What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Straight Truth about Society and Civilization (1 Viewer)

Captain Quinoa

Captain Quinoa

Footballguy
  • Society is a racial construct.
  • There is no magic dirt that will transform, say, Somalis and Syrians into lovers, defenders, and disciples of Constitutional republicanism.
  • Race matters.
  • Once more…..RACE MATTERS.
  • In fact, race is the primary source pool of civilization and culture; all other variables are commentary in comparison.
  • Culture isn’t a costume. It can’t be worn like a Turinic shroud with the expectation that it will reverse-imbue the intrinsic character of any people who happen to hop the border and adopt its most superficial trappings.
  • Culture is an emergent property of the people that comprise it, who themselves are properties of their genes and of the predispositions and beliefs and behaviors and temperaments and aptitudes with which they are endowed by their genes.
  • America is not a nation of immigrants. America is a nation of colonists who, along with their descendants, created, built, and nourished America into a great nation, perhaps the greatest the world has ever known. Immigrants came later, and they were for a long while chosen from stock populations that were not too dissimilar from the founding stock of America (African slaves stand as a glaring exception). It was not until relatively recently (1965 onward) that immigrants significantly deviated in numbers and racial congeniality from the historical norm of immigration into America.
  • Quite simply, the myth of American exceptionalism is just that. American ideals aren’t spread by osmosis into the deep psyches of different races of people; rather, a very specific race of people — White Europeans of primarily Anglo-Celtic-Germanic descent — breathed life into the American ideals, and without them their ideals wither from neglect and misuse in the care of their usurpers.
  • We are not created equal under Nature, and this truism applies to races as it does to individuals. Memorable exceptions only prove the wisdom of pragmatic generalizations.
  • The Constitution, or any stirring stanza of words written by Whites for White sensibilities, will not change a ******** into a heartland Chad. Racial foreigners can mouth the words, but if they don’t feel it in their bones they’ll have no trouble betraying those words when its personally advantageous or when the Law isn’t hovering closely to motivate their observance.
  • A civilization is the sum total of the people that inhabit it. Change the people, change the civilization.
  • Some cultures really are superior to other cultures. If it were not so, millions of those from the lesser cultures would not be escaping into the homelands of the better cultures.
  • Finally, the character of a nation is not established by a founding document; instead, the founding document chronicles the character of a nation. PEOPLE MAKE THE NATION, THE NATION DOES NOT MAKE THE PEOPLE. If the people change, so does the nation, into whatever form the replacement people find most familiar, which usually means a facsimile of their native homelands they left behind.
Enjoy

 
Captain Quinoa said:
  • Society is a racial construct.
  • There is no magic dirt that will transform, say, Somalis and Syrians into lovers, defenders, and disciples of Constitutional republicanism.
  • Race matters.
  • Once more…..RACE MATTERS.
  • In fact, race is the primary source pool of civilization and culture; all other variables are commentary in comparison.
  • Culture isn’t a costume. It can’t be worn like a Turinic shroud with the expectation that it will reverse-imbue the intrinsic character of any people who happen to hop the border and adopt its most superficial trappings.
  • Culture is an emergent property of the people that comprise it, who themselves are properties of their genes and of the predispositions and beliefs and behaviors and temperaments and aptitudes with which they are endowed by their genes.
  • America is not a nation of immigrants. America is a nation of colonists who, along with their descendants, created, built, and nourished America into a great nation, perhaps the greatest the world has ever known. Immigrants came later, and they were for a long while chosen from stock populations that were not too dissimilar from the founding stock of America (African slaves stand as a glaring exception). It was not until relatively recently (1965 onward) that immigrants significantly deviated in numbers and racial congeniality from the historical norm of immigration into America.
  • Quite simply, the myth of American exceptionalism is just that. American ideals aren’t spread by osmosis into the deep psyches of different races of people; rather, a very specific race of people — White Europeans of primarily Anglo-Celtic-Germanic descent — breathed life into the American ideals, and without them their ideals wither from neglect and misuse in the care of their usurpers.
  • We are not created equal under Nature, and this truism applies to races as it does to individuals. Memorable exceptions only prove the wisdom of pragmatic generalizations.
  • The Constitution, or any stirring stanza of words written by Whites for White sensibilities, will not change a ******** into a heartland Chad. Racial foreigners can mouth the words, but if they don’t feel it in their bones they’ll have no trouble betraying those words when its personally advantageous or when the Law isn’t hovering closely to motivate their observance.
  • A civilization is the sum total of the people that inhabit it. Change the people, change the civilization.
  • Some cultures really are superior to other cultures. If it were not so, millions of those from the lesser cultures would not be escaping into the homelands of the better cultures.
  • Finally, the character of a nation is not established by a founding document; instead, the founding document chronicles the character of a nation. PEOPLE MAKE THE NATION, THE NATION DOES NOT MAKE THE PEOPLE. If the people change, so does the nation, into whatever form the replacement people find most familiar, which usually means a facsimile of their native homelands they left behind.
Enjoy
Click to expand...
:thumbup:

 
Juxtatarot said:
No way I'm clicking on that link.
Click to expand...

Chateau Heartiste



 
 

Voice of the voiceful

Men's rights



http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Category:Men's_rights_movement


Lest women catch up




Bros before hoes



v - t - e

Chateau Heartiste is an MRA/PUA blog run by a guy named James C. Weidmann, formerly known as "Roissy" or "Roissy in D.C." One of the sneeriest and most vicious websites of its ilk, arguably even nastier than its compatriot Roosh V, and written in a bombastic, overheated ramble, Roissy's speciality seems to be evolutionary psychological woo. He rants at length about how women having careers, not marrying at age 14,[1] and not looking like airbrushed supermodels[2] is a violation of evolutionary principles, and how women's economic freedom leaves the majority of men with no means of attracting or attaining sex from them, thus leaving them with no incentive to work, thus leading to the collapse of civilizations.

Roissy is also a White Nationalist. He says he opposes the movement, but only because it is not sexist enough for him.[3] Otherwise, his talking points are the same. He does not even try to hide his racism: He thinks "white civilization" is getting destroyed[4] as it is "overrun by Uruk-Hai".[5] The only solution to the terrible prospect of Whites becoming a minority is, according to Roissy, to forcefully deport all minorities.[6] However, this will not happen as, according to him, the "elites" have an "anti-white ideology" and plan to destroy the white race.[7][8]

Combining his two pastimes of sexism and racism, Roissy's most whacked out claim so far is that Adolf Hitler was a beta male who wouldn't have started WWII if he'd read his site.[9] It's not clear how ruling an empire with an iron fist, conquering a swathe of Europe, giving rousing speeches in front of thousands of adoring spectators and killing millions of people would a "beta" male make. 

But don't worry! He can still have a laugh about it![10] Roissy appears to be an "omega"-capitalist, as evidenced by the absence of ads and corporate sponsorship of his website - making it obvious that he is not in it for the money, but rather for the approval-seeking attention ("omega"-male characteristic) of the manosphere, despite his claims of being an alpha.


[edit]External links



[edit]References


  1. ↑ http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2008/03/30/march-2008-comment-winner/
  2. ↑ http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2011/04/20/before-and-after-the-hilarity-of-self-deception/
  3. ↑ http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/09/20/white-woman/
  4. ↑ http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/08/08/comment-of-the-week-60-years-of-shivving/
  5. ↑ http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/white-on-white-war/
  6. ↑ http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/06/13/white-majority-in-the-us-gone-by-2043/
  7. ↑ http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2014/02/24/parade-of-humiliations/
  8. ↑ http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/09/20/do-the-white-elite-dream-of-mulatto-sheep/
  9. ↑ http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/08/26/hitler-was-beta/
  10. ↑ The Wreck of the Beta Male Cuckold



Categories: 






:yawn:  
Click to expand...
 
Captain Quinoa said:
  • Society is a racial construct.
  • There is no magic dirt that will transform, say, Somalis and Syrians into lovers, defenders, and disciples of Constitutional republicanism.
  • Race matters.
  • Once more…..RACE MATTERS.
  • In fact, race is the primary source pool of civilization and culture; all other variables are commentary in comparison.
  • Culture isn’t a costume. It can’t be worn like a Turinic shroud with the expectation that it will reverse-imbue the intrinsic character of any people who happen to hop the border and adopt its most superficial trappings.
  • Culture is an emergent property of the people that comprise it, who themselves are properties of their genes and of the predispositions and beliefs and behaviors and temperaments and aptitudes with which they are endowed by their genes.
  • America is not a nation of immigrants. America is a nation of colonists who, along with their descendants, created, built, and nourished America into a great nation, perhaps the greatest the world has ever known. Immigrants came later, and they were for a long while chosen from stock populations that were not too dissimilar from the founding stock of America (African slaves stand as a glaring exception). It was not until relatively recently (1965 onward) that immigrants significantly deviated in numbers and racial congeniality from the historical norm of immigration into America.
  • Quite simply, the myth of American exceptionalism is just that. American ideals aren’t spread by osmosis into the deep psyches of different races of people; rather, a very specific race of people — White Europeans of primarily Anglo-Celtic-Germanic descent — breathed life into the American ideals, and without them their ideals wither from neglect and misuse in the care of their usurpers.
  • We are not created equal under Nature, and this truism applies to races as it does to individuals. Memorable exceptions only prove the wisdom of pragmatic generalizations.
  • The Constitution, or any stirring stanza of words written by Whites for White sensibilities, will not change a ******** into a heartland Chad. Racial foreigners can mouth the words, but if they don’t feel it in their bones they’ll have no trouble betraying those words when its personally advantageous or when the Law isn’t hovering closely to motivate their observance.
  • A civilization is the sum total of the people that inhabit it. Change the people, change the civilization.
  • Some cultures really are superior to other cultures. If it were not so, millions of those from the lesser cultures would not be escaping into the homelands of the better cultures.
  • Finally, the character of a nation is not established by a founding document; instead, the founding document chronicles the character of a nation. PEOPLE MAKE THE NATION, THE NATION DOES NOT MAKE THE PEOPLE. If the people change, so does the nation, into whatever form the replacement people find most familiar, which usually means a facsimile of their native homelands they left behind.
Enjoy
Click to expand...
I think for once, saying that Hitler would approve of the above seems apropos

 
race is the primary source pool of civilization and culture...A civilization is the sum total of the people that inhabit it....PEOPLE MAKE THE NATION, THE NATION DOES NOT MAKE THE PEOPLE
Click to expand...
I disagree with most of his facts, logic, and conclusions.  He statements imply that you take the same group of people and no matter what the environment (government, religion, wealth, etc.) the outcome of civilization and culture will be the same based almost entirely on their race.  Race is important, but there are so many other factors that are just as important if not more important than race.  Religion and education are vital in establishing values of the people regardless of race.  It is a simpleton analysis which does not really deeply examines anything.  He makes all kinds of strange statements which don't stand up to even the most basic examination.  And his historical statements about immigration in the US do not reflect what really went on.  You just can not bundle all white European immigrants in a nice box and call them all the same.  There was a very diverse mixture of very different cultures coming into the US in the late 1800's consisting of Jews and Irish and Poles and Italians and Greeks and Russians and Bohemians and Chinese.  A very poor effort to attempt to prove his thesis. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
jon_mx said:
I disagree with most of his facts, logic, and conclusions.  He statements imply that you take the same group of people and no matter what the environment (government, religion, wealth, etc.) the outcome of civilization and culture will be the same based almost entirely on their race.  Race is important, but there are so many other factors that are just as important if not more important than race.  Religion and education are vital in establishing values of the people regardless of race.  It is a simpleton analysis which does not really deeply examines anything.  He makes all kinds of strange statements which don't stand up to even the most basic examination.  And his historical statements about immigration in the US do not reflect what really went on.  You just can not bundle all white European immigrants in a nice box and call them all the same.  There was a very diverse mixture of very different cultures coming into the US in the late 1800's consisting of Jews and Irish and Poles and Italians and Greeks and Russians and Bohemians and Chinese.  A very poor effort to attempt to prove his thesis. 
Click to expand...
thanks, jon, nobody could tell.

 
Bottomfeeder Sports said:
I guess it depends on how "race" is defined, but wouldn't different human races need to exist genetically to begin with for it to be important?
Click to expand...
Sometimes it is hard to distinguish those more radicals on the left who discuss race and the neo-nazi's.  The lack of white-bashing was the tipoff. 

 
There's plenty of stupid to go around, but that radical left has never been mainstreamed to the extent that the "Alt-Right" is today. There certainly was no lefty version of Steve Bannon in Obama or Clinton's ear every day.

 
All I know is the Puerto Rican families in my area drive fast and furious type cars with loud mufflers and park all over their front lawn....

 
IvanKaramazov said:
I applaud the author's work to rehabilitate the term "********."
Click to expand...
I've been a big fan of that word ever since I overheard the conversation below. Two middle-aged white people at a dive bar talking about Hideki Matsui.

Man: He's a ********.Woman: No he's not, he's from Japan.(Repeat this about 5 times)Man: He's from Asia.Woman: No he's not, he's from Japan.(Also repeat that part about 5 times)Man: Didn't you ever to go school?Woman: What?Man: Japan is in Asia.Woman: Oh. Well, he's not a ********.Man: He's a ********!

 
Captain Quinoa said:
  • Society is a racial construct.
  • There is no magic dirt that will transform, say, Somalis and Syrians into lovers, defenders, and disciples of Constitutional republicanism.
  • Race matters.
  • Once more…..RACE MATTERS.
  • In fact, race is the primary source pool of civilization and culture; all other variables are commentary in comparison.
  • Culture isn’t a costume. It can’t be worn like a Turinic shroud with the expectation that it will reverse-imbue the intrinsic character of any people who happen to hop the border and adopt its most superficial trappings.
  • Culture is an emergent property of the people that comprise it, who themselves are properties of their genes and of the predispositions and beliefs and behaviors and temperaments and aptitudes with which they are endowed by their genes.
  • America is not a nation of immigrants. America is a nation of colonists who, along with their descendants, created, built, and nourished America into a great nation, perhaps the greatest the world has ever known. Immigrants came later, and they were for a long while chosen from stock populations that were not too dissimilar from the founding stock of America (African slaves stand as a glaring exception). It was not until relatively recently (1965 onward) that immigrants significantly deviated in numbers and racial congeniality from the historical norm of immigration into America.
  • Quite simply, the myth of American exceptionalism is just that. American ideals aren’t spread by osmosis into the deep psyches of different races of people; rather, a very specific race of people — White Europeans of primarily Anglo-Celtic-Germanic descent — breathed life into the American ideals, and without them their ideals wither from neglect and misuse in the care of their usurpers.
  • We are not created equal under Nature, and this truism applies to races as it does to individuals. Memorable exceptions only prove the wisdom of pragmatic generalizations.
  • The Constitution, or any stirring stanza of words written by Whites for White sensibilities, will not change a ******** into a heartland Chad. Racial foreigners can mouth the words, but if they don’t feel it in their bones they’ll have no trouble betraying those words when its personally advantageous or when the Law isn’t hovering closely to motivate their observance.
  • A civilization is the sum total of the people that inhabit it. Change the people, change the civilization.
  • Some cultures really are superior to other cultures. If it were not so, millions of those from the lesser cultures would not be escaping into the homelands of the better cultures.
  • Finally, the character of a nation is not established by a founding document; instead, the founding document chronicles the character of a nation. PEOPLE MAKE THE NATION, THE NATION DOES NOT MAKE THE PEOPLE. If the people change, so does the nation, into whatever form the replacement people find most familiar, which usually means a facsimile of their native homelands they left behind.
Enjoy
Click to expand...
All of this is just superficial.   It is about power and wealth, now carry on.

 
jon_mx said:
I disagree with most of his facts, logic, and conclusions.  He statements imply that you take the same group of people and no matter what the environment (government, religion, wealth, etc.) the outcome of civilization and culture will be the same based almost entirely on their race.  Race is important, but there are so many other factors that are just as important if not more important than race.  Religion and education are vital in establishing values of the people regardless of race.  It is a simpleton analysis which does not really deeply examines anything.  He makes all kinds of strange statements which don't stand up to even the most basic examination.  And his historical statements about immigration in the US do not reflect what really went on.  You just can not bundle all white European immigrants in a nice box and call them all the same.  There was a very diverse mixture of very different cultures coming into the US in the late 1800's consisting of Jews and Irish and Poles and Italians and Greeks and Russians and Bohemians and Chinese.  A very poor effort to attempt to prove his thesis. 
Click to expand...
you are inferring the un-implied.

 
It's sad and a little infuriating that people believe what is in the OP. It's rather disgraceful and can be likened to someone, hopefully, finding their way back to reality and saying out loud, "I once believed that? What was I thinking?" Sadly, I don't see many saying that anytime soon. What a step backwards reality has taken. 

 
IvanKaramazov said:
I applaud the author's work to rehabilitate the term "********."
Click to expand...
I had a (Italian) guy whose kid owns a restaurant in town (the dad is retired and is always there...he used to own it) once say to me.  "My wife isn't feeling well but she's too tough to complain.  She's an Irishman."  

I did not laugh in his face because I'm not a ##### but that was one of the funniest things I've ever heard somebody say with a straight face.  

 
Captain Quinoa said:
Thought provoking and original.
Click to expand...
If your post warranted any reply at all, mockery and derision would be about the extent of it.

I dabbled in some of this thinking in my Limbaugh-listening days, but none of it squared with my real life experiences and I discarded it. I can only hope the same happens for you or failing that, that you don't reproduce.

 
This reminds me a lot of the phenomenon of Texas residents somehow being more skeptical of Trump's wall. Given their proximity, one would assume they would be screaming loudest of all to get the thing built if in fact Mexicans were pouring across the border and raping everything in sight.

Go to NYC and ask anyone their opinion of the statement "social trust is negatively affected by ethnic diversity". 

But go ahead and read any random article on that cesspool of a site and you can see the guy is a moron.

 
Tough topic to discuss, especially in today's climate.  Sad thing is that years ago this topic was debated on a regular basis when I studied international relations in college.  In today's age if you even question the efficacy of multi-culturalism you are immediately branded a racist xenophobe and the discourse usually comes to a grinding halt.  There are a lot of good articles being written overseas about the clash of cultures taking place in Western Europe.  The only place I see those articles being discussed is at Breitbart.  Very sad that we've come to the point in this country where reasoned discussions on such an important topic can't take place.

 
Higgs said:
Tough topic to discuss, especially in today's climate.  Sad thing is that years ago this topic was debated on a regular basis when I studied international relations in college.  In today's age if you even question the efficacy of multi-culturalism you are immediately branded a racist xenophobe and the discourse usually comes to a grinding halt.  There are a lot of good articles being written overseas about the clash of cultures taking place in Western Europe.  The only place I see those articles being discussed is at Breitbart.  Very sad that we've come to the point in this country where reasoned discussions on such an important topic can't take place.
Click to expand...
I think a "clash of culture" discussion is worth having.  However, the OP very clearly states that culture is a function of race, and therefore clash of culture = clash of race.  The very first point is that Society is a racial construct (as opposed to a cultural construct). 

No, this article is full-bore racist propaganda.  You can defend it if you like, but if you do you will be (correctly) branded a racist.  and you know what, it's not sad.  I think it's great that we, as a society, can call a duck a duck.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Higgs said:
Tough topic to discuss, especially in today's climate.  Sad thing is that years ago this topic was debated on a regular basis when I studied international relations in college.  In today's age if you even question the efficacy of multi-culturalism you are immediately branded a racist xenophobe and the discourse usually comes to a grinding halt.  There are a lot of good articles being written overseas about the clash of cultures taking place in Western Europe.  The only place I see those articles being discussed is at Breitbart.  Very sad that we've come to the point in this country where reasoned discussions on such an important topic can't take place.
Click to expand...
And 160 years ago the best way to train a slave was debated on a regular basis. So sad that if you try to do that now, you're branded a racist xenophobe.

 
moleculo said:
I think a "clash of culture" discussion is worth having.  However, the OP very clearly states that culture is a function of race, and therefore clash of culture = clash of race.  The very first point is that Society is a racial construct (as opposed to a cultural construct). 

No, this article is full-bore racist propaganda.  You can defend it if you like, but if you do you will be (correctly) branded a racist.  and you know what, it's not sad.  I think it's great that we, as a society, can call a duck a duck.
Click to expand...
You don't think culture is directly derived from race as a key component?  Sorry, that isn't a racist idea at all.  It dominated socioligical discourse all of last century.  Read Monihan's report in the 60's on blacks in the US.

It's only a racist concept today because liberals have made it such.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

whoknew
DOJ and 30 States File Suit to Break up LiveNation
Replies
10
Views
682
the moops
the moops
BobbyLayne
Yes, Gen Z is staring at you. The question is why.
2
Replies
74
Views
1K
General Malaise
General Malaise
STEADYMOBBIN 22
First time listening - Where are we on Dire Straits?
2
Replies
57
Views
1K
General Malaise
General Malaise

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top