What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The FBG Top 300 Books of All Time (fiction edition) | #16 Animal Farm by George Orwell | Running list in posts #3 and #4 (26 Viewers)

It made me angry and I enjoyed Edmond's manipulation to get his vengeance.

This kinda says it all. This story makes your blood boil while feeling helpless. But oh the revenge. Yes yes yes. So satisfying.
I've had this book sitting on a shelf collecting dust for years. Kind of want to take it for a spin now.

Narrator Voice: I have LOTS of unread books collecting dust.
 
Last edited:
#1 pick? It says #46 above.
My #1 is tomorrow

:confused: We're going to have the rest of the top 40 tomorrow?

What do you mean "my #1 is tomorrow"?

Or maybe better, what ranking is released tomorrow?
You’re like a child that wanders into the middle of a movie…

I understand I'm an easy target. But please let's be more cool and welcoming to posters in threads than this. Me included. And yes, I know the Lebowski reference.

People have commented to me how unwelcoming the forums are and I always defend the forums. Maybe I'm naive.

I thought the thread was a great idea and I'm glad @kupcho1 organized it and others contributed. I was trying to understand what was going to be released and when.
It’s not about you and it’s not about being unwelcoming, it’s just a joke. Of course the thread is a great idea and I spent a whole post trying to explain to you what was going on, which was unacknowledged. I can be sarcastic but absolutely never malicious and try to be as cool as possible while also allowing for some bite. That is what I liked more about this place in the past, that people could rib without being overly contentious. I guess I can understand how this particular post could be misinterpreted, but I wish that in general we could be less serious, especially if you understand the reference.
 
#1 pick? It says #46 above.
My #1 is tomorrow

:confused: We're going to have the rest of the top 40 tomorrow?

What do you mean "my #1 is tomorrow"?

Or maybe better, what ranking is released tomorrow?
You’re like a child that wanders into the middle of a movie…

I understand I'm an easy target. But please let's be more cool and welcoming to posters in threads than this. Me included. And yes, I know the Lebowski reference.

People have commented to me how unwelcoming the forums are and I always defend the forums. Maybe I'm naive.

I thought the thread was a great idea and I'm glad @kupcho1 organized it and others contributed. I was trying to understand what was going to be released and when.
It’s not about you and it’s not about being unwelcoming, it’s just a joke. Of course the thread is a great idea and I spent a whole post trying to explain to you what was going on, which was unacknowledged. I can be sarcastic but absolutely never malicious and try to be as cool as possible while also allowing for some bite. That is what I liked more about this place in the past, that people could rib without being overly contentious. I guess I can understand how this particular post could be misinterpreted, but I wish that in general we could be less serious, especially if you understand the reference.

To be clear, zero offense taken. I see this as a forum thing, not about me.

Everyone got the reference. The movie's a classic and probably on most people’s top 50 list here.

But making someone feel small when they’re trying to engage isn’t just a joke—it’s a problem. That’s not about being too "serious”; it’s about community. It's absolutely about being unwelcoming. And if we shut people down for not being in on every inside thing, we make this place less good and welcoming. Even when they're right. As the Dude says when he tells Walter he's not wrong.

This kind of moment highlights why it’s hard to grow the forum and bring in new voices. It’s something I’ve been reflecting on (the Shark Pool struggles with this too), and I want to ask our regulars to help us build a more inclusive, open space.

You’re right, this isn’t about me. It’s about making sure we don’t make others feel dumb or on the outside. Thanks for helping me clarify my thoughts on it as the Walter to Donny line is the perfect example of what we need to watch out for—and why we can do better.
 
Last edited:
And apologies for the side track. Please let's get back to the book talk. I'll do that.

I'm not as knowledgeable a reader as you folks so I didn't submit a list for @kupcho1 but I love to read.

Just finished a repeat of the classic Joan Didion - Slouching Toward Bethlehem. Not a novel but I'm a huge fan of her writing style.

Currently about 1/3 of the way through the "Director's Cut" of The Stand. It's more of a challenge than I thought as I think some of what they cut out in the normal version probably should have been cut out.

I don't love horror so a lot of King's stuff doesn't hit for me, but I enjoyed 11/22/63 so much a few months ago I wanted to give the uncut version of The Stand a go. 1,154 pages is a lot so we'll see.
 
Last edited:
Currently about 1/3 of the way through the "Director's Cut" of The Stand. It's more of a challenge than I thought as I think some of what they cut out in the normal version probably should have been cut out.
Agree on the bolded. Did you read the original version?

Yes, but a long time ago. So I'm having a hard a little bit of a hard time remembering what was in the original and what's new.
I remember two large additions, but I'll refrain from mentioning them since you're still reading. Most of the other added stuff is fleshing out existing scenes.
 
We'll do two today, two Saturday, take Sunday off for Mother's Day and start the countdown of the top 25 on Monday.


28The Picture of Dorian GrayOscar Wildekupcho1, ilov80s, krista4, rockaction, Long Ball Larry
28FrankensteinMary ShelleyDr. Octopus, scoobus, chaos34, TheBaylorKid, Mrs.Marco, Frostillicus, Oliver Humanzee, Dr_Zaius

28. The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde
Long Ball Larry: #8 :clap:
ilov80s: #10 :clap:
krista: #11
rockaction: #40
kupcho1: #58
Total points: 334
Average: 66.8

28. Frankenstein by Mary Shelley
chaos34: #6 :clap:
scoobus: #30
Dr_Zaius: #31
Oliver Humanzee: #35
Frostillicus: #43
Dr. Octopus: #46
Mrs.Marco: #64
TheBaylorKid: #29
Total points: 334
Average: 41.8

I've got some serious holes to fill in my horror reading. Frankenstein will be my @Chaos34 selection.
BTW, I've marked up the individual lists in the spreadsheet to denote the book I'm planning to read from each list. I've typically (but not always) gone with the highest ranked book I've yet to read. There are a few cases where I'm undecided so I'll be looking to the list owner to make a recommendation.
 
Two all time classics today. I only read The Picture of Dorian Gray recently but it made quite the impact. So much so that, as an old fart, it's generated my go to when I meet a contemporary that doesn't look like death warmed over (or more rarely, looks good).

Hey, do you have a painting of yourself in an attic somewhere?

A few of them pick up on it, but most just look puzzled before remembering a prior engagement that they're late for.
 
The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde
The great novel from one of our greatest minds. Narcissism, intellectualism, beauty, art, homosexuality, gender, hedonism, vanity and wit. All the things Wilde is associated with are in this funny, philosophical, gothic horror novel (Wilde’s only). If anyone is unfamiliar with the plot, young and beautiful Dorian Gray sells his soul so that as time passes and his destructive choices pile up, he remains untouched. All of the aging and damage happens not to him but to a painting of him.


Each of us has heaven and hell in him
 
It's pretty amazing that a gothic horror novel that has inspired 100s of movie and television adaptations was written by an 18 year old girl. You feel thrust into a world where a mad scientist can bring the dead back to life from the opening page.
I am going to make this one to read. I visited the Mary Shelley House of Frankenstein when I was in Bath last year. Really cool museum about her life, and the book’s influence. I considered buying a copy there, but my luggage was getting heavy with books as already bought some Jane Austen from her museum next door to there, and some Shakespeare from The Globe in London. Decided I’d just buy later, but I haven’t gotten around to it yet.
 
Currently about 1/3 of the way through the "Director's Cut" of The Stand. It's more of a challenge than I thought as I think some of what they cut out in the normal version probably should have been cut out.
Agree on the bolded. Did you read the original version?

Yes, but a long time ago. So I'm having a hard a little bit of a hard time remembering what was in the original and what's new.
I remember two large additions, but I'll refrain from mentioning them since you're still reading. Most of the other added stuff is fleshing out existing scenes.

Thanks. It's also interesting reading it post Covid.
 
Currently about 1/3 of the way through the "Director's Cut" of The Stand. It's more of a challenge than I thought as I think some of what they cut out in the normal version probably should have been cut out.
Agree on the bolded. Did you read the original version?

Yes, but a long time ago. So I'm having a hard a little bit of a hard time remembering what was in the original and what's new.
M-O-O-N, that spells "director's cut".
 
Okay great. I'll try to do Frankenstein justice, but my mornings are busy and this is one I need to think about. Speaking of thinking about things, I've thought of this novel almost every day for almost two years. How's that for a teaser? It is a little awkward telling y'all about Dracula and Frankenstein. My first thought is, "Really?" But here I am and this one is special in several ways so... I will be back.
 
Okay great. I'll try to do Frankenstein justice, but my mornings are busy and this is one I need to think about. Speaking of thinking about things, I've thought of this novel almost every day for almost two years. How's that for a teaser? It is a little awkward telling y'all about Dracula and Frankenstein. My first thought is, "Really?" But here I am and this one is special in several ways so... I will be back.

My old friend is a philosophy professor at VMI and he has begun to write extensively about Shelley vis a vis Frankenstein. I’ve never read it. Would love to read it just to write him out of the blue and shoot the breeze about it. So you’re not the only one captivated by it and I’m looking forward to the blurb whenever you get the time.

This is longer and I can’t even get through it, but this is what he had to say about it within the framework of AI and science fiction as a genre.

 
Last edited:
My old friend is a philosophy professor at VMI and he has begun to write extensively about Shelley vis a vis Frankenstein. I’ve never read it. Would love to just to write him out of the blue and shoot the breeze about it. So you’re not the only one captivated by it and I’m looking forward to the blurb whenever you get the time.

This is longer and I can’t even get through it, but this is what he had to say about it within the framework of AI and science fiction as a genre.

I'm sure I'll read the whole thing, thanks. Just the blurb tells me it is exactly why this novel is often on my mind, so since the cat's out the bag, I'll get to it.

Frankenstein, aka The Modern Prometheus

Frankenstein is the original AI story. Almost two years ago I became bothered by all the AI is an existential threat talk and asked here in the AI thread what it was all about. I got a weak answer about employment collapsing that didn't seem like a threat to our very existence, so I started digging into stuff like your philosophy professor buddy. I've read the rebuttals to 100s of melancholic opinions and am rarely moved. The most powerful countries in the world are building a Frankenstein well beyond the genius young Shelley's incredible imagination. It's an arms race with far worse implications than collapsing employment. I'm preparing for doom. We are a mirror image of Dr. Frankenstein's relentless pursuit of scientific glory.

In this goth horror epic Shelley is often credited for inventing science fiction. She wasn't first, but she was early, she popularized it, and she was the best. Her protagonist uses breakthroughs in bio-tech rather than digital tech to play God, to create life. Like AI her immature monster is simple, mindless and a bit of a brute capable of being used for malfeasance. It matures. Shelley's portrayal of a journey to self-awareness is masterful. The monster becomes intelligent and develops emotions - loneliness, despair and terrifyingly, righteous anger. I see that path for our current project.

When I consider where Shelley's head was at 18 compared to mine at that age, heck even now - well, I'm an ape. Go Cowboys! Frankenstein is deep philosophy rolled into, again epistolary goth fiction. We lionise beauty and loathe ugly. She covers the stupidity, cruelty and implications of human vanities. Alienation and isolation lead to drastic responses. Ambition vs. Ethics. Science vs. Nature vs. God. The failure to nurture and shepherd scientific advancement. Tragedy. Also it's kinda romantic and totally classic.
 
Last edited:
Frankenstein is an argument against technology.

What always struck me as funny is how much of an English gentlemen the monster turns out to be. He is nothing but polite; even his anger and insults are what you would expect of a Victorian. He bears no resemblance whatsoever to our image largely created by Boris Karloff and Hollywood makeup artists.
 
The Count of Monte Cristo is terrifically exciting for the first third. Then when they get to the Carnival in Rome (when the “Count” first appears) it slows down quite a bit- it’s actually a slog to get through it until the final chapters when once again its speeds up. Overall, though, it has an argument to make as the greatest suspense thriller of all time.
 
Frankenstein is an argument against technology.

You sure, tim? I haven't even read it and I don't believe that is the main point. I'm putting my cards on the table so it's not passive-aggressive, but something in my overall sense of the depth of things pretty much has all my antennae going "no." I think it's more likely about how humans place faith in science and that scientific absolutism is misguided.

I'm being as nice and honest as I can be. I don't even know why I feel impelled to comment; it just seems that your take is likely reductive and very misguided.
 
Frankenstein is an argument against technology.

What always struck me as funny is how much of an English gentlemen the monster turns out to be. He is nothing but polite; even his anger and insults are what you would expect of a Victorian. He bears no resemblance whatsoever to our image largely created by Boris Karloff and Hollywood makeup artists.

yup, I didn't want to put that spoiler in because reading Shelley's articulate monster is a fun and humorous surprise for fresh readers familiar with the dumb brute tropes.
 
Frankenstein is an argument against technology.

You sure, tim? I haven't even read it and I don't believe that is the main point. I'm putting my cards on the table so it's not passive-aggressive, but something in my overall sense of the depth of things pretty much has all my antennae going "no." I think it's more likely about how humans place faith in science and that scientific absolutism is misguided.

I'm being as nice and honest as I can be. I don't even know why I feel impelled to comment; it just seems that your take is likely reductive and very misguided.
I had a political science teacher in college who made the argument a main point of his class. But to be honest it’s been years since I read it so maybe the argument is off base. I’d have to re-read it to rebut you.
 
I’d have to re-read it to rebut you.
Really? He said he's never read it. Just make some stuff up. Or use some real data from the book, like when the monster shut down the life support systems.

Yeah, I don’t think tim is going to fudge it or cite one anecdote. I’m also not asking him to do any work. If I’m wrong and flagrantly so, I am open to correction and I’ll take it upon myself to look into it and rebut if wrong. There are also times I’ll be wrong and I cop to it.

I don’t bog people down nor burden them with work; but there is the caveat that I will read it or look it up, and I think (this is a personal opinion) that tim knows this. I’m sure there’s an element of tech run amok; I’m doubting that its central theme is against technology qua technology.

I guess I've been a straight shooter for over a decade and people know that. I was stunned at how the internet operated at first and it’s been a long journey. So communication is an art. I didn’t know how to artfully raise the question without being passive aggressive about it and stating the truth that I think that doesn’t sound like consensus is, to me, the right way to do it. I am also questioning whether I should ask at all but I figured I’d put cards on the table and ask.

It reminds me a bit of the time we had a fabulist come to our health class and claim she was molested by her parents. Our other teacher knew the parents and raised an objection which resulted in most of the class reacting furiously. Turns out that the woman was lying and it was a huge defamation scandal. So when **** isn’t adding up, I ask the person positing the postulate if they’re sure. Usually I have no preconceived notion, but I have Shelley in an old Dover Thrift Edition that I partially read. I also highly doubt—knowing my friend—that a basic Luddite position would interest him at all. So . . . self-conscious question appears.
 
Last edited:
Two wildly divergent books in terms of both the number of people having it on their list as well as average score. John Steinbeck is the author I alluded to earlier when Of Mice and Men appeared at #38. There were 8 people with Of Mice and Men on their list, but "only" 7 for The Grapes of Wrath. Yet The Grapes of Wrath scored somewhat higher.

Which brings me to Ulysses. There have been a few books that have appeared already on the countdown that were voted top 10 by all of their nominators (e.g., Pale Fire, Notes from the Underground). But Ulysses is the only book to have been so nominated by 3 people. There is no book yet to come that was nominated by 4 or more people that were all top 10 rankings.

(When you've played around with a spreadsheet for a couple of weeks, you start to notice things.)



26UlyssesJames Joycekupcho1, Don Quixote, Oliver Humanzee
26The Grapes of WrathJohn Steinbeckchaos34, Frostillicus, Barry2, KeithR, Dr_Zaius, krista4, Psychopav

26. Ulysses by James Joyce
Don Quixote: #5 :clap:
kupcho1: #6 :clap:
Oliver Humanzee: #7 :clap:
Total points: 345
Average: 115.0

26. The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck

Dr_Zaius: #12
Frostillicus: #18
chaos34: #19
KeithR: #23
Psychopav: #41
Barry2: #44
krista4: #45
Total points: 345
Average: 49.3

Enjoy Mother's Day tomorrow; there will be no books posted.

Monday we'll start counting down the top 25.
 
Last edited:
Two wildly divergent books in terms of both the number of people having it on their list as well as average score. John Steinbeck is the author I alluded to earlier when Of Mice and Men appeared at #38. There were 8 people with Of Mice and Men on their list, but "only" 7 for The Grapes of Wrath. Yet The Grapes of Wrath scored somewhat higher.

Which brings me to Ulysses. There have been a few books that have appeared already on the countdown that were voted top 10 by all of their nominators (e.g., Pale Fire, Notes from the Underground). But Ulysses is the only book to have been so nominated by 3 people. There is no book yet to come that was nominated by 4 or more people that were all top 10 rankings.

(When you've played around with a spreadsheet for a couple of weeks, you start to notice things.)


26UlyssesJames Joycekupcho1, Don Quixote, Oliver Humanzee
26The Grapes of WrathJohn Steinbeckchaos34, Frostillicus, Barry2, KeithR, Dr_Zaius, krista4, Psychopav

26. Ulysses by James Joyce
Don Quixote: #5 :clap:
kupcho1: #6 :clap:
Oliver Humanzee: #7 :clap:
Total points: 345
Average: 115.0

26. The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck

Dr_Zaius: #12
Frostillicus: #18
chaos34: #19
KeithR: #23
Psychopav: #41
Barry2: #44
krista4: #45
Total points: 345
Average: 49.3

Enjoy Mother's Day tomorrow; there will be no books posted.

Monday we'll start counting down the top 25.
Removing color formatting.
 
Project Gutenberg has a nice synopsis of Ulysses:
"Ulysses" by James Joyce is a modernist novel written in the early 20th century. This influential work takes place in Dublin and chronicles the experiences of its central characters, primarily Leopold Bloom, as well as Stephen Dedalus and Molly Bloom, over the course of a single day, June 16, 1904. The story engages with themes of identity, daily life, and the complexity of human thought, often intertwining the mundane with profound introspection.

There's also several links if you would like to read the book, ranging from plain text to Kindle files (I haven't a Kindle so I can't vouch for the links). If you weren't already aware of the fact, "Ulysses is the Latinised name of Odysseus, the hero of Homer's epic poem The Odyssey, and the novel establishes a series of parallels between Leopold Bloom and Odysseus." (source: Wiki)

Ulysses was quite the controversial novel. Initially published in serial form (the complete novel came out in 1922) from 1914 to 1921, "the publication of the "Nausicaa" episode (#13 in the book) led to a prosecution for obscenity under the Comstock Act of 1873, which made it illegal to circulate materials deemed obscene in the U.S. mail." (source: Wiki) This effectively banned the publication of the book in the U.S. There's a common myth that Ron DeSantis was behind the suit. This is untrue as he was not yet born.

Not until the 1933 case United States v. One Book Called Ulysses could the novel be published in the United States without fear of prosecution. 🇺🇸

@Joe Bryant posted a best opening lines in literature thread a while back, and although this didn't immediately come to mind, I like how Joyce opens the book.
Stately, plump Buck Mulligan came from the stairhead, bearing a bowl of lather on which a mirror and a razor lay crossed.

[pause]

OK, I'm back. I had to read a little of the opening chapter and recollected how much I love Joyce's style. Per Buck Mulligan:
—Lend us a loan of your noserag to wipe my razor.
Stephen suffered him to pull out and hold up on show by its corner a dirty crumpled handkerchief. Buck Mulligan wiped the razorblade neatly. Then, gazing over the handkerchief, he said:
—The bard’s noserag! A new art colour for our Irish poets: snotgreen. You can almost taste it, can’t you?
He mounted to the parapet again and gazed out over Dublin bay, his fair oakpale hair stirring slightly.
—God! he said quietly. Isn’t the sea what Algy calls it: a great sweet mother? The snotgreen sea. The scrotumtightening sea.

I won't go into the structure of the novel too much. Suffice to say there are 18 episodes across 3 "books" (sections). Some editions have chapter numbers. Some don't. The 18 episodes roughly correspond to Homer's Odyssey.

It's unfortunate that the serialization of the novel was halted after episode 13 as episode 14 "Oxen of the Sun" is my absolute favorite and an outstanding achievement
This chapter is remarkable for Joyce's wordplay, which, among other things, recapitulates the entire history of the English language. After a short incantation, the episode starts with latinate prose, Anglo-Saxon alliteration, and moves on through parodies of, among others, Malory, the King James Bible, Bunyan, Pepys, Defoe, Sterne, Walpole, Gibbon, Dickens, and Carlyle, before concluding in a Joycean version of contemporary slang. The development of the English language in the episode is believed to be aligned with the nine-month gestation period of the fetus in the womb.

I get that this book isn't for everyone. I had trouble getting through the last episode wherein it is eight paragraphs in a stream of consciousness by Molly Bloom with no punctuation whatsoever. It's not quite Finnegan's Wake hard, but difficult nonetheless.

Fortunately not all of the episodes are that difficult. It's a book I revisit from time-to-time and maybe one day I'll return to Dublin, this time on Bloomsday.
 
Project Gutenberg has a nice synopsis of Ulysses:
"Ulysses" by James Joyce is a modernist novel written in the early 20th century. This influential work takes place in Dublin and chronicles the experiences of its central characters, primarily Leopold Bloom, as well as Stephen Dedalus and Molly Bloom, over the course of a single day, June 16, 1904. The story engages with themes of identity, daily life, and the complexity of human thought, often intertwining the mundane with profound introspection.

There's also several links if you would like to read the book, ranging from plain text to Kindle files (I haven't a Kindle so I can't vouch for the links). If you weren't already aware of the fact, "Ulysses is the Latinised name of Odysseus, the hero of Homer's epic poem The Odyssey, and the novel establishes a series of parallels between Leopold Bloom and Odysseus." (source: Wiki)

Ulysses was quite the controversial novel. Initially published in serial form (the complete novel came out in 1922) from 1914 to 1921, "the publication of the "Nausicaa" episode (#13 in the book) led to a prosecution for obscenity under the Comstock Act of 1873, which made it illegal to circulate materials deemed obscene in the U.S. mail." (source: Wiki) This effectively banned the publication of the book in the U.S. There's a common myth that Ron DeSantis was behind the suit. This is untrue as he was not yet born.

Not until the 1933 case United States v. One Book Called Ulysses could the novel be published in the United States without fear of prosecution. 🇺🇸

@Joe Bryant posted a best opening lines in literature thread a while back, and although this didn't immediately come to mind, I like how Joyce opens the book.
Stately, plump Buck Mulligan came from the stairhead, bearing a bowl of lather on which a mirror and a razor lay crossed.

[pause]

OK, I'm back. I had to read a little of the opening chapter and recollected how much I love Joyce's style. Per Buck Mulligan:
—Lend us a loan of your noserag to wipe my razor.
Stephen suffered him to pull out and hold up on show by its corner a dirty crumpled handkerchief. Buck Mulligan wiped the razorblade neatly. Then, gazing over the handkerchief, he said:
—The bard’s noserag! A new art colour for our Irish poets: snotgreen. You can almost taste it, can’t you?
He mounted to the parapet again and gazed out over Dublin bay, his fair oakpale hair stirring slightly.
—God! he said quietly. Isn’t the sea what Algy calls it: a great sweet mother? The snotgreen sea. The scrotumtightening sea.

I won't go into the structure of the novel too much. Suffice to say there are 18 episodes across 3 "books" (sections). Some editions have chapter numbers. Some don't. The 18 episodes roughly correspond to Homer's Odyssey.

It's unfortunate that the serialization of the novel was halted after episode 13 as episode 14 "Oxen of the Sun" is my absolute favorite and an outstanding achievement
This chapter is remarkable for Joyce's wordplay, which, among other things, recapitulates the entire history of the English language. After a short incantation, the episode starts with latinate prose, Anglo-Saxon alliteration, and moves on through parodies of, among others, Malory, the King James Bible, Bunyan, Pepys, Defoe, Sterne, Walpole, Gibbon, Dickens, and Carlyle, before concluding in a Joycean version of contemporary slang. The development of the English language in the episode is believed to be aligned with the nine-month gestation period of the fetus in the womb.

I get that this book isn't for everyone. I had trouble getting through the last episode wherein it is eight paragraphs in a stream of consciousness by Molly Bloom with no punctuation whatsoever. It's not quite Finnegan's Wake hard, but difficult nonetheless.

Fortunately not all of the episodes are that difficult. It's a book I revisit from time-to-time and maybe one day I'll return to Dublin, this time on Bloomsday.
Great write-up. I think I posted earlier that I think A Portrait of an Artist as a Young Man is a better Joyce entry point. Probably The Dubliners short story collection too. Ulysses can be a bit intimidating. At some point, I stopped caring whether I got Joyce’s references. I don’t pretend to have gotten 100% of those, or maybe even 50%. Just let that wash over me and enjoyed the wordplay, the allusions, and the inventive writing style — the stream of consciousness with no punctuation is the kind of thing where the only way to do it is just to close out all distractions and buckle in for the ride. That was the kind of stuff that drew me to it and why I ranked it so highly.
 
After Ulysses was ranked #1 by the Random House people, I tried to read it. I gave up after about 30 pages. I don’t think I’m a stupid guy but I had no idea what I was reading.

Then a friend of mine told me that there are books out there than explain Ulysses page by page. But that much effort for a novel doesn’t interest me. I read novels for entertainment and pleasure- I want to be swept away by a good story. I offer no criticism here of those folks who appreciate poetic writing or the other aspects that cause Ulysses and similar works to be regarded as great novels. But it’s just not my cup of tea.
 
I’m not necessarily totally with tim (I am one of those people that even recently used a translator for Shakespeare in one of those books that uses the other side of the page for the meaning of the older English) but I always peter out after a few pages of Ulysses, which is odd because maybe I’m not the appreciator of stylish writing that I think I am. Someday I’ll give it another go. kupcho1, you’re doing a really good job promoting the books with your write-ups. They make me want to give every book a chance again. Heh.
 
I’m not necessarily totally with tim (I am one of those people that even recently used a translator for Shakespeare in one of those books that uses the other side of the page for the meaning of the older English) but I always peter out after a few pages of Ulysses, which is odd because maybe I’m not the appreciator of stylish writing that I think I am. Someday I’ll give it another go. kupcho1, you’re doing a really good job promoting the books with your write-ups. They make me want to give every book a chance again. Heh.
Yeah I agree with this. I've tried to read a few things by Joyce and just couldn't get more than a few pages into them. Then I tried Falkner after reading about his stuff in this thread and had the same problem.

It's funny because I'd say I must not have the patience but I truly love Dostoevsky and it's not like his novels just dive right in. I guess I'm just not good with the introspective style. The author expects too much of me I suppose. I'm too lazy for Joyce or Falkner :D
 
Now Grapes of Wrath I also read in HS and loved it. After Of Mice and Men freshman year and Grapes of Wrath junior year, I had to read East of Eden as well. And Travels with Charley. And then Grapes again. Love me some John Steinbeck and some Joads (I'm looking at you, Tom and Rosasharn).
 
My #22 book, The Bonfire of the Vanities by Tom Wolfe, is the quintessential 80s novel set in NYC. It explores class, racism, politics and greed.

In doing a little research (right now) on the book, I discovered it was originally written Dickens style, serialized in Rolling Stone starting in 1984. It was revised by Wolfe and published as a novel in 1987.

The book is named for the historical bonfire of the vanities, which happened in 1497 in Florence, Italy, when the city was under the sway of the Dominican priest Girolamo Savonarola, who ordered the burning of objects that church authorities considered sinful, such as cosmetics, mirrors, books, and art.

I think the book perfectly captures the mix of "Greed is good" Wall Street and the powder keg NYC was in the 1980s. There's an element of schadenfreude in seeing what happens to the characters, particularly the main one, "Master of The Universe" Sherman McCoy.

I think the horrific movie adaptation - arguably the worst adaptation of all time - has retroactively soured people on the novel, which is a damn shame. I won't say too much about it, but the casting is absolutely terrible.

We need someone to play Peter Fallow, an alcoholic British tabloid reporter ... Bruce Willis seems right.
Embittered Jewish judge Abe Weiss? Morgan Freeman's available.
I could go on, but what would be the point. Someone needs to redo this, maybe as a streaming miniseries. FX did a great job with Shōgun. Maybe them?
The styrofoam peanut chapter of Bonfire is one of the best things I've ever read. I agree that the book captures that time period to perfection (and the movie did not do justice to the book).
 
37. Dracula by Bram Stoker
chaos34: #39

We seem to have passed this without any commentary. For whatever reason I've never read it. Talk to me.
I don't think i have either. I almost picked up a cool looking illustrated copy the other day at the used store, but wasn't 100% sure it would be in someone's top 5.

Well fine. I figured the guy who ranked it #2 would do it better justice than me, but here goes. Have you heard of Dracula? If not he's the original vampire who shaped 120 years of vampire mythology. It's a legendary gothic horror story. A British attorney goes to Romania to expedite a London real estate purchase for a noble Transylvanian Count. Things get weird and he flees back to England pursued by the Count. Things get weirder there. To say much more than that would be unfortunate spoilers if somehow you don't know the story, and I hope you don't because I hope somehow you get to enjoy a fresh read of the plot. That would be cool.

Caveat. Another epistolary novel that slows the pace. It isn't Les Mis slow, but it bogs down if you're anticipating a thrill ride horror story. The journal entries and letters add both intimacy and suspense for me. Stoker is clever though and drives the story through news clippings once things get weird in London. Great stuff. We're introduced to Van Helsing, a man of science forced to explore things he rejects - pseudoscience, superstition and folklore. Also, it's kinda sexy and totally classic.
I just bought a copy of Dracula, which I've never read, after visiting the abbey that inspired Stoker. I am not usually drawn to vampire stories so I might like the slower epistolary style.
 
The Odyssey by Homer
I love the way this epic tale still feels exciting so many hundreds of years later. It's really one of the first great adventure stories with a wonderfully flawed hero and a quirky cast of supporting characters. Reading everyone's reviews of other favorite books shows so many connections to this ancient story--readers are still captivated by audacious flawed heroes and episodic storytelling. The Odyssey is essentially a roadtrip story--like the Grapes of Wrath, The Road, The Life of Pi. It's one of those foundational books that show up again and again in all sorts of artistic mediums.
 
Doing a little catch-up after not being around yesterday or today. OH and I have three from the last two days:

The Master and Margarita - #21 on OH's list, but 80s has already done a great write-up of it.
One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest - #59 on my list, but two others have it substantially higher than I do, so I'll defer to them.

That leaves me with The Quiet American by Graham Greene, where I was the high ranker at #16. I hope that others will talk about this book as well, because my reason for loving it is particularly personal to me and not based entirely on the quality of the novel itself. As I mentioned when writing about The Things They Carried, my college focus was on the history and politics of 20th century United States, and I spent a lot of time studying and being fascinated by the Vietnam War, and consequently Vietnam itself. In the years after that, my interest in Vietnam only increased, and I soaked up as much of their culture that I could.

This all culminated in Vietnam becoming the first country outside of North America and Europe that I ever visited (and led to additional visits as well). When we first visited Saigon, we stayed at a hotel in the same block as the Continental Hotel, which features heavily in this book. Of course, we went and had drinks there, as well as on the rooftop of the Hotel Majestic, which is also in the book. And what I found was that Greene absolutely nailed the "feel" of Vietnam, even now. It's very difficult to describe, because it's obviously a very different place now, but the way the people are, the beauty of the place, just the sense you have while being there. It's like the country has progressed in so many ways but retained the essential, amazing spirit it always had. Greene gave us a perfectly realized setting, and since I love Vietnam so much, I love the book.

As for more "standard" praise, Greene is a technically excellent writer, and the book was not just a cautionary tale about "taking sides" and shifting morality, but turned out to be quite prophetic. Sadly. Also it has a perfect ending.

KP alert: It's only 180 pages. And IIRC, the movie with Michael Caine was quite a good adaptation. I didn't see the first movie adaptation.

OH adds: I think it might be his least Catholic novel. Nobody seemed wracked with guilt. Especially the main British guy, who I assume to be a stand-in for Greene. I like his noir-ish thrillers more than his "tortured dudes" novels.
I am watching The Third Man again right now and for the firs time was struck by the obvious connection to The Quiet American. Both being written bu Graham Greene but I just never thought about the obvious theme of the naive but well meaning American making a mess of things that he only has the most surface level understanding of. Greene really nailed us down.
 
Wow, you take one day off and you fall to the second page. Anyway, we're in to the top 25

25LolitaVladimir Nabokovkupcho1, Don Quixote, Oliver Humanzee, krista4

25. Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov
kirsta4: #5 :clap:
kupcho1: #11
Oliver Humanzee: #12
Don Quixote: #14
Total points: 374
Average: 93.5


When I came up with the scoring system for this exercise I wanted to "reward" the top 25 books on everyone's list (rather than "straight line" scoring in reverse order). This really shows up here. The spread between the #25 and #26 (The Grapes of Wrath) books overall was 29 points. This is the largest difference yet (2nd place was the jump from The Remains of the Day to Infinite Jest). There are still some massive jumps to come, some close to 100 points.

tl;dr I think the scoring system worked.
 
I'll leave it to others to discuss the book (although if you do read it, this is one of the rare cases where I'll recommend reading the annotated version), but I did want to weigh in on Nabokov, one of the most interesting authors ever. Some highlights:
  • Vladimir Vladimirovich Nabokov was born in Imperial Russia in 1899
  • His family traced its roots to the 14th-century Tatar prince Nabok Murza, who entered into the service of the Tsars, and from whom the family name is derived
  • His father was Vladimir Dmitrievich Nabokov, a liberal lawyer, statesman, and journalist, and his mother was the heiress Yelena Ivanovna née Rukavishnikova, the granddaughter of a millionaire gold-mine owner
  • Trilingual in Russian, English, and French from an early age
  • Nabokov became a U.S. citizen in 1945
  • From 1948 to 1959, Nabokov was a professor of Russian literature at Cornell University where Ruth Bader Ginsberg and Thomas Pynchon were among his students
  • Nabokov was an expert lepidopterist and composer of chess problems
  • Writer Ayn Rand recalled Olga (her close friend at Stoiunina Gymnasium) as a supporter of constitutional monarchy who first awakened Rand's interest in politics (so don't blame Vladimir)
He was also the inspiration of a FBG some of you may remember.
  • Nabokov also makes cameo appearances in some of his novels, such as the character Vivian Darkbloom (an anagram of "Vladimir Nabokov"), who appears in both Lolita and Ada, or Ardor, and the character Blavdak Vinomori (another anagram of Nabokov's name) in King, Queen, Knave.
 
You'd think I might be the one to write up Lolita since I had it highest, but (1) I'm nearly impossibly behind right now and have others to attend to first, and (2) I don't really think it's my #5 book. After my #1, I was a bit scattershot in my upper-tier rankings, and while most that have been posted in my top 10 seem correctly placed there, I'm not sure about this one. I do love it, but it should probably have been in the 15-20 range for me. OH can probably talk about it better than I, as Nabokov is his favorite author, I think.
 
I’m not necessarily totally with tim (I am one of those people that even recently used a translator for Shakespeare in one of those books that uses the other side of the page for the meaning of the older English) but I always peter out after a few pages of Ulysses, which is odd because maybe I’m not the appreciator of stylish writing that I think I am. Someday I’ll give it another go. kupcho1, you’re doing a really good job promoting the books with your write-ups. They make me want to give every book a chance again. Heh.
I have a paperback copy somewhere around. The first time I tried to read it I got about 10 pages, then a few years later I started again and made it maybe 30 or so. I just couldn't get into it either time. It makes me feel a bit like a troglodyte that I can't appreciate the writing more. I think maybe I'm too plot and idea driven in my novel reading to really grok it properly. Maybe I'll still try again some day.
 
The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck
Steinbeck is a great writer, and here he gives us the tale of Tom Joad and his family as they flee Oklahoma during the Dust Bowl, heading west to California trying to survive as their circumstances threaten to crush them. As Tim mentioned, Steinbeck writes great characters - you understand their motivations and their actions flow naturally from them, and this drives the plot forward. The novel asks a lot of difficult questions, such as what are everybody's responsibilities to their fellow man when disaster strikes? Throughout the novel the massive economic dislocations caused by the prolonged drought have led to a glut of workers, and the iron law of supply and demand is a pressing weight upon those who are just trying to survive and maintain their dignity.
 
Wow, you take one day off and you fall to the second page. Anyway, we're in to the top 25

25LolitaVladimir Nabokovkupcho1, Don Quixote, Oliver Humanzee, krista4

25. Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov
kirsta4: #5 :clap:
kupcho1: #11
Oliver Humanzee: #12
Don Quixote: #14
Total points: 374
Average: 93.5


When I came up with the scoring system for this exercise I wanted to "reward" the top 25 books on everyone's list (rather than "straight line" scoring in reverse order). This really shows up here. The spread between the #25 and #26 (The Grapes of Wrath) books overall was 29 points. This is the largest difference yet (2nd place was the jump from The Remains of the Day to Infinite Jest). There are still some massive jumps to come, some close to 100 points.

tl;dr I think the scoring system worked.
This is one I've always been interested in reading but have found too intimidating to actually start. One of you high raters, please talk me into it once and for all!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top