What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Stay At Home Moms/Dads With Nannies (1 Viewer)

James Daulton

Footballguy
I'm curious as to the board's take on this topic. Now I don't make Chet or Otis scrilla, so maybe my point of view is a bit skewed, but why would a mom/dad need help carrying for a kid or two if they don't have a job? Is there any other reason other than status, extra free time for the mom/dad? I'm genuinely curious since this has always seemed pretty wasteful and like the mom/dad's shirking their responsibility somewhat.

 
I'm curious as to the board's take on this topic. Now I don't make Chet or Otis scrilla, so maybe my point of view is a bit skewed, but why would a mom/dad need help carrying for a kid or two if they don't have a job? Is there any other reason other than status, extra free time for the mom/dad? I'm genuinely curious since this has always seemed pretty wasteful and like the mom/dad's shirking their responsibility somewhat.
Have you seen some of the obese children in the US?

Whether a parent works or not, that has to be hard on a parents back.

 
People's baselines change. A stay at home

mom gets used to the stay at home schedule/lifestyle and then eventually becomes overwhelmed.
I guess. But there are tons of mom who work full time, take care of the kids in the evening, and take care of the house. I think it's also pretty prevalent in other countries for folks who have a bit of money. I think I'm being super nice since my wife only works part time with 1 kid away at college and 1 junior in high school.

 
People's baselines change. A stay at home

mom gets used to the stay at home schedule/lifestyle and then eventually becomes overwhelmed.
I guess. But there are tons of mom who work full time, take care of the kids in the evening, and take care of the house. I think it's also pretty prevalent in other countries for folks who have a bit of money. I think I'm being super nice since my wife only works part time with 1 kid away at college and 1 junior in high school.
I'm speaking from experience, and totally agree.
 
A guy I work out with at the gym brags about his wife being able to stay home as if it's a status symbol. He also complains about her laziness and inability to keep up with the house duties.

 
In general I think the difficulties of being a stay at home parent are underrated. I did it for a month between jobs with a 10 month old and it was WAY worse than the typical office jobs most of us have. I have no idea how people with 3+ kids do it.

That said, getting a nanny when you already have a stay at home parent seems excessive, and I can't say I've ever come across someone that does it. I guess if you have the money, why not? Kind of like hiring an assistant at work?

Maybe another reason is just to have an 'in' with someone that you trust with your kid for when you want to go on trips and stuff. I guess if you have a stay at home parent then you probably don't have the luxury of someone you trust with your kid for stuff outside the normal working hours like a family with two working parents and a full-time nanny does. I'm thinking mostly of babies here, I've gotta think that most of this stuff gets much easier when the kids are old enough to go off to school.

 
I have a friend who is a doctor and his wife doesn't work and they have a part time nanny. However, they have four girls under age 9, so I get it. She's not a strict disciplinarian and was getting depressed having to care for all of them. One of them also had severe food allergies which makes meal times just that much more difficult.

 
People's baselines change. A stay at home

mom gets used to the stay at home schedule/lifestyle and then eventually becomes overwhelmed.
I guess. But there are tons of mom who work full time, take care of the kids in the evening, and take care of the house. I think it's also pretty prevalent in other countries for folks who have a bit of money. I think I'm being super nice since my wife only works part time with 1 kid away at college and 1 junior in high school.
Are we talking single parent here? There's a huge difference between taking care of the kids when you have someone else to hand them off to for a few minutes while you go to the bathroom or clean up dinner vs. trying to do that stuff with no one else to look after the kid.

I've found there's also a big difference between taking care of the kid from 6-8pm when you've been away from them all day and are excited to see them vs. taking care of the kid from 6-8pm when you've been taking care of them by yourself all day and are ready for them to get out of your hair for the night. This is multiplied when you're on Thursday and you've been doing the same thing for four days straight with barely any time to yourself.

 
I'm curious as to the board's take on this topic. Now I don't make Chet or Otis scrilla, so maybe my point of view is a bit skewed, but why would a mom/dad need help carrying for a kid or two if they don't have a job? Is there any other reason other than status, extra free time for the mom/dad? I'm genuinely curious since this has always seemed pretty wasteful and like the mom/dad's shirking their responsibility somewhat.
Children with special needs?

 
I'm curious as to the board's take on this topic. Now I don't make Chet or Otis scrilla, so maybe my point of view is a bit skewed, but why would a mom/dad need help carrying for a kid or two if they don't have a job? Is there any other reason other than status, extra free time for the mom/dad? I'm genuinely curious since this has always seemed pretty wasteful and like the mom/dad's shirking their responsibility somewhat.
Children with special needs?
Kids that need extra help or a parent who is struggling mentally are the only viable reasons I can see. Everything else? You suck at parenthood. I'm sure people will disagree, but it baffles me how many parents see their kids as a chore.
 
I'm curious as to the board's take on this topic. Now I don't make Chet or Otis scrilla, so maybe my point of view is a bit skewed, but why would a mom/dad need help carrying for a kid or two if they don't have a job? Is there any other reason other than status, extra free time for the mom/dad? I'm genuinely curious since this has always seemed pretty wasteful and like the mom/dad's shirking their responsibility somewhat.
Children with special needs?
Kids that need extra help or a parent who is struggling mentally are the only viable reasons I can see. Everything else? You suck at parenthood. I'm sure people will disagree, but it baffles me how many parents see their kids as a chore.
Maybe the stay at home parent is struggling with postpartum depression and needs extra help some days?

or maybe the parent realizes they do suck and it would be in the best interest of the child to have someone else be more readily attentive?

 
The part time gig wifey has is watching the newborn of our neighbors 3 days per week so the wife could go to work those days. The dad basically works from home and has a super flexible schedule. Now these two had kids when they were older (late 30's) so I'm sure they're used to having a lot of freedom and I'm sure they have a ton of cash. That said, when my wife picks the kid up, she is almost always greeted by the both the dad and mom at 8:30 am. We just have to chuckle since the two of us had to run around like mad people to make sure that at least one of us had coverage for the kid when there were appointments, sickness or whatever else caused my wife to have a conflict with watching or picking our our son. We, however do not mind the $1k she gets every other week for doing something she loves anyway.

 
What about 3 kids?
we have 4 boys, 4-12. No nanny for us, wife does just fine. We did hire a house cleaner to come by once a month for the deep cleaning we (she does 99% of the household chores) didn't get to. Totally worth it as my wife was volunteering in the community and served as the pre-school parents president which was mostly running community events and helping young moms. If your wife volunteers a lot and you could afford it, a nanny starts to make sense even if she (or he) isn't bringing home a salary.

Agree that being a "stay at home" parent is harder than it looks, especially if you have a baby, special needs or multiple kids.

 
What about 3 kids?
we have 4 boys, 4-12. No nanny for us, wife does just fine. We did hire a house cleaner to come by once a month for the deep cleaning we (she does 99% of the household chores) didn't get to. Totally worth it as my wife was volunteering in the community and served as the pre-school parents president which was mostly running community events and helping young moms. If your wife volunteers a lot and you could afford it, a nanny starts to make sense even if she (or he) isn't bringing home a salary.

Agree that being a "stay at home" parent is harder than it looks, especially if you have a baby, special needs or multiple kids.
Agree with all this.

 
I'm curious as to the board's take on this topic. Now I don't make Chet or Otis scrilla, so maybe my point of view is a bit skewed, but why would a mom/dad need help carrying for a kid or two if they don't have a job? Is there any other reason other than status, extra free time for the mom/dad? I'm genuinely curious since this has always seemed pretty wasteful and like the mom/dad's shirking their responsibility somewhat.
Children with special needs?
Kids that need extra help or a parent who is struggling mentally are the only viable reasons I can see. Everything else? You suck at parenthood. I'm sure people will disagree, but it baffles me how many parents see their kids as a chore.
Just curious, what's the longest you've ever taken care of a young (under 3 years old) kid or multiple kids by yourself?

 
After I had my third baby, through a series of fortunate circumstances, we had a Japanese college student come stay with us for six weeks. It was the best six weeks of my life.

 
I don't see if you are a stay at home parent how you would need a nanny in a normal setting. If you are stay at home parent and you have cash to burn, I would just get a maid to come in weekly to help clean up but even that is an obvious huge luxury.

 
The part time gig wifey has is watching the newborn of our neighbors 3 days per week so the wife could go to work those days. The dad basically works from home and has a super flexible schedule. Now these two had kids when they were older (late 30's) so I'm sure they're used to having a lot of freedom and I'm sure they have a ton of cash. That said, when my wife picks the kid up, she is almost always greeted by the both the dad and mom at 8:30 am. We just have to chuckle since the two of us had to run around like mad people to make sure that at least one of us had coverage for the kid when there were appointments, sickness or whatever else caused my wife to have a conflict with watching or picking our our son. We, however do not mind the $1k she gets every other week for doing something she loves anyway.
26K per year, under the table i'm sure, is nothing to sneeze at for part time work.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The part time gig wifey has is watching the newborn of our neighbors 3 days per week so the wife could go to work those days. The dad basically works from home and has a super flexible schedule. Now these two had kids when they were older (late 30's) so I'm sure they're used to having a lot of freedom and I'm sure they have a ton of cash. That said, when my wife picks the kid up, she is almost always greeted by the both the dad and mom at 8:30 am. We just have to chuckle since the two of us had to run around like mad people to make sure that at least one of us had coverage for the kid when there were appointments, sickness or whatever else caused my wife to have a conflict with watching or picking our our son. We, however do not mind the $1k she gets every other week for doing something she loves anyway.
Your wife is banging the dad. HTH.

 
The part time gig wifey has is watching the newborn of our neighbors 3 days per week so the wife could go to work those days. The dad basically works from home and has a super flexible schedule. Now these two had kids when they were older (late 30's) so I'm sure they're used to having a lot of freedom and I'm sure they have a ton of cash. That said, when my wife picks the kid up, she is almost always greeted by the both the dad and mom at 8:30 am. We just have to chuckle since the two of us had to run around like mad people to make sure that at least one of us had coverage for the kid when there were appointments, sickness or whatever else caused my wife to have a conflict with watching or picking our our son. We, however do not mind the $1k she gets every other week for doing something she loves anyway.
26K per year, under the table i'm sure, is nothing to sneeze at for part time work.
Truth.

 
The part time gig wifey has is watching the newborn of our neighbors 3 days per week so the wife could go to work those days. The dad basically works from home and has a super flexible schedule. Now these two had kids when they were older (late 30's) so I'm sure they're used to having a lot of freedom and I'm sure they have a ton of cash. That said, when my wife picks the kid up, she is almost always greeted by the both the dad and mom at 8:30 am. We just have to chuckle since the two of us had to run around like mad people to make sure that at least one of us had coverage for the kid when there were appointments, sickness or whatever else caused my wife to have a conflict with watching or picking our our son. We, however do not mind the $1k she gets every other week for doing something she loves anyway.
Your wife is banging the dad. HTH.
No chance brah, I lift.

 
The part time gig wifey has is watching the newborn of our neighbors 3 days per week so the wife could go to work those days. The dad basically works from home and has a super flexible schedule. Now these two had kids when they were older (late 30's) so I'm sure they're used to having a lot of freedom and I'm sure they have a ton of cash. That said, when my wife picks the kid up, she is almost always greeted by the both the dad and mom at 8:30 am. We just have to chuckle since the two of us had to run around like mad people to make sure that at least one of us had coverage for the kid when there were appointments, sickness or whatever else caused my wife to have a conflict with watching or picking our our son. We, however do not mind the $1k she gets every other week for doing something she loves anyway.
Your wife is banging the dad. HTH.
No chance brah, I lift.
She's actually banging the mom. HTH.

 
The part time gig wifey has is watching the newborn of our neighbors 3 days per week so the wife could go to work those days. The dad basically works from home and has a super flexible schedule. Now these two had kids when they were older (late 30's) so I'm sure they're used to having a lot of freedom and I'm sure they have a ton of cash. That said, when my wife picks the kid up, she is almost always greeted by the both the dad and mom at 8:30 am. We just have to chuckle since the two of us had to run around like mad people to make sure that at least one of us had coverage for the kid when there were appointments, sickness or whatever else caused my wife to have a conflict with watching or picking our our son. We, however do not mind the $1k she gets every other week for doing something she loves anyway.
Your wife is banging the dad. HTH.
No chance brah, I lift.
She's actually banging the mom. HTH.
Hmmm....Mom is a fiery, ok-beauty from Puerto Rico. I could be down for this.

 
The part time gig wifey has is watching the newborn of our neighbors 3 days per week so the wife could go to work those days. The dad basically works from home and has a super flexible schedule. Now these two had kids when they were older (late 30's) so I'm sure they're used to having a lot of freedom and I'm sure they have a ton of cash. That said, when my wife picks the kid up, she is almost always greeted by the both the dad and mom at 8:30 am. We just have to chuckle since the two of us had to run around like mad people to make sure that at least one of us had coverage for the kid when there were appointments, sickness or whatever else caused my wife to have a conflict with watching or picking our our son. We, however do not mind the $1k she gets every other week for doing something she loves anyway.
Your wife is banging the dad. HTH.
No chance brah, I lift.
She's actually banging the mom. HTH.
Hmmm....Mom is a fiery, ok-beauty from Puerto Rico. I could be down for this.
The shark move here is to tell the wife you want to get a little trio action started. Report back the response.

 
As far as I can tell, everyone in my neighborhood is doing their best to get though the day without killing each other so we can all sit on each other's porches and drink beer each night. We're all busy and doing our best. It's of no concern to me how my neighbor organizes his life.

 
I'm curious as to the board's take on this topic. Now I don't make Chet or Otis scrilla, so maybe my point of view is a bit skewed, but why would a mom/dad need help carrying for a kid or two if they don't have a job? Is there any other reason other than status, extra free time for the mom/dad? I'm genuinely curious since this has always seemed pretty wasteful and like the mom/dad's shirking their responsibility somewhat.
Children with special needs?
Kids that need extra help or a parent who is struggling mentally are the only viable reasons I can see. Everything else? You suck at parenthood. I'm sure people will disagree, but it baffles me how many parents see their kids as a chore.
Doesn't baffle me in today's helicopter parent world where even letting your kid play outside alone could get a visit from CPS.

In the world I grew up in? The one where at 10 I could go outside after breakfast and return home at dusk without any problems/questions/issues? THAT would baffle me.

 
Who the hell would want to stay home with 2 or 3 kids all day long? It would drive a normal person insane. I don't know about a full time nanny, but at least a few times a week having a break. Maybe a "Mother's Day Out" type thing where people drop there kids off for 3 to 4 hours.

 
A nanny would be awesome. It would be so nice to have someone there to do the work whenever you didn't feel like it. I stayed home for 3 months once with 2 young kids and it was way more work than my software development job. There's hardly any breaks. With my job, if I feel like coasting some days, I can do that. No can do with kids. Now I only see the need for a nanny until the kids go to school. It should be pretty easy after that.

 
I don't get it either JD. I work from home and our kids are 7 and 3. They've never been in daycare. I was able to do my job plus take care of the kids. Granted, I didn't have two toddlers at once. By the time my son was old enough for school we had my daughter. However, I've always handled both in the after school hours. We do have people that clean the house every other week, but other than that, we've figured it out. I love it. I wouldn't have it any other way.

 
Chadstroma said:
I don't see if you are a stay at home parent how you would need a nanny in a normal setting. If you are stay at home parent and you have cash to burn, I would just get a maid to come in weekly to help clean up but even that is an obvious huge luxury.
If we truly had cash to burn, I'd hire a nanny for ~10 hours each week. More for tutoring type things than simple survival.

 
Chadstroma said:
I don't see if you are a stay at home parent how you would need a nanny in a normal setting. If you are stay at home parent and you have cash to burn, I would just get a maid to come in weekly to help clean up but even that is an obvious huge luxury.
We have a lady who cleans every two weeks. We don't have a huge place and it's still $80, but I can't think of better spent money since I don't have to listen to my wife complain about me cleaning. Do just the bare minimum to keep things tidy is enough until she's comes to clean.

 
Fubar makes a good point - tutoring and housekeeping are two things I've paid for at different times. My wife stays home with our 4 kids. We've discussed having her go back to a "normal" job once the oldest can drive. I couldn't do what she does, I'd go insane.

 
I'm curious as to the board's take on this topic. Now I don't make Chet or Otis scrilla, so maybe my point of view is a bit skewed, but why would a mom/dad need help carrying for a kid or two if they don't have a job? Is there any other reason other than status, extra free time for the mom/dad? I'm genuinely curious since this has always seemed pretty wasteful and like the mom/dad's shirking their responsibility somewhat.
Children with special needs?
Kids that need extra help or a parent who is struggling mentally are the only viable reasons I can see. Everything else? You suck at parenthood. I'm sure people will disagree, but it baffles me how many parents see their kids as a chore.
Just curious, what's the longest you've ever taken care of a young (under 3 years old) kid or multiple kids by yourself?
I don't recall an exact number...maybe four days while the wife was out of town.
 
I'm interested in the concept of being a stay at home dad, with a hired au pair girl to help, and the mom working at a really high paying job out of the house. Does this scenario go on anywhere? Is this possible?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My wife has a nanny/maid. She works fulltime. I work from home but I split time between her house and the ranch, so I am not at her house but maybe two weeks a month (non deer season). Nanny started as a once a week maid, then it became a fulltime deal, and now she lives in the fourth bedroom upstairs. It's awesome. She keeps the house clean, does all the laundry (and irons), cooks for the kids (teenagers), and runs errands when needed. She still has a couple other houses she cleans once a week to make some cash, but she's pretty much our girl.

I see nothing wrong with getting some help, even if you are stay-at-home. Why not?

 
I know I am in the minority, but if you can afford a professional to help raise your kids, you should absolutely do it. Your kids are pretty important, right? What is the issue with spending extra money to improve their upbringing?

 
People's baselines change. A stay at home

mom gets used to the stay at home schedule/lifestyle and then eventually becomes overwhelmed.
I guess. But there are tons of mom who work full time, take care of the kids in the evening, and take care of the house.
They do it because they have no choice. Is it really the most satisfying life for them? Is it the best environment for their kid to be raised in?
 
Chadstroma said:
I don't see if you are a stay at home parent how you would need a nanny in a normal setting. If you are stay at home parent and you have cash to burn, I would just get a maid to come in weekly to help clean up but even that is an obvious huge luxury.
If we truly had cash to burn, I'd hire a nanny for ~10 hours each week. More for tutoring type things than simple survival.
Well, that is called a tutor not a nanny. Those are two different things. A nanny is paid to babysit the kids. Now, obviously a good nanny would help with homework etc but their main job is taking care of the kids- getting them food, keeping them from bodily harm, helping them to the bathroom/change diapers, etc. A tutor is being paid to help them learn outside of the classroom. I don't think you can compare the two. I can see a stay at home parent paying for a tutor. A stay at home parent with a nanny is a different story. I would not say even a nanny is always 'wrong' either but I think that unless there are special needs or the stay at home parent is actually 'working' in other ways (charity work etc) there should be no reason for a nanny other than laziness and bad parenting.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top