Good call.You forgot that there was a female protagonist taken prisoner by the bad guys and held in the base/superweapon, and the other protagonists have to then go rescue her.
Wait, they are set in space or it's just your opinion that they're set in space?There were also females in episode 4 and 7. And both movies were set in space IMO
That's what she* said!*"she" being Red Leader of course.Hang 10 I am going to need to see a few more before you convince me.
I am almost there.
It has a similar feeling as 4. And that's a good thing. Some people are just miserable.Watching 4 last night, it really isn't anything like 7 at all. People are just seeing what they want to see IMO.
This theory that Rey is Obi-Wan's granddaughter has some merit:http://www.nme.com/blogs/nme-blogs/this-new-star-wars-fan-theory-might-hold-the-key-to-reys-parentage
I'd love to see that, starring Ewan MacGregor. It could cement Obi Wan as the greatest Jedi ever, and as long as he's not older than Alec Guinness was in 4 when they film it, the timing will work.There are rumours of a one-off Obi Wan movie set between Episodes 3 and 4 Revenge Of The Sith and A New Hope.
What would he do in this movie? Hang out in the desert and try to hide his identity?This theory that Rey is Obi-Wan's granddaughter has some merit:http://www.nme.com/blogs/nme-blogs/this-new-star-wars-fan-theory-might-hold-the-key-to-reys-parentageI'd love to see that, starring Ewan MacGregor. It could cement Obi Wan as the greatest Jedi ever, and as long as he's not older than Alec Guinness was in 4 when they film it, the timing will work.There are rumours of a one-off Obi Wan movie set between Episodes 3 and 4 Revenge Of The Sith and A New Hope.![]()
Obiwans hay day was the Clone Wars. So yea the period between 3 & 4 while long would be weird to have him doing too much when he's supposed to be hiding. But maybe they make him like an A-team.What would he do in this movie? Hang out in the desert and try to hide his identity?This theory that Rey is Obi-Wan's granddaughter has some merit:http://www.nme.com/blogs/nme-blogs/this-new-star-wars-fan-theory-might-hold-the-key-to-reys-parentageI'd love to see that, starring Ewan MacGregor. It could cement Obi Wan as the greatest Jedi ever, and as long as he's not older than Alec Guinness was in 4 when they film it, the timing will work.There are rumours of a one-off Obi Wan movie set between Episodes 3 and 4 Revenge Of The Sith and A New Hope.![]()
Bang a chick to produce offspring that will produce Rey.....What would he do in this movie? Hang out in the desert and try to hide his identity?This theory that Rey is Obi-Wan's granddaughter has some merit:http://www.nme.com/blogs/nme-blogs/this-new-star-wars-fan-theory-might-hold-the-key-to-reys-parentageI'd love to see that, starring Ewan MacGregor. It could cement Obi Wan as the greatest Jedi ever, and as long as he's not older than Alec Guinness was in 4 when they film it, the timing will work.There are rumours of a one-off Obi Wan movie set between Episodes 3 and 4 Revenge Of The Sith and A New Hope.![]()
No, I'm not the father you are looking for. You're looking for Obi-wan. My name is old Ben. :jedimindtrick:Bang a chick to produce offspring that will produce Rey.....What would he do in this movie? Hang out in the desert and try to hide his identity?This theory that Rey is Obi-Wan's granddaughter has some merit:http://www.nme.com/blogs/nme-blogs/this-new-star-wars-fan-theory-might-hold-the-key-to-reys-parentageI'd love to see that, starring Ewan MacGregor. It could cement Obi Wan as the greatest Jedi ever, and as long as he's not older than Alec Guinness was in 4 when they film it, the timing will work.There are rumours of a one-off Obi Wan movie set between Episodes 3 and 4 Revenge Of The Sith and A New Hope.![]()
Bang a chick to produce offspring that will produce Rey.....What would he do in this movie? Hang out in the desert and try to hide his identity?This theory that Rey is Obi-Wan's granddaughter has some merit:http://www.nme.com/blogs/nme-blogs/this-new-star-wars-fan-theory-might-hold-the-key-to-reys-parentageI'd love to see that, starring Ewan MacGregor. It could cement Obi Wan as the greatest Jedi ever, and as long as he's not older than Alec Guinness was in 4 when they film it, the timing will work.There are rumours of a one-off Obi Wan movie set between Episodes 3 and 4 Revenge Of The Sith and A New Hope.![]()
You don't need to see the results of my blood test. Mine is the penis you're looking for.
With Qui Gon out there as a force ghost, and Yoda on Dagoba, I could see a small organized Jedi council of sorts that works clandestinely against the Empire/Vader without being found out. There's tons of interesting stuff that could be accomplished there. Heck, Vader knows that Obi Wan is alive, so you could even have him pop his head up every once in awhile and have Vader take a swipe at him.This theory that Rey is Obi-Wan's granddaughter has some merit:http://www.nme.com/blogs/nme-blogs/this-new-star-wars-fan-theory-might-hold-the-key-to-reys-parentageI'd love to see that, starring Ewan MacGregor. It could cement Obi Wan as the greatest Jedi ever, and as long as he's not older than Alec Guinness was in 4 when they film it, the timing will work.There are rumours of a one-off Obi Wan movie set between Episodes 3 and 4 Revenge Of The Sith and A New Hope.![]()
Well to be fair the original didn't deserve any Academy nominations outside of technical stuff.Craziest thing in the world if, since the Academy now nominates 10 movies for Best Picture, The Force Awakens gets a courtesy Best Picture nomination based on cinematography, effects, sound, costumes, make-up, and such? But with no acting, directing, or screenwriting nods?
Kind of like how it was for A New Hope at the 1978 Oscars?
EDIT: Ack -- totally forgot that Alec Guiness was nominated for Supporting Actor, and Lucas was nominated for Director and Original Screenplay. Pretty certain The Force Awakens isn't getting any of that, though. Maybe Abrams is a dark, dark horse for Director.
I see it all as a brilliant business move.It was a good movie but anyone trying to argue that it wasn't immensely similar to the OT is just schticking. It's not like they were trying to make anyway think differently, the movie even makes fun of itself for doing so.
My wife doesn't even know what "shticking" is, so no, I doubt that.It was a good movie but anyone trying to argue that it wasn't immensely similar to the OT is just schticking. It's not like they were trying to make anyway think differently, the movie even makes fun of itself for doing so.
Sounds like there's quite a few things she doesn't know.My wife doesn't even know what "shticking" is, so no, I doubt that.It was a good movie but anyone trying to argue that it wasn't immensely similar to the OT is just schticking. It's not like they were trying to make anyway think differently, the movie even makes fun of itself for doing so.
Cool. Gonna attempt to crack on my wife who doesn't post here because she really likes a movie you don't.Sounds like there's quite a few things she doesn't know.My wife doesn't even know what "shticking" is, so no, I doubt that.It was a good movie but anyone trying to argue that it wasn't immensely similar to the OT is just schticking. It's not like they were trying to make anyway think differently, the movie even makes fun of itself for doing so.
You're such a miserable loser my god.Show her my list of coincidences. I would like to help.Cool. Gonna attempt to crack on my wife who doesn't post here because she really likes a movie you don't.Sounds like there's quite a few things she doesn't know.My wife doesn't even know what "shticking" is, so no, I doubt that.It was a good movie but anyone trying to argue that it wasn't immensely similar to the OT is just schticking. It's not like they were trying to make anyway think differently, the movie even makes fun of itself for doing so.You're such a miserable loser my god.
Sure we'll do that over dinner tonightShow her my list of coincidences. I would like to help.Cool. Gonna attempt to crack on my wife who doesn't post here because she really likes a movie you don't.Sounds like there's quite a few things she doesn't know.My wife doesn't even know what "shticking" is, so no, I doubt that.It was a good movie but anyone trying to argue that it wasn't immensely similar to the OT is just schticking. It's not like they were trying to make anyway think differently, the movie even makes fun of itself for doing so.You're such a miserable loser my god.
I'm with you 100%. These people are morons.You do that.That's only a partial list. Could probably come up with 18 more before lunch.That being said, lets take a look at the ways that Episodes IV and VII mirror each other.Watching 4 last night, it really isn't anything like 7 at all. People are just seeing what they want to see IMO.
1. Theres a droid carrying valuable information who finds himself on a desolate desert planet.
2. Theres a Force-sensitive, masked, and darkly clothed antagonist who arrives on the scene shortly after the information is handed off, looking for the droid.
3. Theres a desert settlement that is wiped out by stormtroopers.
4. Theres a hero whos tortured by the bad guys to retrieve the information.
5. Theres a lonely, Force-strong desert dweller who dreams of more.
6. Theres a worldly old warrior who has to explain the Force to the next generation.
7. Theres a cruel military officer who holds a comparable level of authority to his Force-sensitive, masked, and darkly clothed colleague.
8. Theres a mostly unseen supreme evil thats pulling the strings from the shadows.
9. Theres a criminal element thats owed a debt by Han Solo and attempts to kill him after he screws up their arrangement.
10. Theres a cantina filled with various alien creatures.
11. Theres a moment when one of the heroes abandons the fight as a self-preservation measure, but he eventually returns.
12. Theres a massive spherical weapon thats used to destroy a planet.
13. Theres a base belonging to the rebel forces on a forest-covered world.
14. Theres a surrogate father figure who is cut down by someone previously close to him, who has turned to the dark side.
15. The hero watches helplessly from afar as the surrogate father figure is slayed.
16. Theres a coordinated aerial attack on the massive spherical weapon thats monitored from a control room by Leia.
17. Theres a trench that X-wings flew through in order to fire on a vulnerability in the weapon and destroy it.
18. Theres a massive explosion that gives the rebels a major victory but likely allows the Force-sensitive, masked, and darkly clothed antagonist to survive to fight another day.
Other than that it's, totally different!
http://www.ew.com/article/2015/12/19/star-wars-force-awakens-new-hope-similarities![]()
![]()
I honestly have no idea how someone could watch the OT and TFA and not see the vast similarities.My wife doesn't even know what "shticking" is, so no, I doubt that.It was a good movie but anyone trying to argue that it wasn't immensely similar to the OT is just schticking. It's not like they were trying to make anyway think differently, the movie even makes fun of itself for doing so.
what if you're a commie pedo Taliban goat####er who likes the movie?If you don't like star wars You're a commie pedo Taliban goat####er
Phantom Menace?I honestly have no idea how someone could watch the OT and TFA and not see the vast similarities.My wife doesn't even know what "shticking" is, so no, I doubt that.It was a good movie but anyone trying to argue that it wasn't immensely similar to the OT is just schticking. It's not like they were trying to make anyway think differently, the movie even makes fun of itself for doing so.
Our hero, who happens to be a very good pilot, lives on a barren desert planet, unaware of his/her connection to the force. He/she comes across a droid who's carrying a valuable piece of information that they need to deliver to the right person so that person can get it to the resistance/rebellion that they are apart of. Their means of transportation to said resistance/rebellion is the Millenium Falcon.
The bad guys, represented foremost to us via a force wielding villain dressed all in black with a voice modulating helmet, use a giant spherical weapon to blow up a planet(s). That force wielding villain kills the older mentor-like figure who was a key part of the previous trilogy as our hero watches. An X-wing makes a trench run to shoot the giant planet killing object's weak spot and blow it up.
Which movie am I talking about?
Kylo Ren wasn't the foremost representative.I honestly have no idea how someone could watch the OT and TFA and not see the vast similarities.My wife doesn't even know what "shticking" is, so no, I doubt that.It was a good movie but anyone trying to argue that it wasn't immensely similar to the OT is just schticking. It's not like they were trying to make anyway think differently, the movie even makes fun of itself for doing so.
Our hero, who happens to be a very good pilot, lives on a barren desert planet, unaware of his/her connection to the force. He/she comes across a droid who's carrying a valuable piece of information that they need to deliver to the right person so that person can get it to the resistance/rebellion that they are apart of. Their means of transportation to said resistance/rebellion is the Millenium Falcon.
The bad guys, represented foremost to us via a force wielding villain dressed all in black with a voice modulating helmet, use a giant spherical weapon to blow up a planet(s). That force wielding villain kills the older mentor-like figure who was a key part of the previous trilogy as our hero watches. An X-wing makes a trench run to shoot the giant planet killing object's weak spot and blow it up.
Which movie am I talking about?
Who was?Kylo Ren wasn't the foremost representative.I honestly have no idea how someone could watch the OT and TFA and not see the vast similarities.My wife doesn't even know what "shticking" is, so no, I doubt that.It was a good movie but anyone trying to argue that it wasn't immensely similar to the OT is just schticking. It's not like they were trying to make anyway think differently, the movie even makes fun of itself for doing so.
Our hero, who happens to be a very good pilot, lives on a barren desert planet, unaware of his/her connection to the force. He/she comes across a droid who's carrying a valuable piece of information that they need to deliver to the right person so that person can get it to the resistance/rebellion that they are apart of. Their means of transportation to said resistance/rebellion is the Millenium Falcon.
The bad guys, represented foremost to us via a force wielding villain dressed all in black with a voice modulating helmet, use a giant spherical weapon to blow up a planet(s). That force wielding villain kills the older mentor-like figure who was a key part of the previous trilogy as our hero watches. An X-wing makes a trench run to shoot the giant planet killing object's weak spot and blow it up.
Which movie am I talking about?
Plenty of other stuff happened as well, which you left out, and most people aren't obsessing over tiny details like which mode of transportation moved people around like some nerd internet sociopath.FreeBaGeL said:I honestly have no idea how someone could watch the OT and TFA and not see the vast similarities.My wife doesn't even know what "shticking" is, so no, I doubt that.It was a good movie but anyone trying to argue that it wasn't immensely similar to the OT is just schticking. It's not like they were trying to make anyway think differently, the movie even makes fun of itself for doing so.
Our hero, who happens to be a very good pilot, lives on a barren desert planet, unaware of his/her connection to the force. He/she comes across a droid who's carrying a valuable piece of information that they need to deliver to the right person so that person can get it to the resistance/rebellion that they are apart of. Their means of transportation to said resistance/rebellion is the Millenium Falcon.
The bad guys, represented foremost to us via a force wielding villain dressed all in black with a voice modulating helmet, use a giant spherical weapon to blow up a planet(s). That force wielding villain kills the older mentor-like figure who was a key part of the previous trilogy as our hero watches. An X-wing makes a trench run to shoot the giant planet killing object's weak spot and blow it up.
Which movie am I talking about?
Guess it depends on your definition, but snoke was the leader and apparently most powerful. Palpatine didn't appear in ANH, which might be the biggest difference.Insein said:Who was?FUBAR said:Kylo Ren wasn't the foremost representative.FreeBaGeL said:I honestly have no idea how someone could watch the OT and TFA and not see the vast similarities.My wife doesn't even know what "shticking" is, so no, I doubt that.It was a good movie but anyone trying to argue that it wasn't immensely similar to the OT is just schticking. It's not like they were trying to make anyway think differently, the movie even makes fun of itself for doing so.
Our hero, who happens to be a very good pilot, lives on a barren desert planet, unaware of his/her connection to the force. He/she comes across a droid who's carrying a valuable piece of information that they need to deliver to the right person so that person can get it to the resistance/rebellion that they are apart of. Their means of transportation to said resistance/rebellion is the Millenium Falcon.
The bad guys, represented foremost to us via a force wielding villain dressed all in black with a voice modulating helmet, use a giant spherical weapon to blow up a planet(s). That force wielding villain kills the older mentor-like figure who was a key part of the previous trilogy as our hero watches. An X-wing makes a trench run to shoot the giant planet killing object's weak spot and blow it up.
Which movie am I talking about?
Plenty of other stuff happened as well, which you left out, and most people aren't obsessing over tiny details like which mode of transportation moved people around like some nerd internet sociopath.FreeBaGeL said:I honestly have no idea how someone could watch the OT and TFA and not see the vast similarities.My wife doesn't even know what "shticking" is, so no, I doubt that.It was a good movie but anyone trying to argue that it wasn't immensely similar to the OT is just schticking. It's not like they were trying to make anyway think differently, the movie even makes fun of itself for doing so.
Our hero, who happens to be a very good pilot, lives on a barren desert planet, unaware of his/her connection to the force. He/she comes across a droid who's carrying a valuable piece of information that they need to deliver to the right person so that person can get it to the resistance/rebellion that they are apart of. Their means of transportation to said resistance/rebellion is the Millenium Falcon.
The bad guys, represented foremost to us via a force wielding villain dressed all in black with a voice modulating helmet, use a giant spherical weapon to blow up a planet(s). That force wielding villain kills the older mentor-like figure who was a key part of the previous trilogy as our hero watches. An X-wing makes a trench run to shoot the giant planet killing object's weak spot and blow it up.
Which movie am I talking about?![]()
The Death Star (it's existence and the battle to destroy it) and the desert planet origin stories are pretty massive similarities even if you don't want to get into the more granular details. That's not a knock on the movie, in my view, but it is what it is.Plenty of other stuff happened as well, which you left out, and most people aren't obsessing over tiny details like which mode of transportation moved people around like some nerd internet sociopath.FreeBaGeL said:I honestly have no idea how someone could watch the OT and TFA and not see the vast similarities.My wife doesn't even know what "shticking" is, so no, I doubt that.It was a good movie but anyone trying to argue that it wasn't immensely similar to the OT is just schticking. It's not like they were trying to make anyway think differently, the movie even makes fun of itself for doing so.
Our hero, who happens to be a very good pilot, lives on a barren desert planet, unaware of his/her connection to the force. He/she comes across a droid who's carrying a valuable piece of information that they need to deliver to the right person so that person can get it to the resistance/rebellion that they are apart of. Their means of transportation to said resistance/rebellion is the Millenium Falcon.
The bad guys, represented foremost to us via a force wielding villain dressed all in black with a voice modulating helmet, use a giant spherical weapon to blow up a planet(s). That force wielding villain kills the older mentor-like figure who was a key part of the previous trilogy as our hero watches. An X-wing makes a trench run to shoot the giant planet killing object's weak spot and blow it up.
Which movie am I talking about?![]()
This is like the 4th movie with a Death Star in it. That's more of a trend of the bad guys than a copy of the original movie.The Death Star (it's existence and the battle to destroy it) and the desert planet origin stories are pretty massive similarities even if you don't want to get into the more granular details. That's not a knock on the movie, in my view, but it is what it is.Plenty of other stuff happened as well, which you left out, and most people aren't obsessing over tiny details like which mode of transportation moved people around like some nerd internet sociopath.FreeBaGeL said:I honestly have no idea how someone could watch the OT and TFA and not see the vast similarities.My wife doesn't even know what "shticking" is, so no, I doubt that.It was a good movie but anyone trying to argue that it wasn't immensely similar to the OT is just schticking. It's not like they were trying to make anyway think differently, the movie even makes fun of itself for doing so.
Our hero, who happens to be a very good pilot, lives on a barren desert planet, unaware of his/her connection to the force. He/she comes across a droid who's carrying a valuable piece of information that they need to deliver to the right person so that person can get it to the resistance/rebellion that they are apart of. Their means of transportation to said resistance/rebellion is the Millenium Falcon.
The bad guys, represented foremost to us via a force wielding villain dressed all in black with a voice modulating helmet, use a giant spherical weapon to blow up a planet(s). That force wielding villain kills the older mentor-like figure who was a key part of the previous trilogy as our hero watches. An X-wing makes a trench run to shoot the giant planet killing object's weak spot and blow it up.
Which movie am I talking about?![]()
We see snoke all of 3-4 mins of the movie? I wouldn't call that foremost. Even in Empire, Vader is the foremost Villain of the film despite the emperor making an appearance via hologram.Guess it depends on your definition, but snoke was the leader and apparently most powerful. Palpatine didn't appear in ANH, which might be the biggest difference.Insein said:Who was?FUBAR said:Kylo Ren wasn't the foremost representative.FreeBaGeL said:I honestly have no idea how someone could watch the OT and TFA and not see the vast similarities.My wife doesn't even know what "shticking" is, so no, I doubt that.It was a good movie but anyone trying to argue that it wasn't immensely similar to the OT is just schticking. It's not like they were trying to make anyway think differently, the movie even makes fun of itself for doing so.
Our hero, who happens to be a very good pilot, lives on a barren desert planet, unaware of his/her connection to the force. He/she comes across a droid who's carrying a valuable piece of information that they need to deliver to the right person so that person can get it to the resistance/rebellion that they are apart of. Their means of transportation to said resistance/rebellion is the Millenium Falcon.
The bad guys, represented foremost to us via a force wielding villain dressed all in black with a voice modulating helmet, use a giant spherical weapon to blow up a planet(s). That force wielding villain kills the older mentor-like figure who was a key part of the previous trilogy as our hero watches. An X-wing makes a trench run to shoot the giant planet killing object's weak spot and blow it up.
Which movie am I talking about?
Well, at least she is right about the last partMy wife loved 7. Made her watch 4 last night.
Me after the movie: a lot of people say 7 is like 4.
Her: What? Who? People on the Internet? Why? Just because of the space station thing?
Me: yea and the bar scene.
Her: they can only have one bar in the galaxy? Nobody else is allowed to drink? I thought it was a big place. That doesn't make any sense, that's stupid and people just want stuff to complain about. These movies aren't alike at all. You need to start spending less time on the Internet.
Nailed it.FreeBaGeL said:I honestly have no idea how someone could watch the OT and TFA and not see the vast similarities.
Our hero, who happens to be a very good pilot, lives on a barren desert planet, unaware of his/her connection to the force. He/she comes across a droid who's carrying a valuable piece of information that they need to deliver to the right person so that person can get it to the resistance/rebellion that they are apart of. Their means of transportation to said resistance/rebellion is the Millenium Falcon.
The bad guys, represented foremost to us via a force wielding villain dressed all in black with a voice modulating helmet, use a giant spherical weapon to blow up a planet(s). That force wielding villain kills the older mentor-like figure who was a key part of the previous trilogy as our hero watches. An X-wing makes a trench run to shoot the giant planet killing object's weak spot and blow it up.
Which movie am I talking about?
You brought her into it. Youre seriously going to take offense to that?Cool. Gonna attempt to crack on my wife who doesn't post here because she really likes a movie you don't.Sounds like there's quite a few things she doesn't know.My wife doesn't even know what "shticking" is, so no, I doubt that.It was a good movie but anyone trying to argue that it wasn't immensely similar to the OT is just schticking. It's not like they were trying to make anyway think differently, the movie even makes fun of itself for doing so.You're such a miserable loser my god.
"I brought her into it"You brought her into it. Youre seriously going to take offense to that?If your wife doesn't see the similarities, she fell asleep during one of the movies or wasn't paying attention for other reasons. Doesn't mean she can't like them. I don't care if they make 5 more movies just like it. They are enjoyable.Cool. Gonna attempt to crack on my wife who doesn't post here because she really likes a movie you don't.Sounds like there's quite a few things she doesn't know.My wife doesn't even know what "shticking" is, so no, I doubt that.It was a good movie but anyone trying to argue that it wasn't immensely similar to the OT is just schticking. It's not like they were trying to make anyway think differently, the movie even makes fun of itself for doing so.You're such a miserable loser my god.
But Episode 4 and 7 are very similar and this isn't something that is up for debate. It is undeniable.
Your comment is ten times worse.
I actually really liked the movie and have seen it twice. That still pretty serious?"I brought her into it"You brought her into it. Youre seriously going to take offense to that?
If your wife doesn't see the similarities, she fell asleep during one of the movies or wasn't paying attention for other reasons. Doesn't mean she can't like them. I don't care if they make 5 more movies just like it. They are enjoyable.
But Episode 4 and 7 are very similar and this isn't something that is up for debate. It is undeniable.
Your comment is ten times worse.![]()
Not liking this movie is serious business.
I liked the 2009 reboot more than I liked star wars so I won't throw any stones.Would you guys freak out if I said I thought Star Trek: First Contact was better than ALL the Star Wars movies?