What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Birther Conspiracy Thread (4 Viewers)

[[inigo Montoya] You keep using those words. I do not think it means what you think it means. [/inigo Montoya]I don't think any kind of evidence would convince you to change your belief. In fact, I make it a point not to argue with people's beliefs, and I'd encourage others to do the same.
It's a statement of fact. People have advanced the notion that he is somehow powerless to release his own birth certificate. Those assertions are flat out wrong. He can do it anytime he wants.It's not a matter of "belief." To paraphrase, you are entitled to your own beliefs, but not your own facts.
 
[[inigo Montoya] You keep using those words. I do not think it means what you think it means. [/inigo Montoya]I don't think any kind of evidence would convince you to change your belief. In fact, I make it a point not to argue with people's beliefs, and I'd encourage others to do the same.
It's a statement of fact. People have advanced the notion that he is somehow powerless to release his own birth certificate. Those assertions are flat out wrong. He can do it anytime he wants.It's not a matter of "belief." To paraphrase, you are entitled to your own beliefs, but not your own facts.
He provided proof of birth in the U.S.. What more do you want?
 
[[inigo Montoya] You keep using those words. I do not think it means what you think it means. [/inigo Montoya]I don't think any kind of evidence would convince you to change your belief. In fact, I make it a point not to argue with people's beliefs, and I'd encourage others to do the same.
It's a statement of fact. People have advanced the notion that he is somehow powerless to release his own birth certificate. Those assertions are flat out wrong. He can do it anytime he wants.It's not a matter of "belief." To paraphrase, you are entitled to your own beliefs, but not your own facts.
He provided proof of birth in the U.S.. What more do you want?
The lawsuits are asking for the vault copy of his birth certificate. Produce that and don't let any Maj Cook's go legally AWOL.
 
you never answered my "what is the theory" question...and if lou dobbs thinks he is a citizen then why is he wasting cycles on this?
If you and your wife happened to be out of the country when your baby was born, wouldn't you still want to run an announcement in your hometown paper?
I don't know. Did John McCain's parents do that?
:shrugs:I'm not sure why that's even relevant...
True, he's not black.
oh yeah that it....do you ever contribute anything to these boards other than insults?
 
Congresssman Ted Poe and Roland Martin on Dobbs' show

It's another example of a prominent American that ran for the Presidency born while his parents were not in their hometown. Closest example I could come up with on short notice. You brought the question of whether somebody like that would want to run an announcement in the hometown paper. Did the McCains run an ad? Do you think it would be irrelevant if McCain were President instead? I mean McCain says that he was born on 'U.S. soil' in the Panama Canal. Does he have proof?
 
[[inigo Montoya] You keep using those words. I do not think it means what you think it means. [/inigo Montoya]I don't think any kind of evidence would convince you to change your belief. In fact, I make it a point not to argue with people's beliefs, and I'd encourage others to do the same.
It's a statement of fact. People have advanced the notion that he is somehow powerless to release his own birth certificate. Those assertions are flat out wrong. He can do it anytime he wants.It's not a matter of "belief." To paraphrase, you are entitled to your own beliefs, but not your own facts.
He provided proof of birth in the U.S.. What more do you want?
The lawsuits are asking for the vault copy of his birth certificate. Produce that and don't let any Maj Cook's go legally AWOL.
I don't care about Major Cook. Why isn't the official documentation that the State of Hawaii provided not sufficient to establish his birth there? Why wouldn't the statement of the Governor of the State of Hawaii not be good enough? Why do they need this specific document so important?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's another example of a prominent American that ran for the Presidency born while his parents were not in their hometown. Closest example I could come up with on short notice. You brought the question of whether somebody like that would want to run an announcement in the hometown paper. Did the McCains run an ad? Do you think it would be irrelevant if McCain were President instead? I mean McCain says that he was born on 'U.S. soil' in the Panama Canal. Does he have proof?
Just making the point that a newpaper announcement, while evidence, isn't really proof, and there are a lot of reasons why an ad might run that doesn't involve some conspiracy to take over the world or a time machine.
 
[[inigo Montoya] You keep using those words. I do not think it means what you think it means. [/inigo Montoya]I don't think any kind of evidence would convince you to change your belief. In fact, I make it a point not to argue with people's beliefs, and I'd encourage others to do the same.
It's a statement of fact. People have advanced the notion that he is somehow powerless to release his own birth certificate. Those assertions are flat out wrong. He can do it anytime he wants.It's not a matter of "belief." To paraphrase, you are entitled to your own beliefs, but not your own facts.
He provided proof of birth in the U.S.. What more do you want?
The lawsuits are asking for the vault copy of his birth certificate. Produce that and don't let any Maj Cook's go legally AWOL.
I don't care about Major Cook. Why isn't the official documentation that the State of Hawaii provided not sufficient to establish his birth there? Why wouldn't the statement of the Governor of the State of Hawaii not good enough? Why do they need this specific document so important?
The document provided has only been authenticated by a few fly by night websitesThe state of Hawaii has only said they have a document on file. If the Governor has said anything otherwise, please post a link.Alos, this is history. The President was born less than 50 years ago, and we know so little about his birth. Up until a few weeks ago Snopes, some UPI reports and wikipedia had the wrong hospital listed. The historical aspect of this is fascinating too.
 
It's another example of a prominent American that ran for the Presidency born while his parents were not in their hometown. Closest example I could come up with on short notice. You brought the question of whether somebody like that would want to run an announcement in the hometown paper. Did the McCains run an ad? Do you think it would be irrelevant if McCain were President instead? I mean McCain says that he was born on 'U.S. soil' in the Panama Canal. Does he have proof?
Just making the point that a newpaper announcement, while evidence, isn't really proof, and there are a lot of reasons why an ad might run that doesn't involve some conspiracy to take over the world or a time machine.
Can we imply from your point that it is your belief that President Obama's parents placed the ad in the Hawaii papers while out of the country?
 
It's a statement of fact. People have advanced the notion that he is somehow powerless to release his own birth certificate. Those assertions are flat out wrong. He can do it anytime he wants.

It's not a matter of "belief." To paraphrase, you are entitled to your own beliefs, but not your own facts.
He provided proof of birth in the U.S.. What more do you want?
The lawsuits are asking for the vault copy of his birth certificate. Produce that and don't let any Maj Cook's go legally AWOL.
I don't care about Major Cook. Why isn't the official documentation that the State of Hawaii provided not sufficient to establish his birth there? Why wouldn't the statement of the Governor of the State of Hawaii not good enough? Why do they need this specific document so important?
The document provided has only been authenticated by a few fly by night websites and the State of Hawaii.The state of Hawaii has only said they have a document on file. If the Governor has said anything otherwise, please post a link.

Alos, this is history. The President was born less than 50 years ago, and we know so little about his birth. Up until a few weeks ago Snopes, some UPI reports and wikipedia had the wrong hospital listed. The historical aspect of this is fascinating too.
Corrected.
 
I love how it's sites like the WorldNutDaily that are spending an inordinate amount of time trying to keep this non-issue alive, but it's only the "fly by night" websites that have authenticated the birth certificate. I love the wingnuts just slightly more than I love the moonbats.

 
B-Deep said:
okso his theory is??they phoned in the announcement from Kenya JUST IN CASE there child was destined to be the first african american president??ridiculous
When my son was born, I put out newspaper announcements in 116 different countries. You know, just in case.
 
B-Deep said:
okso his theory is??they phoned in the announcement from Kenya JUST IN CASE there child was destined to be the first african american president??ridiculous
When my son was born, I put out newspaper announcements in 116 different countries. You know, just in case.
Not France, though. I'll be damned if my boy is gonna grow up to be president of France.
 
It's another example of a prominent American that ran for the Presidency born while his parents were not in their hometown. Closest example I could come up with on short notice. You brought the question of whether somebody like that would want to run an announcement in the hometown paper. Did the McCains run an ad? Do you think it would be irrelevant if McCain were President instead? I mean McCain says that he was born on 'U.S. soil' in the Panama Canal. Does he have proof?
Just making the point that a newpaper announcement, while evidence, isn't really proof, and there are a lot of reasons why an ad might run that doesn't involve some conspiracy to take over the world or a time machine.
Can we imply from your point that it is your belief that President Obama's parents placed the ad in the Hawaii papers while out of the country?
nofalse dichotomy
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Where are you getting your information? Per wiki:
Do I have to prove to you, like I have with so many others, that information on Wiki is unreliable?Check out the latest info on Ivan Karamazov:

Author Tatyana Tolstaya has confirmed that this character was not named for Ivan Statoramski.

Brothers Karamazov Wiki Page
All I wrote was that wiki says Vince Foster was shot in the mouth. The whole basis of your conspiracy theory is that you said he was shot in the back of the head. I'll ask again: where did you get that info and can you link it, please?
 
There always seems to be a fringe movement out there. When Clinton was President, it was the Vince Foster crowd. For most of Bush's term in office, it was the 9/11 Truther people. Now it's these Birther people. It doesn't seem to matter whether it's from the Left or the Right, these people always seem to be present and rather loud.
So how do you feel about British, Australian and Mexican troops running training missions on US soil?
I think it's part of the overall plan to turn the government of this country over to the United Nations. So?
I was serious. National Level Exercise 2009 (NLE 09)
I don't mean to detract from the blatant fishing and crazy that's going on in much of this thread, but what exactly is this, bueno?I did a quick google search and it came up as an anti-terrorism training exercise. And Britain, Australia, and Mexico are 3 of our biggest allies. This seems like a good thing to me. Am I missing something?
 
Where are you getting your information? Per wiki:
Do I have to prove to you, like I have with so many others, that information on Wiki is unreliable?Check out the latest info on Ivan Karamazov:

Author Tatyana Tolstaya has confirmed that this character was not named for Ivan Statoramski.

Brothers Karamazov Wiki Page
All I wrote was that wiki says Vince Foster was shot in the mouth. The whole basis of your conspiracy theory is that you said he was shot in the back of the head. I'll ask again: where did you get that info and can you link it, please?
I didn't have to read it. I lived it brother.
 
CNN president enables administration coverup:

CNN President Jon Klein wrote an email last night to "Lou Dobbs Tonight" staffers telling them the Obama birth certificate story is "dead," TVNewser reports.

"It seems this story is dead," Klein wrote, "because anyone who still is not convinced doesn't really have a legitimate beef."

He sent the email just before Lou Dobbs went on the air. He included information CNN's political researchers had gotten from the Hawaii Health Department -- information which "seems to definitively answer the question."

"Since the show's mission is for Lou to be the explainer and enlightener, he should be sure to cite this during your segment tonite," Klein wrote.

This is what he sent:

*In 2001 - the state of Hawaii Health Department went paperless.*Paper documents were discarded*The official record of Obama's birth is now an official ELECTRONIC record Janice Okubo, spokeswoman for the Health Department told the Honolulu Star Bulletin, "At that time, all information for births from 1908 (on) was put into electronic files for consistent reporting," she said.

This is what Dobbs then said during his show:

The state of Hawaii says it can't release a paper copy of the president's original birth certificate because they say the state government discarded the original document when the health department records went electronic some eight years ago. That explanation, however, has not satisfied some critics.

He then continued with a segment about the birth certificate.

Dobbs, who's said he believes the president was born in the U.S., has nonetheless given airtime (and a measure of validity) to "birthers," people who question Obama's right to be president and argue that he's hiding his real birth certificate.
link
 
Last edited by a moderator:
didn't the Governor say the paper copy was in a vault?

it's odd that almost a year since this issue was first raised this is the first indication they have given that the original was destroyed.

 
didn't the Governor say the paper copy was in a vault?it's odd that almost a year since this issue was first raised this is the first indication they have given that the original was destroyed.
When do you think the family first got serious about planning for all of this? 1960 or 1961?
 
November 1, 2008

“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures,” ####ino said.

Are they now saying that this was a lie?

 
November 1, 2008

“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures,” ####ino said.

Are they now saying that this was a lie?
How is it a lie?
 
November 1, 2008

“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures,” ####ino said.

Are they now saying that this was a lie?
How is it a lie?
CNN/Klein are now saying that the original was discarded...
*In 2001 - the state of Hawaii Health Department went paperless.*Paper documents were discarded*The official record of Obama's birth is now an official ELECTRONIC record Janice Okubo, spokeswoman for the Health Department told the Honolulu Star Bulletin, "At that time, all information for births from 1908 (on) was put into electronic files for consistent reporting," she said.

This is what Dobbs then said during his show:

The state of Hawaii says it can't release a paper copy of the president's original birth certificate because they say the state government discarded the original document when the health department records went electronic some eight years ago. That explanation, however, has not satisfied some critics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
November 1, 2008

“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures,” ####ino said.

Are they now saying that this was a lie?
How is it a lie?
CNN/Klein are now saying that the original was discarded...
*In 2001 - the state of Hawaii Health Department went paperless.*Paper documents were discarded*The official record of Obama's birth is now an official ELECTRONIC record Janice Okubo, spokeswoman for the Health Department told the Honolulu Star Bulletin, "At that time, all information for births from 1908 (on) was put into electronic files for consistent reporting," she said.

This is what Dobbs then said during his show:

The state of Hawaii says it can't release a paper copy of the president's original birth certificate because they say the state government discarded the original document when the health department records went electronic some eight years ago. That explanation, however, has not satisfied some critics.
Didn't the Politico have a story where they said this should be put to rest because someone had seen the hardcopy? Now (edit: the hospital is) saying that there is no hard copy? whoa.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So she saw the electronic record of the original document. Does this mean she was lying, in your opinion?

Or do you believe that back in 2001 when the department went paperless, someone at that time made a fraudulent entry regarding Obama?

 
Didn't the Politico have a story where they said this should be put to rest because someone had seen the hardcopy? Now (edit: the hospital is) saying that there is no hard copy? whoa.
Perhaps we'd have more answers right now if the director of the hospital hadn't only recently killed himself under very mysterious circumstances by shooting himself in the back of the head...
 
So she saw the electronic record of the original document. Does this mean she was lying, in your opinion?Or do you believe that back in 2001 when the department went paperless, someone at that time made a fraudulent entry regarding Obama?
"Electronic Record" means different things to different people. If it was a computer scan of the original document, I'm ok with that. But if it's just data on a little excel spreadsheet with the Obama vitals in there, the birthers might have something here.
 
Didn't the Politico have a story where they said this should be put to rest because someone had seen the hardcopy? Now (edit: the hospital is) saying that there is no hard copy? whoa.
Perhaps we'd have more answers right now if the director of the hospital hadn't only recently killed himself under very mysterious circumstances by shooting himself in the back of the head...
Tim, they don't kill the ones that are covering for them. The loyal soldiers don't have to worry about eating a glock sandwich.
 
So she saw the electronic record of the original document. Does this mean she was lying, in your opinion?Or do you believe that back in 2001 when the department went paperless, someone at that time made a fraudulent entry regarding Obama?
The electronic is not the original copy. It simply isn't. You'd think sometime over the last year and half she might have mentioned that the original was discarded, instead of saying that she had personally seen it.
 
So she saw the electronic record of the original document. Does this mean she was lying, in your opinion?Or do you believe that back in 2001 when the department went paperless, someone at that time made a fraudulent entry regarding Obama?
The electronic is not the original copy. It simply isn't. You'd think sometime over the last year and half she might have mentioned that the original was discarded, instead of saying that she had personally seen it.
Sam, stop wasting time with details and just admit you think he's an illegal alien and should be deported. Come on, you can admit it here to me. No one else is reading this.
 
There always seems to be a fringe movement out there. When Clinton was President, it was the Vince Foster crowd. For most of Bush's term in office, it was the 9/11 Truther people. Now it's these Birther people. It doesn't seem to matter whether it's from the Left or the Right, these people always seem to be present and rather loud.
So how do you feel about British, Australian and Mexican troops running training missions on US soil?
I think it's part of the overall plan to turn the government of this country over to the United Nations. So?
I was serious. National Level Exercise 2009 (NLE 09)
Do you have a problem with the U.S. running training missions with our allies?
I have a problem with foreign troops on US soil obstensively to protect us from terrorism.
 
I have a problem with foreign troops on US soil obstensively to protect us from terrorism.
I agree with you, and here is what I propose: until they leave, we go hide ourselves in the woods, and attack them with guerilla warfare. We could call ourselves, "The Wolverines".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The lawsuits are asking for the vault copy of his birth certificate. Produce that and don't let any Maj Cook's go legally AWOL.
Can you name one such suit? (I've looked. The suits I've seen against Obama don't ask for any new copies of his birth certificate. The just say the one already produced is a fraud.)
 
There always seems to be a fringe movement out there. When Clinton was President, it was the Vince Foster crowd. For most of Bush's term in office, it was the 9/11 Truther people. Now it's these Birther people. It doesn't seem to matter whether it's from the Left or the Right, these people always seem to be present and rather loud.
So how do you feel about British, Australian and Mexican troops running training missions on US soil?
I think it's part of the overall plan to turn the government of this country over to the United Nations. So?
I was serious. National Level Exercise 2009 (NLE 09)
I don't mean to detract from the blatant fishing and crazy that's going on in much of this thread, but what exactly is this, bueno?I did a quick google search and it came up as an anti-terrorism training exercise. And Britain, Australia, and Mexico are 3 of our biggest allies. This seems like a good thing to me. Am I missing something?
Other than precedent, two things bother me about this.1. I believe last time a substantial number of foreign troops were on our soil not in POW camps was the battle of New Orleans. I for one, don't want foreign troops on American soil. I don't care if they are friendlies.2. The NLE 09 scenario will begin in the aftermath of a notional terrorist event outside of the United States, and exercise play will center on preventing subsequent efforts by the terrorists to enter the United States and carry out additional attacks. This scenario enables participating senior officials to focus on issues related to preventing terrorist events domestically and protecting U.S. critical infrastructure. I don't see this as something that foreign troops should be doing on American soil. Protecting the Homeland is the job of our military and our National Guards, not foreign troops. So why are we training them to do that? This is to test and validate our Homeland Security system. Not a job for which we need to be training foreign troops.
 
here is the thing for me: I don't care if he is a closet Muslim. I think probably he is a natural born US citizen.

What I find bothersome is that the last two Democratic candidates for President have been somewhat less than candid with the US people. First Kerry with his military records (which I believe he still hasn't released) and now Obama, who promised unprecendented transparency, with his birth certificate.

In both cases, this is something that could be released and should be released, but which both candidates have arrogantly refused to release.

It isn't about conspiracy theories. Hell, people still belive Bush stole one of both elections despite even the NYT saying otherwise. It is about whether our elected officials are being totally candid with us or not. That troubles me more than any conspiracy theory.

Arrogant bastards (not to insult a great beer).

 
1. I believe last time a substantial number of foreign troops were on our soil not in POW camps was the battle of New Orleans. I for one, don't want foreign troops on American soil. I don't care if they are friendlies.
You're forgetting the war of Yankee Agression! :lmao:
 
So she saw the electronic record of the original document. Does this mean she was lying, in your opinion?Or do you believe that back in 2001 when the department went paperless, someone at that time made a fraudulent entry regarding Obama?
So why don't they simply release the electronic version of his Certificate of Live Birth? :lmao: Seems pretty simple for a President preaching open government.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top