What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Study: Are we shifting to fewer, weaker Atlantic hurricanes? (1 Viewer)

larch

Footballguy
But, but, global warming and all that fake outrage...

http://wtop.com/science/2015/09/study-are-we-shifting-to-fewer-weaker-atlantic-hurricanes/

WASHINGTON (AP) A new but controversial study asks if an end is coming to the busy Atlantic hurricane seasons of recent decades.

The Atlantic looks like it is entering in to a new quieter cycle of storm activity, like in the 1970s and 1980s, two prominent hurricane researchers wrote Monday in the journal Nature Geoscience.

Scientists at Colorado State University, including the professor who pioneered hurricane seasonal prognostication, say they are seeing a localized cooling and salinity level drop in the North Atlantic near Greenland. Those conditions, they theorize, change local weather and ocean patterns and form an on-again, off-again cycle in hurricane activity that they trace back to the late 1800s.

Warmer saltier produces periods of more and stronger storms followed by cooler less salty water triggering a similar period of fewer and weaker hurricanes, the scientists say. The periods last about 25 years, sometimes more, sometimes less. The busy cycle that just ended was one of the shorter ones, perhaps because it was so strong that it ran out of energy, said study lead author Phil Klotzbach.

Klotzbach said since about 2012 theres been more localized cooling in the key area and less salt, suggesting a new, quieter period. But Klotzbach said it is too soon to be certain that one has begun.

Were just asking the question, he said.

But he said he thinks the answer is yes. He says the busy cycle started around 1995 and probably ended in 2012; in 2005 alone, Katrina, Rita and Wilma killed more than 1,500 people and caused billions of dollars of damage. The quiet cycle before that went from about 1970 to 1994 and before that it was busy from 1926 until 1969, he said.

Klotzbach doesnt take into account where a storm hits, but how strong storms are and how long they last regardless of whether they make landfall. So even though no major hurricane hit the United States in 2010, its overall activity was more than 60 percent higher than normal. And just because its a quiet season doesnt mean a city cant be devastated, Klotzbach said. Hurricane Andrew hit South Florida in an otherwise quiet 1992 season as a top-of-the-scale storm.

Other scientists either reject the study outright or call it premature.

I think theyre pretty much wrong about this, said MIT meteorology professor Kerry Emanuel, who also specializes in hurricane research. That paper is not backed by a lot of evidence.

Emanuel doesnt believe in the cycle cited by the researchers or the connection to ocean temperature and salinity. He thinks the quiet period of hurricanes of the 1970s and 1980s is connected to sulfur pollution and the busy period that followed is a result of the cleaning of the air. And Jim Kossin of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said cooler water temperatures earlier this year might be due to Atlantic dust, and August temperatures there have risen.

Another NOAA scientist, Gabriel Vecchi, said while there seems to be signs of a change in the circulation of the Atlantic, its far too early to say that the shift has happened.

So what happens in the next few years is going to be very exciting to watch as it may help settle or at least refine some intense scientific debates, Vecchi said in an email.

 
This would be great news if it turns out true.

Why you would lead with something about Global Warming is a shame though, sorta tells me there's a slant and all here rather than a presentation of the fact. Sadly, it also does not dispel anything related to what is obviously your real issue making this post.

 
This would be great news if it turns out true.

Why you would lead with something about Global Warming is a shame though, sorta tells me there's a slant and all here rather than a presentation of the fact. Sadly, it also does not dispel anything related to what is obviously your real issue making this post.
Maybe because for the last 25 years every disasterous weather story includes a mention of how global warming is to blame.

 
But check out the Pacific.

I've been saying this for years - whether it's currents or wind patterns or heat or who knows what, things have shifted West considerably. The Pacific has been nutty the past several years, and a lot of those storms that used to just dissipate out over the Atlantic have shifted far enough West to streak the East coast and hit, for instance, New York of all places.

But yeah, we've been in much better shape in the Gulf the last several years. Knock on wood.

 
It's actually global climate change. So the climate is going to change, globally. In general the planet will be warmer and drier but there will be places that are cooler and wetter. That's why we call it climate change.

 
Isn't Atlantic hurricane activity pretty much a 25-ish year cycle to begin with? Seems like this would be expected.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top