What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Subscriber Contest is LIVE (1 Viewer)

Still don't get the 4 points for a TD when 6 points is fairer and then have 1 pt per reception which is supposed to even things out as well.  Just doesn't amek sense.  Rewarding a reception is simlilar to rewarding a handoff to me...makes no sense and is way too artificial
They offer you a free contest that has cash payouts and you complain about the rules. If you don't like it, don't enter. Just quit your whining. When friends invite you over to dinner, do you sit down at the table and then start #####ing that they aren't serving your favorite dishes?
Swing and a miss CP. That is one strike on you. I love this contest and appreciate the opportunity. My point is that I don't understand why a site that is all about stats and value etc. is using a system that the majority of people don't use and one that isn't more towards realism in how it is scored (recognizing this is still fantasy).
I agree. It's a setup very few people use.
X
*lol*Survivor leagues count for what 10% of FF leagues? 5%? 2%?

 
Still don't get the 4 points for a TD when 6 points is fairer and then have 1 pt per reception which is supposed to even things out as well.  Just doesn't amek sense.  Rewarding a reception is simlilar to rewarding a handoff to me...makes no sense and is way too artificial
They offer you a free contest that has cash payouts and you complain about the rules. If you don't like it, don't enter. Just quit your whining. When friends invite you over to dinner, do you sit down at the table and then start #####ing that they aren't serving your favorite dishes?
Swing and a miss CP. That is one strike on you. I love this contest and appreciate the opportunity. My point is that I don't understand why a site that is all about stats and value etc. is using a system that the majority of people don't use and one that isn't more towards realism in how it is scored (recognizing this is still fantasy).
I agree. It's a setup very few people use.
X
*lol*Survivor leagues count for what 10% of FF leagues? 5%? 2%?
Umm, LT is hung up on 4 pts per TD while he is saying the norm is 6 pts. The big red X is in reference to this point as, if there was a poll, most leagues in fact use 4 pts for a passing TD and not 6 pts. The format of Survivor never even entered into the conversation until your last post and while it may not be the best format, in your opinion, how else are you going to run a contest with 8,000+ people entering it? I doubt everyone will want to set up 12-team leagues and all have drafts and what not. Survivor is the only way to go with this and it works out quite well.

 
Still don't get the 4 points for a TD when 6 points is fairer and then have 1 pt per reception which is supposed to even things out as well.  Just doesn't amek sense.  Rewarding a reception is simlilar to rewarding a handoff to me...makes no sense and is way too artificial
They offer you a free contest that has cash payouts and you complain about the rules. If you don't like it, don't enter. Just quit your whining. When friends invite you over to dinner, do you sit down at the table and then start #####ing that they aren't serving your favorite dishes?
Swing and a miss CP. That is one strike on you. I love this contest and appreciate the opportunity. My point is that I don't understand why a site that is all about stats and value etc. is using a system that the majority of people don't use and one that isn't more towards realism in how it is scored (recognizing this is still fantasy).
I agree. It's a setup very few people use.
X
*lol*Survivor leagues count for what 10% of FF leagues? 5%? 2%?
Umm, LT is hung up on 4 pts per TD while he is saying the norm is 6 pts. The big red X is in reference to this point as, if there was a poll, most leagues in fact use 4 pts for a passing TD and not 6 pts. The format of Survivor never even entered into the conversation until your last post and while it may not be the best format, in your opinion, how else are you going to run a contest with 8,000+ people entering it? I doubt everyone will want to set up 12-team leagues and all have drafts and what not. Survivor is the only way to go with this and it works out quite well.
Actually, he doesn't like the PPR either. His overall point was this isn't a system most people use. I ADDED that the format isn't something most people use, wish we could set our only position limits, but said it would be fun regardless.You jumped in, adding nothing, and continue down that path. There's nothing to defend. LT and I said it would be fun, but had some issues with minor details.

You getting involved wasn't needed, and didn't add anything to the thread.

Thanks.

 
Actually, he doesn't like the PPR either. His overall point was this isn't a system most people use. I ADDED that the format isn't something most people use, wish we could set our only position limits, but said it would be fun regardless.

You jumped in, adding nothing, and continue down that path. There's nothing to defend. LT and I said it would be fun, but had some issues with minor details.

You getting involved wasn't needed, and didn't add anything to the thread.

Thanks.
Are those cramps hurting this month, geez. Take some Midol and hop in the bubble bath. The fact is you and whoever else are complaining about something that is being handed to you for nothing. You can choose to like it and accept it or not like it and not play it. It is not that hard of an option to behold. Dont know how long you have been around these parts but Survivor leagues have been happening here, and this contest for the last 4 years... save last year and I have never heard of format being a problem. Pick your 3 QB's and add up to $250 and enjoy the opportunity given to you.

 
Joe and David,

Thanks again for putting together a free and fun contest that neither of you are obligated to do. It should be fun and we all appreciate it. :thumbup: Well, most of us anyway.

 
Joe and David,

Thanks again for putting together a free and fun contest that neither of you are obligated to do. It should be fun and we all appreciate it. :thumbup: Well, most of us anyway.
:goodposting:
 
still playing around with it

Your team has been successfully entered.

QB - Eli Manning - 21

QB - Mark Brunell - 12

QB - Chris Simms - 10

RB - Ronnie Brown - 52

RB - Chester Taylor - 30

RB - Ron Dayne - 22

RB - Fred Taylor - 17

RB - Greg Jones - 2

WR - Roy Williams - 27

WR - Koren Robinson - 12

WR - Mark Clayton - 6

WR - Roddy White - 5

WR - Corey Bradford - 3

WR - Jabar Gaffney - 2

WR - Drew Carter - 1

TE - Ben Watson - 9

TE - Heath Miller - 7

PK - Jason Hanson - 1

PK - Matt Bryant - 1

TD - Chicago Bears - 8

TD - Cleveland Browns - 2

Total value: 250

 
One of the RB's listed is:

M Jones-Drew JAX - 2

Could be, Matt Jones -WR, Greg Jones-RB, or Maurice Drew-RB

 
Yay! I love this contest. ... but people, it's not free.
It is for 300 people who did not subscribe...2. 300 non-subscribers will be drawn from our email list (on August 3rd) and allowed to participate.

 
1st attempt-still tweaking to be done. :thumbup:

QB - Donovan McNabb - 22

QB - Steve McNair - 13

QB - Chris Simms - 10

RB - Ronnie Brown - 52

RB - Cedric Benson - 18

RB - Deuce McAllister - 15

RB - Chris Brown - 7

RB - Greg Jones - 2

WR - Roy Williams - 27

WR - Andre Johnson - 24

WR - Matt Jones - 14

WR - Reggie Brown - 13

WR - Isaac Bruce - 6

WR - Bobby Engram - 4

WR - Antwaan Randle El - 3

TE - Jerramy Stevens - 7

TE - Bubba Franks - 2

PK - Mike Vanderjagt - 2

PK - Nate Kaeding - 2

TD - Jacksonville Jaguars - 4

TD - Miami Dolphins - 3

Total value: 250

 
Thanks David; Sure all appreciate your efforts.. Plus a good PR move .

regards

:thumbup:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Still don't get the 4 points for a TD when 6 points is fairer and then have 1 pt per reception which is supposed to even things out as well.  Just doesn't amek sense.  Rewarding a reception is simlilar to rewarding a handoff to me...makes no sense and is way too artificial
They offer you a free contest that has cash payouts and you complain about the rules. If you don't like it, don't enter. Just quit your whining. When friends invite you over to dinner, do you sit down at the table and then start #####ing that they aren't serving your favorite dishes?
Swing and a miss CP. That is one strike on you. I love this contest and appreciate the opportunity. My point is that I don't understand why a site that is all about stats and value etc. is using a system that the majority of people don't use and one that isn't more towards realism in how it is scored (recognizing this is still fantasy).
Well, look at it as you wish, but when someone offers me something for free that they have thought through in setting it up and has decided that's how they want it, I just graciously accept and say thanks. I guess you aren't seeing the point I'm making, and that's disappointing.
Sorry for the delay in responding. I guess I could just say thanks and accept things, but that is not in my personaility. For example, let's say I made my wife dinner (which I usually do), and she says thanks honey every single night, but deep inside she really doesn't like pork even close to the way she likes chicken. I am not insulted if she tells me that for the future could we do chicken more times a week than pork? I would rather her tell me how she feels so that I can adjust and make her happy. I am more about getting IT right than being right. If my style is too straight forward I apologize...I am from NJ :thumbup:
 
Still don't get the 4 points for a TD when 6 points is fairer and then have 1 pt per reception which is supposed to even things out as well.  Just doesn't amek sense.  Rewarding a reception is simlilar to rewarding a handoff to me...makes no sense and is way too artificial
They offer you a free contest that has cash payouts and you complain about the rules. If you don't like it, don't enter. Just quit your whining. When friends invite you over to dinner, do you sit down at the table and then start #####ing that they aren't serving your favorite dishes?
Swing and a miss CP. That is one strike on you. I love this contest and appreciate the opportunity. My point is that I don't understand why a site that is all about stats and value etc. is using a system that the majority of people don't use and one that isn't more towards realism in how it is scored (recognizing this is still fantasy).
I agree. It's a setup very few people use.
X
*lol*Survivor leagues count for what 10% of FF leagues? 5%? 2%?
Umm, LT is hung up on 4 pts per TD while he is saying the norm is 6 pts. The big red X is in reference to this point as, if there was a poll, most leagues in fact use 4 pts for a passing TD and not 6 pts. The format of Survivor never even entered into the conversation until your last post and while it may not be the best format, in your opinion, how else are you going to run a contest with 8,000+ people entering it? I doubt everyone will want to set up 12-team leagues and all have drafts and what not. Survivor is the only way to go with this and it works out quite well.
PK, you are right, the 4 pts and the PPR are what I was "hung up on." There were a few other threads that did show the 6 pt TD is used more frequently and David acknowledged that they will be looking at it next year as it takes a lot to redo all their databases (I hope I have that right David)
 
Still don't get the 4 points for a TD when 6 points is fairer and then have 1 pt per reception which is supposed to even things out as well. Just doesn't amek sense. Rewarding a reception is simlilar to rewarding a handoff to me...makes no sense and is way too artificial
They offer you a free contest that has cash payouts and you complain about the rules. If you don't like it, don't enter. Just quit your whining. When friends invite you over to dinner, do you sit down at the table and then start #####ing that they aren't serving your favorite dishes?
Swing and a miss CP. That is one strike on you. I love this contest and appreciate the opportunity. My point is that I don't understand why a site that is all about stats and value etc. is using a system that the majority of people don't use and one that isn't more towards realism in how it is scored (recognizing this is still fantasy).
Well, look at it as you wish, but when someone offers me something for free that they have thought through in setting it up and has decided that's how they want it, I just graciously accept and say thanks. I guess you aren't seeing the point I'm making, and that's disappointing.
Sorry for the delay in responding. I guess I could just say thanks and accept things, but that is not in my personaility. For example, let's say I made my wife dinner (which I usually do), and she says thanks honey every single night, but deep inside she really doesn't like pork even close to the way she likes chicken. I am not insulted if she tells me that for the future could we do chicken more times a week than pork? I would rather her tell me how she feels so that I can adjust and make her happy. I am more about getting IT right than being right. If my style is too straight forward I apologize...I am from NJ :thumbup:
That's cool, LT. We just look at it differently. And tell your wife she's lucky you can cook. If she was stuck with me, the closest she'd get to a home cooked meal is hamburger helper or microwaved hot dogs. :D

 
Still don't get the 4 points for a TD when 6 points is fairer and then have 1 pt per reception which is supposed to even things out as well.  Just doesn't amek sense.  Rewarding a reception is simlilar to rewarding a handoff to me...makes no sense and is way too artificial
They offer you a free contest that has cash payouts and you complain about the rules. If you don't like it, don't enter. Just quit your whining. When friends invite you over to dinner, do you sit down at the table and then start #####ing that they aren't serving your favorite dishes?
Swing and a miss CP. That is one strike on you. I love this contest and appreciate the opportunity. My point is that I don't understand why a site that is all about stats and value etc. is using a system that the majority of people don't use and one that isn't more towards realism in how it is scored (recognizing this is still fantasy).
Well, look at it as you wish, but when someone offers me something for free that they have thought through in setting it up and has decided that's how they want it, I just graciously accept and say thanks. I guess you aren't seeing the point I'm making, and that's disappointing.
Sorry for the delay in responding. I guess I could just say thanks and accept things, but that is not in my personaility. For example, let's say I made my wife dinner (which I usually do), and she says thanks honey every single night, but deep inside she really doesn't like pork even close to the way she likes chicken. I am not insulted if she tells me that for the future could we do chicken more times a week than pork? I would rather her tell me how she feels so that I can adjust and make her happy. I am more about getting IT right than being right. If my style is too straight forward I apologize...I am from NJ :thumbup:
That's cool, LT. We just look at it differently. And tell your wife she's lucky you can cook. If she was stuck with me, the closest she'd get to a home cooked meal is hamburger helper or microwaved hot dogs. :D
It is Ok for us to look at it differently...As for cooking, I work very long hours, but I have much more interest in cooking than she does so why not. I let her deal with all the cleaning...It works out well.
 
Great contest!

Thanks a lot David and Joe :thumbup:

I'm glad we're not doing the FFTOC format anymore -- I hated it last year...

I won't post my roster until after they're locked, but I KNOW my team is better than any posted in this thread.. You guys better hope you tweak those some ;)

Anyways, here is what I spent by position, if anyone is interested in what this year's winning team looks like:

QB $42

RB $128

WR $52

TE $24

PK $2

DF $2

 
still playing around with itYour team has been successfully entered.QB - Eli Manning - 21QB - Mark Brunell - 12QB - Chris Simms - 10RB - Ronnie Brown - 52RB - Chester Taylor - 30RB - Ron Dayne - 22RB - Fred Taylor - 17RB - Greg Jones - 2WR - Roy Williams - 27WR - Koren Robinson - 12WR - Mark Clayton - 6WR - Roddy White - 5WR - Corey Bradford - 3WR - Jabar Gaffney - 2WR - Drew Carter - 1TE - Ben Watson - 9TE - Heath Miller - 7PK - Jason Hanson - 1PK - Matt Bryant - 1TD - Chicago Bears - 8TD - Cleveland Browns - 2Total value: 250
:thumbdown:
 
so I guess if you didn't get a notification of being drawn for the free entry, you didn't get drawn? or is there a list posted somewhere?

 
still playing around with it

Your team has been successfully entered.

QB - Eli Manning - 21

QB - Mark Brunell - 12

QB - Chris Simms - 10

RB - Ronnie Brown - 52

RB - Chester Taylor - 30

RB - Ron Dayne - 22

RB - Fred Taylor - 17

RB - Greg Jones - 2

WR - Roy Williams - 27

WR - Koren Robinson - 12

WR - Mark Clayton - 6

WR - Roddy White - 5

WR - Corey Bradford - 3

WR - Jabar Gaffney - 2

WR - Drew Carter - 1

TE - Ben Watson - 9

TE - Heath Miller - 7

PK - Jason Hanson - 1

PK - Matt Bryant - 1

TD - Chicago Bears - 8

TD - Cleveland Browns - 2

Total value: 250
You may want to change this one.
 
I wish I would have written down my team in this thread because I just went to check it out and it had been erased. My account is fine but the team is gone. :rant: :rant:

 
I had a great idea for an Excel (or maybe SAS or JMP or something) formula or program that could pick the absolute best team for you based on your own projections..

In other words, I want to be able to put the players' names in the first column, MY projected fantasy points in the second column, and their $cost in the third column and set up a formula or program to pick the combination of 3 QBs, 5 RBs, 7 WRs, 2 TEs, 2 PKs, and 2 TDs that net me the most fantasy points and cost <= $250...

There should be an easy way to do that -- I just haven't taken the time to figure it out yet..

 
Dolfan said:
I had a great idea for an Excel (or maybe SAS or JMP or something) formula or program that could pick the absolute best team for you based on your own projections..In other words, I want to be able to put the players' names in the first column, MY projected fantasy points in the second column, and their $cost in the third column and set up a formula or program to pick the combination of 3 QBs, 5 RBs, 7 WRs, 2 TEs, 2 PKs, and 2 TDs that net me the most fantasy points and cost <= $250...There should be an easy way to do that -- I just haven't taken the time to figure it out yet..
I build a spreadsheet, but don't have a program to try all the combinations. Not sure how many combinations there are, but I'm sure the number is astronomical. Just the number of ways to choose 7 WRs from a list of 70 or so would be enormous.You'd also need to factor in bye weeks, so your "best" team doesn't end up with too few starters for any single week.
 
Not sure how many combinations there are, but I'm sure the number is astronomical.
According to my (*very* quick, so possibly erroneous) calculations, there are about 2.27 x 10^30 combinations. If your computer could test out a million combinations per second, it would take you a little more than 720296800 million centuries to look at all possible combinations.
 
Not sure how many combinations there are, but I'm sure the number is astronomical.
According to my (*very* quick, so possibly erroneous) calculations, there are about 2.27 x 10^30 combinations. If your computer could test out a million combinations per second, it would take you a little more than 720296800 million centuries to look at all possible combinations.
Alright Shark Pool, someone get on that.
 
Not sure how many combinations there are, but I'm sure the number is astronomical.
According to my (*very* quick, so possibly erroneous) calculations, there are about 2.27 x 10^30 combinations. If your computer could test out a million combinations per second, it would take you a little more than 720296800 million centuries to look at all possible combinations.
anybody got a time machine?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top