ChrisCooleyFan
Footballguy
7 catches 2 carries, says should of had more plays.
Could you please link an article if you're going to make a statement like that?7 catches 2 carries, says should of had more plays.
Normally I HATE the F'ing link police, but I have to agree on this one. Even if he said it, I'm guessing it's out of frustration and/or blown out of proportion, as he's been great in Dallas.Could you please link an article if you're going to make a statement like that?7 catches 2 carries, says should of had more plays.
His Presser was just on the Redskins Post game show. Trying to find a link.Could you please link an article if you're going to make a statement like that?7 catches 2 carries, says should of had more plays.
From the next post.The Cowboys know they have an excellent weapon in Terrell Owens. Against the Redskins, the Cowboys may have tried to force it to T.O. way too much.
Owens had seven catches for 71 yards and bulled his way into the end zone for a 10-yard touchdown in the third quarter. But Shawn Springs smothered Owens in the first half, and Carlos Rogers took over in the second when Springs suffered a calf injury.
The Cowboys ran 58 offensive plays. They threw it to him 18 times and let Owens run it twice on two end-arounds. Yet when asked if the ball was thrown his way often enough, Owens said: "I would say no. I'm a competitor, and I want the ball.
"There were some opportunities there, and there were some opportunities there where they were holding and the refs just didn't call it. You can't blame the refs; we just didn't make the plays.
"Everybody recognized that I wasn't really getting the ball in the first half," Owens said. "I'm pretty sure everybody watching the game recognized it, people in the stands recognized it, I think my team recognized it. I didn't quit. I kept fighting and trying to running my routes and trying to get open."
(Dallas Morning News photo by Milton Hinnant)
Terence Newman was terrible, but at least he admits it
Unlike a certain superstar wide receiver, Pro Bowl CB Terence Newman can admit when he doesn't play well.
He is probably right as the team lost to a team that they should not have. The man wants to help his team out, do want him to sit around on his hands. Wanting the ball to make plays is not an issue in my book.7 catches 2 carries, says should of had more plays.
Saying that 18 targets isn't enough isn't a problem. I'm a huge Cowboys fan, and I've been pretty pleased with him, but now's not the time. The problem is that they forced the damn ball to him too much, not that he didn't get it enough.He is probably right as the team lost to a team that they should not have. The man wants to help his team out, do want him to sit around on his hands. Wanting the ball to make plays is not an issue in my book.7 catches 2 carries, says should of had more plays.
Thanks much for that!From the Dallas Morning News Cowboys blog.
From the next post.The Cowboys know they have an excellent weapon in Terrell Owens. Against the Redskins, the Cowboys may have tried to force it to T.O. way too much.
Owens had seven catches for 71 yards and bulled his way into the end zone for a 10-yard touchdown in the third quarter. But Shawn Springs smothered Owens in the first half, and Carlos Rogers took over in the second when Springs suffered a calf injury.
The Cowboys ran 58 offensive plays. They threw it to him 18 times and let Owens run it twice on two end-arounds. Yet when asked if the ball was thrown his way often enough, Owens said: "I would say no. I'm a competitor, and I want the ball.
"There were some opportunities there, and there were some opportunities there where they were holding and the refs just didn't call it. You can't blame the refs; we just didn't make the plays.
"Everybody recognized that I wasn't really getting the ball in the first half," Owens said. "I'm pretty sure everybody watching the game recognized it, people in the stands recognized it, I think my team recognized it. I didn't quit. I kept fighting and trying to running my routes and trying to get open."
(Dallas Morning News photo by Milton Hinnant)Terence Newman was terrible, but at least he admits it
Unlike a certain superstar wide receiver, Pro Bowl CB Terence Newman can admit when he doesn't play well.
OK. Please show me the part I missed hereCowboys blogYou aren't quoting the full story. He said he ran great routes, and was open all night, but the ball went elsewhere. I'm not a TO hater, but he was a total d!ckhole saying that...
Exactly.....what is he supposed to say? That he got the ball enough and made enough big plays in their loss? They lost to a rival and he's frustrated.If anyone didn't get the ball enough it's Marion Barber. I thought the Cowboys play calling was poor and that they didn't stick with the running game enough early on.I also think the Dallas D wasn't that good. I keep hearing everyone saying how good they are and I don't see it. I don't thin their bad, but they're not some great defense that people can move the ball on.Philly moved the ball on them; Cleveland didn't but their terrible; Green Bay not a ton but a little; and they couldn't keep Washington off the field when they needed to.I'd put the Dallas D in the top half of the league but they're going to have to improve to be a top 10 D IMO. I love defense and I didn't like what I saw in Dallas today.Shocking that someone would try to get Owens to say that he didn't get targetted enough, then blow Owens' response out of proportion.
Dallas lost because they aren't a very good team, the Redskins are the better team.Barber's the one who should be complaining about lack of activity.Neglecting the run is why Dallas lost.
I think Philly and and Green Bay may disagree. Take your fishing pole and go home troll.Dallas lost because they aren't a very good team, the Redskins are the better team.Barber's the one who should be complaining about lack of activity.
Neglecting the run is why Dallas lost.
Reported. Why get personal?I think Philly and and Green Bay may disagree. Take your fishing pole and go home troll.Dallas lost because they aren't a very good team, the Redskins are the better team.Barber's the one who should be complaining about lack of activity.
Neglecting the run is why Dallas lost.
Barber's the one who should be complaining about lack of activity.Neglecting the run is why Dallas lost.
Time of posession: Skins 38 minutes, Boys 22 minutes.That was the story of the game, not Mr. Owens.I'd put the Dallas D in the top half of the league but they're going to have to improve to be a top 10 D IMO. I love defense and I didn't like what I saw in Dallas today.Shocking that someone would try to get Owens to say that he didn't get targetted enough, then blow Owens' response out of proportion.
Owens has never won.Winners always want the ball.
You misspelled "whiners".Winners always want the ball.
I watched him say it on live TV. Its fine saying I want the ball more, the great ones do. But he made it a point to say, I was open, and the ball was going elsewhere. He was knocking Romo's decision making. Defend him if you want, but those kind of comments are what cause friction in locker rooms. Anyway, nice win for the Skins, who along with the Giants, are the best teams in the NFC east right now.OK. Please show me the part I missed hereCowboys blogYou aren't quoting the full story. He said he ran great routes, and was open all night, but the ball went elsewhere. I'm not a TO hater, but he was a total d!ckhole saying that...
I agree that he's become a bit of a turd over the last couple weeks.I watched him say it on live TV. Its fine saying I want the ball more, the great ones do. But he made it a point to say, I was open, and the ball was going elsewhere. He was knocking Romo's decision making. Defend him if you want, but those kind of comments are what cause friction in locker rooms. Anyway, nice win for the Skins, who along with the Giants, are the best teams in the NFC east right now.OK. Please show me the part I missed hereCowboys blogYou aren't quoting the full story. He said he ran great routes, and was open all night, but the ball went elsewhere. I'm not a TO hater, but he was a total d!ckhole saying that...![]()
Tattle Tail.Reported. Why get personal?I think Philly and and Green Bay may disagree. Take your fishing pole and go home troll.Dallas lost because they aren't a very good team, the Redskins are the better team.Barber's the one who should be complaining about lack of activity.
Neglecting the run is why Dallas lost.![]()
Remember Tony is ''his QB''This is a big "rut roh" for Romo and Owens owners...
It's a predictable pattern. The guy's an all-time great talent, but he's ultimately a fair weather friend. Romo will play it off with a lot of grace as that's his way of dealing with things, but we'll see what happens if there's another loss or (more likely) another quiet night for TO next week.I agree that he's become a bit of a turd over the last couple weeks.I watched him say it on live TV. Its fine saying I want the ball more, the great ones do. But he made it a point to say, I was open, and the ball was going elsewhere. He was knocking Romo's decision making. Defend him if you want, but those kind of comments are what cause friction in locker rooms. Anyway, nice win for the Skins, who along with the Giants, are the best teams in the NFC east right now.OK. Please show me the part I missed hereCowboys blogYou aren't quoting the full story. He said he ran great routes, and was open all night, but the ball went elsewhere. I'm not a TO hater, but he was a total d!ckhole saying that...![]()
please please please happen.It's a predictable pattern. The guy's an all-time great talent, but he's ultimately a fair weather friend. Romo will play it off with a lot of grace as that's his way of dealing with things, but we'll see what happens if there's another loss or (more likely) another quiet night for TO next week.I agree that he's become a bit of a turd over the last couple weeks.I watched him say it on live TV. Its fine saying I want the ball more, the great ones do. But he made it a point to say, I was open, and the ball was going elsewhere. He was knocking Romo's decision making. Defend him if you want, but those kind of comments are what cause friction in locker rooms. Anyway, nice win for the Skins, who along with the Giants, are the best teams in the NFC east right now.OK. Please show me the part I missed hereCowboys blogYou aren't quoting the full story. He said he ran great routes, and was open all night, but the ball went elsewhere. I'm not a TO hater, but he was a total d!ckhole saying that...![]()
Actually, in an odd sort of way, Washington's D-line may have been more stout against the run without Taylor in there. Demetric Evans is not a bad lineman at all, but more to the point I'm sure the Cowboys would have run at Taylor all day with Barber. There was a Vermeil quote I highlighted earlier this week that got to the point: With passing plays, it's about quality; with running plays, it's about quantity. Dallas didn't do enough with the run to enable there to be enough doubt in the defense to allow them to pass well.The Boys didn't lose this game because TO didn't get enough looks, it's because MBIII didn't.How can you only call 10 running plays?WAS was missing their best defender, and you only run the ball 10 times(11 if you count Romo's run)??????WTF?????
My opinion: The Redskin run D was very, very good today. Maybe the Cowboys didn't call a lot of running plays because they knew they could not run on the Redskins. Of course, if you don't call running plays, then you really can't run the ball.The Boys didn't lose this game because TO didn't get enough looks, it's because MBIII didn't.How can you only call 10 running plays?WAS was missing their best defender, and you only run the ball 10 times(11 if you count Romo's run)??????WTF?????
17 targets, 2 runs and he is still is whiny little #####. Eight figure talent and a 10-cent brain LMAOShocking that someone would try to get Owens to say that he didn't get targetted enough, then blow Owens' response out of proportion.
A team should always get their top receiving option the ball. That's why Witten catches so many passes.
No, not fishing. I think Witten is clearly the top target for what the Cowboys want to do. Owens is a more talented receiver, but the offense doesn't go through Owens. It goes through Barber and Witten. Their plays help get Owens open for his.
I understand he doesn't like to lose. But 18 targets is too much for Owens imo. He needs to see the ball less and make more with what he does get (fewer drops). The problem wasn't that Owens didn't get the ball enough. The problem was that Washington shut down the run and kept the ball away from Romo with sustained drives.
LinkAll afternoon, Campbell and the Redskins had maintained a commanding grip on the football. Their first possession had lasted four minutes and 29 seconds. Another went 5:05 ... 4:55 ...4:24 ... 6:54.
"If you don’t stop the run, you let teams stick around," Cowboys linebacker Bradie James said.
After their own opening possession, meanwhile, the Cowboys’ offense never had a drive that lasted longer than 2:35. Washington’s total time with the football measured 38:09 to the Cowboys’ 21:51.
No, the boys lost because they couldn't stop the Redskins. How many times did the skins punt?The Boys didn't lose this game because TO didn't get enough looks, it's because MBIII didn't.How can you only call 10 running plays?WAS was missing their best defender, and you only run the ball 10 times(11 if you count Romo's run)??????WTF?????
yup clearly witten is romo's go to guy. he's the only player that can consistently get open against anyone. and witten also makes adjustments to help out romo if the ball is inaccurate.although TO is still dominant, the problem is the team speed on dallas at the other positions. hurd/crayton don't scare anyone, neither does barber with his speed. he can get the 1st downs, but he's not going to break a long one on you. and austin is still too green to make the proper adjustments or get open.amazingly, the dallas offense should get even better as the year goes on. they'll either get LG kosier healthy or montrae holland will be able to play because right now proctor is playing horrible. the guy was personally responsible for almost all the run stuffs. and they'll trust felix, bennett, and austin more.A team should always get their top receiving option the ball. That's why Witten catches so many passes.No, not fishing. I think Witten is clearly the top target for what the Cowboys want to do. Owens is a more talented receiver, but the offense doesn't go through Owens. It goes through Barber and Witten. Their plays help get Owens open for his. I understand he doesn't like to lose. But 18 targets is too much for Owens imo. He needs to see the ball less and make more with what he does get (fewer drops). The problem wasn't that Owens didn't get the ball enough. The problem was that Washington shut down the run and kept the ball away from Romo with sustained drives.
It was quite obvious they were better against the run with Evans replacing Taylor. A lot of us noticed that. The other thing worth mentioning is that Owens was targeted about 19 times, but Springs and Rogers (after Springs got hurt) covered him tightly, with Springs shoving him around a good bit. On many of those targets Owens was not open, and there's some talk that near the end of the game he wasn't even finishing his routes.Actually, in an odd sort of way, Washington's D-line may have been more stout against the run without Taylor in there. Demetric Evans is not a bad lineman at all, but more to the point I'm sure the Cowboys would have run at Taylor all day with Barber.
Winners always want the ball.
2 out of his 18 targets.Did anyone get a drop count on TO from yesterday?