Ditka Butkus
Footballguy
He's not aging well. Looked like he was up all night chasing hookers.
He needs to find some slower hookers then, ones he can catch easily.He's not aging well. Looked like he was up all night chasing hookers.
Why the #### did Frank Nobilo have so much air time on amen corner on hole 11?? I don't hate the guy, but he doesn't seem like the best option.brohans his hole broken hand thing was hilarious the guys in the booth were basically calling bs totally great but anyhow the line of the tourney was faherty saying that speith was tougher than a pair of texas snake boots i do not even know what that means but it made me laugh they should just let faharety call a lot more of the show it would be about a billion times better and it already rules so bam take that to the texas snake bank bromigos
'86, Mr. Golf Knowledge13 strokes off the lead. 9 strokes off of second place. Finished outside the top 5. Outside the top 10. Outside the top 15. 2 rounds over par. Struggled off the tees. And not just a little. A lot. During his Sunday "charge" he only hit 2 fairways.
But did you see him chip????![]()
Is Tiger playing better than he has in the past year? Yup. He most definitely is. Is he the Tiger of old? Nope. Never will be. Could he win a tournament here or there? Sure. Lots of people win tournaments. Will he ever win another major? I doubt it. He may sneak in one more like Jack did back in '85, but I think he's done (when it comes to chasing down Jack's record.)
Tiger had one really good round out of 4 this past weekend. Lots of players are able to do that. In fact, almost all of them can do that. The point I made on Thursday and Friday was that while he may not suck anymore, he's still not very good. And the facts all still prove that.
Of course, I don't have 28 years of golf industry experience. So take what I said with a grain of salt.![]()
that was mccord and he's still not allowed back. feherty is the best theres ever been.i think faherty ticked someone off at the masters a couple of years ago maybe they even had him off of the air for a while but i am glad he is back and will take as much as i can get take that to the bank bromigos
yepTiger's got tons of experience boning. We should not question him.
My bad. I got it confused with Arnold Palmer's age.'86, Mr. Golf Knowledge13 strokes off the lead. 9 strokes off of second place. Finished outside the top 5. Outside the top 10. Outside the top 15. 2 rounds over par. Struggled off the tees. And not just a little. A lot. During his Sunday "charge" he only hit 2 fairways.
But did you see him chip????![]()
Is Tiger playing better than he has in the past year? Yup. He most definitely is. Is he the Tiger of old? Nope. Never will be. Could he win a tournament here or there? Sure. Lots of people win tournaments. Will he ever win another major? I doubt it. He may sneak in one more like Jack did back in '85, but I think he's done (when it comes to chasing down Jack's record.)
Tiger had one really good round out of 4 this past weekend. Lots of players are able to do that. In fact, almost all of them can do that. The point I made on Thursday and Friday was that while he may not suck anymore, he's still not very good. And the facts all still prove that.
Of course, I don't have 28 years of golf industry experience. So take what I said with a grain of salt.![]()
thanks dude i could not remember what the story was i agree that faherty is the man take that to the bankthat was mccord and he's still not allowed back. feherty is the best theres ever been.i think faherty ticked someone off at the masters a couple of years ago maybe they even had him off of the air for a while but i am glad he is back and will take as much as i can get take that to the bank bromigos
body bags and bikini waxthanks dude i could not remember what the story was i agree that faherty is the man take that to the bankthat was mccord and he's still not allowed back. feherty is the best theres ever been.i think faherty ticked someone off at the masters a couple of years ago maybe they even had him off of the air for a while but i am glad he is back and will take as much as i can get take that to the bank bromigos
1994. Something tells me forgiveness and second chance are not in the ANGC lexicon.body bags and bikini waxthanks dude i could not remember what the story was i agree that faherty is the man take that to the bankthat was mccord and he's still not allowed back. feherty is the best theres ever been.i think faherty ticked someone off at the masters a couple of years ago maybe they even had him off of the air for a while but i am glad he is back and will take as much as i can get take that to the bank bromigos
Actually, he wasn'tHe didn't struggle off the tees at all on Saturday. Was hitting perfect drives.13 strokes off the lead. 9 strokes off of second place. Finished outside the top 5. Outside the top 10. Outside the top 15. 2 rounds over par. Struggled off the tees. And not just a little. A lot. During his Sunday "charge" he only hit 2 fairways.
But did you see him chip????![]()
Is Tiger playing better than he has in the past year? Yup. He most definitely is. Is he the Tiger of old? Nope. Never will be. Could he win a tournament here or there? Sure. Lots of people win tournaments. Will he ever win another major? I doubt it. He may sneak in one more like Jack did back in '85, but I think he's done (when it comes to chasing down Jack's record.)
Tiger had one really good round out of 4 this past weekend. Lots of players are able to do that. In fact, almost all of them can do that. The point I made on Thursday and Friday was that while he may not suck anymore, he's still not very good. And the facts all still prove that.
Of course, I don't have 28 years of golf industry experience. So take what I said with a grain of salt.![]()
HE"S BACK, #####!When I left on Friday, everyone had declared him being back.shiek youre the only one on this he's back narrative
Rory is fairly boring and I'm not sure Jordan has any personality at all. So the first pair.Interesting question on Mike and Mike this morning - who would you rather watch in a final pairing at a major:
1. Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson
or
2. Rory Mcilroy and Jordan Spieth
Would be damn happy to see either one. Both would be awesome theater.Interesting question on Mike and Mike this morning - who would you rather watch in a final pairing at a major:
1. Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson
or
2. Rory Mcilroy and Jordan Spieth
Lucas Glover makes Greg Chalmers seem interestingMr. Pickles said:Spieth makes Lucas Glover seem interesting.
I haven't heard anyone suggest that Spieth is going to dominate. People are definitely discussing him and Rory being a rivalry for a long time to come which makes a lot of sense.I'm not going to anoint Spieth at this point. Every time a young guy or relative unknown wins a major, and it has happened a lot recently, the talk starts on whether they are going to
dominate golf.
Golf is such that you don't know that until it happens. The difficulty and complexity of the
game itself and the large tournament fields make it impossible to predict the next superstar.
Doesn't matter how great he looks in a major, or even a few majors.
If he starts closing in on 10+ majors then we can call him the next Tiger.
He's not long. He's not a magician around the greens; in fact, he's shaky on 4-8 footers. He hasn't been a great closer.If you can't see how Spieth is different from some of the guys on that list, I suggest you watch some more golf.
I'd say he has a lot of everything, but doesn't have one attribute that stands out besides his planning and course management. I think it's his mental focus and his putting between 10 and 20 feet. His distance control with all shots in bag is better than most guys out there right now. He may not be a magician like Phil, but his short game is amazing.He's not long. He's not a magician around the greens; in fact, he's shaky on 4-8 footers. He hasn't been a great closer.If you can't see how Spieth is different from some of the guys on that list, I suggest you watch some more golf.
He was a prodigy, the best junior golfer since Woods. He left college after only 3 semesters and had a remarkably smooth transition to the pro level. He did well in the Walker and Ryder Cups, so he's tough mentally. Great family & support system around him.
But what makes him great? What makes him different from other young golfers who enjoyed a measure of success?
Now keep only the ones who were top 5 in the world and major at 21.And of this list only Scott, Oosthuizen, Paddy maybe Bubba and Kaymer were every really talked about as 'maybe the next thing.' You can't just list one hit wonders. No one thought Zach Johnson or Micheel or Simpson were gonna be the next big thing.ESPN and CBS have been all over Spieth being the next Tiger. At least asking the question.
I'm just tired of the same discussion with every major winner in the last decade (will they dominate??), and it never happens. Rory is the closest to meet the expectations.
All of these guys have had people talking up their incredible game and whether it will continue, at least for the Sunday and Monday after whatever they won:
Ben Curtis
Shaun Micheel
Michael Campbell
Jeff Ogilvy
Zach Johnson
Padraig Harrington
Trevor Immelman
Lucas Glover
YE Yang
Graeme McDowell
Louis Oosthuizen
Martin Kaymer
Charl Schwartzel
Keegan Bradley
Bubba Watson
Webb Simpson
Adam Scott
Justin Rose
Jason Dufner
and what has happened?
...now we've got Jordan Speith. Speith seems like the real deal right now, like Rory, but a lot of others have seemed that way after their win too.
Super talented, no doubt. Good genes from having two college athlete patents. Worked hard with good teachers. But I honestly can't come up with what makes him special (and he may well be.)I'd say he has a lot of everything, but doesn't have one attribute that stands out besides his planning and course management. I think it's his mental focus and his putting between 10 and 20 feet. His distance control with all shots in bag is better than most guys out there right now. He may not be a magician like Phil, but his short game is amazing.He's not long. He's not a magician around the greens; in fact, he's shaky on 4-8 footers. He hasn't been a great closer. He was a prodigy, the best junior golfer since Woods. He left college after only 3 semesters and had a remarkably smooth transition to the pro level. He did well in the Walker and Ryder Cups, so he's tough mentally. Great family & support system around him.If you can't see how Spieth is different from some of the guys on that list, I suggest you watch some more golf.
But what makes him great? What makes him different from other young golfers who enjoyed a measure of success?
He's a 21 year old who after 8 total rounds at Augusta already knows exactly how to play that course. That's obscene. It's not a perfect swing or insane distance but his course management is better than most tour players.Super talented, no doubt. Good genes from having two college athlete patents. Worked hard with good teachers. But I honestly can't come up with what makes him special (and he may well be.)I was thinking about this today, and for lack of a better term, he's a generalist. A really, really good all around player. But nobody fawns over his flawless swing technique or power or phenomenal touch. He just does a lot of things well.I'd say he has a lot of everything, but doesn't have one attribute that stands out besides his planning and course management. I think it's his mental focus and his putting between 10 and 20 feet. His distance control with all shots in bag is better than most guys out there right now. He may not be a magician like Phil, but his short game is amazing.He's not long. He's not a magician around the greens; in fact, he's shaky on 4-8 footers. He hasn't been a great closer. He was a prodigy, the best junior golfer since Woods. He left college after only 3 semesters and had a remarkably smooth transition to the pro level. He did well in the Walker and Ryder Cups, so he's tough mentally. Great family & support system around him.If you can't see how Spieth is different from some of the guys on that list, I suggest you watch some more golf.
But what makes him great? What makes him different from other young golfers who enjoyed a measure of success?
Still a few chapters to write, guess we'll all find out together. Really nice kid IMO.
I've watched him quite a bit the last 3+ seasons. He puts himself in position to win a lot. But I wouldn't call him clutch - he's pissed away plenty of potential wins. That said, he's taken it to a whole 'nother level the last four events he's played. Quite a roll.Just watch him play. He has the confidence of a guy who's been playing on the tour for 20 years. Incredibly clutch. The putt he made to force a playoff at the shell houston open was awesome. Just walked in a 12 footer like it was nothing. He's been dominant out there.
Perfectly understandable.Way back, like a dozen strokes or so back. While Mantits Mickelson and Rory charged, Tiger ran in place shaking his wristHE'S BACK!!!!!!
![]()
and thinking of Lindsey's haunches.
I want Tiger to win this challenge as much as any other.Tiger > Speith
Not even close.
Hello?
(######l bathing equipment).Well given what spieth has done, if he died tomorrow he'd be legendary. He's in rare company at age 21
LegendaryWell given what spieth has done, if he died tomorrow he'd be legendary. He's in rare company at age 21