I meant mandatory start two TEs, in the fashion of start two QB leagues.Lots of leagues allow you to start 2 TE's.
Why? Got some reasoning? There's not exactly a point being made in your OP.I meant mandatory start two TEs, in the fashion of start two QB leagues.Lots of leagues allow you to start 2 TE's.
Just feels right. TE's are fast becoming the most skilled players on the field.Why? Got some reasoning? There's not exactly a point being made in your OP.I meant mandatory start two TEs, in the fashion of start two QB leagues.Lots of leagues allow you to start 2 TE's.
In larger leagues, there are very few startable WRs available on the waiver wire. But there are lots and lots of startable TEs available, especially if you play in a league where most people roster only 1 TE.Why? Got some reasoning? There's not exactly a point being made in your OP.I meant mandatory start two TEs, in the fashion of start two QB leagues.Lots of leagues allow you to start 2 TE's.
Whoa, this would be an incredibly fun league to play in. I've sworn off joining new leagues, but I'd be all over this format.If I ever start a league of my own, it will be 2 QB, 2 RB, 4 WR, 2 TE.
Pretty bored of the "RB at all cost" type of formats.
we ended ours a few years back cuz it was getting ridiculousmay be time to end the 1.5 ppr TE leagues
Have't ever joined one, doesn't make sense to me these days.may be time to end the 1.5 ppr TE leagues
I'd rather one that was start 1 QB, 1 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 Superflex, 4 RB/WR/TE flex.EBF said:If I ever start a league of my own, it will be 2 QB, 2 RB, 4 WR, 2 TE.
Pretty bored of the "RB at all cost" type of formats.
This, except it limits trading.I'd rather one that was start 1 QB, 1 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 Superflex, 4 RB/WR/TE flex.EBF said:If I ever start a league of my own, it will be 2 QB, 2 RB, 4 WR, 2 TE.
Pretty bored of the "RB at all cost" type of formats.
No. Start 3 kickers.But I thought this was the year of the kicker? Are you saying I should drop my backup kickers?
same. the draft for that 5 flex league would be all over the place. maybe even sprinkle in an idpI'd rather one that was start 1 QB, 1 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 Superflex, 4 RB/WR/TE flex.EBF said:If I ever start a league of my own, it will be 2 QB, 2 RB, 4 WR, 2 TE.
Pretty bored of the "RB at all cost" type of formats.
I've played in a league where there were multiple flex spots and unless there is a significant change to the scoring system it still reverts to the standard run on RBs splashed with the elite TEs and a few WRs.same. the draft for that 5 flex league would be all over the place. maybe even sprinkle in an idpI'd rather one that was start 1 QB, 1 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 Superflex, 4 RB/WR/TE flex.EBF said:If I ever start a league of my own, it will be 2 QB, 2 RB, 4 WR, 2 TE.
Pretty bored of the "RB at all cost" type of formats.
You should easily be able to expand that league to 4 teams.I'm in a 2 team league where we start 8 QBs, 8 RBs, 12 WRs and 8 TEs. It's so fun you guys.
I've been running a league like this for 3 years.All offensive yards are scored 5 yds = 1 pointMister CIA said:Whoa, this would be an incredibly fun league to play in. I've sworn off joining new leagues, but I'd be all over this format.EBF said:If I ever start a league of my own, it will be 2 QB, 2 RB, 4 WR, 2 TE.
Pretty bored of the "RB at all cost" type of formats.
Yeah, I've noticed that as well. I'd rather have a superflex then have 3+ flex positions. Having those required starters is what makes it a bit more fun and adds more strategy IMO. One thing is for sure sure though, next year I'm going to prefer thge 2 RB, 3WR, Flex format over the 2RB, 2WR, Flex format...WR is just too deep these days.FUBAR said:This, except it limits trading.Adam Harstad said:I'd rather one that was start 1 QB, 1 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 Superflex, 4 RB/WR/TE flex.EBF said:If I ever start a league of my own, it will be 2 QB, 2 RB, 4 WR, 2 TE.
Pretty bored of the "RB at all cost" type of formats.
For the first time, I'm in one that is 2 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 2 TE (1 flex RB/WR/TE). Also, it's PPR. It's VERY interesting; very different. I'm enjoying the change quite a bit.EBF said:If I ever start a league of my own, it will be 2 QB, 2 RB, 4 WR, 2 TE.
Pretty bored of the "RB at all cost" type of formats.
This is close to what we moved both of my leagues to a half dozen years ago.Mister CIA said:Whoa, this would be an incredibly fun league to play in. I've sworn off joining new leagues, but I'd be all over this format.EBF said:If I ever start a league of my own, it will be 2 QB, 2 RB, 4 WR, 2 TE.
Pretty bored of the "RB at all cost" type of formats.
Mandatory positions suck.EBF said:If I ever start a league of my own, it will be 2 QB, 2 RB, 4 WR, 2 TE.
Pretty bored of the "RB at all cost" type of formats.
I like the QB/RB idea. Maybe I'd amend my idea just a little bit and go with...This is close to what we moved both of my leagues to a half dozen years ago.Mister CIA said:Whoa, this would be an incredibly fun league to play in. I've sworn off joining new leagues, but I'd be all over this format.EBF said:If I ever start a league of my own, it will be 2 QB, 2 RB, 4 WR, 2 TE.
Pretty bored of the "RB at all cost" type of formats.
1 QB, 2 RB, 1 flex QB/RB. 4 WR, 2 TE, 1 flex WR/TE.
I strongly recommend the flex QB/RB instead of the 2nd QB. Teams will almost always want to start a 2nd QB when they can so it amounts to 2 QB. But since there aren't enough NFL QBs for everyone to have a 3rd QB in a 12 team league, it allows you to at least not take a zero on both of your QB's bye weeks by plugging in a backup RB.
I'm less fond of our WR/TE flex because of the 5th WR aspect. I would probably either just go 4 WR, 2 TE, or else 3 WR, 2 TE and 1 flex WR/TE if I had it to do over. We also have staggered PPR that of .25 RB, .5 WR and 1.0 TE which helps with value. The top players at each offensive position are legitimate first round picks in this format.
Started a new 10 team league with some friends this year and had a similar formatAdam Harstad said:I'd rather one that was start 1 QB, 1 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 Superflex, 4 RB/WR/TE flex.EBF said:If I ever start a league of my own, it will be 2 QB, 2 RB, 4 WR, 2 TE.
Pretty bored of the "RB at all cost" type of formats.
EBF said:If I ever start a league of my own, it will be 2 QB, 2 RB, 4 WR, 2 TE.
Pretty bored of the "RB at all cost" type of formats.
play in two of these. Both dynasty 30 man rosters. Very enjoyable.Mister CIA said:Whoa, this would be an incredibly fun league to play in. I've sworn off joining new leagues, but I'd be all over this format.EBF said:If I ever start a league of my own, it will be 2 QB, 2 RB, 4 WR, 2 TE.
Pretty bored of the "RB at all cost" type of formats.
Feels like we've discussed this elsewhere, but I like QB, RB, WR, WR, TE, K, Q/K, 2x R/W/TI like the QB/RB idea. Maybe I'd amend my idea just a little bit and go with...This is close to what we moved both of my leagues to a half dozen years ago.Mister CIA said:Whoa, this would be an incredibly fun league to play in. I've sworn off joining new leagues, but I'd be all over this format.EBF said:If I ever start a league of my own, it will be 2 QB, 2 RB, 4 WR, 2 TE.
Pretty bored of the "RB at all cost" type of formats.
1 QB, 2 RB, 1 flex QB/RB. 4 WR, 2 TE, 1 flex WR/TE.
I strongly recommend the flex QB/RB instead of the 2nd QB. Teams will almost always want to start a 2nd QB when they can so it amounts to 2 QB. But since there aren't enough NFL QBs for everyone to have a 3rd QB in a 12 team league, it allows you to at least not take a zero on both of your QB's bye weeks by plugging in a backup RB.
I'm less fond of our WR/TE flex because of the 5th WR aspect. I would probably either just go 4 WR, 2 TE, or else 3 WR, 2 TE and 1 flex WR/TE if I had it to do over. We also have staggered PPR that of .25 RB, .5 WR and 1.0 TE which helps with value. The top players at each offensive position are legitimate first round picks in this format.
1 QB, 1 QB/RB, 2 RB, 4 WR, 2 TE
I think this would go a long way towards correcting the devaluing of QB/TE that takes place in most leagues.