I have 6 good RBs (Charles, Stacy, Andre Brown, Ivory, Vereen and Ben Tate) in a 14 man league. I tried to trade Ivory (or) Stacy and Antonio Brown for Calvin. It was accepted for Ivory, then switched to Stacy because the other guy needed a RB. A few members of the league went bananas and Vetoed the trade(s). My integrity has been questioned and no one is happy. In my opinion, the other league members refuse to allow me to use my assets to improve my team in other areas because it obviously helps me and does not benefit them. I happen to know that those in playoff contention vetoed and those on the bottom of the league did not. The VETO button does not come with any rules or restrictions, so they can press it for whatever reason they want. However, isn't the button really to prevent hugely lopsided trades from going through? Is this trade lopsided to the point of "scandal" claims? Obviously, I'm getting the better player, but I'm not desperate so haven't I earned the right to benefit from a trade like this? Your opinion would be greatly appreciated.