What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Tiger Woods (4 Viewers)

my only ##### about Tiger, is actually not at Tiger. It's the damn press & TV networks that have to cover every aspect of Tiger's round. Here is Tiger walking to the ball. Here is Tiger looking at the sky. Tourney a few years ago Tiger was 10 shots back with 8 holes to go & some TV announcer said, "he's not out of it yet". That's my #####.

Sorry if this has been covered before in another post.
There have been 25 pages added to this thread since Tiger announced he'd play in the Masters 12 days ago. Can't blame the press and TV networks for giving the people what they want.

 
my only ##### about Tiger, is actually not at Tiger. It's the damn press & TV networks that have to cover every aspect of Tiger's round. Here is Tiger walking to the ball. Here is Tiger looking at the sky. Tourney a few years ago Tiger was 10 shots back with 8 holes to go & some TV announcer said, "he's not out of it yet". That's my #####.

Sorry if this has been covered before in another post.
There have been 25 pages added to this thread since Tiger announced he'd play in the Masters 12 days ago. Can't blame the press and TV networks for giving the people what they want.
Yeah, Tiger is definitely still a major draw. I do think that the sport and the TV coverage did a huge disservice to itself years back by focusing solely on Tiger. I'm sure it was easy to do so, but Tiger was never going to be "Tiger" forever. Everyone has an expiration date. They should have been focusing on some of the younger kids coming up, trying to take down Tiger towards the end. That's a tough line to balance, though.

 
Now when you say "in contention" do you mean tied for 17th?
In 1999 Woods finished T18. Guess he's improving.
What?
My mistake. Looks like he's getting worse.
What are you talking about? :confused:
Didn't want you feeling all alone. Thought it might make you feel better if someone else was making nonsensical meaningless statements. Did you figure out what "relative to the field" means? Woods 1997 was more impressive than Spieth 2015.
Been bothering me all week. This was unnecessarily rude. Apologies, Sheik. I'll try not to be so confrontational.

 
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2430216-2015-masters-why-jordan-spieths-scoring-records-are-not-quite-what-they-seem

So the conditions‑‑ the scoring conditions were there, because the greens were soft. I mean we could be aggressive. And the balls were staying back. I was talking to Thomas Bjorn and O'Meara and even Tom Watson earlier today and we couldn't believe how slow they were yesterday. Again, they were slow again today.The balls were spinning back. 5‑irons were making ball marks, things like that, things that you just don't normally find here. But it's up to the committee. If they want to make this golf course a little drier, I was telling the guys earlier, it's quiet out there, there's no sub airs going. If they turn the sub airs on, they can suck the moisture out of this thing and get them firm, or they can live with it like it is, and we can go out there and make a bunch of birdies.
espn's michael collins was asked why the greens were soft and slow. his response:

Collins: That had to do with the one thing Augusta National can't control, Mother Nature. High temps and high humidity made it impossible to get the greens as rock hard as we've seen in years past. Even with the SubAir system under the putting surfaces running in the early part of the week, high humidity kept moisture at the surface of the turf. Why the greens seemed slowed to some players I think was more mental than anything else.

 
So this is what I am hearing about Speith: Very good overall game and great course management. With that combination, it sounds like he will be in contention to win a lot of tournaments.
and putts lights out
Then he not only will be in contention, he will win a lot of tournaments.
Now when you say "in contention" do you mean tied for 17th?
Tiger was in the third to last group to go out on Sunday, i.e. he was in the top 6. He needed to post a ridiculous score, but he was in contention.
No. No he wasn't.
Ten strokes back and he was in contention?

No, no he wasn't.
At Augusta I would say 10 behind with one round to go is not impossible. he could catch the leader. The bigger problem is how many golfers are between him and the leader. I mean odds are they all won't come back to the field. If a guy is 10 behind and goes out and shoots 64, that's 8 of those strokes right there (to par). I think Greg Norman was like 6 or 7 shots ahead going in to the final round in 96. He lost by 6 or 7 shots. Point is there can be some big swings on that golf course. It's one of the reasons it's such a great tournament.
In a vacuum, I agree with you. Of course it's theoretically possible.

In this particular situation, there were two factors that made it practically impossible:

1. The perfect course and weather conditions made it exceedingly unlikely that Spieth, Phil and Rose would shoot over par. Indeed. almost every contender except Tiger shot under par on Sunday.

2. Tiger is 39. His best days are clearly behind him. There was no way he was going to shoot 64.
1) He only needed Spieth to shoot over par. Rory was in the exact same position as him. He finished in 4th, 6 off the lead. If just Spieth shoots over par he's right there with Phil and Rose. Basically all that needed to happen was to swap the rounds of Spieth and Hoffman. Its not like there was a cast of thousands he needed to climb over - it was 4 guys.

2) Anyone on tour, on any given day, can get hot and go super low. There were 2 66s and a few 67s - the course was there for the taking.
Lol. Ifs and buts and candy and nuts and all that...

How about the fact that of all the people who had a shot to make an improbable run, Tiger shat the bed. Couldn't hit a fairway. He was never in contention, by any objective measure.

A more accurate assessment is that Tiget fixed his short game, played two decent rounds where his short game came up large, but was never close to being a threat to win the tourney.

That will be your narrative from here on in. He may win another tourney. Contend for a major even. Maybe. But he is not a top guy anymore and never will be. He put it together for a sweet run in 2013. But the other 5 years since ambiengate are the real story and validate the greatest call ever on this board (which happened in '09).

Taking a holistic view of Tiger's career since the Fin call and describing it as "competitive" is generous, really.

 
:lmao: :lmao: Yeah, calling the 2013 Player of the Year only "competitive" is being very generous.

Good thing for you Tiger haters that he ruptured his spine last year, so this "merely competitive" BS can remain a thing for awhile longer.

 
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2430216-2015-masters-why-jordan-spieths-scoring-records-are-not-quite-what-they-seem

So the conditions‑‑ the scoring conditions were there, because the greens were soft. I mean we could be aggressive. And the balls were staying back. I was talking to Thomas Bjorn and O'Meara and even Tom Watson earlier today and we couldn't believe how slow they were yesterday. Again, they were slow again today.The balls were spinning back. 5‑irons were making ball marks, things like that, things that you just don't normally find here. But it's up to the committee. If they want to make this golf course a little drier, I was telling the guys earlier, it's quiet out there, there's no sub airs going. If they turn the sub airs on, they can suck the moisture out of this thing and get them firm, or they can live with it like it is, and we can go out there and make a bunch of birdies.
espn's michael collins was asked why the greens were soft and slow. his response:

Collins: That had to do with the one thing Augusta National can't control, Mother Nature. High temps and high humidity made it impossible to get the greens as rock hard as we've seen in years past. Even with the SubAir system under the putting surfaces running in the early part of the week, high humidity kept moisture at the surface of the turf. Why the greens seemed slowed to some players I think was more mental than anything else.
Yeah, that's complete bull#### and he knows it. He likes his Masters privileges the way they are and has no interest in getting on the ANGC radar in a manner that could be perceived as critical. The rain was minimal and behind the Friday night rain was very dry air. The humidity Saturday and Sunday was like 25%. And I don't think they ever got more than 2/10ths in a 24 hour period. It still doesn't explain the lack of subairs running Saturday and Sunday. And Michael might want to go back and watch the tournament again for green speeds. If he doesn't have much time, he might look at putts from above the hole on 12 on Friday and compare with every other year. That could have explained the fairways holding the way they did, but not the greens. Either he was the worst caddy ever and is the worst golf analyst ever (he's not good, but hey he's quirky!), or that's what a punt looks like.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
:lmao: :lmao: Yeah, calling the 2013 Player of the Year only "competitive" is being very generous.

Good thing for you Tiger haters that he ruptured his spine last year, so this "merely competitive" BS can remain a thing for awhile longer.
Ruptured spine sounds terrible. He should consider a body transplant.

 
Apple Jack -- all points taken and understood. One question left standing, however:Was the fact that ANGC elected not to dry out the greens ... was that fact in and of itself unusual? Or even suspicious?
It is. The speed and slope of greens at the Masters and the fact you have to leave the ball below the hole on your approach shots are pretty much the defining characteristic.

 
:lmao: :lmao: Yeah, calling the 2013 Player of the Year only "competitive" is being very generous.

Good thing for you Tiger haters that he ruptured his spine last year, so this "merely competitive" BS can remain a thing for awhile longer.
Don't forget the bone that popped out of his hand in the Masters.

 
Ernie Els was in the final group Sunday at the 2000 U.S. Open. Was he "in contention" then, even though he was 10 shots off the lead?

 
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2430216-2015-masters-why-jordan-spieths-scoring-records-are-not-quite-what-they-seem

So the conditions‑‑ the scoring conditions were there, because the greens were soft. I mean we could be aggressive. And the balls were staying back. I was talking to Thomas Bjorn and O'Meara and even Tom Watson earlier today and we couldn't believe how slow they were yesterday. Again, they were slow again today.The balls were spinning back. 5‑irons were making ball marks, things like that, things that you just don't normally find here. But it's up to the committee. If they want to make this golf course a little drier, I was telling the guys earlier, it's quiet out there, there's no sub airs going. If they turn the sub airs on, they can suck the moisture out of this thing and get them firm, or they can live with it like it is, and we can go out there and make a bunch of birdies.
espn's michael collins was asked why the greens were soft and slow. his response:

Collins: That had to do with the one thing Augusta National can't control, Mother Nature. High temps and high humidity made it impossible to get the greens as rock hard as we've seen in years past. Even with the SubAir system under the putting surfaces running in the early part of the week, high humidity kept moisture at the surface of the turf. Why the greens seemed slowed to some players I think was more mental than anything else.
So Mother Nature was in on the big conspiracy. Tough break.

:lmao: :lmao: Yeah, calling the 2013 Player of the Year only "competitive" is being very generous.

Good thing for you Tiger haters that he ruptured his spine last year, so this "merely competitive" BS can remain a thing for awhile longer.
Ruptured spine sounds terrible. He should consider a body transplant.
He's gonna need one if he wants to sniff Jack's record.

 
How's Tiger doing this week?
But he won player of the year 2 years ago by winning 5 versions of the John Deers classic!!

:lmao:
Hardly. ELEVENTH Player of the year award.

Woods won five of the 16 tournaments he played this season and finished in the top 10 in three others.

His wins included the Arnold Palmer Invitational, Farmers Insurance Open, Players Championship, Cadillac Championship and Bridgestone Invitational.

 
How's Tiger doing this week?
But he won player of the year 2 years ago by winning 5 versions of the John Deers classic!!

:lmao:
Hardly. ELEVENTH Player of the year award.

Woods won five of the 16 tournaments he played this season and finished in the top 10 in three others.

His wins included the Arnold Palmer Invitational, Farmers Insurance Open, Players Championship, Cadillac Championship and Bridgestone Invitational.
I know, it a very bad attempt at sarcasm Smailsy.

Although, the Player of the Year argument is very dumb. No one here cares about anything other than majors. Tiger set the bar there himself. I usually know who's losing the battle here by seeing when that's brought up.

 
The top-20 finish at the Masters means he can finally trade up to a slightly more famous OR slightly less skanky blonde imo. If he wants both, he needs to go top-10 in the US Open. His choices right now include Dylan Dryer (NBC weather babe) or a local solid 8 schoolteacher who takes the dean and the football coach at the same time.

 
The Lindsay and Tiger statements they read during the match play had me rolling... Their statements were nearly identical.

 
Tiger sounds like he has been on a 5 day coke and whore bender, as he hasn't slept since the breakup

Look out Majors!

 
The lack of activity in this thread for the most prestigious touney outside of the majors, and the first one he's played since the Masters, shows that even the apologists know it is all about the majors.

 
Remember when Jordan Spieth was the next Tiger Woods and the best thing in golf? He shoots a worse round than Tiger, is three over, and I guess we don't talk about that.

 
Remember when Jordan Spieth was the next Tiger Woods and the best thing in golf? He shoots a worse round than Tiger, is three over, and I guess we don't talk about that.
Jordan has a much better game right now and his head is in the right place. I think we can overlook a bad round here and there with him. I assume you're fishing.

 
Remember when Jordan Spieth was the next Tiger Woods and the best thing in golf? He shoots a worse round than Tiger, is three over, and I guess we don't talk about that.
He has his on thread, feel free to head over there and discuss. While Tiger has struggled lately, he has done more than enough early in his career to keep his thread about him.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top