rockaction
Footballguy
Jeez, travdogg, did a guy named Rosen have relations with your wife? You are...unhappy with his performance.I'm probably cutting Rosen on the spot if I'm the GM. Stevie Wonder could have read the defense better than that.
Jeez, travdogg, did a guy named Rosen have relations with your wife? You are...unhappy with his performance.I'm probably cutting Rosen on the spot if I'm the GM. Stevie Wonder could have read the defense better than that.
The last one wasn’t RosenI'm probably cutting Rosen on the spot if I'm the GM. Stevie Wonder could have read the defense better than that.
Are we playing each other?Oh man, guy in my league has NE defense on bench for the Titans D.
Not me. I'm an innocent bystander in this particular matchup.Are we playing each other?
Good call, I saw the awful throw to a wide open defender and just assumed. My bad.The last one wasn’t Rosen
No(at least I don't think so...) I just hate when a guy keeps getting chances despite looking incompetent in the best of times, throughout his career. There have to UDFA's or guys who get cut from practice squads or preseason cut down guys better than that.Jeez, travdogg, did a guy named Rosen have relations with your wife? You are...unhappy with his performance.
Well that's my situation. I chose Tenn vs Hou over NE at ATL. 40 points on my bench. All but guarantees Houston scores like 30 points this week.Not me. I'm an innocent bystander in this particular matchup.
I mean, he's better right now(probably while wearing a suit) than 2 of the guys who threw passes tonight.It's a bit of an insult to hear Mark Sanchez on the post-game show weigh-in on QB performance
Oh man, guy in my league has NE defense on bench for the Titans D.
I know I could have done better than Rosen and Franks, and I am 54 and fat. I would've taken 3 knees, then punted, like they did on The Waterboy.I mean, he's better right now(probably while wearing a suit) than 2 of the guys who threw passes tonight.
Pats have now scored 70 points unanswered.I'm just now realizing that the Patriots put up 25 unanswered points vs the Falcons last night...
Just like the time it was 28-3
Coincidence??
I'll give you the Jets...Let's see how this team is the rest of the year. The next 4 games look interesting with the Titans, Bills twice, and the Colts at Indy. I must say their defense looks very good, but beating up on teams like the Falcons, Jets, and Browns.......
4.5 YPC. Falcons had 3.2 yards per play for the game.I'll give you the Jets...
But the Falcons beat 4 teams this year ...
Browns with 5 wins... and Pats weren't huge favorites here
I think the team is legit now that the O-line is playing better.
Curious what NEs yds per carry was last night. Seemed like a lot.
Maybe tied a record. BTW, Chris Brown was a RB.Three quarterbacks in one game throwing a pick has to be a record.
There's something to be said for actually beating the teams you should beat. A lot of teams seem to be struggling with that this year...Let's see how this team is the rest of the year. The next 4 games look interesting with the Titans, Bills twice, and the Colts at Indy. I must say their defense looks very good, but beating up on teams like the Falcons, Jets, and Browns.......
I am waiting for the defense to come down to earth. Over their past 3 games, the NE defense has scored more points than the opposition's offense. The Pats are on a run of scoring 70 points unanswered. I am not that great on football rules, but from what I can tell, it's tough to lose when you don't allow any points. Obviously they won't keep winning games by 25 points (their average margin of victory across their 5 game winning streak) and will start allowing more than 4 points a game (their average over their last 3 games). The question will be do they only start to allow scores in the teens . . . or do they have a breakdown and give up 38 points in a couple games.There's something to be said for actually beating the teams you should beat. A lot of teams seem to be struggling with that this year...
Is Buff defense actually that good? They have played Ben (looks awful) and four backups in Heinicke, Brisset, Mills and White. All 5 of those teams are in the bottom 10 for points for game this year and they played MIA twice.The Pats and Bills have the two best defences in the league, these two upcoming match ups will be fun.
Buffalo's pass defense is legit. It remains to be seen how the perform against the run in the second half of the schedule year.Is Buff defense actually that good? They have played Ben (looks awful) and four backups in Heinicke, Brisset, Mills and White. All 5 of those teams are in the bottom 10 for points for game this year and they played MIA twice.
They did keep the KC offense under control but that hasn't been hard this year. The only other top 10 offense they played this year was Ten and they gave up 34 points and lost.
YesWise Old Owl said:Is Buff defense actually that good?
This year's Bills team potentially looks like the 2019 Patriots. Unbelievable numbers against inexperienced QBs and weak opponents. But that was mostly smoke and mirrors and against better teams they were good but not elite.
The last time a team picked off 3 QBs in a game was Week 11 in 2000. The Dolphins intercepted Jim Harbaugh, Ryan Leaf, and Moses Moreno.Three quarterbacks in one game throwing a pick has to be a record.
The Eagles do -- and you can understand why, since they won a SB with a backup. Now, nobody really understands it, and freaks out when they do things like draft Hurts.To get off on a slight rant, I will never understand why teams don't try way harder at backup QB. Its arguably a more important position that a lot of your starters. Its like having a Ferrari, and then not having car insurance. If I were a GM I would draft a QB every single year, even if I didn't need one, because the position is that important. Much like the 90's Packers did.
Pats have now scored 70 points unanswered.
One reason is that proven NFL QBs with starting experience fashion themselves as starters and don't really want to be backups. Some of them have been to the money tree and gotten starter's money and won't really be willing to take back up money.To get off on a slight rant, I will never understand why teams don't try way harder at backup QB. Its arguably a more important position that a lot of your starters. Its like having a Ferrari, and then not having car insurance. If I were a GM I would draft a QB every single year, even if I didn't need one, because the position is that important. Much like the 90's Packers did.
I doubt it. They play the Titans next. Seems like a situation where NE could cough up the ball on their side of the field and the Titans kick a FG to end the streak (even if they don't allow the Titans to advance the ball). Starting in Week 2, TEN has scored 23+ points in every game.1940-41 Chicago Bears might hold the record at 88.
Can New England score 19 unanswered?
I was also talking about drafting a QB every year(ala 90's GB) just to throw a dart and maybe hit on a guy, whio can be a solid backup, future starter, or future trade bait.One reason is that proven NFL QBs with starting experience fashion themselves as starters and don't really want to be backups. Some of them have been to the money tree and gotten starter's money and won't really be willing to take back up money.
That also ties into how much a team is willing to spend at the QB position. If a team is already shelling out $30 million to the starter, they aren't going to want to pay much for a back up. Similarly, a team with a highly touted young QB on a cheap rookie contract is not likely to be attractive to one of the passed over ex-starters if the starting gig seems unreachable.
The third issue for owners is a lot of the experienced guys that lost starting jobs are on the market because they weren't very good. So would teams want to pay low end starter money (or above scale backup money) to a below average player?
So what ends up being available are guys like Bridgewater, Winston, Foles, Trubisky types. Do any of those scream I GOTTA GET THAT GUY?
And I like the Minshew trade too, even I was never of the belief that Hurts job was in any danger.The Eagles do -- and you can understand why, since they won a SB with a backup. Now, nobody really understands it, and freaks out when they do things like draft Hurts.
It may not have been financially possible for Foles to have been moved (without some roster gymnastics). IIRC, he was due close to $7 million this year, so a team would have had to have the cap space to acquire him. Not many teams had much cap space, and his new team would have been on the hook for other guarantees, roster bonuses, and incentives. Bottom line, not many contending teams were flush with cap space.I was also talking about drafting a QB every year(ala 90's GB) just to throw a dart and maybe hit on a guy, whio can be a solid backup, future starter, or future trade bait.
I do think there should have been a lot of demand for Winston, Foles, Trubisky. I can't believe nobody wanted to deal for Foles at the trade deadline, especially a contender.