Yes.I've loved everything he's done except Death Proof / Grindhouse so I'm totally in.
Was thinking the same thing while watching the trailer. Just doesn't seem to fit. But based on my history on things like this, he's a shoe-in for an Academy Award.I get the impression that Kurt Russell isn't going to work in this.
me, too. meh!The trailer did nothing to get me excited to see the movie.
FIRST LOOK: At the holiday luncheon hosted by the Weinstein Company recently Kurt Russell talked about Quentin Tarantino’s new film “The Hateful Eight” in which he plays John “The Hangman” Ruth. (The lunch was also graced by Dame Helen Mirren, looking great in a sheath, grey fox fur collar and tiger print shoes. Her Weinstein movie this year was “Woman in Gold.”)
“It’s a straight forward Western, Sergio Leone-like Western,” Russell said. “It’s an intricate story and in the beginning you don’t know why it’s taking so long” to get started. He was talking about the first hour and forty-five minutes of “The Hateful Eight,” most of which takes place in a stagecoach hurtling through a brutal snowy Wyoming landscape. Ruth is taking a woman in chains, Daisy Domergue, to Red Rock, through a blizzard, for $10,000 bounty and the hangman’s noose. Daisy is played by Jennifer Jason Leigh, in a welcome comeback to big movies, who was also at the lunch.
“The movie has an overture and Intermission” said Russell, who may be up for a best supporting nomination. “There are also chapter headings. “The acting’s not subtle,” he told me. He compared it to old movies adding, “It’s almost jarring sometimes,” but there’s “much more of an emotional payoff. We rehearsed for a month, so when we started shooting we were completely ready to go. You’ll see some fairly long takes. It’s one of the few movies I still remember my lines from,” he said, adding that he’d seen the film four times, “and it’s endlessly fun to watch.” He also called Ennio Morricone’s music “gripping.”MORE
QT should go ahead and legally change his name to "Turd Factory".
While I wont go that far, I do think this movie looks ungood.QT should go ahead and legally change his name to "Turd Factory".![]()
My problem with him is that I feel he spends too much time paying tribute and I have a really hard time figuring out where the remaking of b movies he loves ends and Tarantino begins. The other directors you mention (how dare you leave off PTA) can do different genres, have their own style, and not have the feel of constant homage to old movies.Along with the Star Wars fever are other films I am equally excited and in some way even more interested in watching. QT is a master IMHO and I have been a big fan of his going back to Reservoir Dogs, one of the first films I saw with my wife and we have seen almost all of QT films at the theater. I can't think of one we didn't see on the big screen. He is a movie lover and pays a lot of tribute to films form his generation and what inspired him.
Scorcese, Tarantino, Coens, Wes Anderson, he is on a short list of outstanding directors.
Well, this isn't happening. Got my tickets to Star Wars a couple of weeks ago for Saturday 12/19 matinee, 3D IMAX. $23 a ticket. Hateful Eight won't be out yet.This comes out this winter, right? This and the new Star Wars movie both around Christmas will send me to the theater, possibly for a double-feature. I may only buy one ticket and try to theater hop. Not to save the $10, just because I've never done it and it would make me feel like an outlaw.
Two of these are not like the others.Scorcese, Tarantino, Coens, Wes Anderson, he is on a short list of outstanding directors.
Oof.I've got a bad feeling about it. The same stars in the same kind of movies he's done before. 3 hour length.
I hope I'm wrong.
A roadshow theatrical release (known also as reserved seat engagement) was a term in the American motion picture industry for a practice in which a film opened in a limited number of theaters in large cities like Los Angeles, New York, Chicago, Houston, Atlanta, Dallas and San Francisco for a specific period of time before the nationwide general release. Although variants of roadshow releases occasionally still exist, the practice mostly ended in the early 1970s.
As far as is known, virtually all of the films given roadshow releases were subsequently distributed to regular movie theatres. This was called a general release, and was akin to the modern-day wide release of a film. However, there are five important differences between a roadshow presentation of a film and today's limited releases:
- Roadshow theatrical releases almost always placed a ten to fifteen-minute intermission between the two "acts" of the film, and the first act was frequently longer than the second.
- Films shown as roadshow releases, especially those made between 1952 and 1974, were nearly always longer than the usual motion picture, lasting anywhere from slightly more than two hours to four hours or more, counting the intermission. Examples include Ben-Hur (1959), or Cleopatra (1963). There were no short subjects accompanying the film, and rarely any movie trailers.
- Roadshow presentations were always shown on a one or two-performance a day, reserved seat basis, and admission prices were always higher than those of regular screenings. Unlike today's limited releases, seats had to be reserved; one could not simply buy a ticket at the box office and go in to watch the film. The two-performance-a-day screenings were usually limited to Wednesdays, Saturdays, and Sundays. During the rest of the week, the films would be shown only once a day. (However, in the case of Oklahoma!, there were three showings a day of the film on weekends, rather than two.[1])
- Souvenir programs were often available at roadshow presentations of films, much as souvenir programs are made available when one goes to see the stage version of a play or musical. These movie souvenir programs contained photos from the film, photos and biographies of its cast and principal crew, and information on how the film was made, rather like today's "extras" on DVDs.
- In the days of frequent roadshow releases, production companies and film distributors never used them to determine whether or not a film should be given a wide release, as is done today occasionally when films perform poorly at the box office. From the 1920s to the mid-1970s, a roadshow release would always play widely after its original engagements. This was true even of box office flops.
On the morning shows today promoting the movie.I get the impression that Kurt Russell isn't going to work in this.
In fairness, pretty sure the foot fetish shots are all QT.My problem with him is that I feel he spends too much time paying tribute and I have a really hard time figuring out where the remaking of b movies he loves ends and Tarantino begins. The other directors you mention (how dare you leave off PTA) can do different genres, have their own style, and not have the feel of constant homage to old movies.Along with the Star Wars fever are other films I am equally excited and in some way even more interested in watching. QT is a master IMHO and I have been a big fan of his going back to Reservoir Dogs, one of the first films I saw with my wife and we have seen almost all of QT films at the theater. I can't think of one we didn't see on the big screen. He is a movie lover and pays a lot of tribute to films form his generation and what inspired him.
Scorcese, Tarantino, Coens, Wes Anderson, he is on a short list of outstanding directors.
In fairness, pretty sure the foot fetish shots are all QT.My problem with him is that I feel he spends too much time paying tribute and I have a really hard time figuring out where the remaking of b movies he loves ends and Tarantino begins. The other directors you mention (how dare you leave off PTA) can do different genres, have their own style, and not have the feel of constant homage to old movies.Along with the Star Wars fever are other films I am equally excited and in some way even more interested in watching. QT is a master IMHO and I have been a big fan of his going back to Reservoir Dogs, one of the first films I saw with my wife and we have seen almost all of QT films at the theater. I can't think of one we didn't see on the big screen. He is a movie lover and pays a lot of tribute to films form his generation and what inspired him.
Scorcese, Tarantino, Coens, Wes Anderson, he is on a short list of outstanding directors.
The individual scenes are cool. The movie as a whole is subpar. A bit boring.Terrible.
Good call on PTAMy problem with him is that I feel he spends too much time paying tribute and I have a really hard time figuring out where the remaking of b movies he loves ends and Tarantino begins. The other directors you mention (how dare you leave off PTA) can do different genres, have their own style, and not have the feel of constant homage to old movies.Along with the Star Wars fever are other films I am equally excited and in some way even more interested in watching. QT is a master IMHO and I have been a big fan of his going back to Reservoir Dogs, one of the first films I saw with my wife and we have seen almost all of QT films at the theater. I can't think of one we didn't see on the big screen. He is a movie lover and pays a lot of tribute to films form his generation and what inspired him.
Scorcese, Tarantino, Coens, Wes Anderson, he is on a short list of outstanding directors.
No. Exactly opposite.In other words it's a typical Tarantino movie?Terrible.
I'm going to respect the police request for a boycott of this and pass as well.JaxBill said:Based on his feelings toward police, I'll pass.
I must have missed something this week.I'm going to respect the police request for a boycott of this and pass as well.JaxBill said:Based on his feelings toward police, I'll pass.
First QT movie I'll miss seeing in the theater.
In October he said he was against cops who murder people.I must have missed something this week.I'm going to respect the police request for a boycott of this and pass as well.First QT movie I'll miss seeing in the theater.JaxBill said:Based on his feelings toward police, I'll pass.
What a jerk.In October he said he was against cops who murder people.I must have missed something this week.I'm going to respect the police request for a boycott of this and pass as well.First QT movie I'll miss seeing in the theater.JaxBill said:Based on his feelings toward police, I'll pass.
Well he said thisIn October he said he was against cops who murder people.I must have missed something this week.I'm going to respect the police request for a boycott of this and pass as well.First QT movie I'll miss seeing in the theater.JaxBill said:Based on his feelings toward police, I'll pass.
But then he also said this“I stand by [what I said],” the filmmaker tells EW. “I mean, I was completely misrepresented from what I said. I didn’t say all cops were murderers, or every single police shooting was a murder. We were talking about very specific instances.”
http://www.ew.com/article/2015/12/21/quentin-tarantino-hateful-eight-police-boycott“And I completely and utterly reject the bad apples argument,” he continues. “Chicago just got caught with their pants down in a way that can’t be denied. But I completely and utterly reject the “few bad apples” argument. Yeah, the guy who shot [Laquan McDonald] is a bad apple. But so are the other eight or nine cops that were there that said nothing, did nothing, let a lie stand for an entire year. And the chief of police, is he a bad apple? I think he is. Is [Chicago Mayor] Rahm Emanuel a bad apple? I think he is. They’re all bad apples. That just shows that that’s a bulls— argument. It’s about institutional racism. It’s about institutional cover-ups that are about protecting the force as opposed to the citizens.”
Well good thing I can go right ahead and download this in near-HD quality in less than 5 minutes and watch his work for $0.00 before the theatrical release. If Quentin doesn't like it, he can send his "buddies" after me.Well he said thisIn October he said he was against cops who murder people.I must have missed something this week.I'm going to respect the police request for a boycott of this and pass as well.First QT movie I'll miss seeing in the theater.JaxBill said:Based on his feelings toward police, I'll pass.
But then he also said this“I stand by [what I said],” the filmmaker tells EW. “I mean, I was completely misrepresented from what I said. I didn’t say all cops were murderers, or every single police shooting was a murder. We were talking about very specific instances.”
http://www.ew.com/article/2015/12/21/quentin-tarantino-hateful-eight-police-boycott“And I completely and utterly reject the bad apples argument,” he continues. “Chicago just got caught with their pants down in a way that can’t be denied. But I completely and utterly reject the “few bad apples” argument. Yeah, the guy who shot [Laquan McDonald] is a bad apple. But so are the other eight or nine cops that were there that said nothing, did nothing, let a lie stand for an entire year. And the chief of police, is he a bad apple? I think he is. Is [Chicago Mayor] Rahm Emanuel a bad apple? I think he is. They’re all bad apples. That just shows that that’s a bulls— argument. It’s about institutional racism. It’s about institutional cover-ups that are about protecting the force as opposed to the citizens.”
![]()
I torrented it (but am still gonna see it in a theater).Are you guys getting this via torrents or are there any sites streaming this?