What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The super "OFFICIAL" Offdee Scale with Photos (2 Viewers)

'shuke said:
'Major said:
'offdee said:
Next up, 4 and 7: Below are present visuals, please provide more accurate, if able...

4: Not attractive. Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS4.jpg

7: Cute girl at the club, in classes, at work, in apt building. Definitely cute, but not tops locally.

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS7b.jpg
That 7 is more like a 5 in my book. Here's a 7 (8 in a bikini, yes I have some great pool shots) from a recent trip to Miami: http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p247/derussel/artbasel.jpg.I'm not even going to open the link to the 4. I'll let Christo and company fight over those mutts.
You think your chick is hotter than offdee's 7? :loco:
I do. :shrug: Offdee's 7 is so....ordinary and bland. Major's 7 is a classic beauty. There's a huge difference. Surprised a guy like you can't see it.

 
'jamny said:
'offdee said:
4: Not attractive. Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS4.jpg
That's at least a 5.
No kidding. A 4? Really? I bet she's hotter than 75% of the wives on this board.
I struggled with the 4 pic a bit actually.Is this a better representative?4: Not attractive. Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS45.jpg
Again, I'm failing to see where she is below average looking. Seems like she has a nice enough body....skin looks good. Not an attractive face, but nothing that sends me home screaming in fear.
 
'shuke said:
'Major said:
'offdee said:
Next up, 4 and 7: Below are present visuals, please provide more accurate, if able...

4: Not attractive. Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS4.jpg

7: Cute girl at the club, in classes, at work, in apt building. Definitely cute, but not tops locally.

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS7b.jpg
That 7 is more like a 5 in my book. Here's a 7 (8 in a bikini, yes I have some great pool shots) from a recent trip to Miami: http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p247/derussel/artbasel.jpg.I'm not even going to open the link to the 4. I'll let Christo and company fight over those mutts.
You think your chick is hotter than offdee's 7? :loco:
I do. :shrug: Offdee's 7 is so....ordinary and bland. Major's 7 is a classic beauty. There's a huge difference. Surprised a guy like you can't see it.
The difference between a 7 and 8 is a big distinction.7's are cute...no matter what they try to do to up their hotness they will just always be "cute"

8's are where the hotness begins. They've cleared the "cute" hurdle.

 
'jamny said:
'offdee said:
4: Not attractive. Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS4.jpg
That's at least a 5.
No kidding. A 4? Really? I bet she's hotter than 75% of the wives on this board.
I struggled with the 4 pic a bit actually.Is this a better representative?4: Not attractive. Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS45.jpg
Again, I'm failing to see where she is below average looking. Seems like she has a nice enough body....skin looks good. Not an attractive face, but nothing that sends me home screaming in fear.
So, find me a better 4 pic people.
 
'shuke said:
'Major said:
'offdee said:
Next up, 4 and 7: Below are present visuals, please provide more accurate, if able...

4: Not attractive. Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS4.jpg

7: Cute girl at the club, in classes, at work, in apt building. Definitely cute, but not tops locally.

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS7b.jpg
That 7 is more like a 5 in my book. Here's a 7 (8 in a bikini, yes I have some great pool shots) from a recent trip to Miami: http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p247/derussel/artbasel.jpg.I'm not even going to open the link to the 4. I'll let Christo and company fight over those mutts.
You think your chick is hotter than offdee's 7? :loco:
I do. :shrug: Offdee's 7 is so....ordinary and bland. Major's 7 is a classic beauty. There's a huge difference. Surprised a guy like you can't see it.
The difference between a 7 and 8 is a big distinction.7's are cute...no matter what they try to do to up their hotness they will just always be "cute"

8's are where the hotness begins. They've cleared the "cute" hurdle.
:goodposting: The scale is sort of logrithmic.

 
The difference between a 7 and 8 is a big distinction.7's are cute...no matter what they try to do to up their hotness they will just always be "cute"8's are where the hotness begins. They've cleared the "cute" hurdle.
:goodposting: The scale is sort of logrithmic.
That's why I think the below may be a better "7". She's just the type of girl that will always be "cute" and tough to break into the hotness field.http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS7.jpg
 
'Major said:
'offdee said:
Next up, 4 and 7: Below are present visuals, please provide more accurate, if able...

4: Not attractive. Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS4.jpg

7: Cute girl at the club, in classes, at work, in apt building. Definitely cute, but not tops locally.

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS7b.jpg
That 7 is more like a 5 in my book. Here's a 7 (8 in a bikini, yes I have some great pool shots) from a recent trip to Miami: http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p247/derussel/artbasel.jpg.I'm not even going to open the link to the 4. I'll let Christo and company fight over those mutts.
Boy, that is a classic beauty! She is a GM Scale 4. :thumbup:
:hifive: enjoy this one while it lasts

 
Last edited by a moderator:
IT'S FRIDAY, LET'S FINALIZE THIS THING!

The 10, 9, 8, 7, 4, 3, 2 and 1 visuals are now locked. Use them for reference points for future comparisons.

10: Almost flawless and very rare. Could be a top model, top playboy centerfold (nationally amazing, the MENSA of hotness)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS10.png

9: The hottest girl at the club, The hottest girl at school, etc (more locally amazing)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS85b.jpg

8: One of the hotter women at the club, one of the hotter girls at school (upper class of hot women)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS8.jpg

7: Cute girl at the club, in classes, at work, in apt building. Definitely cute, but not tops locally.

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS7.jpg

4: Not attractive. Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS4c.jpg

3: One of the uglier girls in school, one of the uglier girls at work (lower class of ugly women)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS3.jpg

2: The ugliest girl in school, the ugliest girl at work (couldn't even get into a club)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS2.jpg

1: Absolutely disgusting and hard to look at. Young children point and adults look away upon seeing (not one single redeeming quality)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS1.jpg

---------------------

Next up, 5 and 6: Below are present visuals, please provide more accurate, if able...

5: Starting to be unattractive, but certain qualities work in her favor. Nothing major, but minor problems are more common

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS5b.jpg

6: Fairly attractive, no major flaws but maybe minor ones

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS6.jpg

 
The difference between a 7 and 8 is a big distinction.7's are cute...no matter what they try to do to up their hotness they will just always be "cute"8's are where the hotness begins. They've cleared the "cute" hurdle.
:goodposting: The scale is sort of logrithmic.
That's why I think the below may be a better "7". She's just the type of girl that will always be "cute" and tough to break into the hotness field.http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS7.jpg
Yeah, I think the 6.5 to 7.5 range is probably huge.
 
after review, I'm starting to think all the locked in photos are dead on except for the 8. I'm agreeing with some that she's more of a 7-7.5 actually when looking at the progression.

Guys, need you to hook me up with a new 8 picture stat.

8: One of the hotter women at the club, one of the hotter girls at school (upper class of hot women)

Hotter than this...

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS7.jpg

But, not as hot as this...

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS85b.jpg

 
The difference between a 7 and 8 is a big distinction.7's are cute...no matter what they try to do to up their hotness they will just always be "cute"8's are where the hotness begins. They've cleared the "cute" hurdle.
:goodposting: The scale is sort of logrithmic.
That's why I think the below may be a better "7". She's just the type of girl that will always be "cute" and tough to break into the hotness field.http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS7.jpg
Yeah, I think the 6.5 to 7.5 range is probably huge.
Are you referring to the bell curve?http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/IMAG0136.jpg
 
'Major said:
'offdee said:
Next up, 4 and 7: Below are present visuals, please provide more accurate, if able...

4: Not attractive. Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS4.jpg

7: Cute girl at the club, in classes, at work, in apt building. Definitely cute, but not tops locally.

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS7b.jpg
That 7 is more like a 5 in my book. Here's a 7 (8 in a bikini, yes I have some great pool shots) from a recent trip to Miami: http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p247/derussel/artbasel.jpg.I'm not even going to open the link to the 4. I'll let Christo and company fight over those mutts.
Boy, that is a classic beauty! She is a GM Scale 4. :thumbup:
:hifive: enjoy this one while it lasts
:excited:
 
'Major said:
'offdee said:
Next up, 4 and 7: Below are present visuals, please provide more accurate, if able...

4: Not attractive. Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS4.jpg

7: Cute girl at the club, in classes, at work, in apt building. Definitely cute, but not tops locally.

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS7b.jpg
That 7 is more like a 5 in my book. Here's a 7 (8 in a bikini, yes I have some great pool shots) from a recent trip to Miami: http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p247/derussel/artbasel.jpg.I'm not even going to open the link to the 4. I'll let Christo and company fight over those mutts.
Boy, that is a classic beauty! She is a GM Scale 4. :thumbup:
:hifive: enjoy this one while it lasts
:excited:
yes, I miss that a.....sucks she never called me back last time I was in town :kicksrock:
 
The difference between a 7 and 8 is a big distinction.7's are cute...no matter what they try to do to up their hotness they will just always be "cute"8's are where the hotness begins. They've cleared the "cute" hurdle.
:goodposting: The scale is sort of logrithmic.
That's why I think the below may be a better "7". She's just the type of girl that will always be "cute" and tough to break into the hotness field.http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS7.jpg
Yeah, I think the 6.5 to 7.5 range is probably huge.
Are you referring to the bell curve?http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/IMAG0136.jpg
Not exactly. I'm talking about 1-10 volume control on a stereo where the volume changes a lot more earlier on the scale than later. So in the 6.5-7.5 range you're going to see a bigger difference than you will in the 8-9 range.But maybe it's essentially the same thing. Or maybe I don't have a clue what I'm talking about :unsure:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The difference between a 7 and 8 is a big distinction.7's are cute...no matter what they try to do to up their hotness they will just always be "cute"8's are where the hotness begins. They've cleared the "cute" hurdle.
:goodposting: The scale is sort of logrithmic.
That's why I think the below may be a better "7". She's just the type of girl that will always be "cute" and tough to break into the hotness field.http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS7.jpg
Yeah, I think the 6.5 to 7.5 range is probably huge.
Are you referring to the bell curve?http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/IMAG0136.jpg
Not exactly. I'm talking about 1-10 volume control on a stereo where the volume changes a lot more earlier on the scale than later. So in the 6.5-7.5 range you're going to see a bigger difference than you will in the 8-9 range.But maybe it's essentially the same thing. Or maybe I don't have a clue what I'm talking about :unsure:
I get you.Here's the major groupings...HOT: 10, 9, 8CUTE: 7, 6MEH: 5, 4UGLY: 3, 2, 1
 
'Major said:
'offdee said:
Next up, 4 and 7: Below are present visuals, please provide more accurate, if able...

4: Not attractive. Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS4.jpg

7: Cute girl at the club, in classes, at work, in apt building. Definitely cute, but not tops locally.

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS7b.jpg
That 7 is more like a 5 in my book. Here's a 7 (8 in a bikini, yes I have some great pool shots) from a recent trip to Miami: http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p247/derussel/artbasel.jpg.I'm not even going to open the link to the 4. I'll let Christo and company fight over those mutts.
Boy, that is a classic beauty! She is a GM Scale 4. :thumbup:
:hifive: enjoy this one while it lasts
Upon further review, I'm giving her a GM Scale 5. Absolutely love her. :thumbup:
 
'Major said:
'offdee said:
Next up, 4 and 7: Below are present visuals, please provide more accurate, if able...

4: Not attractive. Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)

http://i280.photobuc...0Scale/TOS4.jpg

7: Cute girl at the club, in classes, at work, in apt building. Definitely cute, but not tops locally.

http://i280.photobuc...Scale/TOS7b.jpg
That 7 is more like a 5 in my book. Here's a 7 (8 in a bikini, yes I have some great pool shots) from a recent trip to Miami: http://i130.photobuc...el/artbasel.jpg.I'm not even going to open the link to the 4. I'll let Christo and company fight over those mutts.
Boy, that is a classic beauty! She is a GM Scale 4. :thumbup:
:hifive: enjoy this one while it lasts
Upon further review, I'm giving her a GM Scale 5. Absolutely love her. :thumbup:
I'm bumping her to 192. Can't be a 212, the jawline is a little off.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top