What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

T.O. starting to complain! (1 Viewer)

From the Dallas Morning News Cowboys blog.

The Cowboys know they have an excellent weapon in Terrell Owens. Against the Redskins, the Cowboys may have tried to force it to T.O. way too much.

Owens had seven catches for 71 yards and bulled his way into the end zone for a 10-yard touchdown in the third quarter. But Shawn Springs smothered Owens in the first half, and Carlos Rogers took over in the second when Springs suffered a calf injury.

The Cowboys ran 58 offensive plays. They threw it to him 18 times and let Owens run it twice on two end-arounds. Yet when asked if the ball was thrown his way often enough, Owens said: "I would say no. I'm a competitor, and I want the ball.

"There were some opportunities there, and there were some opportunities there where they were holding and the refs just didn't call it. You can't blame the refs; we just didn't make the plays.

"Everybody recognized that I wasn't really getting the ball in the first half," Owens said. "I'm pretty sure everybody watching the game recognized it, people in the stands recognized it, I think my team recognized it. I didn't quit. I kept fighting and trying to running my routes and trying to get open."

(Dallas Morning News photo by Milton Hinnant)
From the next post.
Terence Newman was terrible, but at least he admits it

Unlike a certain superstar wide receiver, Pro Bowl CB Terence Newman can admit when he doesn't play well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
7 catches 2 carries, says should of had more plays.
He is probably right as the team lost to a team that they should not have. The man wants to help his team out, do want him to sit around on his hands. Wanting the ball to make plays is not an issue in my book.
 
7 catches 2 carries, says should of had more plays.
He is probably right as the team lost to a team that they should not have. The man wants to help his team out, do want him to sit around on his hands. Wanting the ball to make plays is not an issue in my book.
Saying that 18 targets isn't enough isn't a problem. I'm a huge Cowboys fan, and I've been pretty pleased with him, but now's not the time. The problem is that they forced the damn ball to him too much, not that he didn't get it enough.
 
Shocking that someone would try to get Owens to say that he didn't get targetted enough, then blow Owens' response out of proportion.

 
From the Dallas Morning News Cowboys blog.

The Cowboys know they have an excellent weapon in Terrell Owens. Against the Redskins, the Cowboys may have tried to force it to T.O. way too much.

Owens had seven catches for 71 yards and bulled his way into the end zone for a 10-yard touchdown in the third quarter. But Shawn Springs smothered Owens in the first half, and Carlos Rogers took over in the second when Springs suffered a calf injury.

The Cowboys ran 58 offensive plays. They threw it to him 18 times and let Owens run it twice on two end-arounds. Yet when asked if the ball was thrown his way often enough, Owens said: "I would say no. I'm a competitor, and I want the ball.

"There were some opportunities there, and there were some opportunities there where they were holding and the refs just didn't call it. You can't blame the refs; we just didn't make the plays.

"Everybody recognized that I wasn't really getting the ball in the first half," Owens said. "I'm pretty sure everybody watching the game recognized it, people in the stands recognized it, I think my team recognized it. I didn't quit. I kept fighting and trying to running my routes and trying to get open."

(Dallas Morning News photo by Milton Hinnant)
From the next post.
Terence Newman was terrible, but at least he admits it

Unlike a certain superstar wide receiver, Pro Bowl CB Terence Newman can admit when he doesn't play well.
Thanks much for that! :confused: It will be interesting to see how this plays out...both 9ers and Eagles fans have fallen in love with this guy and been burned...time to see whether Dallas fans are as impervious as they thought they were.

 
You aren't quoting the full story. He said he ran great routes, and was open all night, but the ball went elsewhere. I'm not a TO hater, but he was a total d!ckhole saying that...

 
Shocking that someone would try to get Owens to say that he didn't get targetted enough, then blow Owens' response out of proportion.
Exactly.....what is he supposed to say? That he got the ball enough and made enough big plays in their loss? They lost to a rival and he's frustrated.If anyone didn't get the ball enough it's Marion Barber. I thought the Cowboys play calling was poor and that they didn't stick with the running game enough early on.I also think the Dallas D wasn't that good. I keep hearing everyone saying how good they are and I don't see it. I don't thin their bad, but they're not some great defense that people can move the ball on.Philly moved the ball on them; Cleveland didn't but their terrible; Green Bay not a ton but a little; and they couldn't keep Washington off the field when they needed to.I'd put the Dallas D in the top half of the league but they're going to have to improve to be a top 10 D IMO. I love defense and I didn't like what I saw in Dallas today.
 
Barber's the one who should be complaining about lack of activity.Neglecting the run is why Dallas lost.
:goodposting: That offense keys off of Barber, not Romo or TO. They forgot their roots and fell in love with the pass today, and the end result is that nothing worked well when they needed it to.
 
Maybe someone could explain why everytime Dalas gets a little behind they completely abandon the run?

Barber only had like 10 carries, that's the biggest reason they lost the game, and no Felix Jones either, the running game has been central to them winning the first 3 weeks.

 
Shocking that someone would try to get Owens to say that he didn't get targetted enough, then blow Owens' response out of proportion.
I'd put the Dallas D in the top half of the league but they're going to have to improve to be a top 10 D IMO. I love defense and I didn't like what I saw in Dallas today.
Time of posession: Skins 38 minutes, Boys 22 minutes.That was the story of the game, not Mr. Owens.
 
You aren't quoting the full story. He said he ran great routes, and was open all night, but the ball went elsewhere. I'm not a TO hater, but he was a total d!ckhole saying that...
OK. Please show me the part I missed hereCowboys blog
I watched him say it on live TV. Its fine saying I want the ball more, the great ones do. But he made it a point to say, I was open, and the ball was going elsewhere. He was knocking Romo's decision making. Defend him if you want, but those kind of comments are what cause friction in locker rooms. Anyway, nice win for the Skins, who along with the Giants, are the best teams in the NFC east right now. :rolleyes:
 
You aren't quoting the full story. He said he ran great routes, and was open all night, but the ball went elsewhere. I'm not a TO hater, but he was a total d!ckhole saying that...
OK. Please show me the part I missed hereCowboys blog
I watched him say it on live TV. Its fine saying I want the ball more, the great ones do. But he made it a point to say, I was open, and the ball was going elsewhere. He was knocking Romo's decision making. Defend him if you want, but those kind of comments are what cause friction in locker rooms. Anyway, nice win for the Skins, who along with the Giants, are the best teams in the NFC east right now. :rolleyes:
I agree that he's become a bit of a turd over the last couple weeks.
 
You aren't quoting the full story. He said he ran great routes, and was open all night, but the ball went elsewhere. I'm not a TO hater, but he was a total d!ckhole saying that...
OK. Please show me the part I missed hereCowboys blog
I watched him say it on live TV. Its fine saying I want the ball more, the great ones do. But he made it a point to say, I was open, and the ball was going elsewhere. He was knocking Romo's decision making. Defend him if you want, but those kind of comments are what cause friction in locker rooms. Anyway, nice win for the Skins, who along with the Giants, are the best teams in the NFC east right now. :thumbdown:
I agree that he's become a bit of a turd over the last couple weeks.
It's a predictable pattern. The guy's an all-time great talent, but he's ultimately a fair weather friend. Romo will play it off with a lot of grace as that's his way of dealing with things, but we'll see what happens if there's another loss or (more likely) another quiet night for TO next week.
 
The Boys didn't lose this game because TO didn't get enough looks, it's because MBIII didn't.

How can you only call 10 running plays?

WAS was missing their best defender, and you only run the ball 10 times(11 if you count Romo's run)??????

WTF?????

 
I agree that he is a competitor but I will also a agree that he is not a winner. He has no rings, no MVP's all he does is bring attention to him in a negative way. Being a lifelong Cowboy's fan I am so fed up now how these players start crying and whining if they don't get the ball. Let the coaches handle the media. Dorsett, Hill, Pearson, Staubach and White you never saw them in front of the media preaching about the play calling. TO if you truly want to be in the Ring of Honor and you respect the STAR shut the F up and play the game; after the game take a shower and go your way stop being a media W%O#E

 
You aren't quoting the full story. He said he ran great routes, and was open all night, but the ball went elsewhere. I'm not a TO hater, but he was a total d!ckhole saying that...
OK. Please show me the part I missed hereCowboys blog
I watched him say it on live TV. Its fine saying I want the ball more, the great ones do. But he made it a point to say, I was open, and the ball was going elsewhere. He was knocking Romo's decision making. Defend him if you want, but those kind of comments are what cause friction in locker rooms. Anyway, nice win for the Skins, who along with the Giants, are the best teams in the NFC east right now. :sarcasm:
I agree that he's become a bit of a turd over the last couple weeks.
It's a predictable pattern. The guy's an all-time great talent, but he's ultimately a fair weather friend. Romo will play it off with a lot of grace as that's his way of dealing with things, but we'll see what happens if there's another loss or (more likely) another quiet night for TO next week.
please please please happen. :D
 
The Boys didn't lose this game because TO didn't get enough looks, it's because MBIII didn't.How can you only call 10 running plays?WAS was missing their best defender, and you only run the ball 10 times(11 if you count Romo's run)??????WTF?????
Actually, in an odd sort of way, Washington's D-line may have been more stout against the run without Taylor in there. Demetric Evans is not a bad lineman at all, but more to the point I'm sure the Cowboys would have run at Taylor all day with Barber. There was a Vermeil quote I highlighted earlier this week that got to the point: With passing plays, it's about quality; with running plays, it's about quantity. Dallas didn't do enough with the run to enable there to be enough doubt in the defense to allow them to pass well.
 
The Boys didn't lose this game because TO didn't get enough looks, it's because MBIII didn't.How can you only call 10 running plays?WAS was missing their best defender, and you only run the ball 10 times(11 if you count Romo's run)??????WTF?????
My opinion: The Redskin run D was very, very good today. Maybe the Cowboys didn't call a lot of running plays because they knew they could not run on the Redskins. Of course, if you don't call running plays, then you really can't run the ball.
 
I remember Owens had at least 2 drops (maybe more?) and comments like he makes rankles me more when the ball does reach the receiver but they drop it instead of actually catching it.

I hate when receivers have a game where they drop several balls and then talk about how they just weren't making plays (partly blaming the QB for not delivering the ball to help make the big play) or not being thrown to when the opportunity presented itself.

 
better trade TO away, this is the beginning of the end. i predict he'll be suspended before the next game.

 
I called this in the game thread. We all knew it was just a matter of time. TO will soon throw Romo under the bus.

 
Whole lot of whiners in this thread.

T.O. wants the ball. Every player does.

A reporter baits him and then slams him. Oh joy. Owens answered it correctly.

Bradshaw baited Romo this week, but Romo said pretty much the same thing. Playmakers want the ball.

All targets are not catchable. A thrown away pass is still put towards someone as a target (usually the outside WR).

I watched the game. Romo wasn't all that accurate deep to Owens. He was accurate midrange to Witten and Crayton though.

 
A team should always get their top receiving option the ball. That's why Witten catches so many passes.

No, not fishing. I think Witten is clearly the top target for what the Cowboys want to do. Owens is a more talented receiver, but the offense doesn't go through Owens. It goes through Barber and Witten. Their plays help get Owens open for his.

I understand he doesn't like to lose. But 18 targets is too much for Owens imo. He needs to see the ball less and make more with what he does get (fewer drops). The problem wasn't that Owens didn't get the ball enough. The problem was that Washington shut down the run and kept the ball away from Romo with sustained drives.

 
A team should always get their top receiving option the ball. That's why Witten catches so many passes.

No, not fishing. I think Witten is clearly the top target for what the Cowboys want to do. Owens is a more talented receiver, but the offense doesn't go through Owens. It goes through Barber and Witten. Their plays help get Owens open for his.

I understand he doesn't like to lose. But 18 targets is too much for Owens imo. He needs to see the ball less and make more with what he does get (fewer drops). The problem wasn't that Owens didn't get the ball enough. The problem was that Washington shut down the run and kept the ball away from Romo with sustained drives.
:thumbup:
All afternoon, Campbell and the Redskins had maintained a commanding grip on the football. Their first possession had lasted four minutes and 29 seconds. Another went 5:05 ... 4:55 ...4:24 ... 6:54.

"If you don’t stop the run, you let teams stick around," Cowboys linebacker Bradie James said.

After their own opening possession, meanwhile, the Cowboys’ offense never had a drive that lasted longer than 2:35. Washington’s total time with the football measured 38:09 to the Cowboys’ 21:51.
Link
 
The Boys didn't lose this game because TO didn't get enough looks, it's because MBIII didn't.How can you only call 10 running plays?WAS was missing their best defender, and you only run the ball 10 times(11 if you count Romo's run)??????WTF?????
No, the boys lost because they couldn't stop the Redskins. How many times did the skins punt?
 
A team should always get their top receiving option the ball. That's why Witten catches so many passes.No, not fishing. I think Witten is clearly the top target for what the Cowboys want to do. Owens is a more talented receiver, but the offense doesn't go through Owens. It goes through Barber and Witten. Their plays help get Owens open for his. I understand he doesn't like to lose. But 18 targets is too much for Owens imo. He needs to see the ball less and make more with what he does get (fewer drops). The problem wasn't that Owens didn't get the ball enough. The problem was that Washington shut down the run and kept the ball away from Romo with sustained drives.
yup clearly witten is romo's go to guy. he's the only player that can consistently get open against anyone. and witten also makes adjustments to help out romo if the ball is inaccurate.although TO is still dominant, the problem is the team speed on dallas at the other positions. hurd/crayton don't scare anyone, neither does barber with his speed. he can get the 1st downs, but he's not going to break a long one on you. and austin is still too green to make the proper adjustments or get open.amazingly, the dallas offense should get even better as the year goes on. they'll either get LG kosier healthy or montrae holland will be able to play because right now proctor is playing horrible. the guy was personally responsible for almost all the run stuffs. and they'll trust felix, bennett, and austin more.
 
Actually, in an odd sort of way, Washington's D-line may have been more stout against the run without Taylor in there. Demetric Evans is not a bad lineman at all, but more to the point I'm sure the Cowboys would have run at Taylor all day with Barber.
It was quite obvious they were better against the run with Evans replacing Taylor. A lot of us noticed that. The other thing worth mentioning is that Owens was targeted about 19 times, but Springs and Rogers (after Springs got hurt) covered him tightly, with Springs shoving him around a good bit. On many of those targets Owens was not open, and there's some talk that near the end of the game he wasn't even finishing his routes.
 
Winners always want the ball.
:wolf:Winners always want to do whatever will help the team win the most. That doesn't always mean giving (never mind trying to force) them the ball FYI.Attention whores and spoiled brats always want the ball.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top