needed a quality WR here, so there really was no option. TJ's early season injury last year hurt me in one league but he does not seem injury prone and I wanted to say "championship."

I may have hurt my chances reaching for Brady in 2, but I think with no proven backup behind Mauroney and the addition of Stallworth and Moss, along with Watson at TE, this could be the year Brady challenges for a TD record. Not committing to it, but he has the tools, the players and a D that will give great field position. Norwood is an interesting project. After all the talk that the Falcon would go with a bruiser back, they did not draft a back until the seventh I believe and passed on Michael Turner. Vick's troubles might actually aid Norwood as Harrington is not a scrambling qb and would tend to use the rb as a valve if the wr are not open. The potential loss of Finneran suggests a heavy dependency on the running game in Atlanta, which has an excellent O Line. Dunn will have a role and that actually is good as Norwood's build causes many to question whether he can be a feature back or would he do better in RBBC or a 60/40 split? Excellent numbers in limited action last year. May be the season making or breaking pick.

Witten is not regarded as a top ten TE universally, but with the 2 pt TE ppr, and his numbers improving last year after Romo took over, he may be very serviceable. Yes, I would rather have Gates, but he did not fall to round 5. Would like to see Witten with greater td production, but that is very unlikely to happen. Good value hopefully.

Galloway - leading receiver in TB who has brought in several QBs to revamp their passing O. Hopefully this means more targets and more opportunities for the TB wrs.

Yes, I picked a D in the seventh. I have faith in Chicago to continue with high D scoring, particularly takeaways and hopefully some scoring. Hester probably won't have the same year as last, but this could be the four or five point difference in a key week over the bottom feeder of the league. If Briggs remains and plays with good attitude, and Bears D benefits from the draftees, could be a great point value for the round. D does not usually go this early but where else would one find a high scoring pick in the seventh?

Michael Pittman - Caddy has issues and may not be fully healed. Alstott has an injury history and with his style of play that is not good, especially neck injury. Remember, he almost retired last year. Pittman is very involved in the passing game and may benefit if Alstott limited. Was hoping to pick up M Turner instead, but was already gone.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
1.10 Henry , Denver running backs. :blackdot: :wall:
I like Henry in DEN this year
Ditto, I was considering him as well, especially given a) Denver RB history, b) relative lack of competition for starting gig (M Bell will relieve him, keeping Henry fresh during games to his advantage), c)Cutler is still developing and will depend on running game to control the clock, d) D Graham to Denverm IIRC, great blocking TE, e) is Rod Smith playing this year? Didn't he have surgery during the off-season? Passing game could be good but limited, f) Walker and two good receiving TE will keep D's relatively honest, g) Denver D is much improved and should give good field advantage.Not a pick to be ashamed of unless an undrafted FA tears up the preseason.
 
1.16 Rudi Johnson-RB-CIN2.01 Laurence Maroney-RB-NEYou have to like that start from the 16 hole
...how the?Maroney's ADP in the PDSL was 15 and Rudi's was 9. The lowest he went out of the SSL's was 1.14. Rudi Johnson never got close to the turn in any of the drafts I've seen in these survivor leagues. Grats on winning the league Bruno.
 
1.16 Rudi Johnson-RB-CIN2.01 Laurence Maroney-RB-NEYou have to like that start from the 16 hole
...how the?Maroney's ADP in the PDSL was 15 and Rudi's was 9. The lowest he went out of the SSL's was 1.14. Rudi Johnson never got close to the turn in any of the drafts I've seen in these survivor leagues. Grats on winning the league Bruno.
A little premature. He still needs a few players to compete. :no: :stopdrinkingthekoolaid:
 
I am most curious on how the team who selected Gates-Manning is going to end up looking. Sure, he got the #1 TE and #1 QB, and in a head to head league that might be enough. In a survivor league, it's a little more interesting.

If somehow he can piece together some RBs and WRs to fill the team, look out. I don't see it, however. He will be weak at RB2 or WR2 and WR3. If he can grab depth...

 
1.16 Rudi Johnson-RB-CIN2.01 Laurence Maroney-RB-NEYou have to like that start from the 16 hole
...how the?Maroney's ADP in the PDSL was 15 and Rudi's was 9. The lowest he went out of the SSL's was 1.14. Rudi Johnson never got close to the turn in any of the drafts I've seen in these survivor leagues. Grats on winning the league Bruno.
A little premature. He still needs a few players to compete. :excited: :stopdrinkingthekoolaid:
Yeah I was surprised to see those guys at the turn as well. Not big ppr RBs, but studs none the less. A good start for sure.
 
Ditto on the surprise turn. I had thought perhaps Rudi was being neglected because of his lack in the passing game. This was a coup for sure.

Serpentine drafts certainly take a lot of the sting out of being last pick. I was going to take either if they somehow continued to fall.

 
I am most curious on how the team who selected Gates-Manning is going to end up looking. Sure, he got the #1 TE and #1 QB, and in a head to head league that might be enough. In a survivor league, it's a little more interesting.If somehow he can piece together some RBs and WRs to fill the team, look out. I don't see it, however. He will be weak at RB2 or WR2 and WR3. If he can grab depth...
There is some interesting depth at the RB slot this year, but in a 16 team shark group - this was a risky move IMO. I'm curious myself.
 
......in a 16 team shark group - this was a risky move IMO. I'm curious myself.
What's risky is drafting your first three players all with the same bye week!What I'm really curious about is how you might expect to get past week six? Seriously, do you have a secret plan?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
with the current wr run, shake is looking good to grab some rbs
Yeah.....I was considering going after another myself, in round 4, but now I'm not so sure. It looks like I will head WR instead. But not for a while.......we seem to have bogged down.I am trying to not get irritated by the fact that no PM's were sent out. It can't be that hard this early in the draft to put a solid list together. Especially if you know you won't be able to get back for over 12 hours.Oh well, it is what it is.
 
Man.... When I picked Benson, I specifically looked at the bye weeks.

I have an Excel spreadsheet NFL schedule, but it's tiny.... so I zoomed in, but it only zoomed 100%, but I could still squint and see the teams.

I saw Chicago with a week 9 bye, and I saw Miami with a week 5 bye... of course, Mia and Min look REAL similar in mice type. :shrug:

So I get to pick my 3rd RB before my 2nd WR. SUPER. :D

Some of my super sleeper WRs are going to need to work out...

 
Some of these picks perplex me.

VDavis so high. Cutler so high.

The latest move was I was at the end of the fourth and saw the 2 guys behind each had 2 RBs, so I go WR and seem intent on taking Kevin Jones on the turnaround.

That was until BLOX decided LT and MBIII wasn't enough firepower and grabbed a RB3 before a QB1, TE1, or a WR2.

I don't get that move. Yeah, he's set at RB, but at a cost of other positions. Only 2 RBs score every week. Doesn't make sense to me to leave points on the bench at a cost to a different position.

 
Some of these picks perplex me.

VDavis so high. Cutler so high.

Doesn't make sense to me to leave points on the bench at a cost to a different position.
t8knovr is surely trying a different approach. The value does not seem to be there where he took them........but I guess he figures, get 'em now before it's too late. 16 teams is throwing a 'kink' in some of these guys strategies. We will have to adjust accordingly.So sorry you did not get KJ.

 
Some of these picks perplex me.

VDavis so high. Cutler so high.

Doesn't make sense to me to leave points on the bench at a cost to a different position.
t8knovr is surely trying a different approach. The value does not seem to be there where he took them........but I guess he figures, get 'em now before it's too late. 16 teams is throwing a 'kink' in some of these guys strategies. We will have to adjust accordingly.So sorry you did not get KJ.
T8knover's Cutler pick = :wub: look at his previous posts. mostly all broncos related.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Some of these picks perplex me.VDavis so high. Cutler so high.The latest move was I was at the end of the fourth and saw the 2 guys behind each had 2 RBs, so I go WR and seem intent on taking Kevin Jones on the turnaround.That was until BLOX decided LT and MBIII wasn't enough firepower and grabbed a RB3 before a QB1, TE1, or a WR2.I don't get that move. Yeah, he's set at RB, but at a cost of other positions. Only 2 RBs score every week. Doesn't make sense to me to leave points on the bench at a cost to a different position.
I agree about Cutler & Davis.I don't think it was a bad move for BLOX to go with a RB @ 5.01. He's set at the RB position, there are a ton of middle of the road WRs left on the board, with the top TEs gone there's no need to go there yet and unless a major QB run happpens through the rest of the 5th & the 6th, he should be able to get a satisfactory starter.His pick may have screwed you, but that's just part of the fun of this type of league. :wub:
 
K.Jones was another guy I looked at long and hard in round 4 - but the risk of the injury kept me away. Blox may have done you a favor.

 
Steel Dillo said:
Ruffrodys05 said:
16 teams is throwing a 'kink' in some of these guys strategies. We will have to adjust accordingly.
This seems awfully smug. Are you classifying yourself as an expert 16 team drafter?
No, not smug. I'm classifying myself as an experienced 16 team drafter (not expert) whereas some here have already admitted they have never drafted in a 16 team mock league. I've never come close to winning one of these things, but I do know what value is and where to expect to get it. Throw in a group of newcomers who have never done one of these and you get the types of picks we are seeing here. As an experienced drafter in a 16 team league, I know that adjustments need to be made on the fly, when dealing with such types of picks. Although, if you want to consider my comments smug, be my guest.Are you going to say that the Cutler and Davis picks were on the mark where they were selected?

Oh, and you'll know when I'm being smug, it shines through all of the haze.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Steel Dillo said:
Ruffrodys05 said:
16 teams is throwing a 'kink' in some of these guys strategies. We will have to adjust accordingly.
This seems awfully smug. Are you classifying yourself as an expert 16 team drafter?
No, not smug. I'm classifying myself as an experienced 16 team drafter (not expert) whereas some here have already admitted they have never drafted in a 16 team mock league. I've never come close to winning one of these things, but I do know what value is and where to expect to get it. Throw in a group of newcomers who have never done one of these and you get the types of picks we are seeing here. As an experienced drafter in a 16 team league, I know that adjustments need to be made on the fly, when dealing with such types of picks. Although, if you want to consider my comments smug, be my guest.Are you going to say that the Cutler and Davis picks were on the mark where they were selected?

Oh, and you'll know when I'm being smug, it shines through all of the haze.
RR05 has taken on the responsibility of managing this draft and is doing a great job. I look forward to any commentary as it is a learning curve for me. I have done and won many 12 team leagues but admitted to RR05 in pm that I had not done 16 team draft before and it is a different dynamic, especially in ppr with +2 for te. I didn't see any smugness but maybe it is too hazy here, LOL.
 
Ruffrodys05 said:
pigskin pimp said:
Some of these picks perplex me.

VDavis so high. Cutler so high.

Doesn't make sense to me to leave points on the bench at a cost to a different position.
t8knovr is surely trying a different approach. The value does not seem to be there where he took them........but I guess he figures, get 'em now before it's too late. 16 teams is throwing a 'kink' in some of these guys strategies. We will have to adjust accordingly.So sorry you did not get KJ.
I had V. Davis targeted at 5.10 T8 would not have got him if he waited another round. Think Davis can be huge this year
 
A pretty strong WR run is now happening around the turn between rounds 7 & 8. I'm kinda glad I stuck with my game plan of taking four rather quickly. If you boys keep it up, my next two picks should fall to me rather nicely. :confused: :lmao:

I happen to be an optimist. :fishing:

 
I'll be updating my early post with my thoughts rather than adding a new post with each pick or group of picks. Any interested are welcome to read and comment. I think it is post 4-7 somewhere in there.

 
pigskin pimp said:
The picks are flying.
It's kinda' nice when PM's are sent a little in advance. And none of them had any issues as far as not enough players on their lists or anything. It was quite easy to do.We will screetch to a halt soon enough though......wdcrob did not send any other PM's and he won't be back until tonight.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top