What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Great 2020 All Time Movie Draft- The judging is heavily biased against me. It’s a hoax! Fake news. (1 Viewer)

Not my personal favorite but a great pick and I think it deserves top consideration for the category. I think the bigger and more well known/loved the book is, the more consideration the movie should get in this category. There’s lots of examples of bad or relatively unknown books becoming movies but I think getting a combo of a classic novel and a classic movie should be the goal with this category.
How would you rank a movie that's better than the book?  (if you think that exists)

That is a great point you bring up though.   SO many movies are based on books, but how many are a surprise when you learn that it was a book.   It's even more of an achievement to take a well known or great book and not #### it up, let alone make a great movie out of it too.  

 
How would you rank a movie that's better than the book?  (if you think that exists)

That is a great point you bring up though.   SO many movies are based on books, but how many are a surprise when you learn that it was a book.   It's even more of an achievement to take a well known or great book and not #### it up, let alone make a great movie out of it too.  
I think the movie being better is fine. I just think finding a great movie and being like, "did you know this was based on a book from 1930? They bought the rights for $4 and changed it from a spy thriller to a sex comedy" isn't the idea here. These should be situations where the movie and book are popular.  

 
Disclosure - making it a family draft due to COVID.  I chose Mockingbird.  Son chose Goonies.  Wife gets next pick at 3.15.
Ok, that's awesome.  Mostly I just get an eye roll when I say I am doing another one of these drafts from the household.  

How old is the son?

 
The Vader vs Dracula battle could be interesting. Both dress in black, wear a cape, talk funny, have mind control powers, are very pale. 

 
How would you rank a movie that's better than the book?  (if you think that exists)

That is a great point you bring up though.   SO many movies are based on books, but how many are a surprise when you learn that it was a book.   It's even more of an achievement to take a well known or great book and not #### it up, let alone make a great movie out of it too.  
It's hard for me to think of movies that were better than the book, but there is one that I think is at least as good.  And this was a book that was a Booker prize winner and an author who won a Nobel prize, so both the book and movie are top-rate.  I wouldn't recommend anyone to draft it, as it probably wouldn't do well enough in judging since people are stupid.  But at some point after picks have been made I'd love to hear other people's ideas of movies that are as good as the books.  

 
Grabbing this one now as this is not a favorite category of mine and I usually steer clear of the genre so don't have a big list, but this is a clear top movie for me regardless of category so happy to slot it here.

Winner of the following Academy Awards: Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor, Best Actress and Best Adapted Screenplay making it only the third film in history to accomplish that feat.

Silence of the Lambs - 1991 - Horror
One of my favorites.  I probably would quibble about the category, but grew up watching a ton of horror and I have seen it listed a lot with the horror category so.  :shrug:

One of my buddies in college was SUPER creeped out by Buffalo Bill.  Evidently I do a way too close impersonation of BB (no, not the tuck in...) so I would constantly leave him messages on his machine after I had a few.  

 
I don't feel I have to wipe everybody out, Tom. Just my enemies.

2.5 Best Sequel- The Godfather Part 2 (1974)

dir. by Francis Ford Coppola, starring Al Pacino, Robert Deniro, Robert Duvall, Diane Keaton, Talia Shire, John Cazale. 

A little more strategy here. Sequels could be a messy category full of a lot of pretty good movies. Godfather 2 is among the best period and to me, a complete equal to the original. 
Very surprised this lasted 20 picks.   Like Krista said, this could take #1 in at least 3 categories.  

 
Same thing!
Back to this, and I am probably arguing to argue, but I would need to be persuaded that they are the same thing.  IMO a true sequel comes after the fact and wasn't mapped out from the start, at least if we are talking about all time sequels or giving scores and ####.   Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets is a sequel just because it's the 2nd movie of a series?  

 
Very surprised this lasted 20 picks.   Like Krista said, this could take #1 in at least 3 categories.  
This the best Deniro and the best Pacino performances IMO. That alone makes it historic. Then there is the music, the director, the novel, supporting cast, the cinematography, the production design. This is a perfect movie. 

 
Back to this, and I am probably arguing to argue, but I would need to be persuaded that they are the same thing.  IMO a true sequel comes after the fact and wasn't mapped out from the start, at least if we are talking about all time sequels or giving scores and ####.   Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets is a sequel just because it's the 2nd movie of a series?  
That's just digging too deep for this draft IMO. A sequel is any follow-up to a movie. 

 
Have you seen the movies? LOL. He just sounds like James Earl Jones, likely a Jedi trick. He looks like if someone dumped blue cheese dressing all over an old head of cauliflower and stuck it under the salamander for 10 seconds.
Oh, of course I have.  James Earl Jones just sticks with me no matter what, though.

 
I am starting to think you don't know what my avatar is.  :oldunsure:
It's from Boogie Nights, right? Your boys were involved in a slapstick scene with Jessie's Girl playing in the background. I'll concede that Boogie Nights isn't a slapstick movie per se, it did have some slapstick in it.

 
In my write-up I acknowledged he's not necessarily the greatest director of all time, but when you factor in the totality of his affect on the industry, I have no problem saying that he's the movie business equivalent of Larry Bird, and considering my Michael Jordan--Kubrick--had been taken already, I still stand by taking Spielberg when we did and think we got a steal. 
I agree with all that.  They are also in different categories too, so for this we don't have to argue Bird and Jordan.  

He is one that I was trying to talk about but not talk about in my Kubrick discussion.  There are all sorts of different directors and different styles.   Like you said, Spielberg is as influential as they come, and started off the summer blockbuster and made some of the best of those.   He is all heart, almost to a fault and a great storyteller.   Like I also said, I think in my mind I undersold the back half of his career too as there are a couple damn good movies in there - a couple that I wrote down for later. 

 
It's hard for me to think of movies that were better than the book, but there is one that I think is at least as good.  And this was a book that was a Booker prize winner and an author who won a Nobel prize, so both the book and movie are top-rate.  I wouldn't recommend anyone to draft it, as it probably wouldn't do well enough in judging since people are stupid.  But at some point after picks have been made I'd love to hear other people's ideas of movies that are as good as the books.  
I think I know the book / movie you are talking about and just assumed it would / should be picked

 
It's hard for me to think of movies that were better than the book, but there is one that I think is at least as good.  And this was a book that was a Booker prize winner and an author who won a Nobel prize, so both the book and movie are top-rate.  I wouldn't recommend anyone to draft it, as it probably wouldn't do well enough in judging since people are stupid.  But at some point after picks have been made I'd love to hear other people's ideas of movies that are as good as the books.  
Godfather may qualify here.

 
It's hard for me to think of movies that were better than the book, but there is one that I think is at least as good.  And this was a book that was a Booker prize winner and an author who won a Nobel prize, so both the book and movie are top-rate.  I wouldn't recommend anyone to draft it, as it probably wouldn't do well enough in judging since people are stupid.  But at some point after picks have been made I'd love to hear other people's ideas of movies that are as good as the books.  
Uh, I had a book in mind without looking it up, but I am not sure it's the same one.  I might have to shoot you a PM.

I have one book in mind that I think is better, mostly because I really don't like the writer's style as much as I have tried, and I like the changes that were made for the movie. 

 
Back to this, and I am probably arguing to argue, but I would need to be persuaded that they are the same thing.  IMO a true sequel comes after the fact and wasn't mapped out from the start, at least if we are talking about all time sequels or giving scores and ####.   Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets is a sequel just because it's the 2nd movie of a series?  
Sequel - a work of literature, film, theatre, television, music or video game that continues the story of, or expands upon, some earlier work.

I’d say ESB and your example obviously qualify as sequels.

 
Sequel - a work of literature, film, theatre, television, music or video game that continues the story of, or expands upon, some earlier work.

I’d say ESB and your example obviously qualify as sequels.
A literary work, movie, that is complete in itself, but continues the narrative of a preceding work.  

There's gotta be something that doesn't qualify for the above.  

 
Have you seen the movies? LOL. He just sounds like James Earl Jones, likely a Jedi trick. He looks like if someone dumped blue cheese dressing all over an old head of cauliflower and stuck it under the salamander for 10 seconds.
Oh, of course I have.  James Earl Jones just sticks with me no matter what, though.
Hmmm...

I figured K remembered 'em like this.

 
A literary work, movie, that is complete in itself, but continues the narrative of a preceding work.  

There's gotta be something that doesn't qualify for the above.  
I could see something like James Bond films not being considered sequels - is that what you mean?

 
I could see something like James Bond films not being considered sequels - is that what you mean?
They occurred to me too.  I guess a lot of what I was thinking about were a series of books that came out first and then movies were made of them - but like 80s is saying, I am probably just nitpicking and being a doosh.  

 
If someone is keeping a spreadsheet please post it and I will put it in the OP. 
 

The clock tomorrow is 1 hour from 10am est to 7pm est (7-4 for me.) 

 
I was at work today, so I was going to drop some observations/thoughts/opinions, on some picks, but I wanted to get something out of the way:

Since it was brought up in the music thread about the negativity/bagging on picks, I want to be very clear that I never mean any ill-intent with my posts.  Even if I disagree, everything I post is out of love and at the end of the day I just have a passion for movies, and I love being able to b.s. about them with you fine folk because that is about my only outlet to do so.  
This doesn’t apply to me. All of my negative posts are made with full ill-intent in mind. Star Wars was a terrible pick. The Shawshank Redemption is overrated. Goonies is the worst pick yet. I hope I hurt some feelings. 
 

Also- how can Dracula be a great villain when there’s never been a good or even decent Dracula movie? 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If someone is keeping a spreadsheet please post it and I will put it in the OP. 
 

The clock tomorrow is 1 hour from 10am est to 7pm est (7-4 for me.) 
Hey tim, if you’re updating the OP, you should update to say 16 in.  Makes you look more popular, which I’m sure is important.   :lol:  

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top