What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Star Trek (1 Viewer)

miphin

Footballguy
It looks like they will be re-visiting this franchise on the big screen.

Link

With JJ Abrams behind it, it may be a decent flick.

I was just curious as to who should be cast as the young Kirk, Spock, and others.

Not sure which other characters then will bring back, but you would assume Bones and maybe Scotty.

Johnathon Schaech comes to mind for Spock.

And for some reason a slimmed down Vince Vaughn comes to mind for Kirk, not sure if he could pull it off though.

Just wondering how the FFA would cast the film?

 
This has potential but it's always VERY risky when new actors try to take over for established characters - especially ones as beloved as Kirk, Spock, McCoy etc. I like Abrams' work quite a bit so that's a positive but as a die-hard fan of the original ST cast I'm a bit apprehensive about this project.

 
This has potential but it's always VERY risky when new actors try to take over for established characters - especially ones as beloved as Kirk, Spock, McCoy etc. I like Abrams' work quite a bit so that's a positive but as a die-hard fan of the original ST cast I'm a bit apprehensive about this project.
I agree with your apprehensions, but I think since they are going with the Star Fleet/first time in space angle it gives them some leeway. The characters will be younger, thus seeing the different faces is a little less unnerving. And having the characters as Ensigns or Lts their behaviors are expected to be different as well.I think that basically by doing it this way it gives them a lot of freedom to take some poetic license with the characters.

 
Does anyone have any opinions on the style of the movies? The original Star Treks were kinda light on sci fi, but its the one I fell in love with. The Next Generation always seems a bit nerdy, trying to make everything sound so scientific. I love Space: 1999 (first season). The episodes were really quite suspenseful, although kinda dark. But I suspect that style may not suit the original Star Trek.

 
Star Trek (2009)

Directed by

J.J. Abrams

Cast (Credited cast)

Chris Pine ... Kirk

Zachary Quinto ... Spock

Eric Bana ... Nero

Winona Ryder ... Amanda Grayson

Zoe Saldana ... Nyota Uhura

Karl Urban ... Leonard 'Bones' McCoy

Bruce Greenwood ... Christopher Pike :hot:

John Cho ... Sulu

Leonard Nimoy ... Spock - You mean he was available?

Simon Pegg ... Scotty :shrug:

Anton Yelchin ... Pavel Chekov

Paul McGillion

Greg Ellis ... Chief Engineer Olsen

other cast:

Jennifer Morrison ... Winona Kirk

Rachel Nichols

Tyler Perry :shrug:

Jimmy Bennett ... Young Kirk (rumored)

Ben Cross ... Sarek

Christopher Doohan ... (rumored) (as Chris Doohan)

Clifton Collins Jr. ... Ayel

Lucia Rijker ... Romulan CO

Chris Hemsworth ... George Kirk

Kelvin Yu ... Med Tech

Spencer Daniels ... George Samuel Kirk Junior (rumored)

Marlene Forte ... Chief Transporter

Sonita Henry

James Cawley ... (rumored)

 
It would be nice if they'd get away from the PC stuff and concentrate on something interesting, like the Romulan War.

 
It would be nice if they'd get away from the PC stuff and concentrate on something interesting, like the Romulan War.
I don't remember a "Romulan War" being part of the Star Trek mythos.
There must be some history there since there is a treaty and a neutral zone.But in Balance of Terror, they said no one had actually seen a Romulan before.
That's what I was thinking.
They had fought the Romulans (yes, an outright war), but had never seen one. It was eluded to in Balance of Terror.
 
It would be nice if they'd get away from the PC stuff and concentrate on something interesting, like the Romulan War.
I don't remember a "Romulan War" being part of the Star Trek mythos.
There must be some history there since there is a treaty and a neutral zone.But in Balance of Terror, they said no one had actually seen a Romulan before.
That's what I was thinking.
They had fought the Romulans (yes, an outright war), but had never seen one. It was eluded to in Balance of Terror.
Ah. I remember now.
 
They filmed some of this about an hour from here. My wife did some catering on the set. She got to watch teenage Kirk wash a car over and over.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
They filmed some of this about an hour from here. My wife did some catering on the set. She got to watch teenage Kirk wash a car over and over.
They must have been filming for the sequel - "Cool Hand Kirk."
Fascinating, Jim. What we have here is, quite illogically, a failure to communicate.
:popcorn: Cap'n, if ya poosh the engines any harder, I'm ginna hafta putcha in the box!
That's Uhura, you mullet-head. Anything so innocent, and built like that just gotta be named Uhura.
 
looks good, but I, for one, could do without sex scenes in Star Trek.

If I want 9 1/2 weeks, I'll watch 9 1/2 weeks.

 
not a star trek fan, but this movie looks great. I think it will do well with people like me who just want to go see a good action scifi movie

 
Interesting:

Nimoy Sneaks New Star Trek Movie Into Texas Cinema7 April 2009 6:31 PM, PDTStar Trek superfans in Austin, Texas were treated to a surprise sneak peek of J.J. Abrams' sci-fi summer blockbuster on Monday night when the film was switched with a screening of 1982 sequel The Wrath Of Khan.Sci-fi fans packed the Alamo Draft House to see the Star Trek classic and were left stunned when they realised they were actually watching the first public screening of Star Trek, which doesn't open in cinemas until 8 May.According to EW.com, Trek veteran Leonard Nimoy and producer Damon Lindelhof came up with the idea of the Wrath of Khan hoax in a bid to created Internet interest in the upcoming blockbuster.Austin-based Harry Knowles, who runs movie spoiler website AintItCoolNews.com, reports the screening concluded with a standing ovation that lasted five minutes.He writes, "After the film, the audience was a collective smile, some crying they were so happy."Online reviews posted after the surprise screening call the new film "amazing" and "new and fresh, but it doesn’t forget its roots," while Twitter.com fans who saw the film posted review comments like, "Just saw the new Star Trek movie and it melted my pants!!!!!"
 
Interesting:

Nimoy Sneaks New Star Trek Movie Into Texas Cinema7 April 2009 6:31 PM, PDTStar Trek superfans in Austin, Texas were treated to a surprise sneak peek of J.J. Abrams' sci-fi summer blockbuster on Monday night when the film was switched with a screening of 1982 sequel The Wrath Of Khan.Sci-fi fans packed the Alamo Draft House to see the Star Trek classic and were left stunned when they realised they were actually watching the first public screening of Star Trek, which doesn't open in cinemas until 8 May.According to EW.com, Trek veteran Leonard Nimoy and producer Damon Lindelhof came up with the idea of the Wrath of Khan hoax in a bid to created Internet interest in the upcoming blockbuster.Austin-based Harry Knowles, who runs movie spoiler website AintItCoolNews.com, reports the screening concluded with a standing ovation that lasted five minutes.He writes, "After the film, the audience was a collective smile, some crying they were so happy."Online reviews posted after the surprise screening call the new film "amazing" and "new and fresh, but it doesn’t forget its roots," while Twitter.com fans who saw the film posted review comments like, "Just saw the new Star Trek movie and it melted my pants!!!!!"
Drafthouse is the ####.
 
Andy Dufresne said:
Interesting:

Nimoy Sneaks New Star Trek Movie Into Texas Cinema

7 April 2009 6:31 PM, PDT

Star Trek superfans in Austin, Texas were treated to a surprise sneak peek of J.J. Abrams' sci-fi summer blockbuster on Monday night when the film was switched with a screening of 1982 sequel The Wrath Of Khan.

"After the film, the audience was a collective smile, some crying they were so happy."
If I see anyone crying after this movie, I'm giving them a swift karate chop to the trapezius.
 
Andy Dufresne said:
Interesting:

Nimoy Sneaks New Star Trek Movie Into Texas Cinema

7 April 2009 6:31 PM, PDT

Star Trek superfans in Austin, Texas were treated to a surprise sneak peek of J.J. Abrams' sci-fi summer blockbuster on Monday night when the film was switched with a screening of 1982 sequel The Wrath Of Khan.

"After the film, the audience was a collective smile, some crying they were so happy."
If I see anyone crying after this movie, I'm giving them a swift karate chop to the trapezius.
:excited: You should add that to your sig

 
this does look awesome...

i'll see wolverine & terminator, too... but actually looking forward to this the most...

may check this out on imax for my first time with the format...

* back to the beginning reboot of the franchise ala casino royale for bond?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
this does look awesome...i'll see wolverine & terminator, too... but actually looking forward to this the most...may check this out on imax for my first time with the format...* back to the beginning reboot of the franchise ala casino royale for bond?
yup. a reboot of the franchise, but with a connection to the "known star trek universe".I was lucky enough to see an advanced screening of the movie yesterday and, I gottasay, it was really really great. The great thing is the story, characters and humor areall excellent. Not what I usually would think of for a Star Trek movie.This thing's gonna be a blockbuster.
 
I'll admit, when this was first announced I was really skeptical. But the trailers have looked really sharp.

I just wonder how much screen time/character development each cast member will be given. They have some decent names in the supporting roles (Simon Pegg, John Cho), so you'd think they would give them something to do.

IMO, one of the problems with the Star Trek franchise is that they have too many charcters fighting for screen time. Go back and watch the previous movies (especially with the original cast), and it's mostly Kirk/Spock/Bones doing something and the other crewmembers watching. Scotty usually got about one scene per movie, while Uhura, Chekhov and Sulu were pretty replaceable.

I'm curious to see if they can have enveryone on screen and it not feel like they are neglecting characters.

 
Tigerbot Hesh said:
I'll admit, when this was first announced I was really skeptical. But the trailers have looked really sharp.I just wonder how much screen time/character development each cast member will be given. They have some decent names in the supporting roles (Simon Pegg, John Cho), so you'd think they would give them something to do.IMO, one of the problems with the Star Trek franchise is that they have too many charcters fighting for screen time. Go back and watch the previous movies (especially with the original cast), and it's mostly Kirk/Spock/Bones doing something and the other crewmembers watching. Scotty usually got about one scene per movie, while Uhura, Chekhov and Sulu were pretty replaceable.I'm curious to see if they can have enveryone on screen and it not feel like they are neglecting characters.
That's what, imo, makes this new star trek movie so good. it takes time to give back story and character developmentto kirk and spock, foremost, but also gives us some time with Uhura. Some good intros to Checkov, Sulu and Scottythat develop their character pretty quickly with a combination of what we already know about them from the Star Trekuniverse as well as the actors bringing something that is fresh to the table. And Scotty is really freakin' hilarious in thisfilm in more than just one scene. The comedy writing in this movie is really top notch.This is the movie that makes Star Trek a cross-over hit and not just a niche sci-fi nerd film.
 
Howard Stern and his staff saw a screening of this yesterday and they could not stop raving about it. Stern is THE biggest geek on the planet when it comes to this stuff, and he declared it was the best Sci-Fi movie he ever saw.

Really looking forward to checking it out.

 
Am I the only one who thinks the trailers for this are horrible?
No, I thought this movie was a sure-fire disaster.However, J.J. Abrams is directing it (LOST & Alias), so it had *some* hope. The trailers looked TERRIBLE though. However, apparently early reviews are saying it's really good. Abrams' well known talent for character development worked wonders. I'm actually considering seeing it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top