What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Teacher's Seniority (1 Viewer)

I refuse to believe that education is the only field in which you can't reliably determine the quality of the employee. It simply doesn't make any sense. If you take a three-year average of children's improvement in test scores (which would remove the OMG my kids are idiots all the millionaire kids are in Mr Smith's class!!!! objection), combined with some sort of metric of evaluation based on observation of teaching, combined with student feedback and parent feedback and sprinkle in a little bit of good old-fashioned subjective feedback from the bosses and other teachers, you would probably have a pretty good system for determining which teachers are not pulling their weight in a given school.
You're right. I'm sure somebody could probably come up with a pretty good system for determining a teacher's performance.

You forgot one thing though...it is going to take time and money. Educational time is not measured in days or hours. It is measured in minutes.

 
No matter what field of endeavor you want to talk about, the fact remains that there are simply a few working at that job that suck. How many guys do you work with currently that you wonder why they haven't been fired yet?

It's the same with teaching. Yeah a few teachers stink. But the majority are hard-working and committed to the kids. They didn't go into the profession for the large cash bonuses.
Sure. Is it impossible to figure out who those few are? Is seniority a good way to determine the best teachers?
 
I refuse to believe that education is the only field in which you can't reliably determine the quality of the employee. It simply doesn't make any sense. If you take a three-year average of children's improvement in test scores (which would remove the OMG my kids are idiots all the millionaire kids are in Mr Smith's class!!!! objection), combined with some sort of metric of evaluation based on observation of teaching, combined with student feedback and parent feedback and sprinkle in a little bit of good old-fashioned subjective feedback from the bosses and other teachers, you would probably have a pretty good system for determining which teachers are not pulling their weight in a given school.
You're right. I'm sure somebody could probably come up with a pretty good system for determining a teacher's performance.

You forgot one thing though...it is going to take time and money. Educational time is not measured in days or hours. It is measured in minutes.
That's fair. I know education is very unique in that the 'customer' isn't paying directly, gov't is the payee, intangible direct benefit etc. It's a unique field. I wonder how a highly-scheduled business (doctors, manufacturing etc) handle quality assurance and performance metrics. Maybe there are fields where the time constraints are analogous.

 
I refuse to believe that education is the only field in which you can't reliably determine the quality of the employee. It simply doesn't make any sense. If you take a three-year average of children's improvement in test scores (which would remove the OMG my kids are idiots all the millionaire kids are in Mr Smith's class!!!! objection), combined with some sort of metric of evaluation based on observation of teaching, combined with student feedback and parent feedback and sprinkle in a little bit of good old-fashioned subjective feedback from the bosses and other teachers, you would probably have a pretty good system for determining which teachers are not pulling their weight in a given school.

It seems weird to me that education is The best example where the perfect is the enemy of the good, meaning that many imperfect improvements that are discussed a recommended are thrown out by teachers because they're not perfect or there might be a small issue here there with them.
Where I work we are evaluated annually. It is based on student growth through pre and post test data as well as multiple observations by administration. We then meet with the administrator and go over every point to come to a concensus on where we stand. It's reasonable. Some of the points (the State chose the eval model) are ridiculous and its impossible to be rated as highly effective(One of the highly effective points is attending student events that are not school related - I actually think that one could be borderline creepy). However, you are doing an average job, you should no problem being labeled effective. We have had a couple teachers "quit" over the last couple years because they had too many poor reviews and had failed to take action on the recommendations for improvement.

 
I refuse to believe that education is the only field in which you can't reliably determine the quality of the employee. It simply doesn't make any sense. If you take a three-year average of children's improvement in test scores (which would remove the OMG my kids are idiots all the millionaire kids are in Mr Smith's class!!!! objection), combined with some sort of metric of evaluation based on observation of teaching, combined with student feedback and parent feedback and sprinkle in a little bit of good old-fashioned subjective feedback from the bosses and other teachers, you would probably have a pretty good system for determining which teachers are not pulling their weight in a given school.

It seems weird to me that education is The best example where the perfect is the enemy of the good, meaning that many imperfect improvements that are discussed a recommended are thrown out by teachers because they're not perfect or there might be a small issue here there with them.
Where I work we are evaluated annually. It is based on student growth through pre and post test data as well as multiple observations by administration. We then meet with the administrator and go over every point to come to a concensus on where we stand. It's reasonable. Some of the points (the State chose the eval model) are ridiculous and its impossible to be rated as highly effective(One of the highly effective points is attending student events that are not school related - I actually think that one could be borderline creepy). However, you are doing an average job, you should no problem being labeled effective. We have had a couple teachers "quit" over the last couple years because they had too many poor reviews and had failed to take action on the recommendations for improvement.
In your opinion were those teachers below average?
 
No matter what field of endeavor you want to talk about, the fact remains that there are simply a few working at that job that suck. How many guys do you work with currently that you wonder why they haven't been fired yet?

It's the same with teaching. Yeah a few teachers stink. But the majority are hard-working and committed to the kids. They didn't go into the profession for the large cash bonuses.
While it is true that their are poor performers in every field, the difference is that management could fire the poor performers in other fields if it wished to.

Can you explain why you believe that, of all professions, it is impossible to assess performance of teachers?

 
leftcoastguy7 said:
squidrope said:
Have parents/students/admin rate teachers. Combine this with kids before and after test scores and whamo! Really shouldn't be that difficult to determine the dead wood.
What about elementary students?"I rate Mrs. G. four gold stars!!!!
Or middle school students." I hate that ##### cause she told me to stop talking."
It's much more appropriate for HS where the kids are mature enough to recognize what a makes a good teacher.
"Some" of the kids.

 
I think I would like to fire some of my parents. How do I go about this?

I have no problem getting paid for my performance. How much can I make? I'm okay with my paycheck, but if you want to pay me more for kicking ### I'm okay with that too. Let's talk $. I'm going to make about $73,000 this year. That's about $3000 less than I made three years ago because my state has shifted our pay scale around to pay younger teachers more and older teachers less. It kind of sucks because I'm at the bottom of my payscale and my salary can't go up from year to year. As things cost more due to inflation I'm actually going backwards in my buying power. Making matters worse I plan to teach for 18 more years. I'm 22 years in already.

So, let's talk $. How much are you willing to pay me if I kick ###? Or is this only about firing those with seniority?

 
leftcoastguy7 said:
squidrope said:
Have parents/students/admin rate teachers. Combine this with kids before and after test scores and whamo! Really shouldn't be that difficult to determine the dead wood.
What about elementary students?"I rate Mrs. G. four gold stars!!!!
Or middle school students." I hate that ##### cause she told me to stop talking."
It's much more appropriate for HS where the kids are mature enough to recognize what a makes a good teacher.
I'll give you a good rating if you give me a ride home after school Mrs.....Robinson.
 
Can you explain why you believe that, of all professions, it is impossible to assess performance of teachers?
Several comments in this thread detailing why the teaching profession is a different dynamic. Either you haven't read this thread, or dismissed those reasons as irrelevant.

EDIT: To add to the other comments. Here's a reason you perhaps haven't thought of: Great teaching, not just good, is about making an emotional connection with a kid. Think back to your great teachers. The ones that had some form of impact on your life. You probably don't choose that teacher because of the facts they helped you learn. They made you think more of yourself. They made you think you had potential. Building on this idea, which is the better teacher? They one that guides you to a wealthy life, or the one that guides you to simply being a happier person? Which do we value? Almost 100% of parents would choose to have their kid have a happier life as opposed to a better test score. How do you objectively measure that? I'm all for you trying, but good luck finding a way to pay me more. Again, this is about paying me more for being successful, right?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I refuse to believe that education is the only field in which you can't reliably determine the quality of the employee. It simply doesn't make any sense. If you take a three-year average of children's improvement in test scores (which would remove the OMG my kids are idiots all the millionaire kids are in Mr Smith's class!!!! objection), combined with some sort of metric of evaluation based on observation of teaching, combined with student feedback and parent feedback and sprinkle in a little bit of good old-fashioned subjective feedback from the bosses and other teachers, you would probably have a pretty good system for determining which teachers are not pulling their weight in a given school.

It seems weird to me that education is The best example where the perfect is the enemy of the good, meaning that many imperfect improvements that are discussed a recommended are thrown out by teachers because they're not perfect or there might be a small issue here there with them.
Where I work we are evaluated annually. It is based on student growth through pre and post test data as well as multiple observations by administration. We then meet with the administrator and go over every point to come to a concensus on where we stand. It's reasonable. Some of the points (the State chose the eval model) are ridiculous and its impossible to be rated as highly effective(One of the highly effective points is attending student events that are not school related - I actually think that one could be borderline creepy). However, you are doing an average job, you should no problem being labeled effective. We have had a couple teachers "quit" over the last couple years because they had too many poor reviews and had failed to take action on the recommendations for improvement.
In your opinion were those teachers below average?
They were awful. I hated having to work with them and I found them to be an embarrassment to the school.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
leftcoastguy7 said:
squidrope said:
Have parents/students/admin rate teachers. Combine this with kids before and after test scores and whamo! Really shouldn't be that difficult to determine the dead wood.
What about elementary students?"I rate Mrs. G. four gold stars!!!!
Or middle school students." I hate that ##### cause she told me to stop talking."
It's much more appropriate for HS where the kids are mature enough to recognize what a makes a good teacher.
"Some" of the kids.
Most.
 
Can you explain why you believe that, of all professions, it is impossible to assess performance of teachers?
Several comments in this thread detailing why the teaching profession is a different dynamic. Either you haven't read this thread, or dismissed those reasons as irrelevant.
C'mon, man. Are you kidding me with this? EVERY profession is a "different dynamic". That doesn't excuse teachers from getting performance reviews and weeding out the poor performers - like EVERY profession. When people talk like this, it makes me think that all they want to do is sit on their ### and coast.

Frankly, I'm a bit tired of the "teacher's are special and can't be touched" attitude. FEAR can be a great motivator towards improvement.

For the record, I'm not saying all teachers are lazy, good-for-nothings.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The real issue with tying employment to performance in the teaching field is that so many people got into teaching because it's rewarding and they love doing it and it is a very secure field once you've gotten tenure. So some of the pushback stems from the fact that the teacher constituency is made up largely folks who came into the system with an understanding that if they put a certain number of years and they were at a fairly low risk of losing their jobs. It's like trying to change the rules on pensions after somebody's been vested for 20 years, it's extremely difficult and understandable why the workforce would strongly resist a framework that they been operating under for decades.
Yeah, no.
Yeah in many cases it is.
have to say he is spot on in my case. I was in business school. It wasnt for me. I went into teaching because it was the opposite spectrum. Now they are trying to model education after a business model. I could have just stuck with business if that is what I wanted.
 
Can you explain why you believe that, of all professions, it is impossible to assess performance of teachers?
Several comments in this thread detailing why the teaching profession is a different dynamic. Either you haven't read this thread, or dismissed those reasons as irrelevant.
C'mon, man. Are you kidding me with this? EVERY profession is a "different dynamic". That doesn't excuse teachers from getting performance reviews and weeding out the poor performers - like EVERY profession. When people talk like this, it makes me think that all they want to do is sit on their ### and coast.

Frankly, I'm a bit tired of the "teacher's are special and can't be touched" attitude. FEAR can be a great motivator towards improvement.
Okay. I'm good with your assessment. How much can I make? Give me a ballpark for my potential maximum salary?

 
Are you a good teacher if you take a kid who scored a 30 on the pretest and got them to a 90 on the post

Or did you just teach to the test the whole year

Is there learning going on in that class or just practice.

 
Can you explain why you believe that, of all professions, it is impossible to assess performance of teachers?
Several comments in this thread detailing why the teaching profession is a different dynamic. Either you haven't read this thread, or dismissed those reasons as irrelevant.
C'mon, man. Are you kidding me with this? EVERY profession is a "different dynamic". That doesn't excuse teachers from getting performance reviews and weeding out the poor performers - like EVERY profession. When people talk like this, it makes me think that all they want to do is sit on their ### and coast.

Frankly, I'm a bit tired of the "teacher's are special and can't be touched" attitude. FEAR can be a great motivator towards improvement.
Okay. I'm good with your assessment. How much can I make? Give me a ballpark for my potential maximum salary?
Whatever the market/taxpayers will bear for your profession.

If you're good - like any profession - i'm sure you'll make a lot more.

 
Are you a good teacher if you take a kid who scored a 30 on the pretest and got them to a 90 on the post

Or did you just teach to the test the whole year

Is there learning going on in that class or just practice.
I'm getting the impression that teacher's don't want to be judged based on their students. So if they have a crappy set of students then they can't be judged on their performance. The alternative is, of course, that if they do get students to improve (like in your case) they can't be judge/accept cred for that either.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can you explain why you believe that, of all professions, it is impossible to assess performance of teachers?
Several comments in this thread detailing why the teaching profession is a different dynamic. Either you haven't read this thread, or dismissed those reasons as irrelevant.
C'mon, man. Are you kidding me with this? EVERY profession is a "different dynamic". That doesn't excuse teachers from getting performance reviews and weeding out the poor performers - like EVERY profession. When people talk like this, it makes me think that all they want to do is sit on their ### and coast.

Frankly, I'm a bit tired of the "teacher's are special and can't be touched" attitude. FEAR can be a great motivator towards improvement.
Okay. I'm good with your assessment. How much can I make? Give me a ballpark for my potential maximum salary?
Whatever the market/taxpayers will bear for your profession.

If you're good - like any profession - i'm sure you'll make a lot more.
I'm asking your opinion.

1. What makes a good teacher? Test scores? Long term evaluations? Average ratings by parents/students/administrators over many years? Please be as specific as possible.

2. How much money are YOU willing to see a great teacher earn in a year?

 
I'd say a range of 20%. Great teachers make 10% more than the average. Below average teachers make 10% below the average. Something like that.

 
I refuse to believe that education is the only field in which you can't reliably determine the quality of the employee. It simply doesn't make any sense. If you take a three-year average of children's improvement in test scores (which would remove the OMG my kids are idiots all the millionaire kids are in Mr Smith's class!!!! objection), combined with some sort of metric of evaluation based on observation of teaching, combined with student feedback and parent feedback and sprinkle in a little bit of good old-fashioned subjective feedback from the bosses and other teachers, you would probably have a pretty good system for determining which teachers are not pulling their weight in a given school.
You're right. I'm sure somebody could probably come up with a pretty good system for determining a teacher's performance.

You forgot one thing though...it is going to take time and money. Educational time is not measured in days or hours. It is measured in minutes.
Not to mention that some of the dumbest human beings imaginable are school administrators. At least from what I've seen for my wife.

 
Can you explain why you believe that, of all professions, it is impossible to assess performance of teachers?
Several comments in this thread detailing why the teaching profession is a different dynamic. Either you haven't read this thread, or dismissed those reasons as irrelevant.
C'mon, man. Are you kidding me with this? EVERY profession is a "different dynamic". That doesn't excuse teachers from getting performance reviews and weeding out the poor performers - like EVERY profession. When people talk like this, it makes me think that all they want to do is sit on their ### and coast.

Frankly, I'm a bit tired of the "teacher's are special and can't be touched" attitude. FEAR can be a great motivator towards improvement.
Okay. I'm good with your assessment. How much can I make? Give me a ballpark for my potential maximum salary?
Whatever the market/taxpayers will bear for your profession.

If you're good - like any profession - i'm sure you'll make a lot more.
I'm asking your opinion.

1. What makes a good teacher? Test scores? Long term evaluations? Average ratings by parents/students/administrators over many years? Please be as specific as possible.

2. How much money are YOU willing to see a great teacher earn in a year?
1) That's a tough call because i'm not really qualified. But if you want a non-qualified opinion I'd say this following would be included but not limited to:

a) Management observations

b) Do they get along well with other teachers (are they a "team" player)

c) Peer review

d) Kudos/Complaints (from parents/kids)

e) Do they meet the continuing education guidelines/scores?

f) Some focus on classroom scores I think might be good, but I wouldn't know the details of how to do this. Those in the profession I'm sure can come up with some better metrics.

g) Are they putting in any effort? Or have they "mailed it in"

2) I'd rather see our teachers get paid like pro-athletes than pro-athletes get paid like pro-athletes. I think teaching is THAT important. I think top teachers should make 100K+ if they are that good but, again, I'd see that top number fluctuating based on what the market/taxpayers can bear (like any other profession).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd say a range of 20%. Great teachers make 10% more than the average. Below average teachers make 10% below the average. Something like that.
Avg in Michigan is 60,000. So we are talking about a range of 54-66. Just to give it some real world numbers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Are you a good teacher if you take a kid who scored a 30 on the pretest and got them to a 90 on the post

Or did you just teach to the test the whole year

Is there learning going on in that class or just practice.
If you try to get them to learn, they may fail the test.

 
I'd say a range of 20%. Great teachers make 10% more than the average. Below average teachers make 10% below the average. Something like that.
My kids come from a long line of great teachers on wife's side and I will do everything I can to keep them from teaching now based on the way this society values them. They can make much more coin in a much easier environment in many more places these days. It's just not worth it financially for educated people to be teachers (or coaches) these days. And its getting worse.
 
I'd say a range of 20%. Great teachers make 10% more than the average. Below average teachers make 10% below the average. Something like that.
My kids come from a long line of great teachers on wife's side and I will do everything I can to keep them from teaching now based on the way this society values them. They can make much more coin in a much easier environment in many more places these days. It's just not worth it financially for educated people to be teachers (or coaches) these days. And its getting worse.
Yes, but as long as you don't care that much about making big money, I think it's the best job in the world.
 
leftcoastguy7 said:
squidrope said:
Have parents/students/admin rate teachers. Combine this with kids before and after test scores and whamo! Really shouldn't be that difficult to determine the dead wood.
What about elementary students?"I rate Mrs. G. four gold stars!!!!
Or middle school students." I hate that ##### cause she told me to stop talking."
It's much more appropriate for HS where the kids are mature enough to recognize what a makes a good teacher.
"Some" of the kids.
Most.
51%... maybe.

 
I think top teachers should make 100K+ if they are that good but, again, I'd see that top number fluctuating based on what the market/taxpayers can bear (like any other profession).
What's 100K+? Is that a max of $199,999.99?

What do I have to do to make this much money? Also, can every teacher make this much? Or are we talking about a heavily skewed distribution like the NFL where few make boatloads and most make well below the mean?

 
Can you explain why you believe that, of all professions, it is impossible to assess performance of teachers?
Several comments in this thread detailing why the teaching profession is a different dynamic. Either you haven't read this thread, or dismissed those reasons as irrelevant.

EDIT: To add to the other comments. Here's a reason you perhaps haven't thought of: Great teaching, not just good, is about making an emotional connection with a kid. Think back to your great teachers. The ones that had some form of impact on your life. You probably don't choose that teacher because of the facts they helped you learn. They made you think more of yourself. They made you think you had potential. Building on this idea, which is the better teacher? They one that guides you to a wealthy life, or the one that guides you to simply being a happier person? Which do we value? Almost 100% of parents would choose to have their kid have a happier life as opposed to a better test score. How do you objectively measure that? I'm all for you trying, but good luck finding a way to pay me more. Again, this is about paying me more for being successful, right?
Not really. if you can't be successful at your job you should be fired

 
I'd say a range of 20%. Great teachers make 10% more than the average. Below average teachers make 10% below the average. Something like that.
My kids come from a long line of great teachers on wife's side and I will do everything I can to keep them from teaching now based on the way this society values them. They can make much more coin in a much easier environment in many more places these days. It's just not worth it financially for educated people to be teachers (or coaches) these days. And its getting worse.
Yes, but as long as you don't care that much about making big money, I think it's the best job in the world.
I'm firm believer that I'd rather be happy than rich, or even well-off. And I think a lot of other people are that way too.

Teacher's don't have a monopoly on the "we do it because we love it, not for the salary" kind of talk. So I don't know why we have to pretend to be in awe and give them special breaks whenever we hear that from them because they aren't the only ones that do it.

 
I'd say a range of 20%. Great teachers make 10% more than the average. Below average teachers make 10% below the average. Something like that.
Avg in Michigan is 60,000. So we are talking about a range of 54-66. Just to give it some real world numbers.
Thats a very good wage given the time off. The average is about $10K higher in CA. There are some real high spots though. There are school districts in the Bay Area where the average is over $100K.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd say a range of 20%. Great teachers make 10% more than the average. Below average teachers make 10% below the average. Something like that.
Avg in Michigan is 60,000. So we are talking about a range of 54-66. Just to give it some real world numbers.
Sure. Maybe a bigger range. Thanks for having a reasonable exchange. PIK - teaching is a very solid job for many people. It's not like everyone with a BA Finance or CS degree is pulling 250+. Median income in the US for a bachelors degree is around 50k.

According to this link average public teacher base salary is around 50K. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d09/tables/dt09_075.asp

That link also shows total salary of 56K when Summer earnings are factored in.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think top teachers should make 100K+ if they are that good but, again, I'd see that top number fluctuating based on what the market/taxpayers can bear (like any other profession).
What's 100K+? Is that a max of $199,999.99?

What do I have to do to make this much money? Also, can every teacher make this much? Or are we talking about a heavily skewed distribution like the NFL where few make boatloads and most make well below the mean?
I gave you a number. Make as much as the market/taxpayers will bear for your services. If the market/taxpayers can support paying you 199,999.99 then that's fantastic.

And as for the bolded above, THAT'S the normal for EVERY profession. Does that surprise you?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd say a range of 20%. Great teachers make 10% more than the average. Below average teachers make 10% below the average. Something like that.
My kids come from a long line of great teachers on wife's side and I will do everything I can to keep them from teaching now based on the way this society values them. They can make much more coin in a much easier environment in many more places these days. It's just not worth it financially for educated people to be teachers (or coaches) these days. And its getting worse.
Yes, but as long as you don't care that much about making big money, I think it's the best job in the world.
Big money? Gotta at least pay the bills and its trending in a bad direction now. The environment suxors too. My wife is an art teacher in a great school. She has been there for years and her students win many awards and she is very highly regarded. She has been hating it (even though she is in denial) mostly over the last couple of years. Its really changing for the worse and its not gonna get better. The worst part for me is that the kids and families don't take any responsibility for themselves anymore. This new batch of "changes" reinforces that attitude. Every kid is a genius these days and its the teachers fault when they don't improve (Even if they are a little A How). Like I said, my kids are out.
 
I'd say a range of 20%. Great teachers make 10% more than the average. Below average teachers make 10% below the average. Something like that.
My kids come from a long line of great teachers on wife's side and I will do everything I can to keep them from teaching now based on the way this society values them. They can make much more coin in a much easier environment in many more places these days. It's just not worth it financially for educated people to be teachers (or coaches) these days. And its getting worse.
Yes, but as long as you don't care that much about making big money, I think it's the best job in the world.
Big money? Gotta at least pay the bills and its trending in a bad direction now. The environment suxors too. My wife is an art teacher in a great school. She has been there for years and her students win many awards and she is very highly regarded. She has been hating it (even though she is in denial) mostly over the last couple of years. Its really changing for the worse and its not gonna get better. The worst part for me is that the kids and families don't take any responsibility for themselves anymore. This new batch of "changes" reinforces that attitude. Every kid is a genius these days and its the teachers fault when they don't improve (Even if they are a little A How). Like I said, my kids are out.
I think you can thank the unions for that. Here in WI the teachers really hurt their cause with their behavior during the ACT 10 debate and, most recently, during the right to work debate (although, it was nothing like the ACT 10 nonsense).

 
It's not like everyone with a BA Finance or CS degree is pulling 250+. Median income in the US for a bachelors degree is around 50k.
What if you teach a more specialized subject? I teach AP Calculus and AP Statistics. Should I make more? If so, how much?

 
I'd say a range of 20%. Great teachers make 10% more than the average. Below average teachers make 10% below the average. Something like that.
My kids come from a long line of great teachers on wife's side and I will do everything I can to keep them from teaching now based on the way this society values them. They can make much more coin in a much easier environment in many more places these days. It's just not worth it financially for educated people to be teachers (or coaches) these days. And its getting worse.
Yes, but as long as you don't care that much about making big money, I think it's the best job in the world.
Big money? Gotta at least pay the bills and its trending in a bad direction now. The environment suxors too. My wife is an art teacher in a great school. She has been there for years and her students win many awards and she is very highly regarded. She has been hating it (even though she is in denial) mostly over the last couple of years. Its really changing for the worse and its not gonna get better. The worst part for me is that the kids and families don't take any responsibility for themselves anymore. This new batch of "changes" reinforces that attitude. Every kid is a genius these days and its the teachers fault when they don't improve (Even if they are a little A How). Like I said, my kids are out.
She should do what most people do when they hate their job. Find a new job.

 
My wife and I are both teachers

I made 107,000 this year with no coaching

My wife makes something in the 115-120,000 range. I dont remember exactly

 
Make as much as the market/taxpayers will bear for your services.
I assume that's already happening, so the odds of me making that 100K+ salary is just your opinion and not really going to happen. That sucks.
Well, you're the one asked me for my OPINION, so I'm not sure what you're getting at. People are answering your questions but you keep responding with what I can only assume is shtick (and sarcasm) at this point.

I'm sorry you're upset that your profession doesn't pay you like a hedge fund manager. Welcome to the club.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My wife and I are both teachers

I made 107,000 this year with no coaching

My wife makes something in the 115-120,000 range. I dont remember exactly
Holy ####, man. That's awesome!

Maybe you should talk to Hooper31 and give him some advice.

 
It's not like everyone with a BA Finance or CS degree is pulling 250+. Median income in the US for a bachelors degree is around 50k.
What if you teach a more specialized subject? I teach AP Calculus and AP Statistics. Should I make more? If so, how much?
Are you better than your peers at it? If so, sure. I do t know what your Socratic questioning is going to prove in here. None of us have all the answers. We just think the assumption that 'teaching is one example where you can't appropriateky apply performance metrics' is a bad assumption. We can hold that opinion without having a perfect performance-based compensation system worked out on paper.

But good luck.

 
I'd say a range of 20%. Great teachers make 10% more than the average. Below average teachers make 10% below the average. Something like that.
My kids come from a long line of great teachers on wife's side and I will do everything I can to keep them from teaching now based on the way this society values them. They can make much more coin in a much easier environment in many more places these days. It's just not worth it financially for educated people to be teachers (or coaches) these days. And its getting worse.
Yes, but as long as you don't care that much about making big money, I think it's the best job in the world.
Big money? Gotta at least pay the bills and its trending in a bad direction now. The environment suxors too. My wife is an art teacher in a great school. She has been there for years and her students win many awards and she is very highly regarded. She has been hating it (even though she is in denial) mostly over the last couple of years. Its really changing for the worse and its not gonna get better. The worst part for me is that the kids and families don't take any responsibility for themselves anymore. This new batch of "changes" reinforces that attitude. Every kid is a genius these days and its the teachers fault when they don't improve (Even if they are a little A How). Like I said, my kids are out.
I think you can thank the unions for that. Here in WI the teachers really hurt their cause with their behavior during the ACT 10 debate and, most recently, during the right to work debate (although, it was nothing like the ACT 10 nonsense).
Are you high? Yeah, unions don't fight for the people they represent, they hurt them. If Union workers didn't have the little bit of strength in numbers that they have now, they would be in much worse shape. I have yet to see a big business that is non union where the owners just pay the workers fairly and treat them well out of the kindness of there hearts. Stop with that. Teachers unions dont hurt teachers.
 
Max, your free market approach is rubbish. Education is a public good not a private one (at least based on the current operating assumption that the US should try to educate every child).

I'm fairy conservative and you are ridiculous with this.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the replies. It's partially just for fun. I'm good with what I get paid. I plan to do it for a lot longer and you'll never hear me complain. I find these discussions mildly entertaining. If you're going to be good at this job it has to come from within. A paycheck will never be a good motivator when it comes to this job. Ask all the good ones and they'll tell you the same thing. I work hard at it because I want to be able to look in the mirror and know I did my best. Knowing I've impacted some lives is a great bonus. They just have to pay me enough to keep me interested and continue to give me enough autonomy. Have a nice day. :)

 
Max, your freearket approach is rubbish. Education is a public good not a private one (at least based on the current operating assumption that the US should try to educate every child).

I'm fairy conservative and you are ridiculous with this.
I don't think it's that ridiculous. However, I think you and I are on the same page on this subject for the most part.

 
I'd say a range of 20%. Great teachers make 10% more than the average. Below average teachers make 10% below the average. Something like that.
My kids come from a long line of great teachers on wife's side and I will do everything I can to keep them from teaching now based on the way this society values them. They can make much more coin in a much easier environment in many more places these days. It's just not worth it financially for educated people to be teachers (or coaches) these days. And its getting worse.
Yes, but as long as you don't care that much about making big money, I think it's the best job in the world.
Big money? Gotta at least pay the bills and its trending in a bad direction now. The environment suxors too. My wife is an art teacher in a great school. She has been there for years and her students win many awards and she is very highly regarded. She has been hating it (even though she is in denial) mostly over the last couple of years. Its really changing for the worse and its not gonna get better. The worst part for me is that the kids and families don't take any responsibility for themselves anymore. This new batch of "changes" reinforces that attitude. Every kid is a genius these days and its the teachers fault when they don't improve (Even if they are a little A How). Like I said, my kids are out.
I think you can thank the unions for that. Here in WI the teachers really hurt their cause with their behavior during the ACT 10 debate and, most recently, during the right to work debate (although, it was nothing like the ACT 10 nonsense).
Are you high? Yeah, unions don't fight for the people they represent, they hurt them. If Union workers didn't have the little bit of strength in numbers that they have now, they would be in much worse shape. I have yet to see a big business that is non union where the owners just pay the workers fairly and treat them well out of the kindness of there hearts. Stop with that. Teachers unions dont hurt teachers.
Unions incite the kind of behavior we saw from them and Unions stopped representing their members DECADES ago when they became the fund-raising arm for the Democratic Party.

 
Thanks for the replies. It's partially just for fun. I'm good with what I get paid. I plan to do it for a lot longer and you'll never hear me complain. I find these discussions mildly entertaining. If you're going to be good at this job it has to come from within. A paycheck will never be a good motivator when it comes to this job. Ask all the good ones and they'll tell you the same thing. I work hard at it because I want to be able to look in the mirror and know I did my best. Knowing I've impacted some lives is a great bonus. They just have to pay me enough to keep me interested and continue to give me enough autonomy. Have a nice day. :)
I'd like to pay you more for caring more.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top