podunker
Footballguy
I'm fairly new to Daily Fantasy Football, longtime season long player. Most DFS players have some sort of process they go through each week preparing to make their lineups. Whatever it may be, vegas line, projections, etc. After they are done, they usually have a pool of players at each position that look favorable based on those numbers or their process.
I was curious to know how many actually stick to those numbers even if they are surprised with the results when they are done. I have a terrible time myself picking players on bad teams, even when the process/numbers say they are a favorable play.
Another problem for me is I also tend to do a quick look at the first of the week and form some opinions of who I think would be good plays. Then when I do my process, some of the players I thought wouldn't be good end up being that way, and vice versa.
One other question. If you go through your weekly research/process/etc. to get your players, why would you not use them for both cash games and GPP's. Your process is telling you they are good value. I know you want to be contrarian on the GPP side, but I would think a lot of your lineup would still be the players your process tells you to pick. Unless, like I am sure many big time players do, you are playing a ton of lineups in GPP's hoping to hit the right one. The funny thing is, when I look at the winners of the big GPP's, most of the time, they don't have any really of the wall picks on their roster.
I would love to here some thoughts for David and the rest of the guys on the Staff also. Thank you so much for getting more involved in the DFS arena. Love everything I have been seeing so far on the site!
I was curious to know how many actually stick to those numbers even if they are surprised with the results when they are done. I have a terrible time myself picking players on bad teams, even when the process/numbers say they are a favorable play.
Another problem for me is I also tend to do a quick look at the first of the week and form some opinions of who I think would be good plays. Then when I do my process, some of the players I thought wouldn't be good end up being that way, and vice versa.
One other question. If you go through your weekly research/process/etc. to get your players, why would you not use them for both cash games and GPP's. Your process is telling you they are good value. I know you want to be contrarian on the GPP side, but I would think a lot of your lineup would still be the players your process tells you to pick. Unless, like I am sure many big time players do, you are playing a ton of lineups in GPP's hoping to hit the right one. The funny thing is, when I look at the winners of the big GPP's, most of the time, they don't have any really of the wall picks on their roster.
I would love to here some thoughts for David and the rest of the guys on the Staff also. Thank you so much for getting more involved in the DFS arena. Love everything I have been seeing so far on the site!