Raider Nation
Devil's Advocate
I want these "AWESOME SAUCE!" sisters to get hit by a train.
yesI want these "AWESOME SAUCE!" sisters to get hit by a train.
If those guys were the Lightning/Canadiens call, they were really good.Jim Hughson is so good on play by play.GB NBC giving us the CBC coverage for this game. Need more of it on this side of the border.![]()
It's been growing slowly but surely for awhile.Also, on TSN's first intermission, Martin Biron references Corsi and Bob McKenzie quotes extraskater.com... advanced stats are going mainstream in hockey.
lol. Was coming in to ask if that is what I heardUh oh. Bro Hymn in Anaheim.
It's been going on for a while. Do NOT talk about Rancid and Ruby Soho in Boston in these threads; you'll get killed.lol. Was coming in to ask if that is what I heardUh oh. Bro Hymn in Anaheim.
An "oldie" (well, from about a month ago) but a very goodie.What exactly do these idiots in the first row gain by banging on the glass, other than sore hands?
An "oldie" (well, from about a month ago) but a very goodie.What exactly do these idiots in the first row gain by banging on the glass, other than sore hands?
Yes. Remember that. ####### awesome.An "oldie" (well, from about a month ago) but a very goodie.What exactly do these idiots in the first row gain by banging on the glass, other than sore hands?
Well, it sort of did happen that one time.I just find the act itself sort of puzzling. As if the players are going to suddenly stop scrapping and say "Oh, hello person banging on the glass.... how is your day going?"
Love that.Well, it sort of did happen that one time.I just find the act itself sort of puzzling. As if the players are going to suddenly stop scrapping and say "Oh, hello person banging on the glass.... how is your day going?"
Cute.Well, it sort of did happen that one time.I just find the act itself sort of puzzling. As if the players are going to suddenly stop scrapping and say "Oh, hello person banging on the glass.... how is your day going?"
1 P - BOSTON A 82 54 19 9 117 51 261 177 +84 31-7-3 23-12-6 3-6 5-2-3 LOST 1Bruins clearly couldn't use Kessel or Seguin.![]()
We're both homers (well, me sort of), but do you want Loui Eriksson or Seguin on your third line? And wasn't the Kessel flip for Seguin?1 P - BOSTON A 82 54 19 9 117 51 261 177 +84 31-7-3 23-12-6 3-6 5-2-3 LOST 1Bruins clearly couldn't use Kessel or Seguin.![]()
2 Z - ANAHEIM P 82 54 20 8 116 51 266 209 +57 29-8-4 25-12-4 3-6 7-2-1 WON 4
3 Y - COLORADO C 82 52 22 8 112 47 250 220 +30 26-11-4 26-11-4 5-4 7-1-2 OT 1
4 X - ST. LOUIS C 82 52 23 7 111 43 248 191 +57 28-9-4 24-14-3 9-3 3-7-0 LOST 6
5 X - SAN JOSE P 82 51 22 9 111 41 249 200 +49 29-7-5 22-15-4 10-7 5-4-1 WON 2
6 Y - PITTSBURGH M 82 51 24 7 109 44 249 207 +42 28-9-4 23-15-3 7-3 5-3-2 OT 2
7 X - CHICAGO C 82 46 21 15 107 40 267 220 +47 27-7-7 19-14-8 6-8 5-5-0 LOST 2
8 X - TAMPA BAY A 82 46 27 9 101 38 240 215 +25 25-10-6 21-17-3 8-6 7-3-0 WON 4
9 X - MONTRÉAL A 82 46 28 8 100 40 215 204 +11 23-13-5 23-15-3 6-3 7-2-1 WON 1
10 X - LOS ANGELES P 82 46 28 8 100 38 206 174 +32 23-14-4 23-14-4 8-6 5-3-2 OT 1
11 X - MINNESOTA C 82 43 27 12 98 35 207 206 +1 26-10-5 17-17-7 8-8 6-3-1 LOST 1
12 X - NY RANGERS M 82 45 31 6 96 41 218 193 +25 20-17-4 25-14-2 4-3 6-2-2 OT 1
13 X - PHILADELPHIA M 82 42 30 10 94 39 236 235 +1 24-14-3 18-16-7 3-8 4-3-3 OT 1
14 X - COLUMBUS M 82 43 32 7 93 38 231 216 +15 22-15-4 21-17-3 5-2 6-3-1 WON 1
15 X - DETROIT A 82 39 28 15 93 34 222 230 -8 18-13-10 21-15-5 5-9 6-3-1 WON 1
16 X - DALLAS C 82 40 31 11 91 36 235 228 +7 23-11-7 17-20-4 4-5 6-4-0 LOST 1
17 WASHINGTON M 82 38 30 14 90 28 235 240 -5 21-13-7 17-17-7 10-11 4-3-3 OT 1
18 PHOENIX P 82 37 30 15 89 31 216 231 -15 22-14-5 15-16-10 6-7 3-4-3 WON 1
19 NASHVILLE C 82 38 32 12 88 36 216 242 -26 19-17-5 19-15-7 2-9 7-1-2 WON 3
20 NEW JERSEY M 82 35 29 18 88 35 197 208 -11 21-11-9 14-18-9 0-13 4-1-5 WON 1
21 OTTAWA A 82 37 31 14 88 30 236 265 -29 18-17-6 19-14-8 7-7 8-2-0 WON 5
22 WINNIPEG C 82 37 35 10 84 29 227 237 -10 18-17-6 19-18-4 8-6 5-4-1 WON 2
23 TORONTO A 82 38 36 8 84 29 231 256 -25 24-16-1 14-20-7 9-4 2-8-0 LOST 4
24 CAROLINA M 82 36 35 11 83 34 207 230 -23 18-17-6 18-18-5 2-4 5-3-2 WON 2
25 VANCOUVER P 82 36 35 11 83 31 196 223 -27 20-15-6 16-20-5 5-7 4-5-1 WON 1
26 NY ISLANDERS M 82 34 37 11 79 25 225 267 -42 13-19-9 21-18-2 9-6 6-2-2 WON 3
27 CALGARY P 82 35 40 7 77 28 209 241 -32 19-19-3 16-21-4 7-3 5-5-0 LOST 2
28 EDMONTON P 82 29 44 9 67 25 203 270 -67 16-22-3 13-22-6 4-3 4-6-0 WON 1
29 FLORIDA A 82 29 45 8 66 21 196 268 -72 16-20-5 13-25-3 8-6 3-7-0 LOST 1
30 BUFFALO A 82 21 51 10 52 14 157 248 -91 13-21-7 8-30-3 7-5 1-7-2 OT 1
![]()
WEEI seems to remind us of that every day, and I still forget. And I watch all the time, so...Kessel and Seguin are great goal-scorers, no question about that. There's also no question that Julien's system puts just as much emphasis on play at the other end of the ice and doing the little things all over, including off the ice.
Here's a good read on Zdeno Chara from earlier this year, which addressed the situation with both.
And funny that whenever the Seguin trade is brought up, it's always in comparison with Eriksson. People forget that there were other players in that deal, and that Reilly Smith had a great season (20-31-51, +28) skating alongside Bergeron and Marchand.
It's all good. Just human nature that everyone loves players once they are gone, no matter what team or sport. My only point is that the Bruins still seem to be doing pretty well without them.WEEI seems to remind us of that every day, and I still forget. And I watch all the time, so...Kessel and Seguin are great goal-scorers, no question about that. There's also no question that Julien's system puts just as much emphasis on play at the other end of the ice and doing the little things all over, including off the ice.
Here's a good read on Zdeno Chara from earlier this year, which addressed the situation with both.
And funny that whenever the Seguin trade is brought up, it's always in comparison with Eriksson. People forget that there were other players in that deal, and that Reilly Smith had a great season (20-31-51, +28) skating alongside Bergeron and Marchand.
YMMV, if I'm being critical. Great point, if I'm being generous.
I'm going with YMMV.![]()
Let's beat the damn Wings before msudaisy and Dr. D. show up to give us crap.
That's quite a good article link, BTW. I can't help but think that Julien had a ton to do with the Canadian nationals and their system.It's all good. Just human nature that everyone loves players once they are gone, no matter what team or sport. My only point is that the Bruins still seem to be doing pretty well without them.WEEI seems to remind us of that every day, and I still forget. And I watch all the time, so...Kessel and Seguin are great goal-scorers, no question about that. There's also no question that Julien's system puts just as much emphasis on play at the other end of the ice and doing the little things all over, including off the ice.
Here's a good read on Zdeno Chara from earlier this year, which addressed the situation with both.
And funny that whenever the Seguin trade is brought up, it's always in comparison with Eriksson. People forget that there were other players in that deal, and that Reilly Smith had a great season (20-31-51, +28) skating alongside Bergeron and Marchand.
YMMV, if I'm being critical. Great point, if I'm being generous.
I'm going with YMMV.![]()
Let's beat the damn Wings before msudaisy and Dr. D. show up to give us crap.
He is, but I'm not sure it ever was going to work for him in Boston. As strange as that sounds for a guy who is so young and was in town for only three seasons. Obviously he's in a much better system to play his style of game in Dallas.Obviously the Bruins are still a very very good team, but let's not pretend Seguin isn't an absolute stud who's far superior to Eriksson+Reilly Smith.
A puck possession goal scoring game is pretty universal, his stats in Dallas are quite likely better than they'd be in Boston, but I think he'd be just fine no matter what team in the league he played for. Still think trading a 21 year old stud because he likes to party is beyond idiotic; and although Boston is still succeeding brilliantly without him at the moment, I think they're gonna regret that trade for the next decade +.He is, but I'm not sure it ever was going to work for him in Boston. As strange as that sounds for a guy who is so young and was in town for only three seasons. Obviously he's in a much better system to play his style of game in Dallas.Obviously the Bruins are still a very very good team, but let's not pretend Seguin isn't an absolute stud who's far superior to Eriksson+Reilly Smith.
Not that I'm aware of.Would like to go to a Rangers game, but rather wait until a later round... Anyone see them making the finals?
There's a 50/50 chance they don't leave the first round. Go while you can.Would like to go to a Rangers game, but rather wait until a later round... Anyone see them making the finals?
Seguin 37-47 84 ptsIt's all good. Just human nature that everyone loves players once they are gone, no matter what team or sport. My only point is that the Bruins still seem to be doing pretty well without them.WEEI seems to remind us of that every day, and I still forget. And I watch all the time, so...Kessel and Seguin are great goal-scorers, no question about that. There's also no question that Julien's system puts just as much emphasis on play at the other end of the ice and doing the little things all over, including off the ice.
Here's a good read on Zdeno Chara from earlier this year, which addressed the situation with both.
And funny that whenever the Seguin trade is brought up, it's always in comparison with Eriksson. People forget that there were other players in that deal, and that Reilly Smith had a great season (20-31-51, +28) skating alongside Bergeron and Marchand.
YMMV, if I'm being critical. Great point, if I'm being generous.
I'm going with YMMV.![]()
Let's beat the damn Wings before msudaisy and Dr. D. show up to give us crap.