AngryPatriot
Footballguy
Our long standing league is a keep 8, 1/2 dynasty I guess you could call it. We start (8) 1qb, 2rb, 2wr, 1te, d, k.
We're considering adding ppr, I thought we were a bit "rb heavy". But adding ONE whole point per might change things too much. So we might go .5. This brings up the whole "rb heavy" argument which is certainly debatable with all the rbbc and injuries, inconsistencies out there... And the rise of the wr's... or is this "shift" just a perception and not reality? It (rb heavy) seems to apply to the very top rb studs. Wideouts would certainly gain some value with .5 but I think the TE would be the position to gain the most. Wr's value does seem to last longer just because of their longevity. Maybe attempting to generalize is never going to work when each players situation is so detailed. Adding a penalty for drops is another idea... Any thoughts?
We're considering adding ppr, I thought we were a bit "rb heavy". But adding ONE whole point per might change things too much. So we might go .5. This brings up the whole "rb heavy" argument which is certainly debatable with all the rbbc and injuries, inconsistencies out there... And the rise of the wr's... or is this "shift" just a perception and not reality? It (rb heavy) seems to apply to the very top rb studs. Wideouts would certainly gain some value with .5 but I think the TE would be the position to gain the most. Wr's value does seem to last longer just because of their longevity. Maybe attempting to generalize is never going to work when each players situation is so detailed. Adding a penalty for drops is another idea... Any thoughts?
