What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

T. Romo >>> D. Bledsoe? (1 Viewer)

BigTex

Don't mess with Texas
There's been a lot of talk about Romo lately. From the Cowboys, media and fans. G. Goslin (sp?) is very well respected individual stated today, that multiple sources in the league have told him that the Cowboys are a better team with Romo at the helm. :eek: Goslin went on to say some don't think Bledsoe can get it done.Word is at some point, Romo is going to take over the starting position this season. Today Romo has been working with the first teamers.If your looking for a deep sleeper for your dynasty team.................here you go. There's a lot of buzz about him.

Romo gets big part in summer planParcells ready to give backup QB a chance to show game readinessBy JEAN-JACQUES TAYLOR / The Dallas Morning News Cowboys quarterback Tony Romo hasn't thrown a regular season pass, but he should be throwing more preseason ones.OXNARD, Calif. – All Tony Romo has ever wanted is an opportunity, which can be hard to come by for an undrafted free-agent quarterback from a Division I-AA school.Apparently, that's about to change.Coach Bill Parcells said he's going to give Romo an opportunity to prove his worth to the organization this preseason."I've got to decide where he is," Parcells said. "Our plans are to play him a lot. I've been around him for three years now. I see a guy that's pretty smart. It looks like in practice, he's making fewer and fewer mistakes."Had we just thrown him to the wolves two years ago or something, it probably would have ruined his career. But now he's got enough background and enough knowledge and enough training and enough understanding that it's time to go forward."That's exciting news for Romo."I think he wants to find out whether I can be the guy of the future here. Hopefully that will happen in the preseason," Romo said. "It doesn't change much for me. I'm a pretty competitive guy, and it has never bothered me what people thought. With Bill, it's nice to hear him say those things, but I have to go out and prove it."Two seasons ago, Romo and Drew Henson were even on the depth chart. Now, Romo has clearly surpassed Henson, in part because of their respective performances last preseason.Romo was 23 of 37 for 273 yards and a touchdown in the 2005 preseason, finishing with a 93.7 passer rating. Henson was 12 of 27 for 135 yards with an interception and a rating of 44.5.Now, Parcells wants to see if Romo can take the next step in his development.The Cowboys showed confidence in Romo by signing him to a contract extension before last season that included a $300,000 signing bonus and $1.2 million in salary and bonuses for 2006. Parcells wants to see if Romo is ready to play in regular-season games.Drew Bledsoe took every snap last season, even in blowout wins or losses, because Parcells didn't trust Romo or Henson."It's just like when they put a young fighter in with the wrong guy too soon. You can damage the player, and I just don't think it would have worked," Parcells said. "He's a little bit of a renegade, gun-slinging quarterback, and I think he would have been a little error-prone."Romo has never thrown a regular-season NFL pass, but he has impressed Parcells with his intelligence and athleticism in practice. In the preseason, Romo needs to show Parcells that he can make good decisions and lead the offense to points.Romo doesn't have to be tagged as the quarterback of the future to be an important player. In a league where starting quarterbacks seemingly miss games every week, good backups are valuable commodities.Parcells said Romo reminds him of former NFL quarterbacks Matt Cavanaugh and Jeff Rutledge. They combined for 25 NFL seasons, primarily as backup quarterbacks."They couldn't put any more pressure on myself than I have in years past," Romo said. "Each year, I feel more confident. Every practice, I feel more confident, and it's showing on the field."
Take this for what you will, this is just something you must look at carefully.
 
I was listening to one of the duos on Sirius last week, and they were talking about how screwed the Cowboys would be if Bledsoe went down, because Romo is nowhere near ready to start. :confused:

I must admit, I don't recall seeing a single snap to Romo, so I can't comment, but this report is such a huge contrast to what I heard the other day that I am a bit puzzled.

Maybe, it was Shein that said it though. That would explain a lot, since that guy is a complete moron.

 
Well something has to doom the Cowboys...

may as well be Bledsoe or Romo.

 
Cool i thought he did.I still think a Vet will be signed if Bledsoe gets hurt or maybe before that if Romo does not have a great camp. I dont see him as a threat to unseat Bledsoe this season at all.
I agree with most of that. BigTex is right though...a lot of people in Dallas are starting to talk about Romo (Parcells included). If he has a good camp he'll definitely have a chance to earn the job next year. And if the wheels come off and they start out 2-6 or something crazy like that, I can see Parcells giving him a shot this year.
 
Get rid of Parcells after this year. Get someone with a West Coast offense background to hire (to suit 2), screw Romo and bring in Matt Schaub (who's more than familar with the WC) and be Super Bowl bound.

It's apparent it's not going to work with the Tuna and 2. I hope the Tuna is the one shown the door myself.

 
Get rid of Parcells after this year. Get someone with a West Coast offense background to hire (to suit 2), screw Romo and bring in Matt Schaub (who's more than familar with the WC) and be Super Bowl bound.

It's apparent it's not going to work with the Tuna and 2. I hope the Tuna is the one shown the door myself.
Put me in that crowd that would love to see him gone.
 
Get rid of Parcells after this year. Get someone with a West Coast offense background to hire (to suit 2), screw Romo and bring in Matt Schaub (who's more than familar with the WC) and be Super Bowl bound.

It's apparent it's not going to work with the Tuna and 2. I hope the Tuna is the one shown the door myself.
Put me in that crowd that would love to see him gone.
You being serious BigTex? I am very happy with the depth and defense that Parcells has built in the three years he has been here. The offense is coming along nicely as well. Bill has been on fire drafting. Im really surprised by your comment.
 
IMO

This Romo-hype has been created by Parcells (not taking anything away from Romo). I think that he is just trying to get the media to focus on something besides TO.

 
Get rid of Parcells after this year. Get someone with a West Coast offense background to hire (to suit 2), screw Romo and bring in Matt Schaub (who's more than familar with the WC) and be Super Bowl bound.

It's apparent it's not going to work with the Tuna and 2. I hope the Tuna is the one shown the door myself.
Put me in that crowd that would love to see him gone.
You being serious BigTex? I am very happy with the depth and defense that Parcells has built in the three years he has been here. The offense is coming along nicely as well. Bill has been on fire drafting. Im really surprised by your comment.
Hello simmonjm,It's not Bill the coach that is at issue, he's a great coach, it's his arrogant, self-righteous attitude. :thumbdown:

 
IMOThis Romo-hype has been created by Parcells (not taking anything away from Romo). I think that he is just trying to get the media to focus on something besides TO.
:goodposting: This could be true, I was wondering the same thing this morning. Romo is Bill's guy and Bill does like him. There was an interview last week that been getting a lot of air time. One in which Romo seemed pretting confident in his future as the Cowboys QB. Also remember the Romo hype has been going on since July.
 
IMOThis Romo-hype has been created by Parcells (not taking anything away from Romo). I think that he is just trying to get the media to focus on something besides TO.
:goodposting: This could be true, I was wondering the same thing this morning. Romo is Bill's guy and Bill does like him. There was an interview last week that been getting a lot of air time. One in which Romo seemed pretting confident in his future as the Cowboys QB. Also remember the Romo hype has been going on since July.
I do not doubt that they beleive Romo is the future, maybe as soon as next year. But I still think Bledsoe will be given every chance to lead the Cowboys in 2006.
 
IMOThis Romo-hype has been created by Parcells (not taking anything away from Romo). I think that he is just trying to get the media to focus on something besides TO.
:goodposting: This could be true, I was wondering the same thing this morning. Romo is Bill's guy and Bill does like him. There was an interview last week that been getting a lot of air time. One in which Romo seemed pretting confident in his future as the Cowboys QB. Also remember the Romo hype has been going on since July.
I do not doubt that they beleive Romo is the future, maybe as soon as next year. But I still think Bledsoe will be given every chance to lead the Cowboys in 2006.
Agreed! :thumbup:
 
IMOThis Romo-hype has been created by Parcells (not taking anything away from Romo). I think that he is just trying to get the media to focus on something besides TO.
:goodposting: This could be true, I was wondering the same thing this morning. Romo is Bill's guy and Bill does like him. There was an interview last week that been getting a lot of air time. One in which Romo seemed pretting confident in his future as the Cowboys QB. Also remember the Romo hype has been going on since July.
I do not doubt that they beleive Romo is the future, maybe as soon as next year. But I still think Bledsoe will be given every chance to lead the Cowboys in 2006.
Agreed! :thumbup:
Hey Big Tex - How do you see the running game shaking out in Dallas this year?
 
IMOThis Romo-hype has been created by Parcells (not taking anything away from Romo). I think that he is just trying to get the media to focus on something besides TO.
:goodposting: This could be true, I was wondering the same thing this morning. Romo is Bill's guy and Bill does like him. There was an interview last week that been getting a lot of air time. One in which Romo seemed pretting confident in his future as the Cowboys QB. Also remember the Romo hype has been going on since July.
I do not doubt that they beleive Romo is the future, maybe as soon as next year. But I still think Bledsoe will be given every chance to lead the Cowboys in 2006.
Agreed! :thumbup:
Hey Big Tex - How do you see the running game shaking out in Dallas this year?
Unfortunately for JJ, he'll be on egg shells all year. He says in the media he's not worried, but I believe other wise. IMHO Bill is higher on MBIII than he is on JJ. If I had to sum it up: The job is not for MBIII's to win but for JJ to lose, because once he gets hurt, that's it for him.From all accounts (no injuries) the carry distribution will be something like this: JJ 70%, MBIII 25%, TT 5%.
 
Get rid of Parcells after this year. Get someone with a West Coast offense background to hire (to suit 2), screw Romo and bring in Matt Schaub (who's more than familar with the WC) and be Super Bowl bound.

It's apparent it's not going to work with the Tuna and 2. I hope the Tuna is the one shown the door myself.
Put me in that crowd that would love to see him gone.
No way do I want Bill gone. And replace him with who?

Maybe I should mention these guys:

Chan Gailey

Dave Campo

Barry Switzer

Still want BILL PARCELS gone?

You do remember what a talentless disaster of a team our Cowboys were just 2 short seasons ago right?

 
Parcells needs to get Romo some time in the regular season as it's necessary in his continued development. Doing well in what used to be called "the practice season" is nice but it doesn't make him better than Bledsoe.

 
Get rid of Parcells after this year. Get someone with a West Coast offense background to hire (to suit 2), screw Romo and bring in Matt Schaub (who's more than familar with the WC) and be Super Bowl bound.It's apparent it's not going to work with the Tuna and 2. I hope the Tuna is the one shown the door myself.
Getting a new offensive system is a sure fire way to regress. Adding an inexperienced QB is a good bet to regress too.LOL at Dallas fans not being pleased with him building a winning team. Awaiting complaints in a few months that they're a wildcard team from the toughest division
 
Get rid of Parcells after this year. Get someone with a West Coast offense background to hire (to suit 2), screw Romo and bring in Matt Schaub (who's more than familar with the WC) and be Super Bowl bound.

It's apparent it's not going to work with the Tuna and 2. I hope the Tuna is the one shown the door myself.
Put me in that crowd that would love to see him gone.
No way do I want Bill gone. And replace him with who?

Maybe I should mention these guys:

Chan Gailey

Dave Campo

Barry Switzer

Still want BILL PARCELS gone?

You do remember what a talentless disaster of a team our Cowboys were just 2 short seasons ago right?
1. I don't care2. I remember

3. Yes, it won't hurt my feelings one bit when he's finally gone. Once again, I've never had a problem with him as a coach, but since you've brought it up, let's take a look.

Chan Gailey.

98-Record: 10-6

99-Record: 8-8

Dave Campo

2000-Record: 5-11

2001-Record: 5-11

2002-Record: 5-11

Barry Switzer

94-Championship Game

95-Super Bowl Champions

96-Lost Divisional Playoff

97-Record: 6-10

Bill Parcell

2003-Record: 10-6

2004-Record: 6-10

2005-Record: 9-7

BP>Campo

BP=Gailey

BP<Sooner

P.S.

It's how Bill treats his players, media, and fans that I have a problem with and he's accomplished no more the Gailey and Gailey got the boot after only two years. :thumbdown:

 
P.S.It's how Bill treats his players, media, and fans that I have a problem with and he's accomplished no more the Gailey and Gailey got the boot after only two years. :thumbdown:
with all due respect BigTex, you need to do some reading. There are many many players that have played for him and still keep in touch and consider him a good friend. Reporters(and fans at camp) like to "run with" the barking he does at players but miss all the other stuff.His first year record with the Boys is pretty awesome considerring the team he inheritted. Gailey IIRC inheritted a few HOFers much closer to their prime if not in their prime, so I don't feel that's a reasonable comparison
 
P.S.It's how Bill treats his players, media, and fans that I have a problem with and he's accomplished no more the Gailey and Gailey got the boot after only two years. :thumbdown:
with all due respect BigTex, you need to do some reading. There are many many players that have played for him and still keep in touch and consider him a good friend. Reporters(and fans at camp) like to "run with" the barking he does at players but miss all the other stuff.His first year record with the Boys is pretty awesome considerring the team he inheritted. Gailey IIRC inheritted a few HOFers much closer to their prime if not in their prime, so I don't feel that's a reasonable comparison
Yea I am shocked.I have no idea why you compare those other coaches w/l record with his. Are you actually suggesting Barry Switzer did a better job then Bill has because the players ran and won in spite of him?It also seems to me that the only players who dislike Parcels are players who don't like to work. If he is such a bad guy, then why did Keyshawn, Bledsoe, Glenn, Arron Glenn, Fergunson, and a few others I bet I am forgetting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Too bad we wont ever here any Romo to Rambo commentary. Madden would have had a blast with that on Monday nights.

 
P.S.It's how Bill treats his players, media, and fans that I have a problem with and he's accomplished no more the Gailey and Gailey got the boot after only two years. :thumbdown:
with all due respect BigTex, you need to do some reading. There are many many players that have played for him and still keep in touch and consider him a good friend. Reporters(and fans at camp) like to "run with" the barking he does at players but miss all the other stuff.His first year record with the Boys is pretty awesome considerring the team he inheritted. Gailey IIRC inheritted a few HOFers much closer to their prime if not in their prime, so I don't feel that's a reasonable comparison
Hello Bri,Bill always have guys that are "Bill guys" and yet he has those that are on the opposing end as well i.e Greg Ellis and there are others (but their not going to speak at this point). Most of "Bill guys" are from his old days. I can seperate barking from treatment. His treatment of the media (at least in the begining) was unwarranted, now with T.O the media has some ammo and they too are tired of Bill's treatment. He doesn't allow the coaching staff to talk to the media (which Jerry has admitted on 103.3 ESPN as late as last week that he doesn't agree with). All I'm trying to say is Bill hasn't achieved any more than the other coaches, but he gets a pass on everything he does. He allowed Morten to leak out that he's "possibly contemplating" retirement only to take more money from Jerry. I'm a fan of the Cowboys for life, but I not blind either.So, I understand what you're saying and I agree to great extent on some of what your saying..........I'm just not buying (and never have) that hype that comes along with Bill.I'm not sure who they could get, I'm not saying he should be fired, I never did but I'm sure there are others that could come in and do a good job. The Cowboys haven't won a playoff game in over 10yrs Bill has been here for three of those years.
 
P.S.

It's how Bill treats his players, media, and fans that I have a problem with and he's accomplished no more the Gailey and Gailey got the boot after only two years. :thumbdown:
with all due respect BigTex, you need to do some reading. There are many many players that have played for him and still keep in touch and consider him a good friend. Reporters(and fans at camp) like to "run with" the barking he does at players but miss all the other stuff.His first year record with the Boys is pretty awesome considerring the team he inheritted. Gailey IIRC inheritted a few HOFers much closer to their prime if not in their prime, so I don't feel that's a reasonable comparison
Yea I am shocked.I have no idea why you compare those other coaches w/l record with his. Are you actually suggesting Barry Switzer did a better job then Bill has because the players ran and won in spite of him?

It also seems to me that the only players who dislike Parcels are players who don't like to work. If he is such a bad guy, then why did Keyshawn, Bledsoe, Glenn, Arron Glenn, Fergunson, and a few others I bet I am forgetting.
I agree that those comparisons are a stretch, but I agree with the idea that Parcells is overrated as a coach who benefits too much at this late date from those two championships he won with the Giants. IMHO, his coaching talent is in getting mediocre or bad teams to outperform their talent (you saw this in the first couple of years of every coaching stop he's made) and then building over time a strong team core that will enable that team to be competitive for years to come. I don't think, particularly in the salary cap era, that he's all that good in making the final push for a championship, and I've even pointed out in other threads how his career path is and has been on a declining trend dating back to his Giants years as measured by the ultimate success he reached:

Giants: 2 Super Bowl victories

Patriots: 1 Super Bowl appearance

Jets: 1 conference championship game appearance

Cowboys: 1 playoff appearance, zero playoff wins (to be continued . . .)

For all the credit the media heaps on him, I don't see him at all as a guy who's been able to change with the times. The Bill Parcells you see today is the same guy using the same schtick as you would have seen 20+ years ago with the Giants even though the league has greatly changed around him.

 
P.S.It's how Bill treats his players, media, and fans that I have a problem with and he's accomplished no more the Gailey and Gailey got the boot after only two years. :thumbdown:
with all due respect BigTex, you need to do some reading. There are many many players that have played for him and still keep in touch and consider him a good friend. Reporters(and fans at camp) like to "run with" the barking he does at players but miss all the other stuff.His first year record with the Boys is pretty awesome considerring the team he inheritted. Gailey IIRC inheritted a few HOFers much closer to their prime if not in their prime, so I don't feel that's a reasonable comparison
Yea I am shocked.I have no idea why you compare those other coaches w/l record with his. Are you actually suggesting Barry Switzer did a better job then Bill has because the players ran and won in spite of him?It also seems to me that the only players who dislike Parcels are players who don't like to work. If he is such a bad guy, then why did Keyshawn, Bledsoe, Glenn, Arron Glenn, Fergunson, and a few others I bet I am forgetting.
Hello E. Smith, No I'm not, I'm just saying I want to see something other than hype. I don't want to get too deep into who may or may not like Bill too much. I'm not trying to paint him as Satan. So if I have, then I apologize because that's not the case.What is the time table in which we actually see a playoff victory? What are your expectations? What do you want to see accomplished?
 
P.S.

It's how Bill treats his players, media, and fans that I have a problem with and he's accomplished no more the Gailey and Gailey got the boot after only two years. :thumbdown:
with all due respect BigTex, you need to do some reading. There are many many players that have played for him and still keep in touch and consider him a good friend. Reporters(and fans at camp) like to "run with" the barking he does at players but miss all the other stuff.His first year record with the Boys is pretty awesome considerring the team he inheritted. Gailey IIRC inheritted a few HOFers much closer to their prime if not in their prime, so I don't feel that's a reasonable comparison
Yea I am shocked.I have no idea why you compare those other coaches w/l record with his. Are you actually suggesting Barry Switzer did a better job then Bill has because the players ran and won in spite of him?

It also seems to me that the only players who dislike Parcels are players who don't like to work. If he is such a bad guy, then why did Keyshawn, Bledsoe, Glenn, Arron Glenn, Fergunson, and a few others I bet I am forgetting.
I agree that those comparisons are a stretch, but I agree with the idea that Parcells is overrated as a coach who benefits too much at this late date from those two championships he won with the Giants. IMHO, his coaching talent is in getting mediocre or bad teams to outperform their talent (you saw this in the first couple of years of every coaching stop he's made) and then building over time a strong team core that will enable that team to be competitive for years to come. I don't think, particularly in the salary cap era, that he's all that good in making the final push for a championship, and I've even pointed out in other threads how his career path is and has been on a declining trend dating back to his Giants years as measured by the ultimate success he reached:

Giants: 2 Super Bowl victories

Patriots: 1 Super Bowl appearance

Jets: 1 conference championship game appearance

Cowboys: 1 playoff appearance, zero playoff wins (to be continued . . .)

For all the credit the media heaps on him, I don't see him at all as a guy who's been able to change with the times. The Bill Parcells you see today is the same guy using the same schtick as you would have seen 20+ years ago with the Giants even though the league has greatly changed around him.
:goodposting: Agreed! Oustanding post!

 
I thought this was a Romo/Bledsoe thread. ??

IMO Bledsoe is and will be the quarterback this season, barring injury, or total stinkness. If they are in a position throughout the year to make the playoffs Bledsoe is the man.

 
P.S.It's how Bill treats his players, media, and fans that I have a problem with and he's accomplished no more the Gailey and Gailey got the boot after only two years. :thumbdown:
with all due respect BigTex, you need to do some reading. There are many many players that have played for him and still keep in touch and consider him a good friend. Reporters(and fans at camp) like to "run with" the barking he does at players but miss all the other stuff.His first year record with the Boys is pretty awesome considerring the team he inheritted. Gailey IIRC inheritted a few HOFers much closer to their prime if not in their prime, so I don't feel that's a reasonable comparison
Hello Bri,Bill always have guys that are "Bill guys" and yet he has those that are on the opposing end as well i.e Greg Ellis and there are others (but their not going to speak at this point). Most of "Bill guys" are from his old days. I can seperate barking from treatment. His treatment of the media (at least in the begining) was unwarranted, now with T.O the media has some ammo and they too are tired of Bill's treatment. He doesn't allow the coaching staff to talk to the media (which Jerry has admitted on 103.3 ESPN as late as last week that he doesn't agree with). All I'm trying to say is Bill hasn't achieved any more than the other coaches, but he gets a pass on everything he does. He allowed Morten to leak out that he's "possibly contemplating" retirement only to take more money from Jerry. I'm a fan of the Cowboys for life, but I not blind either.So, I understand what you're saying and I agree to great extent on some of what your saying..........I'm just not buying (and never have) that hype that comes along with Bill.I'm not sure who they could get, I'm not saying he should be fired, I never did but I'm sure there are others that could come in and do a good job. The Cowboys haven't won a playoff game in over 10yrs Bill has been here for three of those years.
In regards to some negative around some players(I don't know re-Ellis, not saying him) they get all high and mighty and it's "he shouldn't talk to me like that" and it's a foolish and naive response to Bill. Countless players, especially Ks and QBs, have said that camp with his challenges and yelling in your ear, are harder than the regular season. Well John Hall still plays and is probably near 10 years in the league, Vinatieri is awesome, Bledsoe has HOF like stats, Simms has supe records and I never thought that guy had oodles of talent, Testaverde threw like 8 INTs for a year under him. He's a brash individual no doubt but it's for a purpose and wise players roll with it and learn. There have been countless idiots that whine and eventually get cut. I remember some idiot for the Jets fumbling like twice in a game, 3-4 times in practice then crying how he's been all over him all day long....yeah well no sh why do you think that is? Also there have been vets that just don't appreciate that and make a move to another team. Those I have no prob with. Probably due to seeing it work well under him, BB and anyone else that worked under Bill has rules about talking to the press. The press naturally doesn't like this. That's "starting off on the wrong foot" right there. Bill says things other coaches surely bite their tongue and don't say. Ya gotta watch a presser live to understand and possibly several in a row. If the same dope asks the same Q everyday or if he gets asked the same Q 4 times in a row....yeah he gets annoyed and barks at them. All of us would be too. In fact in an unlikely perfect world, IMO we should write those newspaper guys and tell them to ask something else so we get better info instead of harping but....so what about him and the press. All those that consider him and SOB would jump at the chance for a solo interview and we all know it.Your Boys stunk. "My" Pats stunk. The Jets stunk. They may have all been 1-15 when he took over(I can't recall Dallas' record 4 wins?) and took them to the playoffs. That's something. If some Dallas fans(not nec you BT) don't appreciate that then hopefully Jones can hire Rich Kotite next
 
P.S.

It's how Bill treats his players, media, and fans that I have a problem with and he's accomplished no more the Gailey and Gailey got the boot after only two years. :thumbdown:
with all due respect BigTex, you need to do some reading. There are many many players that have played for him and still keep in touch and consider him a good friend. Reporters(and fans at camp) like to "run with" the barking he does at players but miss all the other stuff.His first year record with the Boys is pretty awesome considerring the team he inheritted. Gailey IIRC inheritted a few HOFers much closer to their prime if not in their prime, so I don't feel that's a reasonable comparison
Yea I am shocked.I have no idea why you compare those other coaches w/l record with his. Are you actually suggesting Barry Switzer did a better job then Bill has because the players ran and won in spite of him?

It also seems to me that the only players who dislike Parcels are players who don't like to work. If he is such a bad guy, then why did Keyshawn, Bledsoe, Glenn, Arron Glenn, Fergunson, and a few others I bet I am forgetting.
I agree that those comparisons are a stretch, but I agree with the idea that Parcells is overrated as a coach who benefits too much at this late date from those two championships he won with the Giants. IMHO, his coaching talent is in getting mediocre or bad teams to outperform their talent (you saw this in the first couple of years of every coaching stop he's made) and then building over time a strong team core that will enable that team to be competitive for years to come. I don't think, particularly in the salary cap era, that he's all that good in making the final push for a championship, and I've even pointed out in other threads how his career path is and has been on a declining trend dating back to his Giants years as measured by the ultimate success he reached:

Giants: 2 Super Bowl victories

Patriots: 1 Super Bowl appearance

Jets: 1 conference championship game appearance

Cowboys: 1 playoff appearance, zero playoff wins (to be continued . . .)

For all the credit the media heaps on him, I don't see him at all as a guy who's been able to change with the times. The Bill Parcells you see today is the same guy using the same schtick as you would have seen 20+ years ago with the Giants even though the league has greatly changed around him.
NO he's not the same at all.His Pats passed way more in one year than Simms probably passed in two. Their D was nowhere near as dominant and Curtis was eons better than lil Joe.

The Jets had the best WRs of any Parcells team and their TE "held the corner" more than he caught passes which was a major offensive change.

The Boys have a stud WR which is brand new. A young high draft pick RB which he has never had. The average experience of the D is probably under 3 years and he regularly has had older vets weeded into his Ds. He went with Zimmer's speed philosophy for two years ignoring his ow Power philosophy which he's returned to. Witten, Parcells has returned to stud TE like Coates and Bavaro.

Your final push argument is reasonable but I don't think fair. Everyone knew he was walking once Kraft and that whole groceries bit and he's not the first to leave a meddling owner. Most of his boys agreed to leave the Jets after that whole BS with BB being coach for a day so he's not alone there. That team was headed in the right direction. Now the Boys are headed there. If you say he doesn't stay for that final push well then I'd have to agree but I don't think you can say he can't make that final push if he isn't even there to make it.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top