What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Trade- Is it legit? (1 Viewer)

How would you react to this trade?

  • Jacobs and Boldin is the better deal but it's fair enough to go through

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Addai and Williams is the better deal but it's fair enough to go through

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Jacobs and Boldin is the better deal and vote against because it's too big an advantage

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Addai and Williams is the better deal and vote against because it's too big an advantage

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Status
Not open for further replies.

love4win

Footballguy
In my league this is a trade going down.

Brandon Jacobs

Anquan Boldin

*For*

Joseph Addai

Roy Williams

How would you have reacted?

a)Jacobs and Boldin is the better deal but it's fair enough to go through

b)Addai and Williams is the better deal but it's fair enough to go through

c)Jacobs and Boldin is the better deal and vote against because it's too big an advantage.

d)Addai and Williams is the better deal and vote against because it's too big an advantage.

This is a private league about 50-50 people who know each other and invites form the internet. The commissioner who is in 1st place is the team getting Jacobs and Boldin. Commissioner's friend who is in last place is getting Addai and Williams.

Like in most leagues, a few managers are vocal and some just don't post so you don't know what they're thinking. Two other managers posted and said they thought the trade was unfair. I gave this logic:

"Commissioner you are getting-

RB10 Brandon Jacobs (Y! remaining games projection 163.88)- As long as the Giants defense continues to play well, Jacobs should keep on seeing 20-odd carries on a regular basis.

WR11 Anquan Boldin (Y! remaining games projection 144.89)- If his hamstring isn't 100 percent already, there's a good chance that it will be after Arizona's Week 4 bye. He will clearly get a ton of targets given AZ pass first offense.

You are giving-

RB 20 Joseph Addai (Y! remaining games projection 136.49)- He isn't the Colt’s RB1. It looks like a pretty even split of the workload at this point with Donald Brown making them both RB1.5's. He has only averaged 12 carries over the first 3 games which isn't surprising since the Colts will always be pass first given they have Peyton.

WR30 Roy Williams (Y! remaining games projection 91.01)- Last night was better statistically for Williams than the debacle last week against the Giants, but still only got him 7.5 fantasy points. He’s not winning Tony Romo's future targets with that touchdown pass that bounced off his hands on the fade in the end zone."

I said the commissioner should cancel the trade since it seemed like a friend was helping a friend. To his credit the commissioner vetoed his own trade, but he didn't like vetoing it and said so. Suggested they redo the trade. The commissioner's friend had a chance to hear that the 3 managers posting thought it was a bad trade and could have opted to not redo. Bottom line the trade is going through.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If this gets vetoed, you might as well not allow any trading in your league. Seriously, nothing close to wrong with this deal.

 
Where's the "who gives a ####" option?

What I mean is, didn't you get a majority answer in the other thread?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
other then the rare exception ... no trade is veto-able

you might think this is lopsided and the rest of the league might as well ... but its not your team stay out of their business

 
If it's not collusion it goes through. Why people continue to play in leagues that allow the veto of non-collusion trades is beyond me. :goodposting:

 
Wow, you took something so utterly simple and laid a huge steaming pile of doofus thinking on top of it. Haven't you been around this forum long enough to know what this board's philsophy on trades is? Clearly not.

 
Bad enough these types of threads don't belong in the Shark Pool because they don't do anything to add or help others here. Now there's a SECOND thread on a trade in your personal league? Seriously, the fact you got 77 responses on the 1st thread is amazing and a little sad. Adding a poll just makes it downright silly.

 
This trade should not be close to being overturned.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder...I agree that Boldin/Jacobs is probably better deal, I don't think it's terribly unfair. It's not really up to the league to decide if it's fair or what side they like better, just to be sure it's not collusion.
 
Bad enough these types of threads don't belong in the Shark Pool because they don't do anything to add or help others here. Now there's a SECOND thread on a trade in your personal league? Seriously, the fact you got 77 responses on the 1st thread is amazing and a little sad. Adding a poll just makes it downright silly.
Where's the first thread? I've got alot of conf calls this afternoon.
 
There's nothing even close to unfair about this trade. Unless there's some secret deal to trade the same guys back next week, no way this should be stopped.

 
could the owners who are against this trade share the findings of their crystal ball with the rest of us FBGs..??

Would love to see how the players involved finish thier seasons..!!

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top