What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Starting QB Changes for Next Season (1 Viewer)

Clinton

Footballguy
Which teams do you think will bring someone in next season by either the draft or free agent signing to compete for and ideally take over the starting QB position?

For instance...

Is Oakland now content going forward with Gradkowski or do they look to bring someone in?

Are the Redskins now content with Jason Campbell after his recent success or do they look to bring someone in?

Discuss.

 
For sure in my opinion.

Oakland

Buffalo

St Louis

Carolina

possible?

K. City

Jaacksonville

Washington

Minnesota

Seattle

Arizona

Not sure if I forgot anyone.

 
For sure in my opinion.

Oakland

Buffalo

St Louis

Carolina

possible?

K. City

Jaacksonville

Washington

Minnesota

Seattle

Arizona

Not sure if I forgot anyone.
you don't know john fox very well :wall:
Being a Steve Smith owner, I do know Fox and guess I'm just having a little wishful thinking that Fox and Delhomme will be on the same bus out of town.About Cleveland, I think Brady Quinn gets next year to be his make or break season.

 
For sure in my opinion. OaklandBuffaloSt LouisCarolinapossible?K. CityJaacksonvilleWashingtonMinnesotaSeattleArizonaNot sure if I forgot anyone.
I agree with your "for sure" ones. I disagree with KC & Arizona, though. Warner signed on for two years last offseason and that will be year #2 nad outside of him quitting, I don't see how they replace him. And in KC, Cassell has played poorly lately, but they signed him to a big deal and I doubt they give up on him that quicklyMike and Mike were talking about the Redskins this morning and how Todd McShay has them taking Bradford in his latest mock draft. Greenberg and Schlereth both thought they would stick with Campbell next year given that he has come around and played very well in recent weeks. I tend to agree.I think Favre is back if he wants to come back and him not coming back is the only way there will be a QB change in MIN.Jax is possibly due for a change, I agree. The same can be said for Seattle since Hasselbeck cannot stay healthy.
 
possible?

K. City

Jaacksonville

Washington

Minnesota

Seattle

Arizona
I can't believe that KC sunk all that money into Cassel. Can KC homers shine a light on whether he's that bad or its just the team?Chicago obviously won't do anything at the QB position, but I wonder when they'll realize that they gave up way too much... if they already haven't realized it.

 
For sure in my opinion. OaklandBuffaloSt LouisCarolinapossible?K. CityJaacksonvilleWashingtonMinnesotaSeattleArizonaNot sure if I forgot anyone.
I agree with your "for sure" ones. I disagree with KC & Arizona, though. Warner signed on for two years last offseason and that will be year #2 nad outside of him quitting, I don't see how they replace him. And in KC, Cassell has played poorly lately, but they signed him to a big deal and I doubt they give up on him that quicklyMike and Mike were talking about the Redskins this morning and how Todd McShay has them taking Bradford in his latest mock draft. Greenberg and Schlereth both thought they would stick with Campbell next year given that he has come around and played very well in recent weeks. I tend to agree.I think Favre is back if he wants to come back and him not coming back is the only way there will be a QB change in MIN.Jax is possibly due for a change, I agree. The same can be said for Seattle since Hasselbeck cannot stay healthy.
I added Arizone for the same reaon as Minnesota. Just the fact that Warner has taking a pounding over the years and you never know when he might decide to retire. You are probably right about KC, but you never know. Cassell sure doesn't look good and Haley sure doesn't seem like a patient man.
 
possible?

K. City

Jaacksonville

Washington

Minnesota

Seattle

Arizona
I can't believe that KC sunk all that money into Cassel. Can KC homers shine a light on whether he's that bad or its just the team?Chicago obviously won't do anything at the QB position, but I wonder when they'll realize that they gave up way too much... if they already haven't realized it.
IMO Cassel gets at least one more year, remember Pioli traded for him and has to believe in him. Plus they have alot of $ invested in him
 
Mike and Mike were talking about the Redskins this morning and how Todd McShay has them taking Bradford in his latest mock draft. Greenberg and Schlereth both thought they would stick with Campbell next year given that he has come around and played very well in recent weeks. I tend to agree.I think Favre is back if he wants to come back and him not coming back is the only way there will be a QB change in MIN.
Campbell is a free agent. After Washington tried to get rid of him at every chance, I doubt he re-signs with them.TJack is a free agent. It's Favre or back to the drawing board.
 
Mike and Mike were talking about the Redskins this morning and how Todd McShay has them taking Bradford in his latest mock draft. Greenberg and Schlereth both thought they would stick with Campbell next year given that he has come around and played very well in recent weeks. I tend to agree.

I think Favre is back if he wants to come back and him not coming back is the only way there will be a QB change in MIN.
Campbell is a free agent. After Washington tried to get rid of him at every chance, I doubt he re-signs with them.TJack is a free agent. It's Favre or back to the drawing board.
i think it depends on who the next new coach is. he seems to be clicking with the new OC. if he gets promoted to HC then there could be reason to stick around, maybe, especially if the response to his market value is tepid.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top