Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
T. Y. trade (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter USMCav
- Start date
I wouldn't say it isn't fair but I'd rather stick with Hilton. Kupp has a lot of competition for the ball and by all accounts Hilton should still be the man in Indy. Brissett should be better than he was in 2017. It's close enough to go with your gut, but I'd stick with Hilton.
football fan
Footballguy
I think it is really even as far as value is concerned. I would slightly lean Kupp's way for two reasons:
Kupp is a few years younger
Most games, out of all the games that Kupp played last year, he scored really well, so the competition for touches doesn't really scare me. If the Rams really manage Gurley's touches really closely, I start liking Kupp even more.
Also a QB can really affect a WRs fantasy scoring, so I would be a little concerned with owning TY Hilton.
I could also see good arguments for TY Hilton because this deal is close in value and different people can value one player very differently.
Kupp is a few years younger
Most games, out of all the games that Kupp played last year, he scored really well, so the competition for touches doesn't really scare me. If the Rams really manage Gurley's touches really closely, I start liking Kupp even more.
Also a QB can really affect a WRs fantasy scoring, so I would be a little concerned with owning TY Hilton.
I could also see good arguments for TY Hilton because this deal is close in value and different people can value one player very differently.
