bicycle_seat_sniffer
Smells like chicken
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think so. I read they're going to be very tight with their money. The GM mentioned they were not even considering Al, the price was unreasonable. They're going to add a few key guys as they go, and build through the draft. I don't see them blowing 200mil on contracts like the Jets last year. New offense, new defense (no cover 2), it's full on rebuilding. FA is for adding a piece or two to make a run at the playoffs/SB. They're not even on that radar now.They are going to have a lot of $$$ going into free agency. I'm guessing they will be a team that will make an early splash.
But they're not running the tampa 2 anymore. And June is 29. Cato was perfect in that system the Colts/Bucs ran. Bates D, youth movement, June was not a surprise to be cut imho.June surprises me, he would have been the best fit at WLB post Brooks.
I don't think so. I read they're going to be very tight with their money. The GM mentioned they were not even considering Al, the price was unreasonable. They're going to add a few key guys as they go, and build through the draft. I don't see them blowing 200mil on contracts like the Jets last year. New offense, new defense (no cover 2), it's full on rebuilding. FA is for adding a piece or two to make a run at the playoffs/SB. They're not even on that radar now.They are going to have a lot of $$$ going into free agency. I'm guessing they will be a team that will make an early splash.

You should probably cut back on the coffee. It's the offseason, you need to pace yourself.I don't think so. I read they're going to be very tight with their money. The GM mentioned they were not even considering Al, the price was unreasonable. They're going to add a few key guys as they go, and build through the draft. I don't see them blowing 200mil on contracts like the Jets last year. New offense, new defense (no cover 2), it's full on rebuilding. FA is for adding a piece or two to make a run at the playoffs/SB. They're not even on that radar now.They are going to have a lot of $$$ going into free agency. I'm guessing they will be a team that will make an early splash.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
http://www.bucscentral.com/general-news/ma...of-core-playersPeter King, of Sports Illustrated.com, firmly believes the Bucs wont be a major player in the lottery sweepstakes to gain the services of what many have coined, as the prized free agent in this years class DT Albert Haynesworth.
From the lead horses mouth Mark Dominik stated
“To sit there and say we’re going to be major players in the big free-agent market probably is wrong,” Dominik said. “Our goal is to take care of our young core players. The veterans here are important to our future. Then, when you get to free agency, you have to measure the cost and benefit of every player. If you put a value of $4 million a year on a player, and it goes over that, you’ve got to be disciplined about chasing the money.”
“I think it’s a great opportunity that’s been created here. We’re working to make sure we take advantage of it in the right way.”
In other news, the Buccaneers are scheduled to have $55 million in money below the salary cap to spend come the 27 Feb 09. If anyone has every read any of my rants on forums out there they will now that I have stated previously that the team had around $50 million in available cap space for 2009.
Paragraph two says they are going to take care of thier vetrans.... They sure did.You should probably cut back on the coffee. It's the offseason, you need to pace yourself.I don't think so. I read they're going to be very tight with their money. The GM mentioned they were not even considering Al, the price was unreasonable. They're going to add a few key guys as they go, and build through the draft. I don't see them blowing 200mil on contracts like the Jets last year. New offense, new defense (no cover 2), it's full on rebuilding. FA is for adding a piece or two to make a run at the playoffs/SB. They're not even on that radar now.They are going to have a lot of $$$ going into free agency. I'm guessing they will be a team that will make an early splash.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
http://www.bucscentral.com/general-news/ma...of-core-playersPeter King, of Sports Illustrated.com, firmly believes the Bucs wont be a major player in the lottery sweepstakes to gain the services of what many have coined, as the prized free agent in this years class DT Albert Haynesworth.
From the lead horses mouth Mark Dominik stated
“To sit there and say we’re going to be major players in the big free-agent market probably is wrong,” Dominik said. “Our goal is to take care of our young core players. The veterans here are important to our future. Then, when you get to free agency, you have to measure the cost and benefit of every player. If you put a value of $4 million a year on a player, and it goes over that, you’ve got to be disciplined about chasing the money.”
“I think it’s a great opportunity that’s been created here. We’re working to make sure we take advantage of it in the right way.”
In other news, the Buccaneers are scheduled to have $55 million in money below the salary cap to spend come the 27 Feb 09. If anyone has every read any of my rants on forums out there they will now that I have stated previously that the team had around $50 million in available cap space for 2009.
You should probably cut back on the coffee. It's the offseason, you need to pace yourself.I don't think so. I read they're going to be very tight with their money. The GM mentioned they were not even considering Al, the price was unreasonable. They're going to add a few key guys as they go, and build through the draft. I don't see them blowing 200mil on contracts like the Jets last year. New offense, new defense (no cover 2), it's full on rebuilding. FA is for adding a piece or two to make a run at the playoffs/SB. They're not even on that radar now.They are going to have a lot of $$$ going into free agency. I'm guessing they will be a team that will make an early splash.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
http://www.bucscentral.com/general-news/ma...of-core-playersPeter King, of Sports Illustrated.com, firmly believes the Bucs wont be a major player in the lottery sweepstakes to gain the services of what many have coined, as the prized free agent in this years class DT Albert Haynesworth.
From the lead horses mouth Mark Dominik stated
“To sit there and say we’re going to be major players in the big free-agent market probably is wrong,” Dominik said. “Our goal is to take care of our young core players. The veterans here are important to our future. Then, when you get to free agency, you have to measure the cost and benefit of every player. If you put a value of $4 million a year on a player, and it goes over that, you’ve got to be disciplined about chasing the money.”
“I think it’s a great opportunity that’s been created here. We’re working to make sure we take advantage of it in the right way.”
In other news, the Buccaneers are scheduled to have $55 million in money below the salary cap to spend come the 27 Feb 09. If anyone has every read any of my rants on forums out there they will now that I have stated previously that the team had around $50 million in available cap space for 2009.
I don't understand this logic. BA & JG were heavily criticized for not doing enough in FA last season.
I'm surprised they let Dunn go. That only leaves them with Graham as a healthy, viable option at RB. Caddy was injured again in 2008 and Bennett won't be back. So they either have to draft somebody or pick up a FA. Graham is 29 and doesn't have a lot of miles on him, but he is still fast approaching that scary age for RBs. I have Graham on a team I inherited in a dynasty league. This news might push his value up enough for me to move him.Very, very surprised by Brooks. That will not go over well here in Tampa. He was a huge fan favorite.Mildly surprised by Hilliard and Dunn. Ike has been a very consistent player for us here though out the years, but I understand that it might be time for him to go. The RB position is something that we desperately need help at, but I don't mind seeing Dunn go.Galloway and June, meh.
I thought about the possibility of Ward in Tampa as well, but he's already 28 and is only 7 months younger than Graham. Ward is 5'11" to Graham's 5'9" and they have similar weights. So, Ward doesn't represent that big of a change to Graham. Maybe they will look for a younger version of Dunn in FA or grab a back in the draft.I don't get cutting Dunn. His pricetag was $3M, and he put up great numbers last year.Who else do they have after Graham? Caddy was hurt late and cannot be counted on at all.This only makes sense if they are either making room for a run at Haynesworth or if they want to bring in Derrick Ward.
or draft a back in the first or second round.I don't get cutting Dunn. His pricetag was $3M, and he put up great numbers last year.Who else do they have after Graham? Caddy was hurt late and cannot be counted on at all.This only makes sense if they are either making room for a run at Haynesworth or if they want to bring in Derrick Ward.
QUEZILLA said:Geno Hayes is gonna be the man, but I don't think they should have cut ties with Brooks. The others aren't really much of a shock. Maybe a few will resign.
With Brooks and June gone, what are the options at OLB for Tampa? Do they silde Hayes to the outside, but who else? FA's... draft...Punchie said:June surprises me, he would have been the best fit at WLB post Brooks.
Didn't Dominick also say "We are not rebuilding."We'll see soon enough.I do like a lot of the young players...especially in the secondary and OL.QUEZILLA said:Mark Dominick said the possibility of an uncapped season in the future played no role in the decisions. At least Bruce Allen would say "we have a plan for both." Guy is merely a puppet for the broke Glazers. Quez is![]()
![]()
![]()
they're not spending **** this offseason. the whole "rebuilding mode" writing is all over the wall. perfect excuse to hoard more of that cap room and "re-sign our key young players", like phillips and buchanon who are 36 hours away from walking the road. the mouthbreathers who were crawling over each other to get gruden fired are getting served their first plate today. team is in for a long, long, looooooooong road back. hope you guys all like baseball.I'm fine with this provided they show a desire to spend money this offseason.
Well that's true. The Buccaneers signed tons of top free agents during Gruden time here. Such as Keyshawn, Jeff Faine and...well that's it, but still, those two moves were key.who were crawling over each other to get gruden fired are getting served their first plate today.
Agreed. Thanks for the memories #55.I know Brooks is extremely popular but it was time for him to go.
BAH. you're 11 posts slow there pal.I heard that Brooks and Dunn may be forming a band.

Uh, you realize that he made the probowl right? He didn't fall off that much, and they still had a top 10 defense. I think it was a good move to cut him, but the guy just made the probowl, he's hardly "toast".I know Brooks is extremely popular but it was time for him to go. As a matter of fact it's time to call it a career. He is toast as a viable player. Maybe like someone else said earlier, he could be a "mentor" to some young guy, but his days are long gone.
That's a popularity vote. Barrett Ruud was much more deserving of a trip to Hawaii than Brooks. He's a HOF'er for sure, but he has lost a big step the last two seasons. I would have liked to see him in a Bucs uniform for one more year in a reduced role, but Raheem Morris sees otherwise and I'm okay with it provided they have a plan in place.Uh, you realize that he made the probowl right? He didn't fall off that much, and they still had a top 10 defense.
They might be doing that.Sara Walsh, WUSA (DC TV station)Jeff Pasquino said:This only makes sense if they are either making room for a run at Haynesworth or if they want to bring in Derrick Ward.
Albert Haynesworth still doesn't know where he'll land when the free agent market opens this Friday, but the defensive tackle is heavily weighing several options. Aside from Washington, Tennessee, and Tampa, the Giants may also be in the mix.
I spoke with Haynesworth for almost an hour this evening and he truly is torn about where the right fit for him will be. Ironically, he spent much of the conversation grilling me about life in Washington and what the Redskins are like.
A Houston Chronicle report said the Skins were willing to give Haynesworth a deal worth more than 100 million. But the Bucs also have change to spare. Today Tampa made massive cuts, releasing five players including Pro Bowlers Derrick Brooks and Warrick Dunn.
To a degree. But there were lots of popular players who didn't make it. So Ruud should have gone, so Brooks is the 5th best LB last year? 8th? 10th?I never said he hasn't lost a step. I said Brooks wasn't "toast" as someone claimed. That's laughable.PewterFan said:That's a popularity vote. Barrett Ruud was much more deserving of a trip to Hawaii than Brooks. He's a HOF'er for sure, but he has lost a big step the last two seasons. I would have liked to see him in a Bucs uniform for one more year in a reduced role, but Raheem Morris sees otherwise and I'm okay with it provided they have a plan in place.Uh, you realize that he made the probowl right? He didn't fall off that much, and they still had a top 10 defense.
Bringing in Haynesworth would be a HUGE mistake IMHO. He has never played a complete season, takes plays off, and has only had his best years when looking towards making a statement for his next new contract. NO THANKS!My buddy and I were talking about just letting all these guys go. Why not try to trade some of them for some leverage to make a bigger move like going for Boldin or something?bucsbaby said:If Tampa brings in Hayensworth and a vet QB and drafts a WR and RB on the first day then they could easily be competitive imo.
none of those guys TB released would net TB anything in a trade.Bringing in Haynesworth would be a HUGE mistake IMHO. He has never played a complete season, takes plays off, and has only had his best years when looking towards making a statement for his next new contract. NO THANKS!My buddy and I were talking about just letting all these guys go. Why not try to trade some of them for some leverage to make a bigger move like going for Boldin or something?bucsbaby said:If Tampa brings in Hayensworth and a vet QB and drafts a WR and RB on the first day then they could easily be competitive imo.
I am not saying there are better or even other guys to bring in for that kind of impact, but to lock in the kind of money he is talking about would be bad not only because of his part-time playing status, but also because if he didn't pan out it would cripple the team, financially.The Bucs need a big, bigtime DT. Maybe Hayensworth pans out, maybe he doesn't, but if he does it would be HUGE for the Bucs. DT is their biggest need on the defensive side of the ball. I can't see anyone else coming in and having the same potential as Hayensworth would have. If there are other potential great DTs out there TB could bring in, so be it, but tell me who that would be.
I don't think you can be so sure. A conditional draft pick for Brooks could be in the cards. Maybe even for Galloway or Dunn, but I know that is probably less likely. What about June - conditional draft pick may work there, too.I don't know. You may be right, but I wonder if they even tried before they made the cuts.none of those guys TB released would net TB anything in a trade.Bringing in Haynesworth would be a HUGE mistake IMHO. He has never played a complete season, takes plays off, and has only had his best years when looking towards making a statement for his next new contract. NO THANKS!My buddy and I were talking about just letting all these guys go. Why not try to trade some of them for some leverage to make a bigger move like going for Boldin or something?If Tampa brings in Hayensworth and a vet QB and drafts a WR and RB on the first day then they could easily be competitive imo.