Just curious to hear what people's thought's are on Trent Dilfer being an analyst. I was put over the edge today when listening to Dilfer talk about Vick. He talked about how Vick should sign on a team with a hall-of-fame QB and re-learn the game by sitting the bench and watching.... do the "Steve Young" by holding a clipboard and watching Joe Montana for 3 years with SF......As Trent referenced it...........
WHAT????
Not sure what the issue here is? Steve Young took over San Francisco in 1991 at age 30. Vick is 29.Vick was a barely adequate passing QB before he went to jail. He'll have been away from football for two years and is going to have to re-adjust to the speed of the game and get back into condition as it is already. Why not have him sit behind a veteran QB, maybe relearn some throwing mechanics, and then get onto the field as a QB who can still scramble but is a much more refined passer as a result? Don't forget that Vick has been fragile in the past because of his scrambling. Sooner or later, he won't be running as he once used to and if he can't learn to throw, his usefulness will have vanished.
I doubt Dilfer was saying Vick should sit for 3 years but anybody who followed Steve Young knows that he dialed down the scrambling a lot around the mid 1990's when he realized he couldn't run that way forever.
Even current QBs like Donovan McNabb and Steve McNair dialed down their running and became more of a pocket QB as their careers continued.