timschochet
Footballguy
Of course. Many are terrible. What’s your point?What about other governmental bureaucratic abuses? Aren't there many of those every day, where the stakes aren't deportation, but jail?
Of course. Many are terrible. What’s your point?What about other governmental bureaucratic abuses? Aren't there many of those every day, where the stakes aren't deportation, but jail?
That this particular government abuse needs priority and is traceable to a guy who openly admits he despises these bureaucratic apparatuses seems to be a stretch, but I'm really doing football today, so I don't have enough time to flesh it out.Of course. Many are terrible. What’s your point?
He doesn’t appear to despise bureaucracy when it comes to attacking any facet of immigration, legal or otherwise. He simply pushes for the cruelest, most limiting processes he can, and to Hell with the consequences.That this particular government abuse needs priority and is traceable to a guy who openly admits he despises these bureaucratic apparatuses seems to be a stretch, but I'm really doing football today, so I don't have enough time to flesh it out.
That's a fair point. He's not above enforcing bureaucratic law when it comes to limiting immigration. He picks and chooses his bureaucratic battles as suits him. It's hardly principled, but it's like many modern presidents, which is unfortunate.He doesn’t appear to despise bureaucracy when it comes to attacking any facet of immigration, legal or otherwise. He simply pushes for the cruelest, most limiting processes he can, and to Hell with the consequences.
There is no chance in hell she even considered for half a second leaving in 33 days.None of these analogies get to the core of the cruelty at the heart of this issue: a lady with a life threatening disease, who was invited here so that we could learn more about that disease, and who now depends on our medicine to survive, has received a letter from our government which states “you have 33 days to leave the country”
I don’t think these particular actions resemble those of any modern President.That's a fair point. He's not above enforcing bureaucratic law when it comes to limiting immigration. He picks and chooses his bureaucratic battles as suits him. It's hardly principled, but it's like many modern presidents, which is unfortunate.
I have no idea what she’s considering. She’s facing uncertainty about whether she’s going to live. I don’t share your nonchalance about this, and hopefully most people don’t.There is no chance in hell she even considered for half a second leaving in 33 days.
Especially since the letter was presented to her by her lawyer.
You have absolutely no idea what she is considering and neither does anyone else. Why would the letter being presented to her by her lawyer have any bearing on your ridiculous assertion that she won't consider leaving within 33 days? Absurd.There is no chance in hell she even considered for half a second leaving in 33 days.
Especially since the letter was presented to her by her lawyer.
@parasaurolophus....care to answer my question? I'm really curious what your thoughts are on this.You have absolutely no idea what she is considering and neither does anyone else. Why would the letter being presented to her by her lawyer have any bearing on your ridiculous assertion that she won't consider leaving within 33 days? Absurd.
She was invited here as a child for a specific reason. Medical research. She has been able to live longer due to treatments she continually receives here and cannot get where she originates from. She is now an adult. She is no longer permitted to stay here, in fact she is being uninvited and told to leave. Why are you okay with this?
It has bearing because her lawyer wouldnt just hand it to her without words. She wont even see the inside of a courtroom until 2020 if they even bring it to action.You have absolutely no idea what she is considering and neither does anyone else. Why would the letter being presented to her by her lawyer have any bearing on your ridiculous assertion that she won't consider leaving within 33 days? Absurd.
She was invited here as a child for a specific reason. Medical research. She has been able to live longer due to treatments she continually receives here and cannot get where she originates from. She is now an adult. She is no longer permitted to stay here, in fact she is being uninvited and told to leave. Why are you okay with this?
Not one single person who is bothered by this "legislation" is acting like this. Stop with the BS. Answer the question. Why are you okay with our government turning their backs on people in need? Especially those we invited here in the first place. Stop deflecting. Stop with the BS answers.It has bearing because her lawyer wouldnt just hand it to her without words. She wont even see the inside of a courtroom until 2020 if they even bring it to action.
She is obviously permitted to stay here since tons of people are still here that have court orders to be removed and she isnt even a fraction of the way into the process.
You guys are acting like on day 33 the gestapo shows up and takes her away. That isnt even close to the truth and any immigration lawyer obviously knows this.
Also, she is not OBVIOUSLY permitted to stay here. The official letter states otherwise. You have no clue whatsoever. Neither do I.It has bearing because her lawyer wouldnt just hand it to her without words. She wont even see the inside of a courtroom until 2020 if they even bring it to action.
She is obviously permitted to stay here since tons of people are still here that have court orders to be removed and she isnt even a fraction of the way into the process.
You guys are acting like on day 33 the gestapo shows up and takes her away. That isnt even close to the truth and any immigration lawyer obviously knows this.
Deflecting?Not one single person who is bothered by this "legislation" is acting like this. Stop with the BS. Answer the question. Why are you okay with our government turning their backs on people in need? Especially those we invited here in the first place. Stop deflecting. Stop with the BS answers.
Yet she is still here. Broadcasting to the world she is still here.Also, she is not OBVIOUSLY permitted to stay here. The official letter states otherwise. You have no clue whatsoever. Neither do I.
Those reacting to these inexcusable letters are the ones using these people as political pawns? HowSo yeah i am pretty freaking skeptical that these people (being used as political pawns now by people like you) will ever actually get deported when we dont even deport people that should be on a regular basis.
His response is astounding isn’t it? I mean I’ve read it over several times and it’s still incredible every time.Those reacting to these inexcusable letters are the ones using these people as political pawns? Howridiculous! The mere fact that these letters were sent at all has done harm and is contrary to any sense of decency. Whether anyone is ever deported or not there is no justification for this action!
Its all good. Those facing the struggles of life threatening illness are just receiving idle threats. If we all stopped using this as a political talking point and leave the administration to its own devises there would be nothing to worry about. Indifference is so much better than caring.His response is astounding isn’t it? I mean I’ve read it over several times and it’s still incredible every time.
Just like in a marriage sometimes it just ends up not working. Their are to many culture differents between the right and the left for the United States to continue as is.What divorce? What do you mean here?
From Nov 2014 to October of 2015 47 medical deferral requests were granted. This was the only data set I could find accurate info on.Bottomfeeder Sports said:Those reacting to these inexcusable letters are the ones using these people as political pawns? Howridiculous! The mere fact that these letters were sent at all has done harm and is contrary to any sense of decency. Whether anyone is ever deported or not there is no justification for this action!
No phonies. We know about it now because Trump has made it a policy to deny them. That’s what you’re choosing to ignore.From Nov 2014 to October of 2015 47 medical deferral requests were granted. This was the only data set I could find accurate info on.
The program was always being criticized and there were never formal procedures in place. Advocates wanted more approved and wanted actual written published policies since such a small % got approved.
Where were all of you super caring citizens then when these sick people were being denied? Oh, whats that? You didn't know anything about it? Weird you never heard of these sick kids getting denied and being deported huh? So either people only care about it now because it is Trump or they weren't actually getting deported. My money is on both.
Either way a bunch of phonies in here.
Well to be fair he is in favor of allowing east European teen girls in for breast enhancement surgeries. I believe he and Jeffrey Epstein even set up a sort of scholarship program to help them out with this. Of course once they reach the age of majority they are then sent packing back to their home countries.No phonies. We know about it now because Trump has made it a policy to deny them. That’s what you’re choosing to ignore.
Only because she wouldn't do topless before and after pictures with him.In fact I believe he reneged on his pledge to enhance Lauren.
People care now because they are learning that people going through the process as lacking as it may have been are being told that the process retroactively no longer exist; and that there won't be a process; and to get out of the country now. If the same thing happened in the past or happens in a post Trump future* then it was wrong also. I don't think Tim and the others would be bending over backwards to try to excuse it as "both sides"From Nov 2014 to October of 2015 47 medical deferral requests were granted. This was the only data set I could find accurate info on.
The program was always being criticized and there were never formal procedures in place. Advocates wanted more approved and wanted actual written published policies since such a small % got approved.
Where were all of you super caring citizens then when these sick people were being denied? Oh, whats that? You didn't know anything about it? Weird you never heard of these sick kids getting denied and being deported huh? So either people only care about it now because it is Trump or they weren't actually getting deported. My money is on both.
Either way a bunch of phonies in here.
Knowing this, won't people be looking as it would make a great story?I edited the title again because the reverse decision is not permanent- looks like they might try it again when nobody’s looking.
You’d think. But remember that they stopped separating families for a while, then tried to quietly pick it up again when the news moved on.Knowing this, won't people be looking as it would make a great story?
Yep, and got away with it mostly because....ooooo, looky look, a squirrel over there......You’d think. But remember that they stopped separating families for a while, then tried to quietly pick it up again when the news moved on.
I’m still outraged- no pretendingThat happened about two years faster than I thought it would.
I figured there might end up at least being some court actions. Maybe even a court order to leave followed by lack of enforcement, which is the norm these days. We didn't even get that far. Sorry you guys didn't get to pretend to be outraged for longer.
All the hip people are outraged. It’s a thing. Of course, it’s a pretty easy trend to follow if you are so inclined. You don’t have to do anything other than publicly claim to be outraged. Does that mean one is actually outraged? Probably not.That happened about two years faster than I thought it would.
I figured there might end up at least being some court actions. Maybe even a court order to leave followed by lack of enforcement, which is the norm these days. We didn't even get that far. Sorry you guys didn't get to pretend to be outraged for longer.
Some of us call our representatives on a semi-regular basis. Of course, my reps aren't deplorable monsters, so I don't even need to call themAll the hip people are outraged. It’s a thing. Of course, it’s a pretty easy trend to follow if you are so inclined. You don’t have to do anything other than publicly claim to be outraged. Does that mean one is actually outraged? Probably not.