What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Sunday Trivia (1 Viewer)

Chase Stuart

Footballguy
Name the only four eight RBs since the merger to not rank in the top 10 fantasy RBs in any of their first five seasons, but would rank in the top 10 in at least one season in their career.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Name the only four RBs since the merger to not rank in the top 10 fantasy RBs in any of their first five seasons, but would rank in the top 10 in at least one season in their career.
Wow, excellent question. Let me mull this one a bit. :goodposting:Lamont Jordan would be my first guess.
 
Charles White
:unsure:White is correct. But he wasn't in my initial query. I have no idea how I didn't catch him. I gotta think for a minute and see what I did wrong. :( , tho.
White didn't play in 1983, which would have been his fourth season in the league. That's what caused the problem. He's not showing up as not top ten in his fourth year because he didn't play in that season; so I suppose any RB that missed a full year in his first five seasons would have been missed. I'll see if I can quickly find out how many, if any, other RBs were accidentally excluded.
 
Thomas Jones?
this was going to be my guess (all depending on 2005):+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| Year TM | G | Att Yards Y/A TD | Rec Yards Y/R TD |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| 2000 ari | 14 | 112 373 3.3 2 | 32 208 6.5 0 || 2001 ari | 16 | 112 380 3.4 5 | 21 151 7.2 0 || 2002 ari | 9 | 138 511 3.7 2 | 20 113 5.7 0 || 2003 tam | 16 | 137 627 4.6 3 | 24 180 7.5 0 || 2004 chi | 14 | 240 948 4.0 7 | 56 427 7.6 0 || 2005 chi | 15 | 314 1335 4.3 9 | 26 143 5.5 0 || 2006 chi | 16 | 296 1210 4.1 6 | 36 154 4.3 0 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| TOTAL | 100 | 1349 5384 4.0 34 | 215 1376 6.4 0 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
 
Garrison Hearst??

+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+

| Year TM | G | Att Yards Y/A TD | Rec Yards Y/R TD |

+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+

| 1993 pho | 6 | 76 264 3.5 1 | 6 18 3.0 0 |

| 1994 ari | 9 | 37 169 4.6 1 | 6 49 8.2 0 |

| 1995 ari | 16 | 284 1070 3.8 1 | 29 243 8.4 1 |

| 1996 cin | 16 | 225 847 3.8 0 | 12 131 10.9 1 |

| 1997 sfo | 13 | 234 1019 4.4 4 | 21 194 9.2 2 |

| 1998 sfo | 16 | 310 1570 5.1 7 | 39 535 13.7 2 |

| 2001 sfo | 16 | 252 1206 4.8 4 | 41 347 8.5 1 |

| 2002 sfo | 16 | 215 972 4.5 8 | 48 317 6.6 1 |

| 2003 sfo | 12 | 178 768 4.3 3 | 25 211 8.4 1 |

| 2004 den | 6 | 20 81 4.0 1 | 2 20 10.0 0 |

+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+

| TOTAL | 126 | 1831 7966 4.4 30 | 229 2065 9.0 9

from p-f-r.com

 
Garrison Hearst??+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| Year TM | G | Att Yards Y/A TD | Rec Yards Y/R TD |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| 1993 pho | 6 | 76 264 3.5 1 | 6 18 3.0 0 || 1994 ari | 9 | 37 169 4.6 1 | 6 49 8.2 0 || 1995 ari | 16 | 284 1070 3.8 1 | 29 243 8.4 1 || 1996 cin | 16 | 225 847 3.8 0 | 12 131 10.9 1 || 1997 sfo | 13 | 234 1019 4.4 4 | 21 194 9.2 2 || 1998 sfo | 16 | 310 1570 5.1 7 | 39 535 13.7 2 || 2001 sfo | 16 | 252 1206 4.8 4 | 41 347 8.5 1 || 2002 sfo | 16 | 215 972 4.5 8 | 48 317 6.6 1 || 2003 sfo | 12 | 178 768 4.3 3 | 25 211 8.4 1 || 2004 den | 6 | 20 81 4.0 1 | 2 20 10.0 0 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| TOTAL | 126 | 1831 7966 4.4 30 | 229 2065 9.0 9 from p-f-r.com
:(More egg on my face, here. A stupid typing error caused me to miss Hearst here. Hearst, Riggins, Barber, Jones are correct. There are still two more.
 
He didn't achieve a higher rank in his 8th year rather than his 7th?
He ranked 12th in his 7th year and 14th in his 8th year. Regardless, none of those were top ten seasons. Do you see something differently?
 
Charles White
:unsure:White is correct. But he wasn't in my initial query. I have no idea how I didn't catch him. I gotta think for a minute and see what I did wrong. :( , tho.
White didn't play in 1983, which would have been his fourth season in the league. That's what caused the problem. He's not showing up as not top ten in his fourth year because he didn't play in that season; so I suppose any RB that missed a full year in his first five seasons would have been missed. I'll see if I can quickly find out how many, if any, other RBs were accidentally excluded.
One other RB was excluded. I also missed on the first go around a RB that did not rank in the top 10 in his first five years, but ranked 10th later on (I think I was looking at lower than 10th in my initial search, so I missed him).That means there are two more to find. :bag:
 
How about Charlie Garner?

+--------------------------+-------------------------+

| Rushing | Receiving |

+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+

| Year TM | G | Att Yards Y/A TD | Rec Yards Y/R TD |

+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+

| 1994 phi | 10 | 109 399 3.7 3 | 8 74 9.2 0 |

| 1995 phi | 15 | 108 588 5.4 6 | 10 61 6.1 0 |

| 1996 phi | 15 | 66 346 5.2 1 | 14 92 6.6 0 |

| 1997 phi | 16 | 116 547 4.7 3 | 24 225 9.4 0 |

| 1998 phi | 10 | 96 381 4.0 4 | 19 110 5.8 0 |

| 1999 sfo | 16 | 241 1229 5.1 4 | 56 535 9.6 2 |

| 2000 sfo | 16 | 258 1142 4.4 7 | 68 647 9.5 3 |

| 2001 oak | 16 | 211 839 4.0 1 | 72 578 8.0 2 |

| 2002 oak | 16 | 182 962 5.3 7 | 91 941 10.3 4 |

| 2003 oak | 14 | 120 553 4.6 3 | 48 386 8.0 1 |

| 2004 tam | 3 | 30 111 3.7 0 | 9 62 6.9 0 |

+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+

| TOTAL | 147 | 1537 7097 4.6 39 | 419 3711 8.9 12 |

+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+

 
How about Charlie Garner? +--------------------------+-------------------------+ | Rushing | Receiving |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| Year TM | G | Att Yards Y/A TD | Rec Yards Y/R TD |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| 1994 phi | 10 | 109 399 3.7 3 | 8 74 9.2 0 || 1995 phi | 15 | 108 588 5.4 6 | 10 61 6.1 0 || 1996 phi | 15 | 66 346 5.2 1 | 14 92 6.6 0 || 1997 phi | 16 | 116 547 4.7 3 | 24 225 9.4 0 || 1998 phi | 10 | 96 381 4.0 4 | 19 110 5.8 0 || 1999 sfo | 16 | 241 1229 5.1 4 | 56 535 9.6 2 || 2000 sfo | 16 | 258 1142 4.4 7 | 68 647 9.5 3 || 2001 oak | 16 | 211 839 4.0 1 | 72 578 8.0 2 || 2002 oak | 16 | 182 962 5.3 7 | 91 941 10.3 4 || 2003 oak | 14 | 120 553 4.6 3 | 48 386 8.0 1 || 2004 tam | 3 | 30 111 3.7 0 | 9 62 6.9 0 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| TOTAL | 147 | 1537 7097 4.6 39 | 419 3711 8.9 12 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
Garner is correct. I actually thought the first three would be pretty easy: Garner, Barber and Jones. The (original) last one is a little tougher, but someone should get it soon.But there are still three out there (after I found two more).
 
Hint/Clarifier: One of the remaining players missed a couple of seasons. So he did not rank in the top 10 in any of the first five years after he was drafted, but he did technically rank in the top 10 in his first five years of actually playing. But I'm counting him.

 
Hint/Clarifier: One of the remaining players missed a couple of seasons. So he did not rank in the top 10 in any of the first five years after he was drafted, but he did technically rank in the top 10 in his first five years of actually playing. But I'm counting him.
USFL?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top