David Dodds
Administrator
Congrats again to everyone still alive in this contest. Amazing job to get this far. One of you is going to win $25,000. Good luck to all.
I would think it would be pretty tough to get eliminated when you get over 33% of the points you need to stay in from just one player.I'm curious how many LT2 owners dropped out of the contest this week given the huge jump in ownership percentage for him. I'm guessin' not bloody many.-QG
Congrats again to everyone still alive in this contest. Amazing job to get this far. One of you is going to win $25,000. Good luck to all.

(0.108*4002) - (0.142*3000) = 6 unfortunate LT2 owners!I would think it would be pretty tough to get eliminated when you get over 33% of the points you need to stay in from just one player.I'm curious how many LT2 owners dropped out of the contest this week given the huge jump in ownership percentage for him. I'm guessin' not bloody many.-QG
Cool calculation, but the percentage only goes to 1 decimal place. The number of unfortunate LT onwers coudl easily be 0.(0.108*4002) - (0.142*3000) = 6 unfortunate LT2 owners!I would think it would be pretty tough to get eliminated when you get over 33% of the points you need to stay in from just one player.I'm curious how many LT2 owners dropped out of the contest this week given the huge jump in ownership percentage for him. I'm guessin' not bloody many.-QG
approximately 108Brady and Watson - thank you thank you thank youNow if I could get S.A. back.How many S.A. owners are left? Not many, I gather.
Point taken. Recalculation shows an LT2 elimination range of 3 to 9 people for week 8, but I know it wasn't zero.Cool calculation, but the percentage only goes to 1 decimal place. The number of unfortunate LT onwers coudl easily be 0.(0.108*4002) - (0.142*3000) = 6 unfortunate LT2 owners!I would think it would be pretty tough to get eliminated when you get over 33% of the points you need to stay in from just one player.I'm curious how many LT2 owners dropped out of the contest this week given the huge jump in ownership percentage for him. I'm guessin' not bloody many.-QG

I've isolated above the zeroes for the upcoming week. I included backup QBs except Garrard, but not players at other positions if there is a chance they will play. I may have missed one or two, but no one big.With 33% exiting week 9, the high %OWN guys above are more important this week than in any other week. My strategy was to hope to get to this week free of byes, and it's worked out. My only certain zero is Simms.Doug Drinen said:121.5
Percent ownership report:
25.2 percent of all entries are still alive.%OWN = percentage of still-alive rosters that have the given player.%LIVE = percentage of all rosters with the given player that are still alive.Player price %OWN %LIVE----------------------------------------Donovan McNabb 22 7.4 40.6Matt Schaub 5 1.1 29.6Matt Leinart 5 12.6 27.3Jake Delhomme 15 28.2 26.3Jamie Martin 2 1.2 25.2Chris Simms 10 29.5 25.0Jay Cutler 4 2.5 22.3Gus Frerotte 4 0.5 21.1A.J. Feeley 2 1.5 20.8Kellen Clemens 2 2.1 20.6Chad Pennington 7 4.5 20.5Matt Hasselbeck 22 2.1 19.7Kurt Warner 15 16.5 19.4Drew Bledsoe 19 2.0 18.6Craig Nall 2 0.6 18.3Jason Campbell 4 0.2 17.9Daunte Culpepper 18 9.3 17.2Brian Griese 6 2.6 17.0Trent Green 15 3.3 15.9Aaron Brooks 17 1.9 15.8Jay Fiedler 3 0.2 14.3Patrick Ramsey 5 0.1 12.5Billy Volek 10 0.4 8.0Kelly Holcomb 6 0.0 6.7Kyle Boller 5 0.0 6.2Josh McCown 6 0.1 4.3Vernand Morency 1 15.3 27.3Kevan Barlow 6 14.2 26.7Derrick Blaylock 1 3.9 26.7Brian Westbrook 58 1.0 24.8Verron Haynes 3 2.1 24.6DeShaun Foster 28 9.0 23.4DeAngelo Williams 11 6.3 22.3Ryan Moats 3 1.0 18.0Cedric Houston 2 0.7 14.4Edgerrin James 50 1.3 14.1Greg Jones 2 0.6 12.8William Green 2 0.1 12.0J.J. Arrington 1 0.3 9.9Curtis Martin 11 0.2 9.6Shaun Alexander 69 3.6 7.4James Mungro 1 0.1 6.6Antowain Smith 2 0.1 5.0Domanick Davis 41 0.0 0.0Laveranues Coles 19 3.9 31.1Keyshawn Johnson 11 10.9 30.8Reggie Brown 13 10.3 28.2Steve Smith 49 1.7 23.3Corey Bradford 3 5.0 21.4Anquan Boldin 43 2.4 20.9Donte Stallworth 14 8.5 18.0Greg Lewis 2 1.1 15.8David Boston 1 1.9 15.3Keary Colbert 1 1.8 15.1Drew Carter 1 0.5 14.9Robert Ferguson 2 0.9 12.9Sinorice Moss 2 1.4 10.8Todd Pinkston 1 1.1 10.3Justin McCareins 2 0.4 10.0Charles Rogers 1 0.4 9.6Larry Fitzgerald 45 1.9 9.5Scott Vines 1 0.1 9.3Brian Finneran 1 0.2 7.8Koren Robinson 12 0.3 7.6Darius Watts 1 0.1 6.7Peter Warrick 1 0.1 5.3Mike Hass 1 0.0 0.0L.J. Smith 10 7.7 28.2Leonard Pope 1 2.8 20.6Chris Baker 1 0.4 18.2Erron Kinney 2 1.7 18.0Vernon Davis 7 3.8 15.8Kris Mangum 1 0.5 13.9Zach Hilton 6 0.2 7.7Matt Schobel 1 0.1 7.0David Akers 2 18.3 28.4John Kasay 2 11.3 27.1Neil Rackers 4 12.9 23.0Mike Nugent 1 1.2 20.0John Hall 1 1.8 16.3Billy Cundiff 1 0.0 2.5Zac Derr 1 0.0 0.0Arizona Cardinals 2 5.4 29.6Philadelphia Eagles 4 6.4 26.5Carolina Panthers 8 10.6 25.5New York Jets 2 0.8 19.0
Nice work and I like your stategy.Morrency should play this week though, as Packers are not on bye.I've isolated above the zeroes for the upcoming week. I included backup QBs except Garrard, but not players at other positions if there is a chance they will play. I may have missed one or two, but no one big.With 33% exiting week 9, the high %OWN guys above are more important this week than in any other week. My strategy was to hope to get to this week free of byes, and it's worked out. My only certain zero is Simms.Doug Drinen said:121.5
Percent ownership report:
25.2 percent of all entries are still alive.%OWN = percentage of still-alive rosters that have the given player.%LIVE = percentage of all rosters with the given player that are still alive.Player price %OWN %LIVE----------------------------------------Donovan McNabb 22 7.4 40.6Matt Schaub 5 1.1 29.6Matt Leinart 5 12.6 27.3Jake Delhomme 15 28.2 26.3Jamie Martin 2 1.2 25.2Chris Simms 10 29.5 25.0Jay Cutler 4 2.5 22.3Gus Frerotte 4 0.5 21.1A.J. Feeley 2 1.5 20.8Kellen Clemens 2 2.1 20.6Chad Pennington 7 4.5 20.5Matt Hasselbeck 22 2.1 19.7Kurt Warner 15 16.5 19.4Drew Bledsoe 19 2.0 18.6Craig Nall 2 0.6 18.3Jason Campbell 4 0.2 17.9Daunte Culpepper 18 9.3 17.2Brian Griese 6 2.6 17.0Trent Green 15 3.3 15.9Aaron Brooks 17 1.9 15.8Jay Fiedler 3 0.2 14.3Patrick Ramsey 5 0.1 12.5Billy Volek 10 0.4 8.0Kelly Holcomb 6 0.0 6.7Kyle Boller 5 0.0 6.2Josh McCown 6 0.1 4.3Vernand Morency 1 15.3 27.3Kevan Barlow 6 14.2 26.7Derrick Blaylock 1 3.9 26.7Brian Westbrook 58 1.0 24.8Verron Haynes 3 2.1 24.6DeShaun Foster 28 9.0 23.4DeAngelo Williams 11 6.3 22.3Ryan Moats 3 1.0 18.0Cedric Houston 2 0.7 14.4Edgerrin James 50 1.3 14.1Greg Jones 2 0.6 12.8William Green 2 0.1 12.0J.J. Arrington 1 0.3 9.9Curtis Martin 11 0.2 9.6Shaun Alexander 69 3.6 7.4James Mungro 1 0.1 6.6Antowain Smith 2 0.1 5.0Domanick Davis 41 0.0 0.0Laveranues Coles 19 3.9 31.1Keyshawn Johnson 11 10.9 30.8Reggie Brown 13 10.3 28.2Steve Smith 49 1.7 23.3Corey Bradford 3 5.0 21.4Anquan Boldin 43 2.4 20.9Donte Stallworth 14 8.5 18.0Greg Lewis 2 1.1 15.8David Boston 1 1.9 15.3Keary Colbert 1 1.8 15.1Drew Carter 1 0.5 14.9Robert Ferguson 2 0.9 12.9Sinorice Moss 2 1.4 10.8Todd Pinkston 1 1.1 10.3Justin McCareins 2 0.4 10.0Charles Rogers 1 0.4 9.6Larry Fitzgerald 45 1.9 9.5Scott Vines 1 0.1 9.3Brian Finneran 1 0.2 7.8Koren Robinson 12 0.3 7.6Darius Watts 1 0.1 6.7Peter Warrick 1 0.1 5.3Mike Hass 1 0.0 0.0L.J. Smith 10 7.7 28.2Leonard Pope 1 2.8 20.6Chris Baker 1 0.4 18.2Erron Kinney 2 1.7 18.0Vernon Davis 7 3.8 15.8Kris Mangum 1 0.5 13.9Zach Hilton 6 0.2 7.7Matt Schobel 1 0.1 7.0David Akers 2 18.3 28.4John Kasay 2 11.3 27.1Neil Rackers 4 12.9 23.0Mike Nugent 1 1.2 20.0John Hall 1 1.8 16.3Billy Cundiff 1 0.0 2.5Zac Derr 1 0.0 0.0Arizona Cardinals 2 5.4 29.6Philadelphia Eagles 4 6.4 26.5Carolina Panthers 8 10.6 25.5New York Jets 2 0.8 19.0
As a Gore (74.5 %OWN) and Watson (74.0 %OWN) owner, it would be huge if they have a down week and my other guys at those positions go off big. That kind of advantage would go a long way toward making it in ahead of 75% of the remaining contestants.
Also, I think the QB position is critical this week. Ownership of any two of Delhomme (28.2 %OWN), Simms (29.5 %OWN), Warner/Leinart (29.1 %OWN combined), McNabb (7.4 %OWN - and he's been carrying these owners), and Culpepper (9.3 %OWN) is going to catch up to a lot of folks this week if their 3rd QB has an off week. It'll be very hard to survive a 1/3 cut with low points at QB. And I don't think much of anyone is going to survive this 1/3 cut if they own 3 QBs with zeroes this week (also including Hasselbeck, T Green, Pennington who are owned by lesser percentages).
I think Morency was injured.Morrency should play this week though, as Packers are not on bye.
I think Morency was injured.Morrency should play this week though, as Packers are not on bye.
That bites. I thought he was a nice $1 wildcard and he just got over 100 yds. 
Actually the highest number can be 9 and the lowest number can be 4Cool calculation, but the percentage only goes to 1 decimal place. The number of unfortunate LT onwers coudl easily be 0.(0.108*4002) - (0.142*3000) = 6 unfortunate LT2 owners!I would think it would be pretty tough to get eliminated when you get over 33% of the points you need to stay in from just one player.I'm curious how many LT2 owners dropped out of the contest this week given the huge jump in ownership percentage for him. I'm guessin' not bloody many.-QG
-QGI think Morency was injured.Morrency should play this week though, as Packers are not on bye.That bites. I thought he was a nice $1 wildcard and he just got over 100 yds.
![]()
I'm not happy either. He's helped me a couple of times in this contest.RB Vernand Morency - GBMorency suffered a lower back injury on Sunday and had to be carted off the field. He'll be evaluated further during the week but initial indications do not look good - stay tuned.
I have SA and have basically scraped by so far hitting on QB Alex Smith and Norwood a few times and mid-priced WR talent. Would be nice to get him back asap.Brady and Watson - thank you thank you thank youNow if I could get S.A. back.How many S.A. owners are left? Not many, I gather.
Looks to be gone at least 2 weeks.http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpag...NFL&id=3208I think Morency was injured.Morrency should play this week though, as Packers are not on bye.That bites. I thought he was a nice $1 wildcard and he just got over 100 yds.
![]()
Anyone else see this or am i imagining thisI think you gave Brad Johnson points for Bethel Johnsons catches
Anyone else see this or am i imagining thisI think you gave Brad Johnson points for Bethel Johnsons catches
I see that they have Delhomme at 6.5, but I calculate 6.4 (7.4 pts for 149 yds passing and -1 pt for 1 int)7.45 to be accurate. So they round up, you round down. It makes sense they round up so they don't have people screamimg they lost the cut by a tenth due to rounding down.Anyone else see this or am i imagining thisI think you gave Brad Johnson points for Bethel Johnsons catchesI see that they have Delhomme at 6.5, but I calculate 6.4 (7.4 pts for 149 yds passing and -1 pt for 1 int)
I have McNabb and Rivers, and Rivers has had better numbers in week 6 and 8.McNabb (7.4 %OWN - and he's been carrying these owners)
so you're saying it's bad to have Simms, Culpepper, and Delhomme? Looking for a miracle.Wondering, given the injury rate of QBs, whether we should pick 4 qbs and only 6 wrs. Or have some roster flexibility, which would certainly open much more variety in who is picked.Also, I think the QB position is critical this week. Ownership of any two of Delhomme (28.2 %OWN), Simms (29.5 %OWN), Warner/Leinart (29.1 %OWN combined), McNabb (7.4 %OWN - and he's been carrying these owners), and Culpepper (9.3 %OWN) is going to catch up to a lot of folks this week if their 3rd QB has an off week. It'll be very hard to survive a 1/3 cut with low points at QB. And I don't think much of anyone is going to survive this 1/3 cut if they own 3 QBs with zeroes this week (also including Hasselbeck, T Green, Pennington who are owned by lesser percentages).
Adding Brooks and Bledsoe, 10 of the 32 opening day starters aren't starting week 9. It'll be really tough for you to survive a 33% cut without some very big games elsewhere. Good luck!oso diablo said:so you're saying it's bad to have Simms, Culpepper, and Delhomme? Looking for a miracle.Wondering, given the injury rate of QBs, whether we should pick 4 qbs and only 6 wrs. Or have some roster flexibility, which would certainly open much more variety in who is picked.Couch Potato said:Also, I think the QB position is critical this week. Ownership of any two of Delhomme (28.2 %OWN), Simms (29.5 %OWN), Warner/Leinart (29.1 %OWN combined), McNabb (7.4 %OWN - and he's been carrying these owners), and Culpepper (9.3 %OWN) is going to catch up to a lot of folks this week if their 3rd QB has an off week. It'll be very hard to survive a 1/3 cut with low points at QB. And I don't think much of anyone is going to survive this 1/3 cut if they own 3 QBs with zeroes this week (also including Hasselbeck, T Green, Pennington who are owned by lesser percentages).
Still hanging in without Alexander.Bulger, Darrell Jackson and Driver (somewhat) have carried me. I've only broken above 123 once (Week 3) so without Shaun I doubt I'll make it much further.dudaman said:Brady and Watson - thank you thank you thank youNow if I could get S.A. back.How many S.A. owners are left? Not many, I gather.
Hmmm... rules say they should round 5s to the nearest even number. So 7.45=7.4 (7.55=7.6). Dunno what's going on there or with B. Johnson.Couch Potato said:7.45 to be accurate. So they round up, you round down. It makes sense they round up so they don't have people screamimg they lost the cut by a tenth due to rounding down.bryhamm said:John said:Anyone else see this or am i imagining thisI think you gave Brad Johnson points for Bethel Johnsons catchesI see that they have Delhomme at 6.5, but I calculate 6.4 (7.4 pts for 149 yds passing and -1 pt for 1 int)

What kind of funky rule is that?7.45 is always, always rounded up to 7.5.Hmmm... rules say they should round 5s to the nearest even number. So 7.45=7.4 (7.55=7.6). Dunno what's going on there or with B. Johnson.Couch Potato said:7.45 to be accurate. So they round up, you round down. It makes sense they round up so they don't have people screamimg they lost the cut by a tenth due to rounding down.bryhamm said:John said:Anyone else see this or am i imagining thisI think you gave Brad Johnson points for Bethel Johnsons catchesI see that they have Delhomme at 6.5, but I calculate 6.4 (7.4 pts for 149 yds passing and -1 pt for 1 int)
![]()
Read the rules: http://footballguys.com/06contestrules.htm, Scoring subsection, 10/11 update.Then read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rounding#Round-to-even_methodWhat kind of funky rule is that?7.45 is always, always rounded up to 7.5.Hmmm... rules say they should round 5s to the nearest even number. So 7.45=7.4 (7.55=7.6). Dunno what's going on there or with B. Johnson.![]()
Has nothing to do with even and/or odd numbers.
cool. thanksI never heard of that beforeRead the rules: http://footballguys.com/06contestrules.htm, Scoring subsection, 10/11 update.Then read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rounding#Round-to-even_methodWhat kind of funky rule is that?7.45 is always, always rounded up to 7.5.Hmmm... rules say they should round 5s to the nearest even number. So 7.45=7.4 (7.55=7.6). Dunno what's going on there or with B. Johnson.![]()
Has nothing to do with even and/or odd numbers.
Sheesh, hit that pretty spot on, and people made quite a few posts stating that this was ludicrous after Drinen's initial cut post of 101+. I was doubtful myself it would creep that far on MNF, but forgot that Watson was so widely held.Next weeks 33% cut with this week's scoring would equate to a 126.5 cut line. May be a little lower if nobody goes off like they just did (at least the widely held players), but if you want to feel safe again going into week 10, you'll definitely want to be in the 130's.Hate to admit it, but my team is good, but also HIGHLY unlikely good enough to win the whole thing. I don't think I've come within 15 points of a cut so far, but I'm not going to have a week where I'm different enough to sepatate in the finals when I make it. I stated very early in this thread it takes one kind of team to have a high probability to make the finals, but another team completely different to win the finals. The winner will very probably have several "close calls" with byes and off weeks, but will also have an opportunity to put up some killer numbers when his team is on. Tough part is being lucky enough to survive the close calls, which kills a good number of those teams capable of differentiating in the end. I gave a friend of mine a lineup to use since he was too lazy to pick his own, and using the differentiation strategy and he got bounced in week 3, his only tough bye week (and I am WAAAAY to lazy to have been keeping up to see how he would have fared since). Oh well, I can take some consolation in that I have outlasted roughly 9000 other FBG members, now I just hope to keep it up for another few weeks!For what it's worth, after doing a little research, the 75% cut mark in weeks 3, 4, and 5 were 128.8, 114.3 and 108.9 respectively. In weeks 6 and 7, with 6 teams on bye (and lots of widely held players at that), the 75% cut was 116.4 and 104.1. All that said, I'd guess that the cut will probably be somewhere in the low 120's, and very likely NOT above 130.
I had the same thought that you did. All of my players are through their byes. I figured that it was easier to get through the earlier bye weeks than the later ones.Couch Potato said:I've isolated above the zeroes for the upcoming week. I included backup QBs except Garrard, but not players at other positions if there is a chance they will play. I may have missed one or two, but no one big.With 33% exiting week 9, the high %OWN guys above are more important this week than in any other week. My strategy was to hope to get to this week free of byes, and it's worked out. My only certain zero is Simms.Doug Drinen said:121.5
Percent ownership report:
25.2 percent of all entries are still alive.%OWN = percentage of still-alive rosters that have the given player.%LIVE = percentage of all rosters with the given player that are still alive.Player price %OWN %LIVE----------------------------------------Donovan McNabb 22 7.4 40.6Matt Schaub 5 1.1 29.6Matt Leinart 5 12.6 27.3Jake Delhomme 15 28.2 26.3Jamie Martin 2 1.2 25.2Chris Simms 10 29.5 25.0Jay Cutler 4 2.5 22.3Gus Frerotte 4 0.5 21.1A.J. Feeley 2 1.5 20.8Kellen Clemens 2 2.1 20.6Chad Pennington 7 4.5 20.5Matt Hasselbeck 22 2.1 19.7Kurt Warner 15 16.5 19.4Drew Bledsoe 19 2.0 18.6Craig Nall 2 0.6 18.3Jason Campbell 4 0.2 17.9Daunte Culpepper 18 9.3 17.2Brian Griese 6 2.6 17.0Trent Green 15 3.3 15.9Aaron Brooks 17 1.9 15.8Jay Fiedler 3 0.2 14.3Patrick Ramsey 5 0.1 12.5Billy Volek 10 0.4 8.0Kelly Holcomb 6 0.0 6.7Kyle Boller 5 0.0 6.2Josh McCown 6 0.1 4.3Vernand Morency 1 15.3 27.3Kevan Barlow 6 14.2 26.7Derrick Blaylock 1 3.9 26.7Brian Westbrook 58 1.0 24.8Verron Haynes 3 2.1 24.6DeShaun Foster 28 9.0 23.4DeAngelo Williams 11 6.3 22.3Ryan Moats 3 1.0 18.0Cedric Houston 2 0.7 14.4Edgerrin James 50 1.3 14.1Greg Jones 2 0.6 12.8William Green 2 0.1 12.0J.J. Arrington 1 0.3 9.9Curtis Martin 11 0.2 9.6Shaun Alexander 69 3.6 7.4James Mungro 1 0.1 6.6Antowain Smith 2 0.1 5.0Domanick Davis 41 0.0 0.0Laveranues Coles 19 3.9 31.1Keyshawn Johnson 11 10.9 30.8Reggie Brown 13 10.3 28.2Steve Smith 49 1.7 23.3Corey Bradford 3 5.0 21.4Anquan Boldin 43 2.4 20.9Donte Stallworth 14 8.5 18.0Greg Lewis 2 1.1 15.8David Boston 1 1.9 15.3Keary Colbert 1 1.8 15.1Drew Carter 1 0.5 14.9Robert Ferguson 2 0.9 12.9Sinorice Moss 2 1.4 10.8Todd Pinkston 1 1.1 10.3Justin McCareins 2 0.4 10.0Charles Rogers 1 0.4 9.6Larry Fitzgerald 45 1.9 9.5Scott Vines 1 0.1 9.3Brian Finneran 1 0.2 7.8Koren Robinson 12 0.3 7.6Darius Watts 1 0.1 6.7Peter Warrick 1 0.1 5.3Mike Hass 1 0.0 0.0L.J. Smith 10 7.7 28.2Leonard Pope 1 2.8 20.6Chris Baker 1 0.4 18.2Erron Kinney 2 1.7 18.0Vernon Davis 7 3.8 15.8Kris Mangum 1 0.5 13.9Zach Hilton 6 0.2 7.7Matt Schobel 1 0.1 7.0David Akers 2 18.3 28.4John Kasay 2 11.3 27.1Neil Rackers 4 12.9 23.0Mike Nugent 1 1.2 20.0John Hall 1 1.8 16.3Billy Cundiff 1 0.0 2.5Zac Derr 1 0.0 0.0Arizona Cardinals 2 5.4 29.6Philadelphia Eagles 4 6.4 26.5Carolina Panthers 8 10.6 25.5New York Jets 2 0.8 19.0
As a Gore (74.5 %OWN) and Watson (74.0 %OWN) owner, it would be huge if they have a down week and my other guys at those positions go off big. That kind of advantage would go a long way toward making it in ahead of 75% of the remaining contestants.
Also, I think the QB position is critical this week. Ownership of any two of Delhomme (28.2 %OWN), Simms (29.5 %OWN), Warner/Leinart (29.1 %OWN combined), McNabb (7.4 %OWN - and he's been carrying these owners), and Culpepper (9.3 %OWN) is going to catch up to a lot of folks this week if their 3rd QB has an off week. It'll be very hard to survive a 1/3 cut with low points at QB. And I don't think much of anyone is going to survive this 1/3 cut if they own 3 QBs with zeroes this week (also including Hasselbeck, T Green, Pennington who are owned by lesser percentages).
How about Mcnabb, simms and "i'll take jamie martin for $2, Bob"???Gotta hope for huge games from the rest of my team.Adding Brooks and Bledsoe, 10 of the 32 opening day starters aren't starting week 9. It'll be really tough for you to survive a 33% cut without some very big games elsewhere. Good luck!oso diablo said:so you're saying it's bad to have Simms, Culpepper, and Delhomme? Looking for a miracle.Wondering, given the injury rate of QBs, whether we should pick 4 qbs and only 6 wrs. Or have some roster flexibility, which would certainly open much more variety in who is picked.Couch Potato said:Also, I think the QB position is critical this week. Ownership of any two of Delhomme (28.2 %OWN), Simms (29.5 %OWN), Warner/Leinart (29.1 %OWN combined), McNabb (7.4 %OWN - and he's been carrying these owners), and Culpepper (9.3 %OWN) is going to catch up to a lot of folks this week if their 3rd QB has an off week. It'll be very hard to survive a 1/3 cut with low points at QB. And I don't think much of anyone is going to survive this 1/3 cut if they own 3 QBs with zeroes this week (also including Hasselbeck, T Green, Pennington who are owned by lesser percentages).
It's a good point that it could be an against the grain team that wins it all. But in my view it could also easily be a team comprised of a lot of commonly held players but that has no flaws and where some of the less-owned players on the team come through. So if guys like Gore and Watson and Parker and Glenn do well in the key 4 weeks, it may well be someone who owns all of them who wins. But it will be by a smaller margin, and they'll need to have a few of their lesser-owned players really get some good scores. So for example, my team has a lot of commonly held players, but I think I'm screwed not because of that alone, but instead because I have Simms who is obviously of no use, and I have Clayton who has been of little use, and guys like Galloway and Troupe have underperformed (why did I rely on the Tampa passing game so heavily of all things?Sheesh, hit that pretty spot on, and people made quite a few posts stating that this was ludicrous after Drinen's initial cut post of 101+. I was doubtful myself it would creep that far on MNF, but forgot that Watson was so widely held.Next weeks 33% cut with this week's scoring would equate to a 126.5 cut line. May be a little lower if nobody goes off like they just did (at least the widely held players), but if you want to feel safe again going into week 10, you'll definitely want to be in the 130's.Hate to admit it, but my team is good, but also HIGHLY unlikely good enough to win the whole thing. I don't think I've come within 15 points of a cut so far, but I'm not going to have a week where I'm different enough to sepatate in the finals when I make it. I stated very early in this thread it takes one kind of team to have a high probability to make the finals, but another team completely different to win the finals. The winner will very probably have several "close calls" with byes and off weeks, but will also have an opportunity to put up some killer numbers when his team is on. Tough part is being lucky enough to survive the close calls, which kills a good number of those teams capable of differentiating in the end. I gave a friend of mine a lineup to use since he was too lazy to pick his own, and using the differentiation strategy and he got bounced in week 3, his only tough bye week (and I am WAAAAY to lazy to have been keeping up to see how he would have fared since). Oh well, I can take some consolation in that I have outlasted roughly 9000 other FBG members, now I just hope to keep it up for another few weeks!For what it's worth, after doing a little research, the 75% cut mark in weeks 3, 4, and 5 were 128.8, 114.3 and 108.9 respectively. In weeks 6 and 7, with 6 teams on bye (and lots of widely held players at that), the 75% cut was 116.4 and 104.1. All that said, I'd guess that the cut will probably be somewhere in the low 120's, and very likely NOT above 130.
). I do have some not as commonly held players like Vick who help me. I'm sure there are teams out there that have a lot of commonly held players but still have everyone contributing and have a few guys that set them apart - and it's fairly likely that someone like that could win too.Actually it can go about 3000! ways considering there are multiple prizes.Actually it can go about 3000 different ways-QG

The theoretical value is $25,000/3,000=$8.33 based on 1st place alone, assuming all entries have an equal chance (of course, they don't). As Gamblor above posted, based on total prizes of $50,000 each entry is worth $16.67.For those who advance after week 9, the values become $12.50 and $25.Interesting question for everyone - if you make the final 2,000 and someone offered you $25 for your entry, would take it?I was actually thinking (hypothetically of course)- how much could I sell my entry for? It's basically a "ticket" for a 1 in 3000 chance of winning $25,000 along with more chances to win lesser amounts. That must have some valueOk this week was a little nerve racking - not sure if I can take that again. What say the 3000 of us left chop the prze and take home $16.67 each?
No way.Interesting question for everyone - if you make the final 2,000 and someone offered you $25 for your entry, would take it?