What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Tell me why Pennington signs in 1 day (1 Viewer)

You can think he's still talented and I won't try to convince you otherwise, but why do you think 32 NFL general managers and 32 coaches do not want to employ Brooks now?
Like I said, no offense, but I'm not interested in having this conversation. I'm sure there are any number of factors but I don't like where this is going.Peace. :lmao:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You can think he's still talented and I won't try to convince you otherwise, but why do you think 32 NFL general managers and 32 coaches do not want to employ Brooks now?
Like I said, no offense, but I'm not interested in having this conversation.Peace. :lmao:
Ok man, sorry to scare you off by responding to your post. For everyone else, I think the answer to my question is that Brooks has poor character, poor work ethic, and poor fundamentals, which are precisely the areas in which Pennington is excellent. We've seen countless examples over the years of guys with seemingly limited athletic ability being far superior quarterbacks than their more talented counterparts. That's just the nature of the quarterback position.
 
The snide remark only confirms to me that it's not a good idea to continue this conversation.

Obviously you are still very passionate about this, but I left it behind years ago and don't really feel like rehashing what is best left in the past.

Have a nice day, man. :goodposting:

 
I didn't mean that remark to be snide, and I'm really not that passionate about it anymore. You made it obvious you didn't want to talk about the past, so I shifted my question to focus on the topic at hand - "why don't these guys have jobs". I firmly believe the three things I outlined above are the reason. Even McCarthy wasn't interested.

It seems to me you can't discuss Brooks at all because of bad memories of past debates. Trust me, I went through plenty of those too and don't want to do it again either. But if your past precludes you from having any sort of conversation about Brooks, then you probably shouldn't have jumped in the thread. I have the same issue Manning/Brady debates.

 
The snide remark only confirms to me that it's not a good idea to continue this conversation.Obviously you are still very passionate about this, but I left it behind years ago and don't really feel like rehashing what is best left in the past.Have a nice day, man. :confused:
how many goodbye posts are you going to make?
 
Culpepper turned down a Packers deal maybe, wait for it, because he is racist!
Which was ridiculous, IMO. There's no way I'd rather play behind PGH's line than Green Bay's. Now he's competing for the job of second string behind Big Ben, who is much less likely to lose time or get yanked than Rodgers.The dude either doesn't really want to play football or he should 'fire his agent'.
IIRC, Culpepper was acting as his own agent when he was negotiating with the Pack. I am not sure and too lazy to search but I believe the Packers offered him a one year deal at the league minimum. For a team that was 30 M under the cap, that is peanuts for a QB. It almost guarantees that he will be cut before the season no matter how good he played in preseason.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Culpepper turned down a Packers deal maybe, wait for it, because he is racist!
Which was ridiculous, IMO. There's no way I'd rather play behind PGH's line than Green Bay's. Now he's competing for the job of second string behind Big Ben, who is much less likely to lose time or get yanked than Rodgers.The dude either doesn't really want to play football or he should 'fire his agent'.
IIRC, Culpepper was acting as his own agent when he was negotiating with the Pack. I am sure and too lazy to search but I believe the Packers offered him a one year deal at the league minimum. For a team that was 30 M under the cap, that is peanuts for a QB. It almost guarantees that he will be cut before the season no matter how good he played in preseason.
....and just think, Culpepper would have won the league MVP in 2004 had it not been for Peyton Manning's record setting season.
 
Culpepper turned down a Packers deal maybe, wait for it, because he is racist!
Which was ridiculous, IMO. There's no way I'd rather play behind PGH's line than Green Bay's. Now he's competing for the job of second string behind Big Ben, who is much less likely to lose time or get yanked than Rodgers.The dude either doesn't really want to play football or he should 'fire his agent'.
IIRC, Culpepper was acting as his own agent when he was negotiating with the Pack. I am sure and too lazy to search but I believe the Packers offered him a one year deal at the league minimum. For a team that was 30 M under the cap, that is peanuts for a QB. It almost guarantees that he will be cut before the season no matter how good he played in preseason.
Yes, he's been his own agent for some time.
 
Penny is very NFL smart... hes the type that will take a young QB under his wing and Groom him. Even when he was able to go last yr, the Jets still placed Clemens out on the field even when it was clear that Penny offered a better chance to win... and did Penny take it personally, did he look upset when the Jets won a game while he was on the sidelines healthy.. nope; he cheered and congrat the kid for doing a great job. Those types of actions allow you to stay employed.

Pennington is miles ahead of those other QB mentioned.. even if he physically limited in his arm strength... everyone wants a team player in their locker room.

 
I'm not a big believer in racism.But when noodle-arm Chad Pennington lands a STARTING job in 1 day and some of the other guys that have been out there can't find work, it makes me wonder what's going on. I guess I understand Culpepper hasn't been good for a few years now, but I'm a little surprised Leftwich and Brooks have been left out there.Now, I know Culpepper and Leftwich are both going to sign with the Steelers to battle to back up Roethlisberger, but ... what's going on at QB in the NFL?
Parcells drafted Chad and always goes for "his guys" ala Terry Glenn.Pennington is good in the clubhouse, a non-complainer. Pennington is a smart QB, a guy willing to mentor. Culpepper and Lefty do not want to mentor a group of young QBs.
 
You can think he's still talented and I won't try to convince you otherwise, but why do you think 32 NFL general managers and 32 coaches do not want to employ Brooks now?
Like I said, no offense, but I'm not interested in having this conversation.Peace. :confused:
Ok man, sorry to scare you off by responding to your post. For everyone else, I think the answer to my question is that Brooks has poor character, poor work ethic, and poor fundamentals, which are precisely the areas in which Pennington is excellent. We've seen countless examples over the years of guys with seemingly limited athletic ability being far superior quarterbacks than their more talented counterparts. That's just the nature of the quarterback position.
The snide remark only confirms to me that it's not a good idea to continue this conversation.

Obviously you are still very passionate about this, but I left it behind years ago and don't really feel like rehashing what is best left in the past.

Have a nice day, man. :confused:
Point out the snide part - I didn't see it.

It seems to me that you started a topic that couldn't be anything but controversial, but you've gotten some good substantive responses pointing out why the three guys you mentioned are poor examples of racism in the NFL, and I have yet to see you respond to that. Instead, I see you griping about the tone of some responses.

What was the point of this thread?

 
It seems to me that you started a topic that couldn't be anything but controversial, but you've gotten some good substantive responses pointing out why the three guys you mentioned are poor examples of racism in the NFL, and I have yet to see you respond to that. Instead, I see you griping about the tone of some responses.

What was the point of this thread?
Dude. I didn't start the topic.:facepalm:

As for why I didn't feel like going down the tangent we were headed, it should be fairly obvious.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It seems to me that you started a topic that couldn't be anything but controversial, but you've gotten some good substantive responses pointing out why the three guys you mentioned are poor examples of racism in the NFL, and I have yet to see you respond to that. Instead, I see you griping about the tone of some responses.

What was the point of this thread?
Dude. I didn't start the topic.:facepalm:

As for why I didn't feel like going down the tangent we were headed, it should be fairly obvious.
My bad. :hey:
 
Culpepper: Has small hands and a tendency to fumble every time he gets hit. Plus, wthout Randy Moss he's been worse than mediocre. And, he turned down a contract.
:2cents: Culpepper has proven that his banner years were more a product of the system, Robert Smith, Cris Carter and Randy Moss's talent than anything he did. Sure, he could chuck it a mile, but most NFL QB's can. I think he'd be a fine back up. Pennington is a starter and a nice fit for a West-Coast offense. I'm assuming that's what Miami will be running, or at least some version of it.
 
Sorry but I'm going to need a much better apology than this. Something containing the words "beg your humble forgiveness" would do. Or you could buy me a sixer. :unsure:In all honesty, I do agree with the OP to some (small) extent. I mean, Todd Bouman is still in the league for cripe's sake. What redeeming qualities does he have that keep him in a job?But it doesn't just happen with black quarterbacks......like somebody else mentioned, there are very few white receivers and running backs, and the ones that are around in invariably lumped into the "lumbering slow white guy" category.It's hardly a stretch to believe that racism/prejudice exists in the NFL when it quite obviously exists in other parts of society. Not that it's a vast sinister conspiracy or anything like that.
 
Sorry but I'm going to need a much better apology than this. Something containing the words "beg your humble forgiveness" would do. Or you could buy me a sixer. :scared: In all honesty, I do agree with the OP to some (small) extent. I mean, Todd Bouman is still in the league for cripe's sake. What redeeming qualities does he have that keep him in a job?

But it doesn't just happen with black quarterbacks......like somebody else mentioned, there are very few white receivers and running backs, and the ones that are around in invariably lumped into the "lumbering slow white guy" category.

It's hardly a stretch to believe that racism/prejudice exists in the NFL when it quite obviously exists in other parts of society. Not that it's a vast sinister conspiracy or anything like that.
Coaches and GMs that are trying to get a new contract would start a martian at QB if they could run the offense with precision.

 
i was just looking for rational reasons and i appreciate those who provided them. like i said, i don't want to believe racism is why and now i believe that that's not why - that pennington is better suited for the dolphins situation and because parcells drafted him.

 
He can read a D and has a wonderful completion percentage. Why would you not want him over those who can't/don't?

 
i was just looking for rational reasons and i appreciate those who provided them. like i said, i don't want to believe racism is why and now i believe that that's not why - that pennington is better suited for the dolphins situation and because parcells drafted him.
Cool. Glad we could help.
 
Afro Samurai said:
Tatum Bell said:
Sorry but I'm going to need a much better apology than this. Something containing the words "beg your humble forgiveness" would do. Or you could buy me a sixer. :P In all honesty, I do agree with the OP to some (small) extent. I mean, Todd Bouman is still in the league for cripe's sake. What redeeming qualities does he have that keep him in a job?

But it doesn't just happen with black quarterbacks......like somebody else mentioned, there are very few white receivers and running backs, and the ones that are around in invariably lumped into the "lumbering slow white guy" category.

It's hardly a stretch to believe that racism/prejudice exists in the NFL when it quite obviously exists in other parts of society. Not that it's a vast sinister conspiracy or anything like that.
I understand this, but there is something missing from that discussion. I doubt Bauman is getting over the league minimum. Go back and look at what Leftwich and Culpepper wanted. They may have changed their collective tunes by now, but bridges might have been burned. Do I think some players/coaches are discriminated against? maybe. But, I do not think this is what is at work with these two. Aaron Brooks was a situation that surprised me.

 
Given the players selected by the OP, high draft picks with physical talent who have some version of teased and failed as NFL QBs, David Carr and Joey harrington should be the prime examples of guys who have jobs that should not. If you try to take any objective look at whether or not race is a factor in 2008 in QB decisions, while possible would be a tough sell. the organizations which these guys last played for all currently or recently had other black QBs as thier starters and all but a couple of organizations have had a black QB make and stay on the 53 man roster.

I am certain that forms of bigotry exist in the world, but i am more worried about the guy who did not get a $30,000 a year job or was denied a mortgage on an average house than I am guys who made multi-millions who can't get another high paying gig, becasue their play was at best questionable at thier last stop.

 
OP- its been said a few different ways, but Pennington was not cut in the same way the three suckateers you mentioned were. Leftwich and Culpepper had starting jobs last year that they sucked at and they were cut for performance reasons. Brooks would have probably gotten another shot if he hadn't had attitude issues, but he also sucked his last two years (16TD and 25ints in 21 games). Pennington was cut because his salary was to high, they needed cap space to get favre and Chad was suddenly expendable. He may be a below average starting QB, but far ahead of the other three.

as for 3rd string QBs, there are probably a dozen or so of them who would be worse starting QBs than Leftwich, but frankly that difference is small considering that neither would be likely to lead the team to a win. A 3rd QBs job (unless they are young and being groomed) is to run the scout team, chart plays, watch film- in general they are like an assitant coach who will see the field in an emergency.

 
A 3rd QBs job (unless they are young and being groomed) is to run the scout team, chart plays, watch film- in general they are like an assitant coach who will see the field in an emergency.
Yep. The third QB is never a guy that's had his chance and failed at starting. It's silly to act like the guys in question here should have jobs over most of the 3rds in the league now.
 
PlasmaDogPlasma said:
Familiarity with the system. Why make it more complicated than it is?
:excited: Pennington and Parcells have familiarity and a comfort level with one another...yet Aaron Brooks can't get a fair shake and there are people from Appalachia or other white, rural portions of the country who won't attend a real estate open house if they know the real estate agent isn't white?! :blackdot:

Not sure how folks got down that path in the Pool (save it for the FFA, buddy, LOL), but could it just be that Parcells KNOWS Pennington, and sees him as a veteran who can buy them a bit of time to get Henne or ??? ready to take over the gig?! A term for folks to get to know, understand and eventually live by: Occam's razor TIA.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top