What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Tiger Woods (1 Viewer)

Rory will never be Tiger. This argument is dumb and somehow making this discussion even worse.

BUT - should Rory win another 3 to 5 majors over the next several years and get to around 7 or 8 by the time he's 28, the Tiger / Jack comparisons will start grow dramatically and Rory's popularity will grow as will the TV ratings.

Comparing Rory to Tiger now is like comparing a young LeBron to Jordan or a young Kobe to Jordan. It's just way, way too premature.
I'm sorry this part of the discussion isn't up to your standards, but the thread title is "Tiger Woods." I'm also sorry a few geeks have some hard on for what this thread used to be. I could really give a ####. I'm a huge Tiger fan and I'm in here to discuss him.
ok

 
Rory will never be Tiger. This argument is dumb and somehow making this discussion even worse.

BUT - should Rory win another 3 to 5 majors over the next several years and get to around 7 or 8 by the time he's 28, the Tiger / Jack comparisons will start grow dramatically and Rory's popularity will grow as will the TV ratings.

Comparing Rory to Tiger now is like comparing a young LeBron to Jordan or a young Kobe to Jordan. It's just way, way too premature.
I'm sorry this part of the discussion isn't up to your standards, but the thread title is "Tiger Woods." I'm also sorry a few geeks have some hard on for what this thread used to be. I could really give a ####. I'm a huge Tiger fan and I'm in here to discuss him.
This "see if I can be more obnoxious and hated than LHUCKS" shtick is really growing on me.

 
The last time Tiger won anything important:

The Olympics took place... In China.

Obama won the election... his first term.

Russia was invading neighbors... Georgia.

He's kind of like watching Gordie Howe play on the Whalers.
Now you're just :fishing: All that stuff happened years before his last important wins. Among five wins in 2013 were the Tournament Players Championship (TPC Sawgrass), and two World Golf Championships.

 
Why does Woods keep letting the club fly out of his hands? I have seen it happen once in a great while but the last two weeks every highlight they show of Woods the club is flying out of his grip.

 
Why does Woods keep letting the club fly out of his hands? I have seen it happen once in a great while but the last two weeks every highlight they show of Woods the club is flying out of his grip.
He gets stuck inside/underneath, flips at it and finishes the swing right of target. He's not firing his left side through. Rory or Kaymer follow through to the left of the target line. Tiger is stuck. So he doesn't release and feels it immediately and gets frustrated and doesn't finish his swing.
 
The last time Tiger won anything important:

The Olympics took place... In China.

Obama won the election... his first term.

Russia was invading neighbors... Georgia.

He's kind of like watching Gordie Howe play on the Whalers.
Now you're just :fishing: All that stuff happened years before his last important wins. Among five wins in 2013 were the Tournament Players Championship (TPC Sawgrass), and two World Golf Championships.
I'll give you the win at the Players last year, but the WGC are limited field events on courses where Tiger has won multiple times. I'd actually rather see him win at a John Deere or in Hartford or some run-of-the-mill tournament than at one of his favorite courses.

 
Tiger can finish last place in any tournament in the world and still be the most important one on the course.

Still bigger than the sport itself.
That's because people don't watch Rory, root for Rory, support Rory, follow Rory, know who Rory is simply because of the color of his skin.
You can't be serious.
You don't think there are a number of black people who didn't start paying attention to golf until Woods came around and only still pay attention if/when Woods is playing and in contention?
I don't think the casual black fan is anywhere near the top of the list of factors driving Tiger's popularity and TV ratings.
Interesting. In order for Rory to ever be bigger than the sport itself (your words), he's going to need some influences that come from outside of the world of golf. Something that Tiger most definitely had/has, and in my humble opinion, something that Rory will never have.
Yes, he needs to be something he isn't.. arguably the best golfer ever with an amazing marketing appeal. He is/has neither. And neither have anything to do with the skin color of himself or his fans.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tiger can finish last place in any tournament in the world and still be the most important one on the course.

Still bigger than the sport itself.
This is a problem for the Tour honestly. Their narrative for 15 years has been Tiger vs Jack, Tiger vs Field etc. Granted no single challenger really stepped up during his prime as a legit foil, but still, they had 15 years of increased eyeballs to go deeper with those casual fans and introduce other players into the spotlight. But they kept on banging the Tiger drum. Now they've got a problem if he's not Tigre again.
A couple more major victories by Rory, and it will be time to toss Woods to the side as old news and start the Rory vs. the field and Rory vs. Jack.
You mean Rory that won the lowest tv rating Open in 5 years?

Rory's ratings are decreasing.
Yeah the same one that Tiger Woods was in, stinking it up. So the Eldrick Bandwaggoneers went out to mow their lawns when they realized their boy was out of it. Pretty much tells their story. Not real golf fans.

Just missed a 3 foot put. Dude stinks. Going for the double bogey now. MADE IT!!! :towelwave:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
How many majors had Tiger won before they started talking about him breaking Jack's record?
I'd guess somewhere around 4 or 5. He of course started talking about it from the word go since that was his ultimate goal.

50-50 he doesn't make it thru the 2nd round.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
matuski said:
Dondante said:
matuski said:
Ghost Rider said:
matuski said:
Dondante said:
matuski said:
Tiger can finish last place in any tournament in the world and still be the most important one on the course.

Still bigger than the sport itself.
That's because people don't watch Rory, root for Rory, support Rory, follow Rory, know who Rory is simply because of the color of his skin.
You can't be serious.
You don't think there are a number of black people who didn't start paying attention to golf until Woods came around and only still pay attention if/when Woods is playing and in contention?
I don't think the casual black fan is anywhere near the top of the list of factors driving Tiger's popularity and TV ratings.
Interesting. In order for Rory to ever be bigger than the sport itself (your words), he's going to need some influences that come from outside of the world of golf. Something that Tiger most definitely had/has, and in my humble opinion, something that Rory will never have.
Yes, he needs to be something he isn't.. arguably the best golfer ever with an amazing marketing appeal. He is/has neither. And neither have anything to do with the skin color of himself or his fans.
Marketing appeal? WTF do you mean by this, exactly? He's a vanilla shake. And you don't know that Rory isn't going to be better than Tiger. He needs to win a major a year to get to where Tiger is now. Not out of the question. Marketing appeal... that was a good one.

 
matuski said:
Dondante said:
matuski said:
Ghost Rider said:
matuski said:
Dondante said:
matuski said:
Tiger can finish last place in any tournament in the world and still be the most important one on the course.

Still bigger than the sport itself.
That's because people don't watch Rory, root for Rory, support Rory, follow Rory, know who Rory is simply because of the color of his skin.
You can't be serious.
You don't think there are a number of black people who didn't start paying attention to golf until Woods came around and only still pay attention if/when Woods is playing and in contention?
I don't think the casual black fan is anywhere near the top of the list of factors driving Tiger's popularity and TV ratings.
Interesting. In order for Rory to ever be bigger than the sport itself (your words), he's going to need some influences that come from outside of the world of golf. Something that Tiger most definitely had/has, and in my humble opinion, something that Rory will never have.
Yes, he needs to be something he isn't.. arguably the best golfer ever with an amazing marketing appeal. He is/has neither. And neither have anything to do with the skin color of himself or his fans.
Marketing appeal? WTF do you mean by this, exactly? He's a vanilla shake. And you don't know that Rory isn't going to be better than Tiger. He needs to win a major a year to get to where Tiger is now. Not out of the question. Marketing appeal... that was a good one.
Yeah, Tiger has no mass appeal at all. That is billion.. with a "B" in case you were confused.

We know with 99.999999% certainty that Rory isn't Tiger. Neither on the course, nor in his branding ability. He is the next flavor of the year, like a dozen before him in Tiger's career.

 
Yeah, Tiger has no mass appeal at all. That is billion.. with a "B" in case you were confused.

We know with 99.999999% certainty that Rory isn't Tiger. Neither on the course, nor in his branding ability. He is the next flavor of the year, like a dozen before him in Tiger's career.
Yeah, let me check that dozen that have 3 majors by the age of 25 and possibly 4. Oh, there are none. To compare McIlroy to them shows a pure lack a golf knowledge.

If he wins this week, he will be on the exact same pace as Woods.

 
These announcers are worse than Tiger. Jesus. I've been watching for the past hour and a half and all they have done is make excuses for Tiger. Give it a rest all ready.

 
TheIronSheik said:
How many majors had Tiger won before they started talking about him breaking Jack's record?
The thing that really propelled Tiger into the national spotlight was not just his early exposure as a kid, but his winning 3 straight US amateurs. Before these he was promise but you didn't know. Winning those as young as he was showed he was the real deal. Plus he won at least one in a spectacular comeback, hitting crazy shots and putts to win. He may have been behind in all three. Anyway, people knew him and expected him to be awesome before he set foot on his first course as a pro. His run was seriously amazing and I'm glad I got to watch the ride.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joe T said:
Rory will never be Tiger. This argument is dumb and somehow making this discussion even worse.

BUT - should Rory win another 3 to 5 majors over the next several years and get to around 7 or 8 by the time he's 28, the Tiger / Jack comparisons will start grow dramatically and Rory's popularity will grow as will the TV ratings.

Comparing Rory to Tiger now is like comparing a young LeBron to Jordan or a young Kobe to Jordan. It's just way, way too premature.
Not only that, but Tiger's youth career is likely the best ever. Rory was really good...but it makes the comparison now even further off.

 
I don't like Tiger but this enjoyment some people here are getting from a guy who is clearly hurt playing poorly is kinda pathetic.

 
TheIronSheik said:
How many majors had Tiger won before they started talking about him breaking Jack's record?
The thing that really propelled Tiger into the national spotlight was not just his early exposure as a kid, but his winning 3 straight US amateurs. Before these he was promise but you didn't know. Winning those as young as he was showed he was the real deal. Plus he won at least one in a spectacular comeback, hitting crazy shots and putts to win. He may have been behind in all three. Anyway, people knew him and expected him to be awesome before he set foot on his first course as a pro. His run was seriously amazing and I'm glad I got to watch the ride.
Yep, we may never see a ride like that again in golf.

 
He should pack it in and retire.
Back surgery followed by more back problems at 35 is never going to end well. All the money he could ever want, no chance of catching Jack -- why grind it out hoping he wins one more big one?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Has Jack cracked open the champagne like the '72 Dolphins?
He was on Mike and Mike this morning and said there was no reason to do so.. players routinely win in their 40's. Also said he wouldn't want Tiger's run to end on account of injury.

Spoke highly of Tiger.

eta - or yesterday.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Has Jack cracked open the champagne like the '72 Dolphins?
He was on Mike and Mike this morning and said there was no reason to do so.. players routinely win in their 40's.
Not majors... not really.

Going back to 1960 here are some facts.1. The average and median age for major champions is 32. It skews a little younger at the British Open (median of 31) and a little older at the PGA Championship (median of 33), but it’s basically 32. That number has stayed pretty constant for 50-plus years. That’s your peak: age 32.

2. Players 35 and younger have won more than three-quarters of all the majors since 1960. It may be hard to believe, but it’s a young man’s game.

3. Less than 10 percent – just 20 of 216 – of all majors were won by players 40 and over. It does happen, especially at the British Open (the last three British Open champions were all 40-somethings). But since 2000, only one golfer – 41-year-old Vijay Singh – has won a Masters, U.S. Open or PGA Championship.

4. Only two players in the last 54 years – Nicklaus in ’86 and Julius Boros in ’68 – were 46 or older when they won a Grand Slam title.

Here’s a quick chart of major championship winners by age if you are interested:

• Age 20-25: 24 (11%)

• Age 26-30: 64 (30%)

• Age 31-35: 76 (35%)

• Age 36-40: 34 (16%)

• Age 41-over: 19 (8%)
 
Tiger came back early to try to make the Ryder Cup....period. If you don't get this you're not really trying.

 
Only 33 of the last 430 major championships dating to the 1860 British Open have been won by a player in his 40s.
And if anyone who ever played the game could do it.. Tiger could.

eta - this is what really seems to get your goats.. no matter what you hate on, the historical scoreboard bites you in the ###. He is arguably the greatest ever, get used to it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Only 33 of the last 430 major championships dating to the 1860 British Open have been won by a player in his 40s.
And if anyone who ever played the game could do it.. Tiger could.

eta - this is what really seems to get your goats.. no matter what you hate on, the historical scoreboard bites you in the ###. He is arguably the greatest ever, get used to it.
My calculations indicate otherwise.

 
Only 33 of the last 430 major championships dating to the 1860 British Open have been won by a player in his 40s.
And if anyone who ever played the game could do it.. Tiger could.

eta - this is what really seems to get your goats.. no matter what you hate on, the historical scoreboard bites you in the ###. He is arguably the greatest ever, get used to it.
My calculations indicate otherwise.
We know where your bias lies, have fun with the judgmental anger. :shrug:

 
Only 33 of the last 430 major championships dating to the 1860 British Open have been won by a player in his 40s.
And if anyone who ever played the game could do it.. Tiger could.

eta - this is what really seems to get your goats.. no matter what you hate on, the historical scoreboard bites you in the ###. He is arguably the greatest ever, get used to it.
My calculations indicate otherwise.
We know where your bias lies, have fun with the judgmental anger. :shrug:
I couldn't care less if he finishes with 40 major wins. It won't change my life one bit. I simply pointed out what a terrible person he is. :shrug:

 
Only 33 of the last 430 major championships dating to the 1860 British Open have been won by a player in his 40s.
And if anyone who ever played the game could do it.. Tiger could.

eta - this is what really seems to get your goats.. no matter what you hate on, the historical scoreboard bites you in the ###. He is arguably the greatest ever, get used to it.
My calculations indicate otherwise.
We know where your bias lies, have fun with the judgmental anger. :shrug:
I couldn't care less if he finishes with 40 major wins. It won't change my life one bit. I simply pointed out what a terrible person he is. :shrug:
have fun with the judgmental anger.


 
Only 33 of the last 430 major championships dating to the 1860 British Open have been won by a player in his 40s.
And if anyone who ever played the game could do it.. Tiger could.

eta - this is what really seems to get your goats.. no matter what you hate on, the historical scoreboard bites you in the ###. He is arguably the greatest ever, get used to it.
My calculations indicate otherwise.
We know where your bias lies, have fun with the judgmental anger. :shrug:
I couldn't care less if he finishes with 40 major wins. It won't change my life one bit. I simply pointed out what a terrible person he is. :shrug:
He's guilty of naively getting married when he shouldn't have. What an evil *******!!!

 
Naively getting married when he shouldn't have? :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

That's about the nicest way I've ever heard cheating on your wife with dozens of gorgeous broads worded. 100 percent chance you have the Tiger fist pump poster over your bed.

"My wife divorced me?"

"Why?"

"I banged 40 women while we were married and gave her herpes"

AJ: "Oh you didn't cheat on her, you 'naively got married when you shouldn't have'"

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top