What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** Tomlinson *** (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

EdwardCat

Footballguy
Tomlinson, once considered the holy grail of fantasy players, seems to be handing over the reigns. He is insistant that Turner take over during 3rd and 4th quarters when they are trying to run out the clock. This used to be prime point time for Tomlinson. I look for his average points per week to drop by around 5. Consider that San Diego was only up 13-6 and Tomlinson was taken out to let Turner run out the clock. He said as much himself in a recent quote. That's a pretty small margin to already be taking out your top running back. It might be time to trade Tomlinson while his value is sickeningly inflated.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not worried. How many times are the Charges gonna blow teams out?

05 vs PIT

06 @SF -- maybe

07 @KC

08 vs STL

09 vs CLE -- maybe

10 @ CIN

11 @ DEN

12 vs OAK -- maybe

13 @ BUF

14 vs DEN

15 vs KC

16 @ SEA

17 vs ARZ -- maybe, but its week 17. Who cares?

Not many. LT will get the lions share of carries still. I can see Turner spelling him here or there but theres only 3 games where I could see a blowout where Turner will get alot of late touches. In close games LT will be the man.

 
Tomlinson, once considered the holy grail of fantasy players, seems to be handing over the reigns. He is insistant that Turner take over during 3rd and 4th quarters when they are trying to run out the clock. This used to be prime point time for Tomlinson. I look for his average points per week to drop by around 5. Consider that San Diego was only up 13-6 and Tomlinson was taken out to let Turner run out the clock. He said as much himself in a recent quote. That's a pretty small margin to already be taking out your top running back. It might be time to trade Tomlinson while his value is sickeningly inflated.
As much as they are mixing in Turner, Tomlinson is on pace for 410 carries.
 
Considering the last game, they don't need to be blowing a team out in order to take LT out. They lost and they still took LT out.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Considering the last game, they don't need to be blowing a team out in order to take LT out. They lost and they still took LT out.
Good point. If the game is out of hand thats another situation Turner will come in. Forgot about that possibility. Still, I think LT finishes as RB1.
 
I guess what we can expect is that Tomlinson will not have any 160+ yard games or 3 TD games again unless he goes nuts in the first two quarters. Odds are that if he has that type of game, SD is up big and they will take him out. I believe his best games this year will be 120-130 yards and maybe 2 TDs. With the new twist, it won't allow for Tomlinson to have huge games like he had in the past. He had a chance for a monster game against the Titans but they got up by too much and took him out barely into the third quarter. Even then, his YPC were a paltry (for him) 3.7 yards. He's slipping and this only adds to the dilemma.

 
Currently he's on pace for 2005 total yards. I think Wingnut's point about them not blowing out teams seems logical. Considering they have a newbie QB, they'll need to rely on Tomlinson to pull them through. Most likely, they will not be up by enough to merit taking Tomlinson out. Maybe they learned their lesson after last week's debacle. Regardless, this sheds some interesting light on Tomlinson and his future.

 
I guess what we can expect is that Tomlinson will not have any 160+ yard games or 3 TD games again unless he goes nuts in the first two quarters. Odds are that if he has that type of game, SD is up big and they will take him out. I believe his best games this year will be 120-130 yards and maybe 2 TDs. With the new twist, it won't allow for Tomlinson to have huge games like he had in the past. He had a chance for a monster game against the Titans but they got up by too much and took him out barely into the third quarter. Even then, his YPC were a paltry (for him) 3.7 yards. He's slipping and this only adds to the dilemma.
They could get into shootouts where he scores 3 TDs easily. I dont see many but he could have a couple.STAY OPTIMISTIC MAN!!!! :)
 
value drops to what, just above the #2 ranked RB?

He's still #1 regardless. I think it's beneficial actually, keeps him fresh & healthy.

A RB that starts all 16 games is a huge advantage in and of itself.

 
Will keep this thread alive to discuss LT on a weekly basis. Matchup discussion, injury news, anything pertinant to LT this season. NO WDIS questions or Trade offer evaluations please!!

This week Pittsburgh visits San Diego for SNF. LT has played the Steelers twice. His two games against them:

vs PIT Oct 10, 2005 (Steelers won 24-22) :

18rush, 62yds, 1td

7rec 68yds

@ PIT Dec 21, 2003 (Steelers won 40-24)

22rush, 91yds, 2tds

6rec, 8yds

Id take either performance this week. Whats he gonna do this week? 100+ and a TD? Kept in check by PITs D? Maybe this is the week he throws a TD.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
LT tabbed Turner for big series

Star says his backup better at 'pounding it'

By Jay Posner

UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

October 2, 2006

BALTIMORE – Every defeat hurts, but yesterday's 16-13 Chargers loss to the Ravens seemed to affect LaDainian Tomlinson a little bit more than usual.

“Been in too many of these games; it gets old real fast,” the Chargers' star running back said. “No question it's a tough loss. These are the type of losses that wear on you. I don't care what anybody else says, but they wear on you, take something out of you every time.”

Tomlinson's reaction hardly was surprising, considering the Chargers outplayed their hosts at M&T Bank Stadium for nearly three hours. What was unexpected, however, was the revelation that he allowed his backup, Michael Turner, to be in the game with 5½ minutes remaining and the Chargers trying to protect a 13-7 lead.

The drive began at the Chargers' 9-yard line, but two false-start penalties pushed San Diego back to its 2. Lorenzo Neal carried for 1 yard before Turner gained 7 and 2 yards on consecutive plays. The Chargers wound up taking an intentional safety with 3:12 to play, which preceded Baltimore's winning drive.

Tomlinson said he was “fine” physically. But he added the Chargers had discussed that if they were trying to run out the clock in the final four minutes, Turner would be the running back.

“I don't always have to be in there,” said Tomlinson, who finished with 27 carries for 98 yards. “Michael's running style is more 'pound it' and that's what we were planning on doing in that situation was pounding the ball. That's why I said if we're going to pound the ball, let's pound the ball with Michael.”

Many experts regard Tomlinson as the league's best running back, so it was somewhat startling to hear him say someone else might be better suited to run the ball in any situation. When that was mentioned to Tomlinson, he said:

“I'm not a selfish guy. If his style is more conducive to what we're doing out there on the football field, then, hey, let's get a first down and let's run the clock out and win it. Coaches have talked about it before. I kind of escalated the situation.

“ . . . Michael can come in sometime. We can switch it up. Sometimes I'll stay in there. But at that time, I felt like if we need a first down, we're going to pound the football and Michael breaks a lot of tackles. Me, I'm all over the place. So at that time I felt like it was best to let Michael do that.

“It was my call. I don't know, would we have got a first down if I would have been in the game? Probably not. You saw how many people they had up in the box; they knew exactly what we were going to do. They knew we were running the ball. It's hard to run against stuff like that. I don't know, it was just a tough situation.”

By the time Tomlinson spoke with reporters, coach Marty Schottenheimer was not available to comment. Schottenheimer has said this year that he wanted to get Turner more opportunities; Tomlinson's backup had seven carries for 46 yards yesterday, including a 19-yard run.

The Chargers finished with 150 yards rushing on a season-high 41 attempts. For comparison's sake, they had as many as 41 carries only once last season. But Tomlinson said he was not surprised by how often San Diego ran, even in passing situations.

“I'm at the point now where nothing surprises me at all,” he said. “We just have to be able to deal with the situation. It doesn't matter what happens; we've got to deal with it.”

What figures to happen is more teams loading up against the run, beginning with Pittsburgh on Sunday night at Qualcomm Stadium.

“If we do (see that), we've got to be prepared for it,” Tomlinson said, “because we've got a group of guys coming in next week that's hungry for a victory. They beat us last year (24-22), so they already have it in their mind that they can beat us.”

------------------------------------------------

Important point is Tomlinson took himself out.... to let the Burner "pound it". Gotta love that if you are an MT owner. And obviously the LT owners on this board have not been doing their required reading. NONE of this should come as a shock to any of you. :no:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Important point is Tomlinson took himself out.... to let the Burner "pound it". Gotta love that if you are an MT owner. And obviously the LT owners on this board have not been doing their required reading. NONE of this should come as a shock to any of you. :no:
I own him and Im not surprised. I just dont think it hurts his numbers enough to warrant any panic. He will finish as a top 3 RB with a great chance of finishing RB1. I got him at pick 3 so as long as he stays healthy Im happy.
 
not to be wise but...why?

I have him in one league and start him every week. How could you not? Do you really care who he plays as far as FF is concerned?

I like the idea just wish it were a player that wasn't a lock every week.

 
Just my :2cents:

Turner's playing time isn't harming LT, as much as it is keeping him fresh and helping keep pressure off of Rivers.

These are LT's carries for the first three games in the past 6 years; Quick, guess the year (and more important, which one is 2006)

19, 19, 21

31, 19, 26

26, 19, 22

13, 16, 23

21, 27, 26

36, 27, 21

 
I like an LT thread Idea. Maybe we should ave one going on several other high profile players to keep the board tidy. But Bri is Right LT is kind of a no Brainer.

I figure 65 yds rushing, 25 recieving and getting into the endzone one time. Below average game game for him yardage wise but I figure they will get close enough to get him one score.

Steelers D is good. The points they allowed vs Cinci were largely due to turnovers and Troy P has been playing hurt.

As a Steelers follower I hope they are sharper offensively following the bye week but they have to make the long trip so I fiugre I have to start over FWP (also on my roster).

 
I like an LT thread Idea. Maybe we should ave one going on several other high profile players to keep the board tidy. But Bri is Right LT is kind of a no Brainer.I figure 65 yds rushing, 25 recieving and getting into the endzone one time. Below average game game for him yardage wise but I figure they will get close enough to get him one score. Steelers D is good. The points they allowed vs Cinci were largely due to turnovers and Troy P has been playing hurt. As a Steelers follower I hope they are sharper offensively following the bye week but they have to make the long trip so I fiugre I have to start over FWP (also on my roster).
Who are you starting between Parker, T. Jones and Gore? I'm in the same boat you are w/ RB's, Parker's my clear #2 but with the tough matchup I have to decide between Parker, Addai and T. Jones. Right now I have Addai in my lineup with a great matchup against the Titans (though he only gets roughly half the carries), though a strong case can be made for T. Jones vs Bills and Parker still gets all the carries. I even have Tomlinson as my #1.
 
Tomlinson can do more with 20 carries/3 receptions than anybody in the league. That doesn't worry me. It's his willingness to take himself out of games that bugs me.

 
Tomlinson said he was “fine” physically. But he added the Chargers had discussed that if they were trying to run out the clock in the final four minutes, Turner would be the running back.
We're talking about the final four minutes out of 60 minutes and only in the cases where they are blowing a team out.In last weeks game, Turner hardly came in during the first 3 quarters.

If you want LT healthy for 16 weeks, he needs to be taken out of games when the chargers are dominating the score. The Chiefs did this with Priest even before there was LJ in KC.

 
not to be wise but...why?I have him in one league and start him every week. How could you not? Do you really care who he plays as far as FF is concerned? I like the idea just wish it were a player that wasn't a lock every week.
I like an LT thread Idea. Maybe we should ave one going on several other high profile players to keep the board tidy.
Thats kind of the idea. One thread to discuss anything LT, not to discuss whether or not to start him. Maybe Ill post here every week what hes done the last few games against his current opponent just so LT owners (or even those playing against him) can get a feel for what they might expect for the current week. It was late and I was a bit tipsy last night while looking at past numbers for some of my players and it sounded like a good idea at the time :shrug:
 
LT will get PLENTY of touches. That's all I'm concerned about as an LT owner. It's not like Turner is going to be the GL back or anything. I'm perfectly fine with how things are going. :)

 
LT has had more touches than anyone in the NFL the last 5 year, his body is breaking down a bit. Turner is more than qualified to get some of the load.

It just makes sense to try to take some of the burden off LT.

 
Tomlinson, once considered the holy grail of fantasy players, seems to be handing over the reigns. He is insistant that Turner take over during 3rd and 4th quarters when they are trying to run out the clock. This used to be prime point time for Tomlinson. I look for his average points per week to drop by around 5. Consider that San Diego was only up 13-6 and Tomlinson was taken out to let Turner run out the clock. He said as much himself in a recent quote. That's a pretty small margin to already be taking out your top running back. It might be time to trade Tomlinson while his value is sickeningly inflated.
As much as they are mixing in Turner, Tomlinson is on pace for 410 carries.
Right Turners carries are coming at the expense of the QB.
 
LT has had more touches than anyone in the NFL the last 5 year, his body is breaking down a bit. Turner is more than qualified to get some of the load. It just makes sense to try to take some of the burden off LT.
Where is your evidence of his body breaking down a bit?All NFL RBs get dinged up. I don't see an injury pattern specific to LT.
 
Look at this nonsense from the RT Sports site:

We learned that Marty Schottenheimer will ruin more than the San Diego Chargers – again – this year. He’ll also send your fantasy team down the drain. Seriously. There are no offensive players on the Chargers who are worth anything right now. Clearly, you don’t bench LaDainian Tomlinson, but until Schottenheimer takes the handcuffs off of Philip Rivers, don’t expect much production from ANYONE.

For real — how on earth do you try to sit on a 13-7 lead…for the entire second half…on the road…against a team with Steve McNair? I watched the game and couldn’t believe my eyes. Third-and-long. Instead of chucking a pass or two toward Antonio Gates, Schottenheimer opted for three straight running plays up the middle. I’m having another heart attack just writing this.

Again, you can’t bench LT or Gates — but don’t be surprised if they finish the season with merely mortal numbers this year.

 
LT has had more touches than anyone in the NFL the last 5 year, his body is breaking down a bit. Turner is more than qualified to get some of the load. It just makes sense to try to take some of the burden off LT.
Where is your evidence of his body breaking down a bit?All NFL RBs get dinged up. I don't see an injury pattern specific to LT.
:yes: The only injuries he's had are a groin injury and a Raiders player purposely damaging his ribs in a pileup. I don't see any evidence of him breaking down and Turner will only help him stay healthier.
 
Not worried. How many times are the Charges gonna blow teams out?

05 vs PIT

06 @SF -- maybe

07 @KC -- maybe

08 vs STL -- definitely

09 vs CLE -- maybe

10 @ CIN -- maybe

11 @ DEN

12 vs OAK -- definitely

13 @ BUF -- definitely

14 vs DEN

15 vs KC -- maybe

16 @ SEA

17 vs ARZ -- maybe, but its week 17. Who cares?

Not many. LT will get the lions share of carries still. I can see Turner spelling him here or there but theres only 3 games where I could see a blowout where Turner will get alot of late touches. In close games LT will be the man.
fixed...they'll easily run the ball vs. these teams in bold type..KC? please..buffalo? pushover. Oakland? they might each have 100 yards in that game..Cleveland? same deal, 100+ yards rushing for each, st louis? they'll kill that porous st louis run defense..cincy? NE just ran WILD all over cincy last week..SD will too..

LT is definitely the man in SD, never a doubt..but against these subpar run defenses, you get the feeling LT might have 100 yards by halftime, and midway thru the 3rd quarter, they'll sprinkle in some MT with his fresh legs and crazy running style..

both have significant fantasy value in the coming weeks, IMO..Lt is the better play, but MT is no slouch!

 
Look at this nonsense from the RT Sports site:

We learned that Marty Schottenheimer will ruin more than the San Diego Chargers – again – this year. He’ll also send your fantasy team down the drain. Seriously. There are no offensive players on the Chargers who are worth anything right now. Clearly, you don’t bench LaDainian Tomlinson, but until Schottenheimer takes the handcuffs off of Philip Rivers, don’t expect much production from ANYONE.

For real — how on earth do you try to sit on a 13-7 lead…for the entire second half…on the road…against a team with Steve McNair? I watched the game and couldn’t believe my eyes. Third-and-long. Instead of chucking a pass or two toward Antonio Gates, Schottenheimer opted for three straight running plays up the middle. I’m having another heart attack just writing this.

Again, you can’t bench LT or Gates — but don’t be surprised if they finish the season with merely mortal numbers this year.
The first paragraph is utter nonsense. The second is laser beam accurate. And the third really wouldn't be shocking at this point...
 
Not worried. How many times are the Charges gonna blow teams out? 05 vs PIT06 @SF -- maybe07 @KC08 vs STL09 vs CLE -- maybe10 @ CIN11 @ DEN12 vs OAK -- maybe13 @ BUF14 vs DEN15 vs KC16 @ SEA17 vs ARZ -- maybe, but its week 17. Who cares?
Predictions like this suck - for a variety of reasons. Any given Sunday . . .
 
KC? please..
You mean the same KC team that is 9th in the league in defense against rush attempts and 15th in YPC? This is true despite a game against the run oriented Denver Broncos and the run oriented Cincinnati Bengals?One MORE reaons why predictions weeks ahead of time suck.
 
Look at this nonsense from the RT Sports site:

We learned that Marty Schottenheimer will ruin more than the San Diego Chargers – again – this year. He’ll also send your fantasy team down the drain. Seriously. There are no offensive players on the Chargers who are worth anything right now. Clearly, you don’t bench LaDainian Tomlinson, but until Schottenheimer takes the handcuffs off of Philip Rivers, don’t expect much production from ANYONE.

For real — how on earth do you try to sit on a 13-7 lead…for the entire second half…on the road…against a team with Steve McNair? I watched the game and couldn’t believe my eyes. Third-and-long. Instead of chucking a pass or two toward Antonio Gates, Schottenheimer opted for three straight running plays up the middle. I’m having another heart attack just writing this.

Again, you can’t bench LT or Gates — but don’t be surprised if they finish the season with merely mortal numbers this year.
The first paragraph is utter nonsense. The second is laser beam accurate. And the third really wouldn't be shocking at this point...
Forget the second half, Rivers only threw 7 times after the 1st quarter until the final :29 seconds. Absolutely no excuse for that and another example of why Martyball ends up costing as many as many games as it wins.
 
As an LT and Turner owner in several leagues, and an LT-only owner in a couple leagues, I don't mind one bit. Keep him fresh. LT isn't worried about fantasy. He's worried about winning games. He stated his reason for taking himself out, and I can completely agree with that. He's unselfish as they come.

He has had a lot of touches already. He's playing some rough defenses right now. It's a long season. Keep him fresh, and extend that HoF career, I say! :thumbup:

 
Come on...

Wasn't this Tiki Barber we were talking about the last couple of years with the threat of Jacobs. Tiki's quotes about letting Jacobs get more carries to keep him fresh, ease some pounding, goaline carries, etc. Everyone got nervous just like this. I think it worked out just fine for Tiki's numbers the last two seasons.

 
cstu said:
ydub said:
NYRAGE said:
Look at this nonsense from the RT Sports site:

We learned that Marty Schottenheimer will ruin more than the San Diego Chargers – again – this year. He’ll also send your fantasy team down the drain. Seriously. There are no offensive players on the Chargers who are worth anything right now. Clearly, you don’t bench LaDainian Tomlinson, but until Schottenheimer takes the handcuffs off of Philip Rivers, don’t expect much production from ANYONE.

For real — how on earth do you try to sit on a 13-7 lead…for the entire second half…on the road…against a team with Steve McNair? I watched the game and couldn’t believe my eyes. Third-and-long. Instead of chucking a pass or two toward Antonio Gates, Schottenheimer opted for three straight running plays up the middle. I’m having another heart attack just writing this.

Again, you can’t bench LT or Gates — but don’t be surprised if they finish the season with merely mortal numbers this year.
The first paragraph is utter nonsense. The second is laser beam accurate. And the third really wouldn't be shocking at this point...
Forget the second half, Rivers only threw 7 times after the 1st quarter until the final :29 seconds. Absolutely no excuse for that and another example of why Martyball ends up costing as many as many games as it wins.
:goodposting: As KC homer, I had to endure this kind of playcalling for years. On one hand, I love him. He brought credibility back to the franchise and did wonders for the organization as a whole. On the other hand, I hate him. Sure, he can work miracles with substandard talent but I'm not sure anyone is as effective at stifling superior talent. And his "stalemates" are excruciating. All it takes is one effective counter from the competition and his ultimate objective turns on a dime.

 
cstu said:
ydub said:
NYRAGE said:
Look at this nonsense from the RT Sports site:

We learned that Marty Schottenheimer will ruin more than the San Diego Chargers – again – this year. He’ll also send your fantasy team down the drain. Seriously. There are no offensive players on the Chargers who are worth anything right now. Clearly, you don’t bench LaDainian Tomlinson, but until Schottenheimer takes the handcuffs off of Philip Rivers, don’t expect much production from ANYONE.

For real — how on earth do you try to sit on a 13-7 lead…for the entire second half…on the road…against a team with Steve McNair? I watched the game and couldn’t believe my eyes. Third-and-long. Instead of chucking a pass or two toward Antonio Gates, Schottenheimer opted for three straight running plays up the middle. I’m having another heart attack just writing this.

Again, you can’t bench LT or Gates — but don’t be surprised if they finish the season with merely mortal numbers this year.
The first paragraph is utter nonsense. The second is laser beam accurate. And the third really wouldn't be shocking at this point...
Forget the second half, Rivers only threw 7 times after the 1st quarter until the final :29 seconds. Absolutely no excuse for that and another example of why Martyball ends up costing as many as many games as it wins.
:goodposting: As KC homer, I had to endure this kind of playcalling for years. On one hand, I love him. He brought credibility back to the franchise and did wonders for the organization as a whole. On the other hand, I hate him. Sure, he can work miracles with substandard talent but I'm not sure anyone is as effective at stifling superior talent. And his "stalemates" are excruciating. All it takes is one effective counter from the competition and his ultimate objective turns on a dime.
Agreed, I admire him for the turnaround he's made in SD but at some point he has to realize that a one TD lead isn't enough to sit on the rest of the game. BTW, great Jammer quote.

 
Come on...Wasn't this Tiki Barber we were talking about the last couple of years with the threat of Jacobs. Tiki's quotes about letting Jacobs get more carries to keep him fresh, ease some pounding, goaline carries, etc. Everyone got nervous just like this. I think it worked out just fine for Tiki's numbers the last two seasons.
Excellent point. Maybe this will mean good things for Tomlinson. At the outset, it seems more of a detriment, though. We need to see how it plays out. Obviously, they aren't going to forget about Tomlinson and move towards Turner.
 
As much as Schottenheimer relies on his RBs to carry the load over the Rivers and the passing game, I'm happy Turner's gonna get some carries. Tomlinson would be run down by the end of the season if Schottenheimer relied on Tomlinson alone.

 
EdwardCat said:
LivingTheDream said:
Can we shut this thread down now??Talk about a jinx...
Meh...it was only a matter of time. Tomlinson was good. Now there are other good backs in the league. He is a tier 2 RB at this point. The Steelers are proving the point clearly.
tonight he isn't worth a roster spot. POS is costing me the game, the league title most likely, and about $1000. thanks LT, good night to do it buddy.
 
EdwardCat said:
LivingTheDream said:
Can we shut this thread down now??Talk about a jinx...
Meh...it was only a matter of time. Tomlinson was good. Now there are other good backs in the league. He is a tier 2 RB at this point. The Steelers are proving the point clearly.
tonight he isn't worth a roster spot. POS is costing me the game, the league title most likely, and about $1000. thanks LT, good night to do it buddy.
Agreed. I had a chance to trade him for LaMont Jordan, Chad Johnson and a pick. Now I'll be lucky if anyone offers me an ok RB.
 
EdwardCat said:
LivingTheDream said:
Can we shut this thread down now??Talk about a jinx...
Meh...it was only a matter of time. Tomlinson was good. Now there are other good backs in the league. He is a tier 2 RB at this point. The Steelers are proving the point clearly.
tonight he isn't worth a roster spot. POS is costing me the game, the league title most likely, and about $1000. thanks LT, good night to do it buddy.
Agreed. I had a chance to trade him for LaMont Jordan, Chad Johnson and a pick. Now I'll be lucky if anyone offers me an ok RB.
that's taking it a little too far son. i tried to offer fitz, droughns, and chester taylor this week for him, got turned down, would still do it. it's one bad game, but one game i need a decent game from him, that's all!
 
EdwardCat said:
LivingTheDream said:
Can we shut this thread down now??

Talk about a jinx...
Meh...it was only a matter of time. Tomlinson was good. Now there are other good backs in the league. He is a tier 2 RB at this point. The Steelers are proving the point clearly.
tonight he isn't worth a roster spot. POS is costing me the game, the league title most likely, and about $1000. thanks LT, good night to do it buddy.
After your wife checks the bank statement and asks you why the joint account has a zero balance, there's only one thing you can do... :ptts:

 
EdwardCat said:
LivingTheDream said:
Can we shut this thread down now??

Talk about a jinx...
Tomlinson was good. Now there are other good backs in the league. He is a tier 2 RB at this point. The Steelers are proving the point clearly.
tonight he isn't worth a roster spot. POS is costing me the game, the league title most likely, and about $1000. thanks LT, good night to do it buddy.
Agreed.
Tier 2 RB....not worth a roster spot...costing someone the league title in week 5....agreeing... :lmao: :lmao:

 
EdwardCat said:
LivingTheDream said:
Can we shut this thread down now??

Talk about a jinx...
Tomlinson was good. Now there are other good backs in the league. He is a tier 2 RB at this point. The Steelers are proving the point clearly.
tonight he isn't worth a roster spot. POS is costing me the game, the league title most likely, and about $1000. thanks LT, good night to do it buddy.
Agreed.
Tier 2 RB....not worth a roster spot...costing someone the league title in week 5....agreeing... :lmao: :lmao:
:hot: what are you laughing at? He's definitely Barlow from 2 years ago. All hype. Hope the koolaid tasted good!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top