What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Trade: Who comes out ahead? (1 Viewer)

Who would you rather have

  • Barnett & Tillman

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Urlacher & S.Taylor

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

gridiron-ghost

Footballguy
Have been kicking around a trade offer I received a few days ago. I'm torn, so thought I let you sharks vote on it. Feel free to explain your choice.

Dynasty League - DF score as much as offense.

Thanks :boxing:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Have been kicking around a trade offer I received a few days ago. I'm torn, so thought I let you sharks vote on it. Feel free to explain your choice.

Thanks :boxing:
Close. But assuming this is a dynasty league with standard scoring, I go with the side that has the more stable and established linebacker - Urlacher. Possible that Barnett could move to the strong side sometime in the next season or two. I like Tillman better than Taylor (and more than just about anyone else around here apparently :D ), but there've been rumblings about a change of position and corners are always volatile.Pretty close though.

 
I disagree with Jene on Tillman versus Taylor. I tend to think Taylor still has the potential to develop into an elite fantasy DB. However there are the obvious behavioral red flags.

I too voted Urlacher/Taylor.

 
Urlacher is the obvious choice when it comes to the linebacker part. As for the DB's with Archuleta playing SS, the will have to run in Taylor's direction now. :hophead:

 
Urlacher and Taylor...classic no-brainer! Barnett is an average football player that has played on one of the worst defenses in modern NFL history from a talent standpoint. Tillman may be a push with Taylor. I'd take 2 high 1st round picks that have already played well (current value plus potential for more)!

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top