The FIX - Dynasty League - Rookie Draft (1 Viewer)

[bicycle_seat_sniffer]

some of the most hardcore Football minds on this board plus some staffers have a league we call THE FIX

12 man league, 24 roster spots. We are near the end of the draft so I figured I would put the first two rounds here and generate alittle discussion.

1.01 Team Legacy- Moreno, Knowshon DEN RB ® 12:11:16 a.m.

1.02 Bicycle Seat Sniffer- Wells, Chris ARI RB ® 9:05:19 a.m.

1.03 Capt. Hook- Brown, Donald IND RB ® 10:55:24 a.m.

1.04 Money Moves- Crabtree, Michael SFO WR ® 10:55:24 a.m.

1.05 Twilight - Harvin, Percy MIN WR ® 4:14:09 p.m.

1.06 Duckboy - Nicks, Hakeem NYG WR ® 4:14:09 p.m.

1.07 Pimpin Ain't Easy - Maclin, Jeremy PHI WR ® 4:56:34 p.m.

1.08 Radballs - McCoy, LeSean PHI RB ® 5:56:47 p.m.

1.09 ffweasel - Greene, Shonn NYJ RB ® 11:10:03 p.m.

1.10 Pimpin Ain't Easy - Stafford, Matthew DET QB ® 2:25:12 a.m.

1.11 ABrecher - Heyward-Bey, Darrius OAK WR ® 2:25:12 a.m.

1.12 Jason Wood - Bennett, Earl CHI WR 8:24:23 a.m.

2.01 Team Legacy - Britt, Kenny TEN WR ® 9:57:24 a.m.

2.02 Ministry of Pain - Austin, Miles DAL WR 10:43:05 a.m.

2.03 Capt. Hook - Sanchez, Mark NYJ QB ® 11:21:38 a.m.

2.04 Money Moves - Iglesias, Juaquin CHI WR ® 11:47:33 a.m.

2.05 Twilight - Cook, Jared TEN TE ® 12:50:31 p.m.

2.06 Duckboy - Pettigrew, Brandon DET TE ® 1:15:59 p.m.

2.07 Bicycle Seat Sniffer - Robiskie, Brian CLE WR ® 1:36:05 p.m.

2.08 Radballs - Tate, Brandon NEP WR ® 4:37:35 p.m.

2.09 ffweasel - Barden, Ramses NYG WR ® 12:38:15 a.m.

2.10 ABrecher - Sweed, Limas PIT WR 8:02:26 a.m.

2.11 ABrecher - Nelson, Shawn BUF TE ® 8:14:57 a.m.

2.12 Jason Wood - Beckum, Travis NYG TE ® 9:44:37 a.m.

3.01 Team Legacy - Celek, Brent PHI TE 10:33:34 a.m.

3.02 ABrecher- Brown, Andre NYG RB ® 10:33:34 a.m.

3.03 Money Moves - White, Pat MIA QB ® 1:21:36 p.m.

3.04 Ministry of Pain - Freeman, Josh TBB QB ® 1:35:22 p.m.

3.05 Twilight - Collie, Austin IND WR ® 2:24:08 p.m.

3.06 Duckboy - Thomas, Mike JAC WR ® 2:24:08 p.m.

3.07 Bicycle Seat Sniffer - Bradley, Mark KCC WR 4:30:24 p.m.

3.08 Radballs - Burress, Plaxico FA WR 4:30:24 p.m.

3.09 ffweasel - Timer Expired 10:45:02 a.m.

3.10 Ministry of Pain - McMichael, Randy STL TE 10:45:02 a.m.

3.11 ABrecher - Burton, Keenan STL WR 10:45:02 a.m.

3.12 Jason Wood- Davis, James CLE RB ® 10:45:02 a.m.

Link to League: http://www9.myfantasyleague.com/2009/home/19075

NOTE - the league is still draft so no highlighting remaining players please.

Feel free comment on best value etc.

To me - I think Weasel got a good deal on Shonn Greene

 

[David Yudkin]

Good to see my squad went back to back.

 

[Jason Wood]

Good to see my squad went back to back.

To be clear, I took over Yudkin's team last year and won the title, he was also the defending champ. We also run a redraft league with the same guys and scoring, but without the keeper angle. Last year was the first for that and I was runner up. One of the interesting things about this draft has been the availability of veterans. Picking at the 12 spot I wasn't sure I would have any rookies that really wowed me, but I never expected Earl Bennett to be available. That made me all sorts of giddy.It's also worth pointing out that this is TEs get 2PPR in this league, which is really why I was able to win the title [and David before me] in spite of an admittedly weak RB group.

 

[Twilight]

Good to see my squad went back to back.

To be clear, I took over Yudkin's team last year and won the title, he was also the defending champ. We also run a redraft league with the same guys and scoring, but without the keeper angle. Last year was the first for that and I was runner up. One of the interesting things about this draft has been the availability of veterans. Picking at the 12 spot I wasn't sure I would have any rookies that really wowed me, but I never expected Earl Bennett to be available. That made me all sorts of giddy.It's also worth pointing out that this is TEs get 2PPR in this league, which is really why I was able to win the title [and David before me] in spite of an admittedly weak RB group.

2 PPR + ability to have 3 TE's score in a best ball format. The 2 ppr by itself was only a league oddity. That combo is what scored you over 500 pts above league average

 

[Captain Hook]

Good to see my squad went back to back.

To be clear, I took over Yudkin's team last year and won the title, he was also the defending champ. We also run a redraft league with the same guys and scoring, but without the keeper angle. Last year was the first for that and I was runner up. One of the interesting things about this draft has been the availability of veterans. Picking at the 12 spot I wasn't sure I would have any rookies that really wowed me, but I never expected Earl Bennett to be available. That made me all sorts of giddy.It's also worth pointing out that this is TEs get 2PPR in this league, which is really why I was able to win the title [and David before me] in spite of an admittedly weak RB group.

Clearly a matter of perspective Jason as I was glad to have you take Bennett and MOP take Miles, because while they may well be valuable for your team's wide receivers this year, it is likely the only was I would have had a shot at one of the two elite rookie quarterbacks or tight ends - I didn't actually think I would have had the choice...........and glad to add Sanchez.

 

[CBower4545]

Good to see my squad went back to back.

To be clear, I took over Yudkin's team last year and won the title, he was also the defending champ. We also run a redraft league with the same guys and scoring, but without the keeper angle. Last year was the first for that and I was runner up. One of the interesting things about this draft has been the availability of veterans. Picking at the 12 spot I wasn't sure I would have any rookies that really wowed me, but I never expected Earl Bennett to be available. That made me all sorts of giddy.It's also worth pointing out that this is TEs get 2PPR in this league, which is really why I was able to win the title [and David before me] in spite of an admittedly weak RB group.

I love that pick. Been grabbing up Bennet where I can. I am surprised at how many are ready to write him off, when he has a great opportunity this year. Bennett may do nothing, but he has a better chance then most the rookie WRs to make an impact this year.

 

[BuckeyeArt]

I'm surprised at all the non-rookies available. Ours is a 12 team, 24 man roster as well but Bennett, Sweed, Bradley, Burress, McMichael, and Burton were all already rostered in ours. Only Miles was available. A difference in the rules must cause you to roster other positions.

 

[Team Legacy]

I'm surprised at all the non-rookies available. Ours is a 12 team, 24 man roster as well but Bennett, Sweed, Bradley, Burress, McMichael, and Burton were all already rostered in ours. Only Miles was available. A difference in the rules must cause you to roster other positions.

Correct, at 2PPR for tight ends, and best ball format, it causes the lineups to look a little different than normal. Also, blind bidding for free agency doesn't allow for as much movement as Free for all pickups.

 

[Winning IS Everything]

BSS I agree with you that Greene was outstanding value. I own the 1.9 in my draft and would LOVE for him to fall there but I doubt it.

I like Bennett at 1.12 as well.

 

[bicycle_seat_sniffer]

BSS I agree with you that Greene was outstanding value. I own the 1.9 in my draft and would LOVE for him to fall there but I doubt it.I like Bennett at 1.12 as well.

Funny thing about Earl Bennett. I grabbed him in round2 last year, when we hit about week 8 I had to cut him as the playoff push was happening, no space for a guy that doesnt produce. My draft:Chris WellsBrian RobiskieMark BradleyTJ Duckett

 

[KellysHeroes]

I'm surprised at all the non-rookies available. Ours is a 12 team, 24 man roster as well but Bennett, Sweed, Bradley, Burress, McMichael, and Burton were all already rostered in ours. Only Miles was available. A difference in the rules must cause you to roster other positions.

Correct, at 2PPR for tight ends, and best ball format, it causes the lineups to look a little different than normal. Also, blind bidding for free agency doesn't allow for as much movement as Free for all pickups.

I agree, no matter the format I'm surprised that players like Sweed and Bennett could be dropped and not picked up in a second.I played in a league that was 22 man rosters last yr and cut Manningham, sure enough he was grab in the next set of Waivers

 

[CBower4545]

BSS I agree with you that Greene was outstanding value. I own the 1.9 in my draft and would LOVE for him to fall there but I doubt it.I like Bennett at 1.12 as well.

Funny thing about Earl Bennett. I grabbed him in round2 last year, when we hit about week 8 I had to cut him as the playoff push was happening, no space for a guy that doesnt produce. My draft:Chris WellsBrian RobiskieMark BradleyTJ Duckett

If you can't afford to hold a rookie WR for at least a couple years why bother drafting him? You should be able to get a decent veteran for a mid second, better then a mid season waiver claim anyways.

 

[David Yudkin]

BSS I agree with you that Greene was outstanding value. I own the 1.9 in my draft and would LOVE for him to fall there but I doubt it.I like Bennett at 1.12 as well.

Funny thing about Earl Bennett. I grabbed him in round2 last year, when we hit about week 8 I had to cut him as the playoff push was happening, no space for a guy that doesnt produce. My draft:Chris WellsBrian RobiskieMark BradleyTJ Duckett

If you can't afford to hold a rookie WR for at least a couple years why bother drafting him? You should be able to get a decent veteran for a mid second, better then a mid season waiver claim anyways.

Given that the core of my team has won this league twice and was runner-up the other year in the 3 years of this league, I would say that this style league has a lot of ways to exploit the scoring system and things to be careful of or it can hurt your team. The problem that non-league people may be missing is that in a best ball league, everyone on the roster can score in any given week, and having guys "stashed" on your roster or "future prospects" WILL hurt your team. So you are actually better off carrying guys like Toomer or Ricky Williams than carrying a guy that might not do anything for a couple of years. Over the years, there were consistently players available for free that should not have been. I picked up players like Marty Booker, Wes Welker, Alge Crumpler, Mewelde Moore, Kurt Warner, Derrick Mason, etc. for effectively nothing because people gre more enamored with young guys.

 

[CBower4545]

BSS I agree with you that Greene was outstanding value. I own the 1.9 in my draft and would LOVE for him to fall there but I doubt it.I like Bennett at 1.12 as well.

Funny thing about Earl Bennett. I grabbed him in round2 last year, when we hit about week 8 I had to cut him as the playoff push was happening, no space for a guy that doesnt produce. My draft:Chris WellsBrian RobiskieMark BradleyTJ Duckett

If you can't afford to hold a rookie WR for at least a couple years why bother drafting him? You should be able to get a decent veteran for a mid second, better then a mid season waiver claim anyways.

Given that the core of my team has won this league twice and was runner-up the other year in the 3 years of this league, I would say that this style league has a lot of ways to exploit the scoring system and things to be careful of or it can hurt your team. The problem that non-league people may be missing is that in a best ball league, everyone on the roster can score in any given week, and having guys "stashed" on your roster or "future prospects" WILL hurt your team. So you are actually better off carrying guys like Toomer or Ricky Williams than carrying a guy that might not do anything for a couple of years. Over the years, there were consistently players available for free that should not have been. I picked up players like Marty Booker, Wes Welker, Alge Crumpler, Mewelde Moore, Kurt Warner, Derrick Mason, etc. for effectively nothing because people gre more enamored with young guys.

If that's the case then why not try to get something for your rookie picks in veteran talent. The only way you get any value out of WR and QB picks is to be patient, if your in a league where you don't feel like that is possible why not try to find an owner who can be patient and get some value out of your picks. I am not saying that you can't find a veteran to help your team, but make that choice before you make the pick. If you don't think you can hold a WR or QB if they do nothing the first year just trade the pick. If you pick WRs hoping for Royal numbers and cut guys who don't do much your going be throwing your picks away. If you wait to make that decision to week 8 your going to throw away alot of picks over the years and some will come back to haunt you. I guarantee you will regret less trading a pick for a veteran player then cutting Branden Marshall in his first year.

 

[David Yudkin]

BSS I agree with you that Greene was outstanding value. I own the 1.9 in my draft and would LOVE for him to fall there but I doubt it.I like Bennett at 1.12 as well.

Funny thing about Earl Bennett. I grabbed him in round2 last year, when we hit about week 8 I had to cut him as the playoff push was happening, no space for a guy that doesnt produce. My draft:Chris WellsBrian RobiskieMark BradleyTJ Duckett

If you can't afford to hold a rookie WR for at least a couple years why bother drafting him? You should be able to get a decent veteran for a mid second, better then a mid season waiver claim anyways.

Given that the core of my team has won this league twice and was runner-up the other year in the 3 years of this league, I would say that this style league has a lot of ways to exploit the scoring system and things to be careful of or it can hurt your team. The problem that non-league people may be missing is that in a best ball league, everyone on the roster can score in any given week, and having guys "stashed" on your roster or "future prospects" WILL hurt your team. So you are actually better off carrying guys like Toomer or Ricky Williams than carrying a guy that might not do anything for a couple of years. Over the years, there were consistently players available for free that should not have been. I picked up players like Marty Booker, Wes Welker, Alge Crumpler, Mewelde Moore, Kurt Warner, Derrick Mason, etc. for effectively nothing because people gre more enamored with young guys.

If that's the case then why not try to get something for your rookie picks in veteran talent. The only way you get any value out of WR and QB picks is to be patient, if your in a league where you don't feel like that is possible why not try to find an owner who can be patient and get some value out of your picks. I am not saying that you can't find a veteran to help your team, but make that choice before you make the pick. If you don't think you can hold a WR or QB if they do nothing the first year just trade the pick. If you pick WRs hoping for Royal numbers and cut guys who don't do much your going be throwing your picks away. If you wait to make that decision to week 8 your going to throw away alot of picks over the years and some will come back to haunt you. I guarantee you will regret less trading a pick for a veteran player then cutting Branden Marshall in his first year.

I believe I used all my rookie pixks on established players that were not rostered at the time. I don't think I ever rostered a rookie. I may have traded a draft pick for a veteran, but I'm pretty sure I never drafted one.Again, there are quirkly strategies that can easily work. QBBC, RB2BC, and WR2BC have a high degree of success. Since TE score so much in this inflated TE scoring format, having 3 elite TEs can make your life so much easier. You only need to get decent scoring at those other spots, so you can live with marginal WR or RB depth.At one point I believe there was a movement to expand rosters or make a secondary "development team," almost like a practice squad, but I'm pretty sure that got shot down (at least it did when I was around).

 

[CBower4545]

I believe I used all my rookie pixks on established players that were not rostered at the time. I don't think I ever rostered a rookie. I may have traded a draft pick for a veteran, but I'm pretty sure I never drafted one.Again, there are quirkly strategies that can easily work. QBBC, RB2BC, and WR2BC have a high degree of success. Since TE score so much in this inflated TE scoring format, having 3 elite TEs can make your life so much easier. You only need to get decent scoring at those other spots, so you can live with marginal WR or RB depth.At one point I believe there was a movement to expand rosters or make a secondary "development team," almost like a practice squad, but I'm pretty sure that got shot down (at least it did when I was around).

That's true I didn't think about that. Looking at the list there are veterans in the draft that you could use your pick on. I don't disagree with your estimation of the league and your strategy in it. Just that IF you do draft a rookie ala Bennet then you need to make the decision on whether you can afford to carry a rookie a year or two while he develops before you draft him. If you don't your just throwing your picks away. Maybe in the process of making your decision you decide you can't afford him, then you pick a veteran or trade the pick for a veteran who can have more of an impact. Put off that decision to midseason will only rob you of the value that rookie picks present. Since you don't develop the player to a stud and at midseason point you can't trade the player for the value you could before the draft. In fact it seems like by mid season a slow performer has lost almost all value. I know my leagues are not exactly the same but it is the biggest mistake I see over and over again. People draft guys everyone knows will take a couple years at least to emerge and then decide they can't wait. I know Bennet was supposed to have a chance at some early numbers last year, but we know we cant expect early numbers from WRs. It's about having a plan that makes sense before you draft and not just drafting guys you like.

 

[Twilight]

I believe I used all my rookie pixks on established players that were not rostered at the time. I don't think I ever rostered a rookie. I may have traded a draft pick for a veteran, but I'm pretty sure I never drafted one.

Again, there are quirkly strategies that can easily work. QBBC, RB2BC, and WR2BC have a high degree of success. Since TE score so much in this inflated TE scoring format, having 3 elite TEs can make your life so much easier. You only need to get decent scoring at those other spots, so you can live with marginal WR or RB depth.

At one point I believe there was a movement to expand rosters or make a secondary "development team," almost like a practice squad, but I'm pretty sure that got shot down (at least it did when I was around).

That's true I didn't think about that. Looking at the list there are veterans in the draft that you could use your pick on. I don't disagree with your estimation of the league and your strategy in it. Just that IF you do draft a rookie ala Bennet then you need to make the decision on whether you can afford to carry a rookie a year or two while he develops before you draft him. If you don't your just throwing your picks away. Maybe in the process of making your decision you decide you can't afford him, then you pick a veteran or trade the pick for a veteran who can have more of an impact. Put off that decision to midseason will only rob you of the value that rookie picks present. Since you don't develop the player to a stud and at midseason point you can't trade the player for the value you could before the draft. In fact it seems like by mid season a slow performer has lost almost all value. I know my leagues are not exactly the same but it is the biggest mistake I see over and over again. People draft guys everyone knows will take a couple years at least to emerge and then decide they can't wait. I know Bennet was supposed to have a chance at some early numbers last year, but we know we cant expect early numbers from WRs. It's about having a plan that makes sense before you draft and not just drafting guys you like.

This is the 2nd round last year:2.01 13. ABrecher Ryan, Matt ATL QB ®

2.02 14. Pimpin Ain't Easy Charles, Jamaal KCC RB ®

2.03 15. Team Legacy Hardy, James BUF WR ®

2.04 16. Radballs Thomas, Pierre NOS RB

2.05 17. Team Legacy Keller, Dustin NYJ TE ®

2.06 18. Duckboy Kelly, Malcolm WAS WR ®

2.07 19. Twilight Jackson, DeSean PHI WR ®

2.08 20. ffweasel Avery, Donnie STL WR ®

2.09 21. Bicycle Seat Sniffer Bennett, Earl CHI WR ®

2.10 22. Capt. Hook Flacco, Joe BAL QB ®

2.11 23. Family Matters Doucet, Early ARI WR ®

2.12 24. Jason Wood Carlson, John SEA TE ®

Yes, only 2 of the 6 WRs were real contributors(Jackson and Avery). But all 6 of the non WRs contributed last year and all are solid future contributors as well. It's actually a better percentage than I was expecting, and really shows not to dismiss the 2nd round so quickly, despite an occasional whiff.

 

[CBower4545]

I believe I used all my rookie pixks on established players that were not rostered at the time. I don't think I ever rostered a rookie. I may have traded a draft pick for a veteran, but I'm pretty sure I never drafted one.

Again, there are quirkly strategies that can easily work. QBBC, RB2BC, and WR2BC have a high degree of success. Since TE score so much in this inflated TE scoring format, having 3 elite TEs can make your life so much easier. You only need to get decent scoring at those other spots, so you can live with marginal WR or RB depth.

At one point I believe there was a movement to expand rosters or make a secondary "development team," almost like a practice squad, but I'm pretty sure that got shot down (at least it did when I was around).

That's true I didn't think about that. Looking at the list there are veterans in the draft that you could use your pick on. I don't disagree with your estimation of the league and your strategy in it. Just that IF you do draft a rookie ala Bennet then you need to make the decision on whether you can afford to carry a rookie a year or two while he develops before you draft him. If you don't your just throwing your picks away. Maybe in the process of making your decision you decide you can't afford him, then you pick a veteran or trade the pick for a veteran who can have more of an impact. Put off that decision to midseason will only rob you of the value that rookie picks present. Since you don't develop the player to a stud and at midseason point you can't trade the player for the value you could before the draft. In fact it seems like by mid season a slow performer has lost almost all value. I know my leagues are not exactly the same but it is the biggest mistake I see over and over again. People draft guys everyone knows will take a couple years at least to emerge and then decide they can't wait. I know Bennet was supposed to have a chance at some early numbers last year, but we know we cant expect early numbers from WRs. It's about having a plan that makes sense before you draft and not just drafting guys you like.

This is the 2nd round last year:2.01 13. ABrecher Ryan, Matt ATL QB ®

2.02 14. Pimpin Ain't Easy Charles, Jamaal KCC RB ®

2.03 15. Team Legacy Hardy, James BUF WR ®

2.04 16. Radballs Thomas, Pierre NOS RB

2.05 17. Team Legacy Keller, Dustin NYJ TE ®

2.06 18. Duckboy Kelly, Malcolm WAS WR ®

2.07 19. Twilight Jackson, DeSean PHI WR ®

2.08 20. ffweasel Avery, Donnie STL WR ®

2.09 21. Bicycle Seat Sniffer Bennett, Earl CHI WR ®

2.10 22. Capt. Hook Flacco, Joe BAL QB ®

2.11 23. Family Matters Doucet, Early ARI WR ®

2.12 24. Jason Wood Carlson, John SEA TE ®

Yes, only 2 of the 6 WRs were real contributors(Jackson and Avery). But all 6 of the non WRs contributed last year and all are solid future contributors as well. It's actually a better percentage than I was expecting, and really shows not to dismiss the 2nd round so quickly, despite an occasional whiff.

Last year was a better second round for rookies then there has been in awhile. I am not dismissing the second round by the way.

 

[AB in DC]

Just that IF you do draft a rookie ala Bennet then you need to make the decision on whether you can afford to carry a rookie a year or two while he develops before you draft him.

Exactly -- which is why you're better off scouring the FA pool for players who actually do make progress, instead of wasting a roster spot on a developmental player who may never do much of anything. Because the rosters are fairly small for a dynasty league, chances are you'll be able to find a lot more talent (especially at QB and WR) outside the rookie pool. That's why I spent picks on 2d-year and 3d-year players like Sweed, Keenan Burton, and Kevin Kolb -- who in other dynasty leagues would be already be stashed on someone's roster -- instead of drafting a bunch of rookies who won't help me in 2009 and may never help me at all.

 

[Joe Bryant]

Hey Guys,

Getting some feedback about why I'm allowing this thread to stay in the Shark Pool when other league threads are moved to the ACF. It's not an unfair question. This one can stay but it needs to keep a heavy focus on analysis and a focus on giving useful information to everyone that is reading. Thanks.

J

 

[ConstruxBoy]

I miss this league. Great guys and very interesting format that you don't see much, which may be why it's worth keeping in the Shark Pool.

Almost all Best Ball leagues are survivor leagues. But having a H2H, roster management league that uses Best Ball scoring is very different than lineup leagues and it's a nice twist for people looking to start a new league with a little less time management needed than standard lineup leagues. What makes Best Ball leagues most interesting to me is that I think they fit in well with 3 growing NFL trends:

1) Multiple RB production - As fewer and fewer teams are going away from one, bell cow RB, it makes it harder and harder to choose RB starters each week. A Best Ball league makes it easier because you don't need to know which of your 5 RBBC-type RBs is going to have a good week. You are given the two best scores of the 5 of them. This shifts the focus from lineup management to roster management, which is tougher because you can't really just follow a cheatsheet.

2) Spread Offenses - Another growing trend in the NFL is a more spread, wide open offense, with more WRs seeing action and multiple pass-catching TEs. As with RBs, WRs and TEs are helped by Best Ball leagues in which those WR4 and WR5 players on an NFL team may score more often for you, even though you would be hard pressed to ever start them in a lineup league. It makes more players relevant.

3) Wildcat - The last growing trend that Best Ball leagues help is the Wildcat offense. A player like Pat White, listed as a QB, seems like a waste in a standard lineup league. But in a Best Ball league, he can become a very valuable member of your roster. If he gets a couple of scores and some nice runs some week, even with limited touches, he could actually outscore your normal starting QB. Best Ball leagues make players like White much more relevant. Throw in Special Teams yardage and TDs and players like Josh Cribbs become more interesting.

Best Ball leagues aren't for everyone, but they sure do bring an interesting twist to a league and make more NFL players viable fantasy contributors.

 

[Team Legacy]

Hey Guys,Getting some feedback about why I'm allowing this thread to stay in the Shark Pool when other league threads are moved to the ACF. It's not an unfair question. This one can stay but it needs to keep a heavy focus on analysis and a focus on giving useful information to everyone that is reading. Thanks.J

Great suggestion Joe and point well taken. I think these ALL PLAY leagues need discussion as this is a very fun twist on the conventional "Who Do I Start" leagues.