I want to be like him. :capella:Your so cool Jetdoc
I'm new to the situation, why didn't Hollings play yesterday?I am doubly stupid. I bought into the hype a few weeks ago and picked up Domanick Davis. Then, I realized he was not the guy it was Hollings...so I dropped Davis and grabbed Tony. Now, I just don't know what to think. Why was he inactive anyways?
Capers has stated publically that he will only keep three active tailbacks on his roster for any given game.Mack and Davis were the two main backs, and Jonathan Wells excels on special teams.Hollings was the odd man out, and will probably continue to be the odd man out until someone gets hurt.Hollings is a good keeper for a dynasty league after Mack leaves...but I would be VERY afraid that the Texans go RB in the first round of next year's draft....and yes, I'm so cool.I'm new to the situation, why didn't Hollings play yesterday?
Here is why I think he is being overhyped-A short and incompletesample of Hollings' shark pool threads from the last week and a half:1)Why all the talk about Hollings? 2)Tony Hollings? 3)hollings vs. mack??? 4)Hollings Looking Good 5)Onterrio Smith vs. Tony Hollings 6)Will Hollings win the job today? 7)Stacy Mack now a 3rd down back only? 8)Tony Hollings :Anyone hear his status for today? 9)Tony Hollings to see 1st & 2nd down action... 10) The one that we are inThat's more than a thread a day for a guy who got about 10 carries, fumbled, got benched for the rest of the game and then made inactive the following week. Can you list me five players that get this many threads and have done so little? If you can, I will say that they are overhyped as well.I think it's funny that lately there seems to be this notion that Hollings is overhyped. Folks, the vast majority of people on these boards aren't predicting much at all from Tony this season so you can go ahead and settle down. I feel he might make some noise down the stretch, but to say that such a belief represents gross overhyping is just stupid.
Please elaborate on this.Last I saw, Tony Hollings played a whopping four games in college at RB before he got injured.Those four stellar games were against the defensive powerhouses of Vanderbilt, Connecticut, Clemson and BYU.Domanick Davis was drafted as a special teams specialist, plain and simple.Stacey Mack signed a one-year contract for a reason.I don't see the Texans putting all of their faith in an unproven Tony Hollings. Davis doesn't have the physical ability to hold up as a featured runner in the NFL, and Wells is worthless.A logical POSSIBILITY (as I stated above) is for the Texans to draft a RB in the first round, especially if they wind up with a first round pick in the 6-10 range (which is what they are on pace for now).Support your position, HERD...The Texans are not going for a RB in the first round next year. The mere fact that you made that part of your post takes all credibility away from anything else you have to say.HERD
Then why did they spend a 2004 2nd round pick on him knowing that next years RB class should be deeper and stronger than this years?I think that says a lot about what they think of him and the impact they expect from him.I don't see the Texans putting all of their faith in an unproven Tony Hollings.
Hmmm...you don't seem to understand the mind of Mr. Casserly.Casserly doesn't draft players based on NEED...he drafts them based on value. Hell, look at their 2003 draft...he drafted Dave Ragone and Drew Henson when he already had David Carr.Why? Value. Trade bait.Tony Hollings is a similar value. Everyone had him highly regarded coming out of college, given his limited performance. As RB's continue to fall, SOMEONE is going to approach Casserly with a trade for Mr. Hollings.You are absolutely correct about their O-Line...they will most likely go through free agency to achieve those needs. The Texans already have two OL mainstays that have less than a year of experience (Pitts and Wand). I would actually be surprised if they added more youth to their OL via the draft...they really need more experience on the line.I'm not sure about DESPERATELY needing LB help...Sharper/Foreman/Wong/Clemons is a formidable foursome, with Peek as youth backing them up. I agree that free agency would be the place to go for a LB...but they won't pursue a premier one, given Casserly's reluctance to overpay for old talent.Again, with Casserly, you can never tell which way he will go in the draft. I don't think Mack will be asked to return (e.g. see Allen from 2002), which leaves them a little vulnerable at RB without a free agent signing. If a good RB value is available in the first round, I would NOT be surprised if Casserly pounced on it. THAT is what would make me nervous if I were a Hollings owner.To be competitive, Casserly is bound to know they don't need another skill-position player, they need O-line help (most likely through free agency) and defensive playmakers. The DBs aren't too bad, but they desperately need LBs for the 3-4 scheme.
Doesn't make sense to rationalize with someone so clearly biased beyond reason, but here's a couple immediate thoughts that come to mind:(1) If the Texans drafted a RB in the 1st round next draft, would this not be the first time in NFL history that an NFL team utilized 1st and 2nd round picks in an NFL draft to take RBs... even with multiple picks in either round? They could sell this from a PR standpoint because they have no other weaknesses to draft? I sure wouldn't want to be Casserly explaining this and I highly doubt Casserly would want to be Casserly explaining this.(2) Speculation of this nature seems pretty unsupported and dare I say blatantly argumentative to begin with since each of D.Davis and Hollings have, if anything, exceeded expectations in the limited time each has played. If both completely flopped at this point, speculation of RB needs worthy of a 1st round pick might be more open for debate. Right now, it's ludicrous. This team doesn't have 1st round needs other than replacing RBs who respectively have 5.9 YPC (Hollings) and 4.0 YPC (D.Davis) in what should be a learning year?You have an anti-Hollings agenda, plain and simple. At least pro-Hollings agenda folks seem rational understanding this was not likely to be a productive year for Hollings under the most favorable of circumstances.Please elaborate on this.
I think most people are understanding Casserly's mind. It's yours that is giving me problems. We'll see if your x-files storyline plays out...Hmmm...you don't seem to understand the mind of Mr. Casserly.
Wow, I totally overlooked this and had to point out how much this tremendously alarming tone (even capped!) amuses me. I find it hard to believe Tony Hollings owners would be overly "nervous" about anything, given the fact that he is likely filling the very last seat on their bench. :rotflmaoid I mention how nervous I am about Jose Cortez losing his job? VERY nervous.THAT is what would make me nervous if I were a Hollings owner.
maybe he can hire Otis as his FBGmanager...it worked for reshard leeTexans | T. Hollings released
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:01:19 -0800
HoustonTexans.com reports the Houston Texans have released RB Tony Hollings from the team.
What a nice opportunity to reminisce the rookies I passed up for Tony Hollings:Carson PalmerTexans | T. Hollings released
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:01:19 -0800
HoustonTexans.com reports the Houston Texans have released RB Tony Hollings from the team.