I think I projected them at 571.:hijack:
I keep seeing people ranking the Arizona WR duo in the Top 5, and I have to ask . . . does Edgerrin James being on the team even REMOTELY enter into your projections/rankings?
Many people have Fitz and Boldin in their Top 5 or 6 WR . . . does the threat of Edge taking away over 100 passing attempts reduce your enthusiam even a little bit? The Cardinals hoisted the ball up 670 times last year . . . how many passing attemts are you allocating for them this year?
:end hijack:
If that were the case, my decrease of 100 attempts would not be far off.I think I projected them at 571.:hijack:
I keep seeing people ranking the Arizona WR duo in the Top 5, and I have to ask . . . does Edgerrin James being on the team even REMOTELY enter into your projections/rankings?
Many people have Fitz and Boldin in their Top 5 or 6 WR . . . does the threat of Edge taking away over 100 passing attempts reduce your enthusiam even a little bit? The Cardinals hoisted the ball up 670 times last year . . . how many passing attemts are you allocating for them this year?
:end hijack:
If that were the case, my decrease of 100 attempts would not be far off.I think I projected them at 571.:hijack:
I keep seeing people ranking the Arizona WR duo in the Top 5, and I have to ask . . . does Edgerrin James being on the team even REMOTELY enter into your projections/rankings?
Many people have Fitz and Boldin in their Top 5 or 6 WR . . . does the threat of Edge taking away over 100 passing attempts reduce your enthusiam even a little bit? The Cardinals hoisted the ball up 670 times last year . . . how many passing attemts are you allocating for them this year?
:end hijack:
DING! DING! DING! Thank you for in a round about way bringing up what I have been saying all along. Fitz and Boldin by some folks are getting projected at more looks than last year and more production when IMO they should be projected down instead.If the team passes 15% less this year (which is a dropoff of 100 attempts), I would look at both guys seeing close to a 10-15% reduction from last year's numbers.so if the # of passes drops by 100, which of the two stud receivers will be affected the most? it seems that both get equal # of looks
It is refreshing to me.Holt- I think he'll have his best season as a pro under Linnehan. Linnehan has a past track record of getting alot out of his #1 wr's.
Owens- I think pound for pound still the best wr in the game (I hate him)
R. Moss- Without an injury a no doubt top 5 guy.
R. Williams- Yes, I'm going out on a limb but I've always been a big fan of his talent and now with a qb (somewhat) and a GREAT offensive coordinator he will get the rock.
D. Driver- That limb just got alittle longer with this pick but why is it so crazy to think of Driver as a top 5 guy. He's the only wr on a pass first team and Favre probably has something this year. With not much of a running game to speak of and not much other competition for the ball I don't think it's crazy to think Driver could have about 1300 yards and 10 td's.
Sorry not to put the same as other people but I'll go out on a limb alittle
You're right on here David. Combine your argument with 3 other points and you have a recipe for decreased production: 1) the Cards will soon be working with a rookie QBDING! DING! DING! Thank you for in a round about way bringing up what I have been saying all along. Fitz and Boldin by some folks are getting projected at more looks than last year and more production when IMO they should be projected down instead.If the team passes 15% less this year (which is a dropoff of 100 attempts), I would look at both guys seeing close to a 10-15% reduction from last year's numbers.so if the # of passes drops by 100, which of the two stud receivers will be affected the most? it seems that both get equal # of looks
That would put them more in the Top 10-12 range than the Top 5 range that many people have them slotted in.
Some will argue that one not the other will lose out and that their guy will get more looks, but I don't see it playing out that way.
OK, but Boldin missed 3 games last year too. So while Arizona's pass attempts pretty much have to go down (and so Boldin's ppg will probably decrease), is there good reason to think that Boldin's overall numbers don't decrease all that much? It looks like if he stays healthy, he could match last year's reception, yardage, and TD numbers despite the dip in per game production.DING! DING! DING! Thank you for in a round about way bringing up what I have been saying all along. Fitz and Boldin by some folks are getting projected at more looks than last year and more production when IMO they should be projected down instead.If the team passes 15% less this year (which is a dropoff of 100 attempts), I would look at both guys seeing close to a 10-15% reduction from last year's numbers.so if the # of passes drops by 100, which of the two stud receivers will be affected the most? it seems that both get equal # of looks
That would put them more in the Top 10-12 range than the Top 5 range that many people have them slotted in.
Some will argue that one not the other will lose out and that their guy will get more looks, but I don't see it playing out that way.
I dig the D-Jax call. Missed out of my top 5 but definetly in my top 10.1. S. Smith
2. Holt
3. Owens
4. R. Moss
5. Darrell Jackson
Just miss: CJ, Harrison, Arizona guys
Does Owens @ 2 + 4 = 1?1. S. Smith
2. Owens
3. Chambers (if C-Pep is healthy)
4. Owens
5. Holt
Harrison, Holt, Chad, R.Moss, Fitz
lots of good ones
It is refreshing to me.Holt- I think he'll have his best season as a pro under Linnehan. Linnehan has a past track record of getting alot out of his #1 wr's.
Owens- I think pound for pound still the best wr in the game (I hate him)
R. Moss- Without an injury a no doubt top 5 guy.
R. Williams- Yes, I'm going out on a limb but I've always been a big fan of his talent and now with a qb (somewhat) and a GREAT offensive coordinator he will get the rock.
D. Driver- That limb just got alittle longer with this pick but why is it so crazy to think of Driver as a top 5 guy. He's the only wr on a pass first team and Favre probably has something this year. With not much of a running game to speak of and not much other competition for the ball I don't think it's crazy to think Driver could have about 1300 yards and 10 td's.
I have to disagree with the Donald Driver estimate, I watched every game last year and he has serious issues getting off the defender when he is the #1 guy. I just don't think he has it in him to break double digit td's. and to be in the top five you need double digit td's. unless fergusen steps up as a #2, I don't see Driver having better than 1300/8. that is about his historical numbers
Sorry not to put the same as other people but I'll go out on a limb alittle
sorry, the message was blended in with the rest of a prior message, the point is Driver is no where near a top 5what is the point of this last post?![]()
You football forum whore: "Thou shall not cheat on his Football Forum"Who are yours?
1st-Terrell Owens
2nd-Torry Holt
3rd-Larry Fitzgerald
4th-Steve Smith
5th-Anquawn Boldin
Why? You take out one year (2003) and he's avg. 80 catches a year, close to 1200 yards and 8 td's a year. Add intot he fact that Walker is gone now and someone is going to be getting those balls. GB was also a very good running team during those years as well (when they had an o-line). I'm not saying I guarantee Driver will be there but I think he has a good chance. Let me guess, you think Holt, Smith, R. Moss, Owens and C. Johnson will be there right?sorry, the message was blended in with the rest of a prior message, the point is Driver is no where near a top 5what is the point of this last post?![]()
I would have to disagree. I don't see Hass as a top 5 qb this year but he is Mr. consistantcy (sp). In the last three years he has been around 3400 yards and 22, 24 and 26 td's. These #'s put him in the top ten every year. I do however agree that losing Hutchinson will be huge for them but I actually think it could help D-JAX's #'s alittle. Guards are more important for running the ball as where you tackles give you the better protection in the passing game. If Alexander isn't as dominating on the ground than D-JAX should get more attempts. If they aren't blowing people out in the second half, like last year, D-JAX might see some more love. I had both last year, Hass and D-JAX and I got so sick and tired of great first halves and nothing in the second I had to get rid of both of them this offseason.I'm not too big on Darrell Jackson, like other people are. Last year Seattle was in the weakest division in the league. This year they will have some contention to deal with. Hasselbecks last season was somewhat of a fluke. Look at his number evey other season. The only reason the passing ame was opened up was b/c of how much Alexander was doing. They lost a significant player on their left side. And if you know anything about their rungame, the left side is the key to them winning. Tell me you disagree with me on this
:hijack:
I keep seeing people ranking the Arizona WR duo in the Top 5, and I have to ask . . . does Edgerrin James being on the team even REMOTELY enter into your projections/rankings?
Many people have Fitz and Boldin in their Top 5 or 6 WR . . . does the threat of Edge taking away over 100 passing attempts reduce your enthusiam even a little bit? The Cardinals hoisted the ball up 670 times last year . . . how many passing attemts are you allocating for them this year?
:end hijack:
i have 3 of your top ten on my dynasty squad (Holt, DJax, Driver)Holt
Smith
Owens
C. Johnson
D. Jackson
Moss
Driver
Boldin/Fitz
Harrison
Looks good to me.
*edit - holy crap, how did I forget about Djax![]()
I would have to disagree. I don't see Hass as a top 5 qb this year but he is Mr. consistantcy (sp). In the last three years he has been around 3400 yards and 22, 24 and 26 td's. These #'s put him in the top ten every year. I do however agree that losing Hutchinson will be huge for them but I actually think it could help D-JAX's #'s alittle. Guards are more important for running the ball as where you tackles give you the better protection in the passing game. If Alexander isn't as dominating on the ground than D-JAX should get more attempts. If they aren't blowing people out in the second half, like last year, D-JAX might see some more love. I had both last year, Hass and D-JAX and I got so sick and tired of great first halves and nothing in the second I had to get rid of both of them this offseason.I'm not too big on Darrell Jackson, like other people are. Last year Seattle was in the weakest division in the league. This year they will have some contention to deal with. Hasselbecks last season was somewhat of a fluke. Look at his number evey other season. The only reason the passing ame was opened up was b/c of how much Alexander was doing. They lost a significant player on their left side. And if you know anything about their rungame, the left side is the key to them winning. Tell me you disagree with me on this
It probably shows nothing else interesting either...If nothing else, JayMan's post illustrates how all over the map the WR rankings have been in recent years.
History is on your side that says the passing game numbers should diminish with the addition of an Edge caliber back.That's one of the reasons I'm not buying into the Kurt Warner with 4,000 yards and 30 TDs club.:hijack:
I keep seeing people ranking the Arizona WR duo in the Top 5, and I have to ask . . . does Edgerrin James being on the team even REMOTELY enter into your projections/rankings?
Many people have Fitz and Boldin in their Top 5 or 6 WR . . . does the threat of Edge taking away over 100 passing attempts reduce your enthusiam even a little bit? The Cardinals hoisted the ball up 670 times last year . . . how many passing attemts are you allocating for them this year?
:end hijack:
It's strange that you see that.When I look at Hass, I see a guy who's yards/TD per game put him at 3800/26 in a 16 game season.I would have to disagree. I don't see Hass as a top 5 qb this year but he is Mr. consistantcy (sp). In the last three years he has been around 3400 yards and 22, 24 and 26 td's.
I think you took my post in the wrong way. I think Hass is a very good qb option. I think he is a guy that will get you solid points week in and out. The thing I don't care is his oppurtunity to score in all four quarters of the game. That 3800/26 should be attainable IF and only IF they are in some closer games next year, which could be possible. However until I see see him airing it out in the second half I will keep him at 7 thru 9 in my rankings.It's strange that you see that.When I look at Hass, I see a guy who's yards/TD per game put him at 3800/26 in a 16 game season.I would have to disagree. I don't see Hass as a top 5 qb this year but he is Mr. consistantcy (sp). In the last three years he has been around 3400 yards and 22, 24 and 26 td's.
He was clearly on pace for that in 2004, but missed two games.
He was clearly on pace for that in 2005, but sat week 17.
When I look at Matt Hasselbeck, I see a guy who has averaged 237 passing yards and 1.6 passing TD per game (3800/26) the last three years. And he's only missed two games due to injury the last three years.
He's just about Marc Bulger with less injuries and less INTs.
His career highs are 1199 yards and 9 TDs. It's hard to lump him into the same category as guys like Holt, Moss, Boldin, Smith, Johnson, and Owens.Why no love for D-JAX ?!!! He could have been top 5 last year pending injury and he has a great relationship with a solid QB. I dare someone to say Nate Burleson either![]()
My thoughts exactly. Many may not agree with Harrison being top 5 but he'll finish in the top 5,mark my words.6. Larry FitzgeraldS.Smith
Holt
C.Johnson
HARRISON
Owens
If never having been in the Top 5 precludes you from being able to, no one would ever break into the Top 5. The past few years have had several new entries into the Gold Circle of WRs (whether they stayed there or not): Boldin, Fitzgerald, Muhammad, Smith, the little Moss, Galloway, etc. There will be other guys int he mix here, and figuring out who they are will get you way ahead of the game fantasy wise.I've mentioned several times in other threads that the top WR this year all have question marks involving new teammates, new teams, new coaches, injuries to QB, etc. that make all of them risky picks. Some may have negative impacts, so leabing the status quo as the vanguard may not be the best thing to do (and recent WR rankings reflect this).His career highs are 1199 yards and 9 TDs. It's hard to lump him into the same category as guys like Holt, Moss, Boldin, Smith, Johnson, and Owens.Why no love for D-JAX ?!!! He could have been top 5 last year pending injury and he has a great relationship with a solid QB. I dare someone to say Nate Burleson either![]()
And as for consistency he is right behind Holt and just in front of Chad. Making him one of my top 3 picks. Will take his consistency anyday, as long as Manning is chucking the ball to him.My thoughts exactly. Many may not agree with Harrison being top 5 but he'll finish in the top 5,mark my words.6. Larry FitzgeraldS.Smith
Holt
C.Johnson
HARRISON
Owens
7.Randy Moss
8.Chris Chambers
9. Darrel Jackson
10. Anquan Boldin