What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Top 10 ppr RB 2009 (1 Viewer)

tribecalledjeff

Footballguy
edited to new rankings based on some good thoughts so far.

1. Westy

2. MJD

3. Forte

4. Bush

5. ADP

6. CJ3

7. SJax

8. Turner

9. Slaton

10. Barber

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very bad list IMO.

Bush shouldnt be a top 50 player next year with Thomas's emergence.

Barber is still ahead of Slaton

 
Very bad list IMO.Bush shouldnt be a top 50 player next year with Thomas's emergence.Barber is still ahead of Slaton
You did see the ppr, right? Bush will still catch 80 balls. Thomas is just a better Duece. Barber now has 2 guys that will cut into his carries, and more importantly to me, receptions. You may be right about Slaton being too high.
 
I'd be more concerned with Bush landing on IR two years in a row with knee injuries. No doubt he's got great PPR value, but I'd dropped him down a few spots due to knee injuries

 
Very bad list IMO.Bush shouldnt be a top 50 player next year with Thomas's emergence.Barber is still ahead of Slaton
You did see the ppr, right? Bush will still catch 80 balls. Thomas is just a better Duece. Barber now has 2 guys that will cut into his carries, and more importantly to me, receptions. You may be right about Slaton being too high.
Sorry if i sounded a little too blunt, but just because you listed PPR RB's doesnt mean Bush is more valuable than AP!Yes he will get more receptions but even in PPR leagues a horse with consistent 150 yard games will demolish the one who catches 7 balls a game and has trouble running
 
The Eagles are definitely sending signals right now that they would like to reduce the workload on Westbrook.

The days of him being an everydown certainly seem to be numbered. Look at the past week for instance. After missing 2 games Buckhalter came back and stole 6 of the 22 carries when the game was still competitive. Also, prior to Buckhalter being hurt the coaches were talking about how they were mistaken in not using Buckhalter more.

Westbrook will be 30 to start next year and while he is still effective when healthy the Eagles may very well go into next year with the idea of significantly reducing Westbrooks workload in an effort to keep him healthier. Also, it certainly isn't out of the realm of possibility that the Eagles may actually draft a running back this year

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very bad list IMO.Bush shouldnt be a top 50 player next year with Thomas's emergence.Barber is still ahead of Slaton
You did see the ppr, right? Bush will still catch 80 balls. Thomas is just a better Duece. Barber now has 2 guys that will cut into his carries, and more importantly to me, receptions. You may be right about Slaton being too high.
No he isn't(Thomas) What will Bush's role be if he's even on the Saints? He can't stay healthy as a RB. Slot receiver maybe?
 
tribecalledjeff said:
Not including rookies yet.1. Westbrook2. MJD3. Bush4. SJax5. ADP6. Forte7. Slaton8. CJ39. Turner10. Barber
Turner is not a pass catcher...except did have at least 3 catches that I saw last week vs. TB. Maybe they change the way he is used.Without PThomas listed, I can't take the list too seriously. Bush's role should change alot, and he can't stay on the field. Second year in a row he is on IR by the end of the year. You have to consider if a guy will make it to 16 games.
 
Very bad list IMO.Bush shouldnt be a top 50 player next year with Thomas's emergence.Barber is still ahead of Slaton
You did see the ppr, right? Bush will still catch 80 balls. Thomas is just a better Duece. Barber now has 2 guys that will cut into his carries, and more importantly to me, receptions. You may be right about Slaton being too high.
Sorry if i sounded a little too blunt, but just because you listed PPR RB's doesnt mean Bush is more valuable than AP!Yes he will get more receptions but even in PPR leagues a horse with consistent 150 yard games will demolish the one who catches 7 balls a game and has trouble running
I would argue that Bush is much more consistent than ADP. Knock Bush down b/c of health concerns, fine - that's more than fair. But a lot of people forget that 80 catches is like an extra 500 yards and 6 TDs - that's huge. A receptions are consistent.ADP has had 8 games of <10 points in ppr scoring in the last 2 years. Bush has had 5 in his whole career. It's the receptions that save you from those horrible games and allow you not to have to worry about bad matchups. In terms of ppg, Bush > ADP in ppr without a doubt. Again, if you want to knock him down because of injury, I can't argue. But when healthy, he is a ppr monster and can carry a team.
 
A bit off-topic, but I'll never support PPR for running backs. Awarding the same point for a simple catch for no gain as a 10 yard run? Making mediocre RBs seem much better than they are (Reggie's a good reciever but as a RB...).

PPR for WRs, no PPR for RBs is the best way to go IMO.

 
A bit off-topic, but I'll never support PPR for running backs. Awarding the same point for a simple catch for no gain as a 10 yard run? Making mediocre RBs seem much better than they are (Reggie's a good reciever but as a RB...).PPR for WRs, no PPR for RBs is the best way to go IMO.
I've never played that, but at first glance it would appear to make RBs very invaluable. And the problem that you stated would still be the same. A 8-50 catch game from some slot receiver would be worth a 25 carry, 130 yard effort from ADP. Those questioning my leaving out of Pierre Thomas are probably right. I don't own him and fortunately haven't played against him recently, so he has kind of slipped under my radar. May need to re-evaluate the NO RB situation in general.
 
sounds like its time to get Reggie in ppr leagues. how soon people forget he was the #1 RB in this format before getting hurt and that was getting around 12 carries per game. Unless you think he's going to be phased out of the offense (unlikely) or moved to WR a lot more (even better in ppr leagues)

 
tribecalledjeff said:
Not including rookies yet.1. Westbrook2. MJD3. Bush4. SJax5. ADP6. Forte7. Slaton8. CJ39. Turner10. Barber
Turner is not a pass catcher...except did have at least 3 catches that I saw last week vs. TB. Maybe they change the way he is used.Without PThomas listed, I can't take the list too seriously. Bush's role should change alot, and he can't stay on the field. Second year in a row he is on IR by the end of the year. You have to consider if a guy will make it to 16 games.
You wouldn't take a RB list seriously because PThomas is not in the top 10? wow, the hype on this guy is outrageous. Its certainly possible that he finishes top 10 next year, but he also could be a version of Ryan Grant...and Grant didn't have to contend with Reggie Bush this year.Thomas wasn't even playing when Bush, Deuce, Stecker were healthy. Maybe things change next year, do you seriously want to use your #1 pick to find out.
 
tribecalledjeff said:
Not including rookies yet.

1. Westbrook

2. MJD

3. Bush

4. SJax

5. ADP

6. Forte

7. Slaton

8. CJ3

9. Turner

10. Barber
Turner is not a pass catcher...except did have at least 3 catches that I saw last week vs. TB. Maybe they change the way he is used.Without PThomas listed, I can't take the list too seriously. Bush's role should change alot, and he can't stay on the field. Second year in a row he is on IR by the end of the year. You have to consider if a guy will make it to 16 games.
You wouldn't take a RB list seriously because PThomas is not in the top 10? wow, the hype on this guy is outrageous. Its certainly possible that he finishes top 10 next year, but he also could be a version of Ryan Grant...and Grant didn't have to contend with Reggie Bush this year.Thomas wasn't even playing when Bush, Deuce, Stecker were healthy. Maybe things change next year, do you seriously want to use your #1 pick to find out.
:wub:
 
A bit off-topic, but I'll never support PPR for running backs. Awarding the same point for a simple catch for no gain as a 10 yard run? Making mediocre RBs seem much better than they are (Reggie's a good reciever but as a RB...).PPR for WRs, no PPR for RBs is the best way to go IMO.
I don't agree at all. I can see .5 PPR but not zero.
 
You wouldn't take a RB list seriously because PThomas is not in the top 10? wow, the hype on this guy is outrageous. Its certainly possible that he finishes top 10 next year, but he also could be a version of Ryan Grant...and Grant didn't have to contend with Reggie Bush this year.Thomas wasn't even playing when Bush, Deuce, Stecker were healthy. Maybe things change next year, do you seriously want to use your #1 pick to find out.
Really. Look up the games he has started and do the math. Who said anything about a #1 pick? Who would take Slaton in the 1st round either?
 
after reggie came back from injury briefly before getting injured again(thats a hell of confidence building statement) Pierre was the complete workhorse. he's(Pierre) much much better than duece in the 'reggie and duece' roll. Pierre is a pretty good receiver himself, that will sapp reggies PPR production immensely. whoever thinks reggie's PPR value would go up if he played slot is an idiot!!! he was a freakish PPR machine when lined' up 8yards deep with that cushion and a LB normally tryin to catch up to him. Brees would/could throw to him all day in that scenario, lined up in the slot he won't come close to catching 80-90passes. he's not a real WR and in the slot he'll like have actual DB's assigned to him. he is not the marshall faulk of route running for a RB, if he was moved to WR fulltime he wouldn't even start but just come in on packages

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You wouldn't take a RB list seriously because PThomas is not in the top 10? wow, the hype on this guy is outrageous. Its certainly possible that he finishes top 10 next year, but he also could be a version of Ryan Grant...and Grant didn't have to contend with Reggie Bush this year.Thomas wasn't even playing when Bush, Deuce, Stecker were healthy. Maybe things change next year, do you seriously want to use your #1 pick to find out.
Really. Look up the games he has started and do the math. Who said anything about a #1 pick? Who would take Slaton in the 1st round either?
If you think it's ridiculous that he's not in the top 10, that means you think he's easily top 10, so say top 6-7. The top 6-7 RBs tend to go in the first round. It's not a reach to say that if someone thinks a top 10 list without Thomas is a joke also thinks Thomas is a round 1 pick.
 
You wouldn't take a RB list seriously because PThomas is not in the top 10? wow, the hype on this guy is outrageous. Its certainly possible that he finishes top 10 next year, but he also could be a version of Ryan Grant...and Grant didn't have to contend with Reggie Bush this year.Thomas wasn't even playing when Bush, Deuce, Stecker were healthy. Maybe things change next year, do you seriously want to use your #1 pick to find out.
Really. Look up the games he has started and do the math. Who said anything about a #1 pick? Who would take Slaton in the 1st round either?
:thumbup: I think generally speaking the top 10 RB's are considered 1st round picks. If you are in a 12 team league and you have Thomas ranked say #7 there a good chance he goes in the first round.I personally wouldn't have Slaton in my top 10 either over guys like Lynch & Portis.
 
You wouldn't take a RB list seriously because PThomas is not in the top 10? wow, the hype on this guy is outrageous. Its certainly possible that he finishes top 10 next year, but he also could be a version of Ryan Grant...and Grant didn't have to contend with Reggie Bush this year.Thomas wasn't even playing when Bush, Deuce, Stecker were healthy. Maybe things change next year, do you seriously want to use your #1 pick to find out.
Really. Look up the games he has started and do the math. Who said anything about a #1 pick? Who would take Slaton in the 1st round either?
:thumbup: I think generally speaking the top 10 RB's are considered 1st round picks. If you are in a 12 team league and you have Thomas ranked say #7 there a good chance he goes in the first round.I personally wouldn't have Slaton in my top 10 either over guys like Lynch & Portis.
Not for me. For me it's who will finish the season in the top 10. I'm looking more at dynasty buy low candidates. Pierre has Bush looming. If Bush changes his role and Thomas is the declared starter I could see him there, but if it's in flux I like him as a later round bargain. Slaton is another with potential, but unless he is the declared starter he shouild be picked in the first.I think it's a value list.
 
after reggie came back from injury briefly before getting injured again(thats a hell of confidence building statement) Pierre was the complete workhorse. he's(Pierre) much much better than duece in the 'reggie and duece' roll. Pierre is a pretty good receiver himself, that will sapp reggies PPR production immensely. whoever thinks reggie's PPR value would go up if he played slot is an idiot!!! he was a freakish PPR machine when lined' up 8yards deep with that cushion and a LB normally tryin to catch up to him. Brees would/could throw to him all day in that scenario, lined up in the slot he won't come close to catching 80-90passes. he's not a real WR and in the slot he'll like have actual DB's assigned to him. he is not the marshall faulk of route running for a RB, if he was moved to WR fulltime he wouldn't even start but just come in on packages
Reggie never fully recovered from the injury. He came back in limited action only. To say Pierre is the workhorse with a healthy Reggie is unknown. Pierre himself is still a relative unknown. His good games have come against the worst defenses in the NFL. Reggie's not only going to play slot alone. He'd play some slot, some runningback, some receiver out of the backfield. Wherever they think they can get him in space. If you really think Pierre is going to relegate Reggie to return duty and change of pace then you need to decide where Reggie's going to go cause he certainly wouldnt remain with the Saints.
 
You wouldn't take a RB list seriously because PThomas is not in the top 10? wow, the hype on this guy is outrageous. Its certainly possible that he finishes top 10 next year, but he also could be a version of Ryan Grant...and Grant didn't have to contend with Reggie Bush this year.

Thomas wasn't even playing when Bush, Deuce, Stecker were healthy. Maybe things change next year, do you seriously want to use your #1 pick to find out.
Really. Look up the games he has started and do the math. Who said anything about a #1 pick? Who would take Slaton in the 1st round either?
:lmao: I think generally speaking the top 10 RB's are considered 1st round picks. If you are in a 12 team league and you have Thomas ranked say #7 there a good chance he goes in the first round.I personally wouldn't have Slaton in my top 10 either over guys like Lynch & Portis.
Not for me. For me it's who will finish the season in the top 10.I'm looking more at dynasty buy low candidates. Pierre has Bush looming. If Bush changes his role and Thomas is the declared starter I could see him there, but if it's in flux I like him as a later round bargain.

Slaton is another with potential, but unless he is the declared starter he shouild be picked in the first.

I think it's a value list.
:lmao: It still means that in a startup dynasty PPR league, you would expect Thomas to go in the 1st round. Let's not be intentionally dense here.
 
Turner is not a pass catcher...except did have at least 3 catches that I saw last week vs. TB. Maybe they change the way he is used.
I agree. I'd be surprised if Turner was ever a major factor in the passing game. I've watched most of the ATL games this year (Ryan/Turner owner), and have seen a few checkdown passes bounce off his hands. They simply prefer the highly effective Norwood. Of Turner's two catches last week, one was a screen pass during a no huddle offense, and the other a short everyone-is-covered pass to the middle of the field. I think they occasionally throw his way just because no one expects it, but I think everyone's being way too hopeful about his 2-30 day becoming a regular occurrence.
 
I think it's harder to rank running backs at this points then wide receivers. However, here's my stab at it.

1. Maurice Jones-Drew – yardage should increase next year

2. Adrian Peterson – lack of receptions really hurt in PPR

3. Brian Westbrook – turns 30 next year, but nobody is better when healthy

4. Marion Barber – was #1 among RBs in points for awhile this season

5. Matt Forte – leads rookie RBs in receptions

6. LaDainian Tomlinson – not what he once was, but he’s still good

7. Chris Johnson – leads all rookies in rushing

8. Marshawn Lynch – Much more involved in the passing game this year

9. Frank Gore – somebody who always seems to be rated higher then he should

10. Steve Slaton –worried that he could have a sophomore slump

11. Michael Turner – lot of touchdowns but almost no receptions

12. Steven Jackson – injuries have impacted his last two season

13. Joseph Addai – terrible 2008 season, but I think he’ll bounce back for a nice 2009

14. DeAngelo Williams – Jonathan Stewart in the same backfield a major concern

15. Brandon Jacobs – gets dinged up to often

16. Clinton Portis – a lot of career carries for someone his age

17. Reggie Bush – ranked ahead of Thomas because of his pass catching abilities

18. Pierre Thomas – to early to say how the Saints will split carries between Thomas and Bush

19. Ronnie Brown – People say it takes one year to fully recover from an torn ACL

20. Darren McFadden – turf toe spoiled his rookie season

I really don't think anyone can honestly give rank Reggie Bush and Pierre Thomas with confidence right now. The Saints backfield will be a position people will have to watch closely next year in training camp.

 
I think it's harder to rank running backs at this points then wide receivers. However, here's my stab at it.1. Maurice Jones-Drew – yardage should increase next year2. Adrian Peterson – lack of receptions really hurt in PPR3. Brian Westbrook – turns 30 next year, but nobody is better when healthy4. Marion Barber – was #1 among RBs in points for awhile this season5. Matt Forte – leads rookie RBs in receptions6. LaDainian Tomlinson – not what he once was, but he’s still good7. Chris Johnson – leads all rookies in rushing8. Marshawn Lynch – Much more involved in the passing game this year9. Frank Gore – somebody who always seems to be rated higher then he should10. Steve Slaton –worried that he could have a sophomore slump11. Michael Turner – lot of touchdowns but almost no receptions12. Steven Jackson – injuries have impacted his last two season13. Joseph Addai – terrible 2008 season, but I think he’ll bounce back for a nice 200914. DeAngelo Williams – Jonathan Stewart in the same backfield a major concern15. Brandon Jacobs – gets dinged up to often16. Clinton Portis – a lot of career carries for someone his age17. Reggie Bush – ranked ahead of Thomas because of his pass catching abilities18. Pierre Thomas – to early to say how the Saints will split carries between Thomas and Bush19. Ronnie Brown – People say it takes one year to fully recover from an torn ACL20. Darren McFadden – turf toe spoiled his rookie seasonI really don't think anyone can honestly give rank Reggie Bush and Pierre Thomas with confidence right now. The Saints backfield will be a position people will have to watch closely next year in training camp.
LT and Barber are way too high. Gore is a top 5 PPR whne healthy.
 
hello? no one would take deangelo williams in the first round? i defended the guy all offseason with people's worries about stewart. now, stewart has been ok, but not nearly as explosive as deangelo. stewart hasn't been able to stay healthy either. how can you STILL be concerned about stewart being in the same backfield?

the amazing thing is, i thought deangelo would be $$ in ppr, and because carolina has been soooo good on the ground, they haven't been in many situations where they need to throw short passes to rb's (not many 3rd and longs, not many games where they are way behind early) and deangelo has been great despite this. what gives?

 
I think it's harder to rank running backs at this points then wide receivers. However, here's my stab at it.1. Maurice Jones-Drew – yardage should increase next year2. Adrian Peterson – lack of receptions really hurt in PPR3. Brian Westbrook – turns 30 next year, but nobody is better when healthy4. Marion Barber – was #1 among RBs in points for awhile this season5. Matt Forte – leads rookie RBs in receptions6. LaDainian Tomlinson – not what he once was, but he’s still good7. Chris Johnson – leads all rookies in rushing8. Marshawn Lynch – Much more involved in the passing game this year9. Frank Gore – somebody who always seems to be rated higher then he should10. Steve Slaton –worried that he could have a sophomore slump11. Michael Turner – lot of touchdowns but almost no receptions12. Steven Jackson – injuries have impacted his last two season13. Joseph Addai – terrible 2008 season, but I think he’ll bounce back for a nice 200914. DeAngelo Williams – Jonathan Stewart in the same backfield a major concern15. Brandon Jacobs – gets dinged up to often16. Clinton Portis – a lot of career carries for someone his age17. Reggie Bush – ranked ahead of Thomas because of his pass catching abilities18. Pierre Thomas – to early to say how the Saints will split carries between Thomas and Bush19. Ronnie Brown – People say it takes one year to fully recover from an torn ACL20. Darren McFadden – turf toe spoiled his rookie seasonI really don't think anyone can honestly give rank Reggie Bush and Pierre Thomas with confidence right now. The Saints backfield will be a position people will have to watch closely next year in training camp.
Runner, that is a darn fine list. I think you left out some guys who should maybe be mentioned: Thomas Jones, FatWhale, NE RB, Grant, Parker. Maybe Stewart and Larry Johnson, or maybe not. Is McGahee done? Is Hillis a serious player or just a Denver flavor of the month?In PPR, here are my rankings:1. Adrian Peterson - consistency is what you want in a 1st round pick2. Steven Jackson – this is his last year to be a fantasy FB stud3. Matt Forte – PPR stud, Chico offense will go thru him4. Maurice Jones-Drew5. Brian Westbrook6. Marion Barber7. Chris Johnson8. LaDainian Tomlinson – one last good year9. Marshawn Lynch10. Michael Turner – should be consistent workhorse type11. Thomas Jones - same as Turner, and in decent settled offense next year12. Steve Slaton13. Frank Gore14. Clinton Portis – might be a miss this high15. Ronnie Brown - time to explode again?16. Darren McFadden17. Reggie Bush – can he stay healthy?18. Joseph Addai19. DeAngelo Williams – I have no faith that he doesn't get killed by RBBC20. Brandon Jacobs - who knows
 
hello? no one would take deangelo williams in the first round? i defended the guy all offseason with people's worries about stewart. now, stewart has been ok, but not nearly as explosive as deangelo. stewart hasn't been able to stay healthy either. how can you STILL be concerned about stewart being in the same backfield? the amazing thing is, i thought deangelo would be $$ in ppr, and because carolina has been soooo good on the ground, they haven't been in many situations where they need to throw short passes to rb's (not many 3rd and longs, not many games where they are way behind early) and deangelo has been great despite this. what gives?
I like Williams, but i am not sure i would trust him as my #1. Stewart has looked very good this year, and i could easily see him getting a bigger chunk of carries next year.
 
I think it's harder to rank running backs at this points then wide receivers. However, here's my stab at it.1. Maurice Jones-Drew – yardage should increase next year2. Adrian Peterson – lack of receptions really hurt in PPR3. Brian Westbrook – turns 30 next year, but nobody is better when healthy4. Marion Barber – was #1 among RBs in points for awhile this season5. Matt Forte – leads rookie RBs in receptions6. LaDainian Tomlinson – not what he once was, but he’s still good7. Chris Johnson – leads all rookies in rushing8. Marshawn Lynch – Much more involved in the passing game this year9. Frank Gore – somebody who always seems to be rated higher then he should10. Steve Slaton –worried that he could have a sophomore slump11. Michael Turner – lot of touchdowns but almost no receptions12. Steven Jackson – injuries have impacted his last two season13. Joseph Addai – terrible 2008 season, but I think he’ll bounce back for a nice 200914. DeAngelo Williams – Jonathan Stewart in the same backfield a major concern15. Brandon Jacobs – gets dinged up to often16. Clinton Portis – a lot of career carries for someone his age17. Reggie Bush – ranked ahead of Thomas because of his pass catching abilities18. Pierre Thomas – to early to say how the Saints will split carries between Thomas and Bush19. Ronnie Brown – People say it takes one year to fully recover from an torn ACL20. Darren McFadden – turf toe spoiled his rookie seasonI really don't think anyone can honestly give rank Reggie Bush and Pierre Thomas with confidence right now. The Saints backfield will be a position people will have to watch closely next year in training camp.
Runner, that is a darn fine list. I think you left out some guys who should maybe be mentioned: Thomas Jones, FatWhale, NE RB, Grant, Parker. Maybe Stewart and Larry Johnson, or maybe not. Is McGahee done? Is Hillis a serious player or just a Denver flavor of the month?In PPR, here are my rankings:1. Adrian Peterson - consistency is what you want in a 1st round pick2. Steven Jackson – this is his last year to be a fantasy FB stud3. Matt Forte – PPR stud, Chico offense will go thru him4. Maurice Jones-Drew5. Brian Westbrook6. Marion Barber7. Chris Johnson8. LaDainian Tomlinson – one last good year9. Marshawn Lynch10. Michael Turner – should be consistent workhorse type11. Thomas Jones - same as Turner, and in decent settled offense next year12. Steve Slaton13. Frank Gore14. Clinton Portis – might be a miss this high15. Ronnie Brown - time to explode again?16. Darren McFadden17. Reggie Bush – can he stay healthy?18. Joseph Addai19. DeAngelo Williams – I have no faith that he doesn't get killed by RBBC20. Brandon Jacobs - who knows
ronnie brown, addai and mcfadden over williams? so bad RBBC are ok, but unstoppable ones are no good? i won't even comment on sjax that high. oopsi like where you've both placed lynch. high ceiling there. they did get him very involved in the passing game this year.
 
Adrian Peterson should definitely not be #1 in a ppr. Guys like him and Turner get killed in ppr compared to their NFL value. They are also more prone to very bad games against great run Ds as they don't get any catches to balance out a day in which they struggle on the ground. Ranking ADP #1 rb is a perfect example of not understanding how different scoring systems change the values of players.

 
7. Chris Johnson – leads all rookies in rushing10. Steve Slaton –worried that he could have a sophomore slump
Solid list, but I have to ask:Why are people afraid Slaton will have a sophomore slump, but not Chris Johnson? Their stats are virtually identical:Slaton: 230 rushes, 1124 yards, 4.9ypc; 40 rec, 305 yards, 7.6 yprJohnson: 235 rushes, 1159 yards, 4.9ypc; 41 rec, 259 yards, 6.3 yprThis isn't to pick on your list in particular, it's just a common theme that I'm noticing.ETA: Additionally, both have 8 TDs, but it would seem that Johnson faces far more challenge in terms of goal-line vulturing with Lendale around than Slaton is with any other Houston RB. I just can't see why, at this point, CJ's 3 spots higher.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
7. Chris Johnson – leads all rookies in rushing10. Steve Slaton –worried that he could have a sophomore slump
Solid list, but I have to ask:Why are people afraid Slaton will have a sophomore slump, but not Chris Johnson? Their stats are virtually identical:Slaton: 230 rushes, 1124 yards, 4.9ypc; 40 rec, 305 yards, 7.6 yprJohnson: 235 rushes, 1159 yards, 4.9ypc; 41 rec, 259 yards, 6.3 yprThis isn't to pick on your list in particular, it's just a common theme that I'm noticing.ETA: Additionally, both have 8 TDs, but it would seem that Johnson faces far more challenge in terms of goal-line vulturing with Lendale around than Slaton is with any other Houston RB. I just can't see why, at this point, CJ's 3 spots higher.
The Texans will likely bring in another back, and we dont know how that will affect Slatons numbers next year. We know what we will get out of CJ next year. However, if the Texans bring in a RB who wont threaten Slatons carries much, i would rank him ahead of CJ.
 
7. Chris Johnson – leads all rookies in rushing10. Steve Slaton –worried that he could have a sophomore slump
Solid list, but I have to ask:Why are people afraid Slaton will have a sophomore slump, but not Chris Johnson? Their stats are virtually identical:Slaton: 230 rushes, 1124 yards, 4.9ypc; 40 rec, 305 yards, 7.6 yprJohnson: 235 rushes, 1159 yards, 4.9ypc; 41 rec, 259 yards, 6.3 yprThis isn't to pick on your list in particular, it's just a common theme that I'm noticing.ETA: Additionally, both have 8 TDs, but it would seem that Johnson faces far more challenge in terms of goal-line vulturing with Lendale around than Slaton is with any other Houston RB. I just can't see why, at this point, CJ's 3 spots higher.
because everyone has a man crush on johnson. i'd still take michael turner over him.
 
buccosfan said:
lyon812 said:
runner06 said:
7. Chris Johnson – leads all rookies in rushing10. Steve Slaton –worried that he could have a sophomore slump
Solid list, but I have to ask:Why are people afraid Slaton will have a sophomore slump, but not Chris Johnson? Their stats are virtually identical:Slaton: 230 rushes, 1124 yards, 4.9ypc; 40 rec, 305 yards, 7.6 yprJohnson: 235 rushes, 1159 yards, 4.9ypc; 41 rec, 259 yards, 6.3 yprThis isn't to pick on your list in particular, it's just a common theme that I'm noticing.ETA: Additionally, both have 8 TDs, but it would seem that Johnson faces far more challenge in terms of goal-line vulturing with Lendale around than Slaton is with any other Houston RB. I just can't see why, at this point, CJ's 3 spots higher.
because everyone has a man crush on johnson. i'd still take michael turner over him.
There is a reason people have a man-crush on CJ.
 
buccosfan said:
lyon812 said:
runner06 said:
7. Chris Johnson – leads all rookies in rushing10. Steve Slaton –worried that he could have a sophomore slump
Solid list, but I have to ask:Why are people afraid Slaton will have a sophomore slump, but not Chris Johnson? Their stats are virtually identical:Slaton: 230 rushes, 1124 yards, 4.9ypc; 40 rec, 305 yards, 7.6 yprJohnson: 235 rushes, 1159 yards, 4.9ypc; 41 rec, 259 yards, 6.3 yprThis isn't to pick on your list in particular, it's just a common theme that I'm noticing.ETA: Additionally, both have 8 TDs, but it would seem that Johnson faces far more challenge in terms of goal-line vulturing with Lendale around than Slaton is with any other Houston RB. I just can't see why, at this point, CJ's 3 spots higher.
because everyone has a man crush on johnson. i'd still take michael turner over him.
There is a reason people have a man-crush on CJ.
Sure, and it's well earned. There's a reason people have one for Slaton, too. Even if another back is brought in to share time with Slaton, it’s not outrageous to assume that he and CJ will have roughly the same amount of carries per game (16-17), based on their usage patterns this season--and that includes when Slaton was “fighting” with Green for carries. So what you have are two backs that 1) may split time, 2) receive a consistent amount of weekly touches in the mid-teens, 3) are actively involved in the passing game, and 4) have proven to be a home-run threat at any time. I just don't foresee either of them dropping below a certain threshold of either opportunity or productivity. If people are going to be down on one, they really should be down on the other as well.
 
buccosfan said:
lyon812 said:
runner06 said:
7. Chris Johnson – leads all rookies in rushing10. Steve Slaton –worried that he could have a sophomore slump
Solid list, but I have to ask:Why are people afraid Slaton will have a sophomore slump, but not Chris Johnson? Their stats are virtually identical:Slaton: 230 rushes, 1124 yards, 4.9ypc; 40 rec, 305 yards, 7.6 yprJohnson: 235 rushes, 1159 yards, 4.9ypc; 41 rec, 259 yards, 6.3 yprThis isn't to pick on your list in particular, it's just a common theme that I'm noticing.ETA: Additionally, both have 8 TDs, but it would seem that Johnson faces far more challenge in terms of goal-line vulturing with Lendale around than Slaton is with any other Houston RB. I just can't see why, at this point, CJ's 3 spots higher.
because everyone has a man crush on johnson. i'd still take michael turner over him.
There is a reason people have a man-crush on CJ.
Sure, and it's well earned. There's a reason people have one for Slaton, too. Even if another back is brought in to share time with Slaton, it’s not outrageous to assume that he and CJ will have roughly the same amount of carries per game (16-17), based on their usage patterns this season--and that includes when Slaton was “fighting” with Green for carries. So what you have are two backs that 1) may split time, 2) receive a consistent amount of weekly touches in the mid-teens, 3) are actively involved in the passing game, and 4) have proven to be a home-run threat at any time. I just don't foresee either of them dropping below a certain threshold of either opportunity or productivity. If people are going to be down on one, they really should be down on the other as well.
Like i said though, there is a certain comfortability in CJ from knowing what you are going to get out of him next year.
 
tribecalledjeff said:
Adrian Peterson should definitely not be #1 in a ppr. Guys like him and Turner get killed in ppr compared to their NFL value. They are also more prone to very bad games against great run Ds as they don't get any catches to balance out a day in which they struggle on the ground. Ranking ADP #1 rb is a perfect example of not understanding how different scoring systems change the values of players.
Underachievers said:
ADP is not top 5 in a PPR league. He barely reaches the top 10 in a PPR format (and he is actually the 11th ranked RB in our league).
FYI, amongst RBs in my two PPR leagues Peterson is 1st and 4th going into week 16.
 
tribecalledjeff said:
Adrian Peterson should definitely not be #1 in a ppr. Guys like him and Turner get killed in ppr compared to their NFL value. They are also more prone to very bad games against great run Ds as they don't get any catches to balance out a day in which they struggle on the ground. Ranking ADP #1 rb is a perfect example of not understanding how different scoring systems change the values of players.
Underachievers said:
ADP is not top 5 in a PPR league. He barely reaches the top 10 in a PPR format (and he is actually the 11th ranked RB in our league).
FYI, amongst RBs in my two PPR leagues Peterson is 1st and 4th going into week 16.
You have a unique scoring system then.
 
tribecalledjeff said:
Adrian Peterson should definitely not be #1 in a ppr. Guys like him and Turner get killed in ppr compared to their NFL value. They are also more prone to very bad games against great run Ds as they don't get any catches to balance out a day in which they struggle on the ground. Ranking ADP #1 rb is a perfect example of not understanding how different scoring systems change the values of players.
Underachievers said:
ADP is not top 5 in a PPR league. He barely reaches the top 10 in a PPR format (and he is actually the 11th ranked RB in our league).
FYI, amongst RBs in my two PPR leagues Peterson is 1st and 4th going into week 16.
You have a unique scoring system then.
Scoring for both leagues:.1 point per yard rushing/receiving

1 PPR

3 point bonus at 100 yards

6 points for rushing/receiving TD

Nothing out of the ordinary for that.

Difference between the two leagues are the one where Peterson is ranked 1st we get bonuses for high carries and high yards per carry.

Edit to clarify: I'm talking about ranked 1st and 4th amongst RBs (not overall) in accordance with the thread topic.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
FYI, amongst RBs in my two PPR leagues Peterson is 1st and 4th going into week 16.
Funny, in my PPR league he's 8th, and he's about 2 points away from being 10th. (No bonuses)1. Forte 2762. MJD 2733. TJones 2604. DWill 2555. Westbrook 2466. Turner 2407. LT 2378. ADP 2369. Slaton 23510. CJ3 235In terms of points per game, he's actually 14th.ADP is a mediocre rb1 in ppr leagues.
 
If McNabb gets traded out of philly you HAVE to knock Westy down a few notches and if L.T gets a really good fullback and the oline gets there crap together (he will be fully healthy by next season) i say he can rise to a top 5

 
probably a dumb question - what's stopping minny from getting ADP more involved in the passing game? I know he doesn't have the best hands & chester is dependable, but i've still got visions of that screen pass he tipped up to himself and took to the house in one of his first games as a pro showing us all how skilled he really was. I know I'd take him in the first round in any format just for his upside.

 
FYI, amongst RBs in my two PPR leagues Peterson is 1st and 4th going into week 16.
Funny, in my PPR league he's 8th, and he's about 2 points away from being 10th. (No bonuses)1. Forte 276

2. MJD 273

3. TJones 260

4. DWill 255

5. Westbrook 246

6. Turner 240

7. LT 237

8. ADP 236

9. Slaton 235

10. CJ3 235

In terms of points per game, he's actually 14th.

ADP is a mediocre rb1 in ppr leagues.
not in PPR leagues that also have bonus for 100+ yard games....he is 4th in one of my PPR league that give bonus points for 100 yard games
 
FYI, amongst RBs in my two PPR leagues Peterson is 1st and 4th going into week 16.
Funny, in my PPR league he's 8th, and he's about 2 points away from being 10th. (No bonuses)1. Forte 276

2. MJD 273

3. TJones 260

4. DWill 255

5. Westbrook 246

6. Turner 240

7. LT 237

8. ADP 236

9. Slaton 235

10. CJ3 235

In terms of points per game, he's actually 14th.

ADP is a mediocre rb1 in ppr leagues.
not in PPR leagues that also have bonus for 100+ yard games....he is 4th in one of my PPR league that give bonus points for 100 yard games
Fair enough - those leagues are a different animal, and I can see him being worth more in that system. I never understood those leagues at all - a 100 yard game is worth a TD more than a 99 yard game? Doesn't make sense to me at all.

But hey, to each their own :goodposting:

 
FYI, amongst RBs in my two PPR leagues Peterson is 1st and 4th going into week 16.
Funny, in my PPR league he's 8th, and he's about 2 points away from being 10th. (No bonuses)1. Forte 2762. MJD 2733. TJones 2604. DWill 2555. Westbrook 2466. Turner 2407. LT 2378. ADP 2369. Slaton 23510. CJ3 235In terms of points per game, he's actually 14th.ADP is a mediocre rb1 in ppr leagues.
This alone should highlight the stupidity of PPR leagues.
 
buccosfan said:
lyon812 said:
runner06 said:
7. Chris Johnson – leads all rookies in rushing10. Steve Slaton –worried that he could have a sophomore slump
Solid list, but I have to ask:Why are people afraid Slaton will have a sophomore slump, but not Chris Johnson? Their stats are virtually identical:Slaton: 230 rushes, 1124 yards, 4.9ypc; 40 rec, 305 yards, 7.6 yprJohnson: 235 rushes, 1159 yards, 4.9ypc; 41 rec, 259 yards, 6.3 yprThis isn't to pick on your list in particular, it's just a common theme that I'm noticing.ETA: Additionally, both have 8 TDs, but it would seem that Johnson faces far more challenge in terms of goal-line vulturing with Lendale around than Slaton is with any other Houston RB. I just can't see why, at this point, CJ's 3 spots higher.
because everyone has a man crush on johnson. i'd still take michael turner over him.
There is a reason people have a man-crush on CJ.
Sure, and it's well earned. There's a reason people have one for Slaton, too. Even if another back is brought in to share time with Slaton, it’s not outrageous to assume that he and CJ will have roughly the same amount of carries per game (16-17), based on their usage patterns this season--and that includes when Slaton was “fighting” with Green for carries. So what you have are two backs that 1) may split time, 2) receive a consistent amount of weekly touches in the mid-teens, 3) are actively involved in the passing game, and 4) have proven to be a home-run threat at any time. I just don't foresee either of them dropping below a certain threshold of either opportunity or productivity. If people are going to be down on one, they really should be down on the other as well.
Like i said though, there is a certain comfortability in CJ from knowing what you are going to get out of him next year.
Last year everyone liked guys like Addai over D.Williams cause they felt comfortable with Addai's situation as compared to Williams where there was a chance of them bringing someone in. A team bringing in a second back doesnt have to mean a decline in stats for the starter. If the starter has talent they will give them their touches and if they bring in someone else it will just to be someone who compliments the starter. Just like CJ3 and white. Slaton's proved to have talent, trust from the coaches and able to carry the load if needed. He will be getting touches regardless next year. plus bringing in a big back next year could actually help him because the bigger back would wear down the defense more making it easier for Slaton, again just like White/CJ3. So you really just need to base it on talent and surrounding team. If you've watched both there games there is no way that you cant say Slaton has as much if not more talent than CJ3. And as for the offense he's in, Houston can throw the ball very well so he wont see alot of 8 man fronts as apposed to Tenn where they will try to stop the run and let Collins/Young beat them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Underachievers said:
ADP is not top 5 in a PPR league. He barely reaches the top 10 in a PPR format (and he is actually the 11th ranked RB in our league).
ADP is 6th in my PPR league
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top