What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Trade value for Blount? (1 Viewer)

trading him at this point is a mistake unless you get good value. I moved Jamaal Charles at this point last year and regretted it dearly9 11/07/10 12:00pm @ATL - - - - -10 11/14/10 12:00pm CAR - - - - -11 11/21/10 3:05pm @SF - - - - -12 11/28/10 12:00pm @BAL - - - - -13 12/05/10 12:00pm ATL - - - - -14 12/12/10 12:00pm @WAS - - - - -15 12/19/10 12:00pm DET - - - - -16 12/26/10 12:00pm SEAnot to mention, he only really has 1 tough match-up in Balt
That is pretty tough schedule IMO. Only real good matchups seem to be Washington and Detroit. That said, Blount looks very special so I'm not sure I would discount him too much. Just sayin, schedule is not a positive IMO
 
I just traded G. Blount and D. Brown for the Vikings D/ST. Unfortuantely it was an offer I put in last week and the other owner accepted it early tuesday morning.

 
Traded him away in dynasty for Steve Johnson last week. Granted the other owner can see the future and knew this blow up game was coming while I didn't, I still like my side of the trade.

Now if Blount were playing the Cardinals every week it might be a different story.

 
Was offered Calvin Johnson for Blount and TO. I declined.
This I may have done. Calvin is the man so it would have been hard to pass up. I'm thinking about giving up a first round pick in my dynasty league to get him but I'm just not sure yet.
I agree, that's a pretty good offer (I'm assuming redraft, you HAVE to take that in a dynasty). I can see turning it down though, especially if you need him to start.As for giving up the #1 pick, the only way I wouldn't is if you thought it was going to be top 5 or so. Anything lower than that and you're just hoping your pick ends up similar to Blount IMO.
The pick I would be giving up is a top 5 pick since the team is in second to last place right now.
You're giving up a first round pick for Blount? I like Blount and all but no way I would shell out a first rounder for the guy. Yes I'm bitter I dropped him but he's not a first round talent yet.
 
Was offered Calvin Johnson for Blount and TO. I declined.
This I may have done. Calvin is the man so it would have been hard to pass up. I'm thinking about giving up a first round pick in my dynasty league to get him but I'm just not sure yet.
I agree, that's a pretty good offer (I'm assuming redraft, you HAVE to take that in a dynasty). I can see turning it down though, especially if you need him to start.As for giving up the #1 pick, the only way I wouldn't is if you thought it was going to be top 5 or so. Anything lower than that and you're just hoping your pick ends up similar to Blount IMO.
if the rookie draft from 2010 were redone today where would he stack up? I'd guess he'd be top 5The pick I would be giving up is a top 5 pick since the team is in second to last place right now.
You're giving up a first round pick for Blount? I like Blount and all but no way I would shell out a first rounder for the guy. Yes I'm bitter I dropped him but he's not a first round talent yet.
 
Was offered Calvin Johnson for Blount and TO. I declined.
This I may have done. Calvin is the man so it would have been hard to pass up. I'm thinking about giving up a first round pick in my dynasty league to get him but I'm just not sure yet.
I agree, that's a pretty good offer (I'm assuming redraft, you HAVE to take that in a dynasty). I can see turning it down though, especially if you need him to start.As for giving up the #1 pick, the only way I wouldn't is if you thought it was going to be top 5 or so. Anything lower than that and you're just hoping your pick ends up similar to Blount IMO.
The pick I would be giving up is a top 5 pick since the team is in second to last place right now.
You're giving up a first round pick for Blount? I like Blount and all but no way I would shell out a first rounder for the guy. Yes I'm bitter I dropped him but he's not a first round talent yet.
Why isn't he a 1st round rookie talent (later 1st round- I wouldn't deal the top 5 pick for him)? Are there really 8-12 rookies that you'd take over him? I'd take Blount, knowing what his situation is and seeing him play, over the completely unknown 2nd or 3rd tier rookies myself.
 
I just proposed a trade in my dynasty league. My team in sig. BlountHillisBarberfor Adrion PetersonI will let you guys know how this turns out. He is pretty weak at RB as Steven Jackson is his only other starter.
I doubt you get AP. and how is AP and SJax weak?
 
Why isn't he a 1st round rookie talent (later 1st round- I wouldn't deal the top 5 pick for him)? Are there really 8-12 rookies that you'd take over him? I'd take Blount, knowing what his situation is and seeing him play, over the completely unknown 2nd or 3rd tier rookies myself.
Because he's played ok in 1 game and great in another. I hope he does well and think he has the talent but I'm not sold on paying that price for him. I guess it depends. For us FA and rookies are the same draft and it depends on your needs. It also depends on the draft class.The past class was not deep but 2009 you could end up with a Nicks, Mccoy, Greene, HarvinLast year was "awful" Hardesty, Thomas, Tate, Mccluster2008 - I mean Chris Johnson, Ray Rice were ranked out of the top 5. I can see your point and not sure where I would put him among the players I mentioned above I'm not sure I would buy at that value, just yet.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I really like this kid Blount. But, now that I have him and he led my team riddled with bye week issues to a key win, I have to consider if he is worth sticking in my lineup for good. I have a stable of good RB's that are no brainer starters most weeks, but need an upgrade at WR. Is anyone considering selling established RB talent low to make room for him?
I am in a very similiar sitaution......I hoard RB's more than any other position even if I do not need them.....throughout the last few weeks I picked up Torrain, BJGE, and Blount to add to my RB's that were already very strong (Best, Peterson, Bradshaw)....we can start 3 RB's so I like to carry 4-5 strong ones.....my WR's are ok but not real strong....got an offer after the TB game of Steve Smith (CAR) for Blount straight up...was looking at that cause Smith had like 15 targets this week and Moore seems to dial him up.....sat back and decided Blount is pretty much a beast and might be that type of Charles or Harrison type from last year that could help carry you down the stretch......shopped my league a little and ended up packing BJGE and Torrain in a deal that helped me get Hicks.....it was a 5 for 5 deal with some others thrown in, but those were the main players......had I not hoarded RB's and had Blount not given me the confidence, I wouldn't have been able to pull this off.......Nicks is a strong addtion to my weekly lineup, so although I didn't trade Blount for him, Blount factored into it getting done........
That sounds like a great deal you did to get Nicks. I am envious. I recently pulled the trigger on a sell low of one of my main backs, Mendenhall for Boldin..straight up. I figure I have Blount on my bench and I really need an upgrade at WR. Now my team is more balanced moving forward, and even if Blount drops off, (which I don't think he will), I have many more options with a balanced talent level at the core positions.
 
Why isn't he a 1st round rookie talent (later 1st round- I wouldn't deal the top 5 pick for him)? Are there really 8-12 rookies that you'd take over him? I'd take Blount, knowing what his situation is and seeing him play, over the completely unknown 2nd or 3rd tier rookies myself.
Because he's played ok in 1 game and great in another. I hope he does well and think he has the talent but I'm not sold on paying that price for him. I guess it depends. For us FA and rookies are the same draft and it depends on your needs. It also depends on the draft class.The past class was not deep but 2009 you could end up with a Nicks, Mccoy, Greene, HarvinLast year was "awful" Hardesty, Thomas, Tate, Mccluster2008 - I mean Chris Johnson, Ray Rice were ranked out of the top 5. I can see your point and not sure where I would put him among the players I mentioned above I'm not sure I would buy at that value, just yet.
Having FA's in your rookie draft can make a huge difference obviously, depending on who is there. I'm talking full dynasty, where the draft is almost exclusively rookies.I understand he doesn't have a huge track record, but that's still more than any of the rookies have. We know he's on TB, we know he has very little competition right now. and we know he's done well so far. We don't even know exactly what rookies are going to be available in the draft, nevermind what team's they're going to be on. Plus you have to consider that you're going to get production out of Blount for the rest of this season, which you obviously aren't going to get out of a college player.Yes, there's a chance you could end up with a good player, but it's more likely that you end up with a flop. It obviously depends on the league, but assuming it's only rookies, I'd take Blount over the crapshoot in the 8-12 range myself.
 
This guy in my league with lots of receiving depth and no rbs just traded Reggie Wayne for Blount.

 
trading him at this point is a mistake unless you get good value. I moved Jamaal Charles at this point last year and regretted it dearly9 11/07/10 12:00pm @ATL - - - - -10 11/14/10 12:00pm CAR - - - - -11 11/21/10 3:05pm @SF - - - - -12 11/28/10 12:00pm @BAL - - - - -13 12/05/10 12:00pm ATL - - - - -14 12/12/10 12:00pm @WAS - - - - -15 12/19/10 12:00pm DET - - - - -16 12/26/10 12:00pm SEAnot to mention, he only really has 1 tough match-up in Balt
That is pretty tough schedule IMO. Only real good matchups seem to be Washington and Detroit. That said, Blount looks very special so I'm not sure I would discount him too much. Just sayin, schedule is not a positive IMO
ok, i'll add how MFL ranks their rush D to the right (think that is based off yardage, but not sure)9 at Falcons 810 vs Panthers 2011 at 49ers 912 at Ravens 1713 vs Falcons 814 at Redskins 1915 vs Lions 2616 vs Seahawks 10I like it as much as anyones else in the league...I don't think ATL, Seattle, or SanFran are as good as their rankings indicate
 
in a $200 start 2 RB PPR Dynasty, just gave up Lynch, Vincent Jackson and Kellen Winslow and my 3rd rounder next year for Blount, Meacham and Witten and his 6th. (Lynchon bench, behind cj3 on bye and Dwill killin us all and Winslow behind Gonzo) I need a 2nd RB, this clearly is my motivation and i was able to upgrade at TE a wee bit. In addition, this is a league that only allows 5 waiver pickups a year....witten / gonzo should protect me in playoffs at the 1 TE position required. i gave next year to help this year, clearly. I also need to find a lil lightining in a bottle and im thinking this is THE guy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
i was just offered 2 trades for blount which i insta declined.

steve breaston for blount

tolbert for blount

its a 2 flex standard league

 
Wow, what is up w/ all these crazy offers for Blount? I own the guy and would trade him in a heartbeat for guys like MJD, R. Wayne, (Brees + AJ wth?)

He's had ONE good game against a porous ARI run defense. I understand he's getting more opportunities now, but he's not overvalued in my league... not yet anyway.

 
Wow, what is up w/ all these crazy offers for Blount? I own the guy and would trade him in a heartbeat for guys like MJD, R. Wayne, (Brees + AJ wth?)He's had ONE good game against a porous ARI run defense. I understand he's getting more opportunities now, but he's not overvalued in my league... not yet anyway.
Ten other teams could agree with you, but all it takes is one team manager with delusions of grandeur.
 
I was just offered Drew Brees and Andre Johnson for LeGarrette Blount, Matt Stafford, and Mike Williams (WR Sea).

Keep in mind he is pretty deep at WR and owns Roethlesberger and I just lost Romo. He is also very weak at RB.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was just offered LGB and Desean Jackson for Andre Johnson and Max HallTurned it down..
Redraft or Dynasty?If redraft, you lose. That is a 2 for 1 trade, and DeSean going forward is a slight dropoff or even a wash a gimpy AJ. And Blount is going to be a solid RB2 going forward. DeSean is back and the hookup with Vick is going to only get better. I don't get what's not to like about that deal. :goodposting:
 
12 tm redraft very deep rosters:

Just Traded:

D.Garrard

L.Blount

Caddy

for

Wells

Hightower

Ocho Cinco

K. Smith

2 reasons why I moved Blount.

1- I think Tampa finishes 8-8. I don't see them winning a ton down the stretch. With them coming back to earth, I think his 20+ carry games will be limited, because he is not on the field all 3 downs.

I like Raheem Morris' energy, but I feel like people will be looking at that clip of him saying 'Buccs are best in NFC,' and laughing at some point.

2- I don't think he'll hold up physically. His running style is straight punishing. Guy looked like a manimal in last two games, but I get this "Brandon Jacobs" feeling with him getting nicked, or injured real soon. He doesn't run as high as Jacobs, but he finishes runs similar, and it concerns me.

That said Wells, who I just acquired is having knee issues as well.

We shall see.

 
12 tm redraft very deep rosters:Just Traded:D.GarrardL.BlountCaddyforWells HightowerOcho CincoK. Smith 2 reasons why I moved Blount.1- I think Tampa finishes 8-8. I don't see them winning a ton down the stretch. With them coming back to earth, I think his 20+ carry games will be limited, because he is not on the field all 3 downs.I like Raheem Morris' energy, but I feel like people will be looking at that clip of him saying 'Buccs are best in NFC,' and laughing at some point.2- I don't think he'll hold up physically. His running style is straight punishing. Guy looked like a manimal in last two games, but I get this "Brandon Jacobs" feeling with him getting nicked, or injured real soon. He doesn't run as high as Jacobs, but he finishes runs similar, and it concerns me.That said Wells, who I just acquired is having knee issues as well.We shall see.
Why do you see Tampa finishing 8-8? Why won’t they finish strong? Even if they do finish 8-8, they will be competitive and Blount’s carries going forward should approach 20+ consistently. It’s almost as if you believe they will be getting blown out from here on, and they will abandon the run.The reason I am optimistic about Tampa is their QB. Josh Freeman is the equivalent to Ben Roethlisberger. He throws a very nice deep ball, and has rallied his team time and time again. He won’t let his team down. Dude's a winner. At this point, I’d have to consider him for the NFL MVP. Having a great QB, who is at this point top 3 in the NFC in my opinion, the Bucs will have an offense that will sustain Blount’s success. They may lose this weekend to Atlanta, but the betting line is crazy. This will be a tight game decided near the end, and Blount will show that last week was no fluke.
 
I was just offered LGB and Desean Jackson for Andre Johnson and Max HallTurned it down..
Redraft or Dynasty?If redraft, you lose. That is a 2 for 1 trade, and DeSean going forward is a slight dropoff or even a wash a gimpy AJ. And Blount is going to be a solid RB2 going forward. DeSean is back and the hookup with Vick is going to only get better. I don't get what's not to like about that deal. :yes:
It's dynasty PPR..You can't replace top ranking players. I like both Desean and Blount but neither of them will supply the consistent strong stats that AJ will.. And their stats are going to be easier to reproduce elsewhere than AJ's...Aside from that, D-Jax has never broken 70 rec in a year, and he won't do it this year either... Blount has had 1 good game against a bad run D... AJ is a proven beast, virtually irreplaceable..I'm pretty sure I'm right to hold out for more..
 
I was just offered LaRon Landry for Blount in my main IDP league. If I needed a DB I probably would have accepted.

I think he is going to be a solid play the rest of the way though. It isn't just what he did stat-wise, its how he looked doing it. The guy is flat out fired up and running with a purpose. Yes, Arizona's run defense is pretty bad, but he has looked good every chance he has been given so far. He Looked good even against the Steelers Defense which has only given up two rushing TDs on the year. Blount accounts for 50% of that number.

 
Mozeta said:
Just rejected Donald Brown for Blount offer
Why?
a few reasons:Brown hasn't shown me anything, and he might be still banged upI need a RB for the season not for a couple of weeks, Addai/Hart will be backwho knows if Brown loses carries to the James kid, Brown performed horribly last week
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mozeta said:
Just rejected Donald Brown for Blount offer
Why?
a few reasons:Brown hasn't shown me anything, and he might be still banged upI need a RB for the season not for a couple of weeks, Addai/Hart will be backwho knows if Brown loses carries to the James kid, Brown performed horribly last week
Makes sense, for some reason I read this backwards the first time and thought someone was offering Blount to you for Donald Brown and you didn't want to do the deal.
 
Was offered Nicks for Blount, Steve Smith (Car), and Cooley. I'm relatively deep at WR and TE so I am considering this deal. I tried to swap Felix Jones for Blount and the guy wouldn't do it. 12 team PPR league.

 
Mozeta said:
I was just offered Drew Brees and Andre Johnson for LeGarrette Blount, Matt Stafford, and Mike Williams (WR Sea).Keep in mind he is pretty deep at WR and owns Roethlesberger and I just lost Romo. He is also very weak at RB.
seems like an instasnap accept iiuc.
 
Guy just offered me Fitzgerald and Daniels for Blount. I had to take that. Even with Fitz being down, Blount probably wouldnt have started for me. Pretty good value for a throw in on another trade.

 
I just dealt Blount + R. Brown for Peyton Hillis. Why? Analysis of Blount's "breakout" performance against Arizona, a terrible run defense:

The fumble hurt a lot, but it was a boom-and-bust day overall -- in 22 carries, he gained more than 3 yards just seven times (and one of those was the fumble).
Tossed in Ronnie as a sweetener, but I figure Blount's upside is really about Hillis' baseline. Both have easy playoff schedules, but Hillis is a fantastic pass blocker, and that fact makes me think he'll be on the field consistently. Plus, he's the only weapon left in the Cleveland offense. White guys are consistently underrated, but he grades out as a top-8 fantasy producer at the RB position. In the end the only factor that breaks this trade is an injury. Both players could end up having similar second-halves.
 
Just traded him away with Celek for DWill and Witten. I like his outlook, but he was RB4 on my team and I was never going to use him.

 
I just dealt Blount + R. Brown for Peyton Hillis. Why? Analysis of Blount's "breakout" performance against Arizona, a terrible run defense:
What about the 6.5 yards per carry average he had against the Rams? Pretty sure they have the 8th-best rushing defense in the league.
 
I just dealt Blount + R. Brown for Peyton Hillis. Why? Analysis of Blount's "breakout" performance against Arizona, a terrible run defense:
What about the 6.5 yards per carry average he had against the Rams? Pretty sure they have the 8th-best rushing defense in the league.
After adjustments for the offenses they have faced, the Rams actually rank 15th against the run.
Adjustments as in, what, strength of schedule? I don't care how easy their SoS is even though, from looking at it, it doesn't look too weak to me. They've only given up two rushing touchdowns so far this year. TWO! This is the NFL, there's parity, and the Rams have played against seven different teams thus far and have only let up two rushing touchdowns. They've gone against the likes of Jonathan Stewart, Ryan Matthews, Mike Tolbert, Jahvid Best, Darren McFadden...

They held Jahvid Best to just 59 yards on the ground, Ryan Matthews to just 64 yards and Jonathan Stewart to just 30 yards. Looking at their schedule this season, the only bad game they've had as a run defense came against Oakland where Darren McFadden went off on them for 145 rushing yards. But then again, he's been doing that to pretty much everyone the Raiders play this year.

Care to enlighten me further as to these adjustments?

And even giving you the benefit of the doubt and saying they do have the 15th ranked rush defense in the league after adjusting everything, isn't a 6.5 carry average against more or less anyone an impressive feat? Nevermind a middle-of-the-pack rush defense.

 
I just dealt Blount + R. Brown for Peyton Hillis. Why? Analysis of Blount's "breakout" performance against Arizona, a terrible run defense:
What about the 6.5 yards per carry average he had against the Rams? Pretty sure they have the 8th-best rushing defense in the league.
After adjustments for the offenses they have faced, the Rams actually rank 15th against the run.
I believe they rank 8th at home against the run, and 15th overall...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top