What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

St. Louis Rams soon will be put up for sale (1 Viewer)

St. Louis Bob

Footballguy
Link

Here's an early heads-up for any wealthy individuals, families or potential investor groups in the St. Louis area who dream of owning an NFL franchise:

You're in luck.

But you might want to act fast, because the Rams are likely to hit the open market in the near future, officially offered for sale by majority owners Chip Rosenbloom and Lucia Rodriguez.

After inheriting control of the Rams in early 2008 from their late mother, Georgia Frontiere, Rosenbloom and Rodriguez have concentrated on reorganizing the football operation. And they've had to deal with complex estate-tax issues in the aftermath of their mother's death.

With substantial progress made in those areas, the timetable for a sale has moved up.

Two sources with direct knowledge of the situation told the Post-Dispatch on Saturday that Rosenbloom and Rodriguez have retained the services of Goldman Sachs, the prominent investment banking firm.

The owners will ask Goldman Sachs to help facilitate the sale of the Rams by evaluating bids and soliciting potential buyers.

The sale price is unknown, but Forbes magazine's most recent estimate listed the Rams' value at $929 million.

And if you are a St. Louis Rams fan, here's the reason to be concerned: I'm told there will be no preconditions attached to the sale of the Rams. This means the Rams could be scooped up by out-of-town buyers.

And that's a dramatic — and potentially ominous — development, given the Rams' shaky lease at the Edward Jones Dome.

Until now, Rosenbloom, the franchise's managing partner, has said he was open to the idea of selling the Rams as long as the new owner agreed to keep the team in St. Louis, long-term. Rosenbloom hoped that his pledge would entice a buyer from the St. Louis community.

According to a source familiar with Rosenbloom's thinking, Rosenbloom is discouraged by the apparent lack of local ownership interest. Rosenbloom, the source said, has been waiting for more than a year for a St. Louis-area bidder to step forward, to no avail.

The source said Rosenbloom's strong preference is to sell to St. Louis representatives. But with nothing happening on the St. Louis front, Rosenbloom has reluctantly concluded that the only way to expedite a sale is to make the Rams available to any party, near or far. And that includes Los Angeles, the Rams' home until moving to St. Louis in 1995.

When reached Saturday, Rosenbloom declined to comment on sale and stadium issues. "The most important thing for me right now is putting a winning team on the field," he said. "And we don't want that goal to be disrupted in any way."

Rodriguez could not be reached for comment.

Rosenbloom and Rodriguez own a combined 60 percent of the Rams, with Stan Kroenke still in place with a 40 percent ownership share.

I'm told that Kroenke wants to retain his 40 percent piece of the Rams. That's a positive development. Local bidders would have to fund a 60 percent purchase instead of all 100 percent.

According to strict NFL rules on cross-ownership, Kroenke is prohibited from being the majority owner of the Rams unless he first sells two other teams that he owns, the NBA's Denver Nuggets and NHL's Colorado Avalanche.

If the Rams are to be secured for St. Louis on a long-term basis, finding a local owner is the first and most important step.

Unless local ownership emerges, the Rams' future in St. Louis is increasingly uncertain.

The Rams' lease agreement with the St. Louis Convention and Visitors Commission stipulates that the Edward Jones Dome must be a "top-tier" facility that ranks among the top eight stadiums in terms of quality in the 32-team NFL by 2015.

If that top-level status is not met, the Rams would be able to opt out of the stadium lease following the 2014 season.

It's virtually impossible for the CVC to meet that top-eight standard. By 2010, 23 NFL stadiums will have been built or thoroughly renovated since the Edward Jones Dome opened in 1995.

Even with a $30 million upgrade that's being done now, the Edward Jones Dome will be one of the oldest stadiums in the NFL by 2015.

In 2012 the CVC and the Rams will each submit a plan to suitably improve the Dome. And if they can't agree, the dispute will go to arbitration.

The source with knowledge of Rosenbloom's thinking describes the owner as reluctant to get into an extended and nasty battle with the CVC — which probably explains the timing of Rosenbloom's decision to sell sooner.

This is what concerns me:

Coming up with public financing to build a new football stadium in St. Louis is virtually impossible. What about public dollars for a massive renovation of the Dome? A long shot — though voters in Jackson County, Mo., passed a sales-tax increase to refurbish Arrowhead Stadium, home of the Kansas City Chiefs.

And what about a compromise solution that could make the Dome workable for the Rams and the CVC for the intermediate future until both sides agree on a long-range plan?

If an out-of-towner gets control of the franchise and is determined to move to, say, Los Angeles, it would be easy to play hardball and rebuff the CVC's efforts to reach that compromise.

But if new local ownership emerges to take charge of the Rams, I believe the chances of conciliation will increase dramatically.

Make no mistake, the Rams will be in play — and soon.

Will a local buyer preserve the franchise for St. Louis? And how will city-regional leadership respond to the challenge?

It's time for St. Louis to come up with an effective prevent defense.
Here we go again.... :bowtie:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very interesting. With the Rams falling on such hard times lately, I'm not sure how strong the fight will be to keep them in STL. LA is an obvious choice; and I suppose the other usual names (like San Antonio) will get bandied about. The Rams have been under the ownership of Chip or one of his parents since the historic trade in 1972 when Carroll Rosenbloom traded the Colts to Bob Irsay. It looks like that lineage has just about expired. Curious to see who steps up here.

Do the STL homers think they'll keep this team? It sounds like it's very unlikely that the city will finance anything major.

 
It sounds like it's very unlikely that the city will finance anything major.
I don't see the city, or state, building another stadium which is what would be required to meet the standards under the agreement.Personally, as somebody that went to a bunch of Big Red games, I like the dome. Well, I like it instead of sitting in the rain or sub zero temperatures. It is very sterile though and lacks personality.Like the article said, our only hope to keep the team long term would be for a local guy to buy the team. I don't see that happening unfortunately.
 
that would be pretty cool to see the rams return back to the LA area....... the NFL would get a nice boost by having team in that market....of course the big ? is what to do about a stadium and the help from the local and state government for it .....the coliseum is huge but antiquated by modern nfl standards......

 
i would like to see 2 things change :

outside stadium

go back to the yellow and blue . changing the colors after a championship has to be one of the wierdest things a modern sports franchise has done and they deserve a jinx for it imo .

 
that would be pretty cool to see the rams return back to the LA area....... the NFL would get a nice boost by having team in that market....of course the big ? is what to do about a stadium and the help from the local and state government for it .....the coliseum is huge but antiquated by modern nfl standards......
The Coliseum was antiquated by NFL standards when the Raiders moved there in 1981. To put it in perspective, that venue was built for the 1932 Olympics, the Olympics before the one where Jesse Owens pissed off Hitler in Berlin. Short of a tear-down and rebuild (something that the City of LA won't go for) I don't see how that stadium can be brought up to NFL standard.
 
that would be pretty cool to see the rams return back to the LA area....... the NFL would get a nice boost by having team in that market....of course the big ? is what to do about a stadium and the help from the local and state government for it .....the coliseum is huge but antiquated by modern nfl standards......
No, no it wouldn't.
 
that would be pretty cool to see the rams return back to the LA area....... the NFL would get a nice boost by having team in that market....of course the big ? is what to do about a stadium and the help from the local and state government for it .....the coliseum is huge but antiquated by modern nfl standards......
I have not gone back to find one of the several threads on this topic, but theoretical plans are in place for a stadium in City of Industry. One guy owns all the ground, and several zoning issues are already handled. While not the ideal location, it is still relatively accessible for the area bounded by Long Beach to Thousand Oaks to Ontario. All he needs to get started is an agreement for a team, or at least that is his claim.
 
Can someone cue the song from Player titled "Baby Come Back"

I would love to see them move back...many "what if's" have plagued me since they left:

What if they never moved to Anaheim

What if Favre in 1994 signed the offer from the then Los Angeles Rams

On the flip side, It would upset me to see St Louis lose another franchise, their fans have embraced this football team.

 
I have not gone back to find one of the several threads on this topic, but theoretical plans are in place for a stadium in City of Industry. One guy owns all the ground, and several zoning issues are already handled. While not the ideal location, it is still relatively accessible for the area bounded by Long Beach to Thousand Oaks to Ontario. All he needs to get started is an agreement for a team, or at least that is his claim.
ed roski is a local LA real estate billionaire... one of the biggest obstacles to bringing a team back to LA in the recent past was too many competing ideas, bad ideas (revamping the coliseum), lack of a coherent plan... it seems pretty clear that roski is best positioned to pull something like this off, if a team were to become available... not sure if it is the city council, but i think the recent zoning vote was comprised of all but one of his people...BTW, i hope for the city of st. louis fans that they can work it out (though this doesn't sound promising)... but if nobody from st. louis steps up, i would just as soon see them come back to LA than somewhere else... i was disappointed to see them leave in the first place...
 
On the flip side, It would upset me to see St Louis lose another franchise, their fans have embraced this football team.
:confused: There are ton of loyal football fans here. The Big Red still drew a considerable amount of fans even though the organizations was awful. I think the only person hated more in St. Louis than Don Denkinger is Bill Bidwell.I found out I got my Rams season ticket the day after my wedding. My wife remarked that I seemed happier about that than getting married. Now that I think about it, I've only missed 2 games since they moved her both due to out of town weddings.
 
St. Louis Bob said:
HMH said:
On the flip side, It would upset me to see St Louis lose another franchise, their fans have embraced this football team.
:jawdrop: There are ton of loyal football fans here. The Big Red still drew a considerable amount of fans even though the organizations was awful. I think the only person hated more in St. Louis than Don Denkinger is Bill Bidwell.

I found out I got my Rams season ticket the day after my wedding. My wife remarked that I seemed happier about that than getting married. Now that I think about it, I've only missed 2 games since they moved her both due to out of town weddings.
Freudian slip, GB? :coffee:
 
Supposed to wait til a team does well or at least shows a promising future with pieces in place for a promising future, before you sell. They're losing millions and millions selling now. Pat Kirwan called Bill Parcells the billion dollar man or somesuch as he went in and increased the value of the Fins by at least a couple hundred mil in just a few months-I forget what it was as a final result but geesh the price went way up.

We fans need good owners for all sorts of reasons. I hope the team isn't sold to just any rich guy.

Does Curtis Martin have his investors ready like he did on two previous occasions?

I'd love to see that guy own an NFL team.

 
All the talk of the Rams going to LA makes no sense to me. They didn't support the team there before. There are many reasons for that and most will point to the bad facility they played in. But the bigger reason is that in November and December in LA there are lots of things to do other than go to a football game on a Sunday afternoon. In St. Louis the options are watching a football game on TV or going to the game.

I feel the Rams are finally turning the corner and in the next couple of years will be in the playoffs again. It would really be a shame if they bolted. Particularly since the city just paid for a bunch of improvements to the dome...

One question. Is the team not bound by the lease agreement for the dome if they are sold?

 
All the talk of the Rams going to LA makes no sense to me. They didn't support the team there before. There are many reasons for that and most will point to the bad facility they played in. But the bigger reason is that in November and December in LA there are lots of things to do other than go to a football game on a Sunday afternoon. In St. Louis the options are watching a football game on TV or going to the game.

I feel the Rams are finally turning the corner and in the next couple of years will be in the playoffs again. It would really be a shame if they bolted. Particularly since the city just paid for a bunch of improvements to the dome...

One question. Is the team not bound by the lease agreement for the dome if they are sold?
:popcorn: LA is just not a football town and it's obvious from a historical perspective. (2x teams have left). Unless a new stadium is built there is no way the idea of an NFL team in LA can exist IMO. We'll see.

 
All the talk of the Rams going to LA makes no sense to me. They didn't support the team there before. There are many reasons for that and most will point to the bad facility they played in. But the bigger reason is that in November and December in LA there are lots of things to do other than go to a football game on a Sunday afternoon. In St. Louis the options are watching a football game on TV or going to the game.

I feel the Rams are finally turning the corner and in the next couple of years will be in the playoffs again. It would really be a shame if they bolted. Particularly since the city just paid for a bunch of improvements to the dome...

One question. Is the team not bound by the lease agreement for the dome if they are sold?
:nerd: LA is just not a football town and it's obvious from a historical perspective. (2x teams have left). Unless a new stadium is built there is no way the idea of an NFL team in LA can exist IMO. We'll see.
I think the "LA is not a football town" stuff is way overrated. I agree that a new stadium is necessary, but I find it *very* hard to believe an NFL team wouldn't be uber successful in LA. Two teams have left Cleveland and Baltimore, too. It doesn't mean those cities can't hold a football team, and LA is a much bigger market than those places.

 
On the flip side, It would upset me to see St Louis lose another franchise, their fans have embraced this football team.
:popcorn: There are ton of loyal football fans here. The Big Red still drew a considerable amount of fans even though the organizations was awful. I think the only person hated more in St. Louis than Don Denkinger is Bill Bidwell.

I found out I got my Rams season ticket the day after my wedding. My wife remarked that I seemed happier about that than getting married. Now that I think about it, I've only missed 2 games since they moved her both due to out of town weddings.
Freudian slip, GB? :lmao:
:lmao:
 
All the talk of the Rams going to LA makes no sense to me. They didn't support the team there before. There are many reasons for that and most will point to the bad facility they played in. But the bigger reason is that in November and December in LA there are lots of things to do other than go to a football game on a Sunday afternoon. In St. Louis the options are watching a football game on TV or going to the game.

I feel the Rams are finally turning the corner and in the next couple of years will be in the playoffs again. It would really be a shame if they bolted. Particularly since the city just paid for a bunch of improvements to the dome...

One question. Is the team not bound by the lease agreement for the dome if they are sold?
:sadbanana: LA is just not a football town and it's obvious from a historical perspective. (2x teams have left). Unless a new stadium is built there is no way the idea of an NFL team in LA can exist IMO. We'll see.
I think the "LA is not a football town" stuff is way overrated. I agree that a new stadium is necessary, but I find it *very* hard to believe an NFL team wouldn't be uber successful in LA. Two teams have left Cleveland and Baltimore, too. It doesn't mean those cities can't hold a football team, and LA is a much bigger market than those places.
Personally, I want to agree with you but it's hard. In my mind LA would/should be a staple in the NFL with the amount people. media, economy, possibilities but it's just backwards on what it should be. Im all for an NFL team in LA but history has shown unless there's a winner then the franchise cant really hold a true fan base. Up for debate but I agree with you.. its overrated but only time will tell. Def. find it hard to believe that the NFL wont be in LA soon.
 
All the talk of the Rams going to LA makes no sense to me. They didn't support the team there before. There are many reasons for that and most will point to the bad facility they played in. But the bigger reason is that in November and December in LA there are lots of things to do other than go to a football game on a Sunday afternoon. In St. Louis the options are watching a football game on TV or going to the game.

I feel the Rams are finally turning the corner and in the next couple of years will be in the playoffs again. It would really be a shame if they bolted. Particularly since the city just paid for a bunch of improvements to the dome...

One question. Is the team not bound by the lease agreement for the dome if they are sold?
:goodposting: LA is just not a football town and it's obvious from a historical perspective. (2x teams have left). Unless a new stadium is built there is no way the idea of an NFL team in LA can exist IMO. We'll see.
I think the "LA is not a football town" stuff is way overrated. I agree that a new stadium is necessary, but I find it *very* hard to believe an NFL team wouldn't be uber successful in LA. Two teams have left Cleveland and Baltimore, too. It doesn't mean those cities can't hold a football team, and LA is a much bigger market than those places.
:confused: LA supported the Rams for 40-50 years before they left, and it was only due to a dumb decision to move to Anaheim that they ultimately declined. The Raiders were always going to be a temporary resident here given Al Davis' opportunism - they were only here for 14 seasons - to put it in perspective they've now been gone from LA longer than they were here.

The big issue is a stadium, and I still don't see a good plan to solve that problem. And now, with California in dire economic straits, what little support (very little) there might have been for public money behind a stadium project is also gone.

 
FedEx’s Smith could deliver bid for RamsSt. Louis Business Journal - by Christopher Tritto

Photo, courtesy Memphis Business Journal

Fred Smith, CEO, FedEx

View Larger Fred Smith, founder, chairman, CEO and president of Memphis-based FedEx Corp., has joined the short list of people whose names are circulating as potential bidders for a majority stake in the St. Louis Rams.

Smith has the financial resources to buy an NFL franchise. His nearly 20 million shares of FedEx stock alone are worth about $1 billion and his annual base salary tops $1.1 million. He already owns a 10 percent stake in the Washington Redskins — which he would have to sell — worth about $150 million, based on Forbes magazine’s $1.5 billion valuation of the team.

Smith’s long-running relationship with the NFL and its owners, his business background, and his family’s passion for football would make him an ideal lead owner in the nation’s wealthiest and most prestigious sports league, industry sources say.

“Fred Smith would be an owner straight out of central casting for the NFL,” said Mark Ganis, president of Chicago-based consulting firm Sportscorp Ltd. “He would be very well received in NFL circles. They know him well. He is an entrepreneur who built a business from scratch into one of the most successful companies in the world. He has a marketing and customer service background. He has a love of the game of football. And he looks the part.”

Fans who fear that a new out-of-town owner would relocate the team might breathe easier if Smith steps up with a bid. His hometown of Memphis is not a likely candidate for a move due to its proximity to Nashville’s Tennessee Titans, sources said.

“Fred Smith was, and has been for a long time, interested in obtaining an NFL franchise,” said Hall of Fame lineman Dan Dierdorf, the NFL broadcaster and former St. Louis football Cardinals star.

“What makes him attractive in my mind is financially he is more than capable of the transaction,” Dierdorf said. “The NFL would not want two teams in Tennessee. Bud Adams, the (Titans) owner in Nashville, would have a fit. Smith would be a great choice because his hometown would not be a competitor with St. Louis. He could keep the Rams here long term.”

Rams lead owners Chip Rosenbloom and Lucia Rodriguez are exploring a sale of their 60 percent position. The son and daughter of late owner Georgia Frontiere have hired investment banking firm Goldman Sachs to review the assets of Frontiere’s estate, including the football team. Smith did not respond to a request for comment.

Smith’s interest in football ownership dates back to at least the early 1990s when he helped bankroll a Memphis group that competed with St. Louis and three other finalist cities for one of two NFL expansion franchises. In 1993, when the league instead awarded expansion teams to groups in Charlotte, N.C., and Jacksonville, Fla., Smith turned his attention to an alternate plan.

In 1994, he and other investors explored starting a new football league to rival the NFL. The plan proposed corporate team ownership, and Smith’s FedEx considered forming a team in Memphis. But the so-called “A League” never materialized.

Smith continued to develop ties to the NFL. In 1999, FedEx entered into a multiyear, $205 million naming-rights agreement with the Redskins for FedExField in Washington, D.C. The global express shipping company also is an extensive sports supporter beyond the NFL with sponsorships that include the PGA Tour’s FedExCup, college football’s FedEx Orange Bowl, a NASCAR race team owned by former Redskins coach Joe Gibbs, and FedExForum, home to the NBA’s Memphis Grizzlies and University of Memphis Tigers basketball.

Smith finally broke into the NFL ownership ranks in August 2003 when he personally purchased a 10 percent stake in the Redskins and joined its leadership council, or board of directors. Since then, the team’s annual revenue has increased $100 million, or 44 percent, to $327 million, and the Redskins have become the second-most valuable franchise in the league behind the Dallas Cowboys, according to Forbes’ rankings.

The Redskins connection has become a family affair. Smith’s son Arthur, who played on the offensive line for the University of North Carolina from 2001 to 2005, has worked as a defensive coach for the Redskins since 2007. Smith’s younger son, Cannon, is a sophomore backup quarterback at the University of Miami.

Forbes estimates the Rams are worth $929 million. Whether such a value would hold up remains to be seen. The team had a 2-14 record last season, the recession is expected to have a negative effect on revenue, and the Rams play in a stadium that observers agree will not be among the top eight in the NFL by 2015 as required by the current lease.

But if a bidder agrees the franchise is worth that much, the 60 percent stake owned by Rosenbloom and Rodriguez would cost about $557 million. A 30 percent stake, the minimum an individual majority owner must control under NFL rules, would cost about $279 million. If Smith can get an estimated $150 million for his share of the Redskins, he would be halfway there.

And if Smith needs an introduction to Rosenbloom, Rams minority owner Stan Kroenke or others in the St. Louis community, he has a high-profile ally who can help open doors. August Busch IV, former CEO of Anheuser-Busch, is a FedEx director.
Link
 
Interesting tidbit on Rams sale:

by

Tim Klutsarits

June 23,

There is some more encouraging news out there on the Rams sale front. There seems to be more signs pointing toward a sale coming sooner rather than later and the Rams remaining in St. Louis.

One of the signs comes from Michael Silver of Yahoo Sports who is one of the most tied in people in NFL circles when it comes to covering the league. I would place him ahead of the Peter King's and Chris Mortensen's of the world, that is how good his info is. In Friday's column Silver placed this note in his article on things he says you can take to the ATM....

"The NFL will waive its provision against cross-ownership of teams in competing markets to allow minority owner Stan Kroenke to purchase a controlling interest in the St. Louis Rams."

continued here..

http://www.examiner.com/x-4388-St-Louis-Ra...Rams-sale-front

 
By Bernie Miklasz

COPYRIGHT © 2010 - ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH

02/11/2010

Rams owners Chip Rosenbloom and Lucia Rodriguez have entered into a signed agreement to sell the team to Shahid Khan, multiple NFL sources told the Post-Dispatch late Wednesday night.

Khan, 55, is the president of Flex-N-Gate Corp., an auto-parts manufacturer based in Urbana, Ill. Khan has lived in the Champaign-Urbana area for more than 40 years and is married with two adult children. Khan is a graduate of the School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the University of Illinois.

According to league sources, Khan will purchase the 60 percent of the team owned by siblings Rosenbloom and Rodriguez, who inherited the franchise from their late mother, Georgia Frontiere, in early 2008. NFL owners must approve the sale.

MORE

bullet BERNIE'S PRESS BOX: Rams sold thread

bullet BLOG: Updates from Bernie

The Rams owners and Khan won't close on the deal until sometime next month.

Stan Kroenke owns the 40 percent remaining, and it's unclear if Kroenke plans to retain his share. If Kroenke wants to be bought out, sources say Khan is likely to do so, and that would make him the 100 percent owner.

Kroenke also has the right of first refusal to buy the Rosenbloom-Rodriguez 60 percent, but current NFL rules barring cross ownership prevent Kroenke from taking over as the team's majority owner. Kroenke owns the Denver Nuggets in the NBA and the Colorado Avalanche in the NHL. To buy a controlling interest, Kroenke would have to persuade the NFL to change its ownership rules.

Multiple league sources describe Khan as an enthusiastic Rams fan who has attended home games at the Edward Jones Dome. League sources say Khan is committed to keeping the team in St. Louis — and that was an important consideration to Rosenbloom and Rodriguez in making their decision to sell to him.

The Rams will probably be able to vacate their lease agreement after the 2014 season, but sources say Khan is willing to work with local leaders in an effort to assure the team's long-term future in St. Louis. A source noted Khan's deep and stable roots in central Illinois as a sign that he wants to own an NFL franchise in St. Louis — and in no other market.

Moreover, Khan is said to have special feelings for St. Louis because he arrived in St. Louis early in his life when his parents moved to the United States from Pakistan.

Khan began working for Flex-N-Gate in 1970 and has owned the company since 1980. Under Khan's direction, Flex-N-Gate's revenue has increased to more than $2 billion. The company manufactures metal and plastic automotive components and assemblies, such as bumpers, grilles, hinges, interior panels and pillars, latches, pedal systems, parking brakes and running boards for a wide range of customers in the automobile industry including BMW, Chrysler, Ford, Honda, General Motors, Toyota and Volvo. Flex-N-Gate has more than 50 manufacturing and engineering facilities in the U.S., Argentina, Canada, Mexico and Spain.

Khan received the Distinguished Alumnus Award from the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Illinois in 1999 and has served on multiple boards at Illinois.

One concern is Khan's ongoing dispute with the IRS over prior income-tax obligations.

Sources say Khan's dispute is unlikely to be a major issue in the sale, pointing out that Khan was thoroughly vetted by the Goldman-Sachs investment broker, which conducted background checks on potential buyers before submitting acceptable applicants to Rosenbloom and Rodriguez. Rams owners hired Goldman-Sachs to screen potential candidates.

Rosenbloom and Rodriguez entertained several other offers for the Rams, including one from a group led by Blues Chairman Dave Checketts.

Rosenbloom declined to comment Wednesday when reached via text message.
linkIt will be interesting to see if a Pakistani makes it into the OBN.

Personally, I welcome this buyer. :thumbup:

 
One concern is Khan's ongoing dispute with the IRS over prior income-tax obligations.Sources say Khan's dispute is unlikely to be a major issue in the sale, pointing out that Khan was thoroughly vetted by the Goldman-Sachs investment broker, which conducted background checks on potential buyers before submitting acceptable applicants to Rosenbloom and Rodriguez. Rams owners hired Goldman-Sachs to screen potential candidates.
PFT mentioned today the prospective buyer has a history with the IRS for tax shelter irregularities...
great
This was sort of addressed in your last post and at this point I don't think it has a bearing on the sale (according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.)
 
SURPRISE!

Stan Kroenke, the Missouri native and collector of pro sports franchises, is trying to collect another. Kroenke has decided to exercise his matching rights and attempt to purchase the 60 percent share of the team currently owned by Chip Rosenbloom and Lucia Rodriguez

Yes, the same 60 percent that Urbana, Ill., businessman Shahid Khan had entered into a sales agreement with Rosenbloom and Rodriquez.

As part of Khan’s sales agreement with Rosenbloom and Rodriguez, Kroenke was given 60 days to declare his intentions with respect to his share of the team.

Kroenke took it to the wire, taking the full 60 days before making his declaration Monday.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top