Last edited by a moderator:
really?TJ Downing, OG
40 Yard 5.24 (1.77 / 3.02) 5.18 (1.75 / 2.99)
Vertical jump - 28.5
Broad jump - 9 ft
Shuttle - 4.46
3 cone - 7.81 (had a 7.4 but disallowed)
Bench 31 reps
His Vertical tied for 3rd of all Guards at the Combine
His Broad jump was better than anyone at the Combine
His shuttle was 2 tenths faster than anyone at the combine
He showed explosiveness and good lateral movement
Seriously?~ signed, Drew Breestoo short
I love the exception to the rule argument...Smith is no Brees.Seriously?~ signed, Drew Breestoo short
true. but I remember when Drew Brees wasn't even Drew BreesI love the exception to the rule argument...Smith is no Brees.Seriously?~ signed, Drew Breestoo short
Could you compare them coming out of college?I love the exception to the rule argument...Smith is no Brees.Seriously?~ signed, Drew Breestoo short
Smith was more athletic, but Brees to me showed more upside because of his ability to carry Purdue.Let's put it this way, Smith might be the next Brees, but the odds are extremely stacked against him. Smith should be happy to have Shaun King's NFL career.Could you compare them coming out of college?I love the exception to the rule argument...Smith is no Brees.Seriously?~ signed, Drew Breestoo short
WOW. Shaun King? Thats awfully harshDepending on who drafts him I see him no worse that Seneca Wallace who I think could be a decent starter.Smith was more athletic, but Brees to me showed more upside because of his ability to carry Purdue.Let's put it this way, Smith might be the next Brees, but the odds are extremely stacked against him. Smith should be happy to have Shaun King's NFL career.Could you compare them coming out of college?I love the exception to the rule argument...Smith is no Brees.Seriously?~ signed, Drew Breestoo short
Another highly credible post against a BIG TEN and OSU player. What's interesting to me is that I know you probably haven't watched him play because you hate the BIG TEN and OSU. So what exactly are you basing your analisys on?Here are few more exceptions you forgot:Brees, Brunell, Flutie, Garcia, Bob Griese, Hadl, Haden, Carley Johnson, Jurgenson, Kemp, Kramer, Krieg, Layne, LeBaron, Lujack, Luckman, McMahon, Morrall, Parilli, Peete, Plum, Starr, Stewart, Tarkenton, Theismann, Thomason, Tittle, Tolliver, Tomczak, Vick, Waterfield are all guys listed 6'1" or less that played in the NFL. Some better than others. Some HOF'ers. Hardly ground breaking.Smith was more athletic, but Brees to me showed more upside because of his ability to carry Purdue.Let's put it this way, Smith might be the next Brees, but the odds are extremely stacked against him. Smith should be happy to have Shaun King's NFL career.Could you compare them coming out of college?I love the exception to the rule argument...Smith is no Brees.Seriously?~ signed, Drew Breestoo short
I think height is a bigger issue now that linemen don't average 5'10".You cannot automatically discount Smith from being potentially a good player becuase of his lack of height, however it's clearly a negative attribute. Isn't it?Another highly credible post against a BIG TEN and OSU player. What's interesting to me is that I know you probably haven't watched him play because you hate the BIG TEN and OSU. So what exactly are you basing your analisys on?Here are few more exceptions you forgot:Brees, Brunell, Flutie, Garcia, Bob Griese, Hadl, Haden, Carley Johnson, Jurgenson, Kemp, Kramer, Krieg, Layne, LeBaron, Lujack, Luckman, McMahon, Morrall, Parilli, Peete, Plum, Starr, Stewart, Tarkenton, Theismann, Thomason, Tittle, Tolliver, Tomczak, Vick, Waterfield are all guys listed 6'1" or less that played in the NFL. Some better than others. Some HOF'ers. Hardly ground breaking.Smith was more athletic, but Brees to me showed more upside because of his ability to carry Purdue.Let's put it this way, Smith might be the next Brees, but the odds are extremely stacked against him. Smith should be happy to have Shaun King's NFL career.Could you compare them coming out of college?I love the exception to the rule argument...Smith is no Brees.Seriously?~ signed, Drew Breestoo short
What's interesting to me is that I know you probably haven't watched him play because you hate the BIG TEN and OSU. So what exactly are you basing your analisys on?
Huh? Brees played in Joe Tiller's spread, qb friendly offense at Purdue. Smith played in a more traditional Pro Style system. Like I said, what really sticks out to me is Smith's completion %. I think he is going to be a good one.Smith was more athletic, but Brees to me showed more upside because of his ability to carry Purdue.Let's put it this way, Smith might be the next Brees, but the odds are extremely stacked against him. Smith should be happy to have Shaun King's NFL career.Could you compare them coming out of college?I love the exception to the rule argument...Smith is no Brees.Seriously?~ signed, Drew Breestoo short
In every passing system, the qb needs lanes to throw the football. Most O lineman are in the 6'3 to 6'5 range. And there aren't many 6'6 qbs. Size can be a hindrance but by no means is an indicator of whether a qb will be successful or not. Talent ultimately decides that.I think height is a bigger issue now that linemen don't average 5'10".You cannot automatically discount Smith from being potentially a good player becuase of his lack of height, however it's clearly a negative attribute. Isn't it?Another highly credible post against a BIG TEN and OSU player. What's interesting to me is that I know you probably haven't watched him play because you hate the BIG TEN and OSU. So what exactly are you basing your analisys on?Here are few more exceptions you forgot:Brees, Brunell, Flutie, Garcia, Bob Griese, Hadl, Haden, Carley Johnson, Jurgenson, Kemp, Kramer, Krieg, Layne, LeBaron, Lujack, Luckman, McMahon, Morrall, Parilli, Peete, Plum, Starr, Stewart, Tarkenton, Theismann, Thomason, Tittle, Tolliver, Tomczak, Vick, Waterfield are all guys listed 6'1" or less that played in the NFL. Some better than others. Some HOF'ers. Hardly ground breaking.Smith was more athletic, but Brees to me showed more upside because of his ability to carry Purdue.Let's put it this way, Smith might be the next Brees, but the odds are extremely stacked against him. Smith should be happy to have Shaun King's NFL career.Could you compare them coming out of college?I love the exception to the rule argument...Smith is no Brees.Seriously?~ signed, Drew Breestoo short
Every analyst and their mom mark it as a huge negative...but obviously the homers are taking over in this thread.Signed, Charlie WardI think height is a bigger issue now that linemen don't average 5'10".You cannot automatically discount Smith from being potentially a good player becuase of his lack of height, however it's clearly a negative attribute. Isn't it?Another highly credible post against a BIG TEN and OSU player. What's interesting to me is that I know you probably haven't watched him play because you hate the BIG TEN and OSU. So what exactly are you basing your analisys on?Here are few more exceptions you forgot:Brees, Brunell, Flutie, Garcia, Bob Griese, Hadl, Haden, Carley Johnson, Jurgenson, Kemp, Kramer, Krieg, Layne, LeBaron, Lujack, Luckman, McMahon, Morrall, Parilli, Peete, Plum, Starr, Stewart, Tarkenton, Theismann, Thomason, Tittle, Tolliver, Tomczak, Vick, Waterfield are all guys listed 6'1" or less that played in the NFL. Some better than others. Some HOF'ers. Hardly ground breaking.Smith was more athletic, but Brees to me showed more upside because of his ability to carry Purdue.Let's put it this way, Smith might be the next Brees, but the odds are extremely stacked against him. Smith should be happy to have Shaun King's NFL career.Could you compare them coming out of college?I love the exception to the rule argument...Smith is no Brees.Seriously?~ signed, Drew Breestoo short
Aside from height, what would you base your comparison between Ward and Smith on?Every analyst and their mom mark it as a huge negative...but obviously the homers are taking over in this thread.Signed, Charlie WardI think height is a bigger issue now that linemen don't average 5'10".You cannot automatically discount Smith from being potentially a good player becuase of his lack of height, however it's clearly a negative attribute. Isn't it?Another highly credible post against a BIG TEN and OSU player. What's interesting to me is that I know you probably haven't watched him play because you hate the BIG TEN and OSU. So what exactly are you basing your analisys on?Here are few more exceptions you forgot:Brees, Brunell, Flutie, Garcia, Bob Griese, Hadl, Haden, Carley Johnson, Jurgenson, Kemp, Kramer, Krieg, Layne, LeBaron, Lujack, Luckman, McMahon, Morrall, Parilli, Peete, Plum, Starr, Stewart, Tarkenton, Theismann, Thomason, Tittle, Tolliver, Tomczak, Vick, Waterfield are all guys listed 6'1" or less that played in the NFL. Some better than others. Some HOF'ers. Hardly ground breaking.Smith was more athletic, but Brees to me showed more upside because of his ability to carry Purdue.Let's put it this way, Smith might be the next Brees, but the odds are extremely stacked against him. Smith should be happy to have Shaun King's NFL career.Could you compare them coming out of college?I love the exception to the rule argument...Smith is no Brees.Seriously?~ signed, Drew Breestoo short
Sounds like we are in agreement!In every passing system, the qb needs lanes to throw the football. Most O lineman are in the 6'3 to 6'5 range. And there aren't many 6'6 qbs. Size can be a hindrance but by no means is an indicator of whether a qb will be successful or not. Talent ultimately decides that.I think height is a bigger issue now that linemen don't average 5'10".You cannot automatically discount Smith from being potentially a good player becuase of his lack of height, however it's clearly a negative attribute. Isn't it?
Right, I'm not going to compare Smith to Charlie Ward or such, but those that think height isn't going to play a role in how good Smith will be in the NFL are just ignoring things. Can he overcome it? Of course. I don't think anyone is saying it will be impossible for Smith to have a good career, just that his lack of height isn't helping things. What's wrong with that?Every analyst and their mom mark it as a huge negative...but obviously the homers are taking over in this thread.
Actually Ward is substantially taller than Smiith.Anyhow I think the comparison is glaringly obviousa) Heisman trophy winners from powerhouse teams(neither should have won)b) athleticc) undersized by NFL standardsSmith has a stronger arm and is faster from what I can recall.Aside from height, what would you base your comparison between Ward and Smith on?Every analyst and their mom mark it as a huge negative...but obviously the homers are taking over in this thread.Signed, Charlie WardI think height is a bigger issue now that linemen don't average 5'10".You cannot automatically discount Smith from being potentially a good player becuase of his lack of height, however it's clearly a negative attribute. Isn't it?Another highly credible post against a BIG TEN and OSU player. What's interesting to me is that I know you probably haven't watched him play because you hate the BIG TEN and OSU. So what exactly are you basing your analisys on?Here are few more exceptions you forgot:Brees, Brunell, Flutie, Garcia, Bob Griese, Hadl, Haden, Carley Johnson, Jurgenson, Kemp, Kramer, Krieg, Layne, LeBaron, Lujack, Luckman, McMahon, Morrall, Parilli, Peete, Plum, Starr, Stewart, Tarkenton, Theismann, Thomason, Tittle, Tolliver, Tomczak, Vick, Waterfield are all guys listed 6'1" or less that played in the NFL. Some better than others. Some HOF'ers. Hardly ground breaking.Smith was more athletic, but Brees to me showed more upside because of his ability to carry Purdue.Let's put it this way, Smith might be the next Brees, but the odds are extremely stacked against him. Smith should be happy to have Shaun King's NFL career.Could you compare them coming out of college?I love the exception to the rule argument...Smith is no Brees.Seriously?~ signed, Drew Breestoo short
Answer me this does it matter whether a qb is 6'1" or 6'3" if his lineman are all 6'5" in regards to seeing over his lineman?I think height is a bigger issue now that linemen don't average 5'10".You cannot automatically discount Smith from being potentially a good player becuase of his lack of height, however it's clearly a negative attribute. Isn't it?Another highly credible post against a BIG TEN and OSU player. What's interesting to me is that I know you probably haven't watched him play because you hate the BIG TEN and OSU. So what exactly are you basing your analisys on?Here are few more exceptions you forgot:Brees, Brunell, Flutie, Garcia, Bob Griese, Hadl, Haden, Carley Johnson, Jurgenson, Kemp, Kramer, Krieg, Layne, LeBaron, Lujack, Luckman, McMahon, Morrall, Parilli, Peete, Plum, Starr, Stewart, Tarkenton, Theismann, Thomason, Tittle, Tolliver, Tomczak, Vick, Waterfield are all guys listed 6'1" or less that played in the NFL. Some better than others. Some HOF'ers. Hardly ground breaking.Smith was more athletic, but Brees to me showed more upside because of his ability to carry Purdue.Let's put it this way, Smith might be the next Brees, but the odds are extremely stacked against him. Smith should be happy to have Shaun King's NFL career.Could you compare them coming out of college?I love the exception to the rule argument...Smith is no Brees.Seriously?~ signed, Drew Breestoo short
Yes it does.....How often do linemen stand strait up? They may be 6'5" but they are hunched over. If a QB is 6'3" he can 1)see over then easier2)not have his passes knocked down as easy3) See the entire field betterAnswer me this does it matter whether a qb is 6'1" or 6'3" if his lineman are all 6'5" in regards to seeing over his lineman?I think height is a bigger issue now that linemen don't average 5'10".You cannot automatically discount Smith from being potentially a good player becuase of his lack of height, however it's clearly a negative attribute. Isn't it?Another highly credible post against a BIG TEN and OSU player. What's interesting to me is that I know you probably haven't watched him play because you hate the BIG TEN and OSU. So what exactly are you basing your analisys on?Here are few more exceptions you forgot:Brees, Brunell, Flutie, Garcia, Bob Griese, Hadl, Haden, Carley Johnson, Jurgenson, Kemp, Kramer, Krieg, Layne, LeBaron, Lujack, Luckman, McMahon, Morrall, Parilli, Peete, Plum, Starr, Stewart, Tarkenton, Theismann, Thomason, Tittle, Tolliver, Tomczak, Vick, Waterfield are all guys listed 6'1" or less that played in the NFL. Some better than others. Some HOF'ers. Hardly ground breaking.Smith was more athletic, but Brees to me showed more upside because of his ability to carry Purdue.Let's put it this way, Smith might be the next Brees, but the odds are extremely stacked against him. Smith should be happy to have Shaun King's NFL career.Could you compare them coming out of college?I love the exception to the rule argument...Smith is no Brees.Seriously?~ signed, Drew Breestoo short
:(Yes it does.....How often do linemen stand strait up? They may be 6'5" but they are hunched over. If a QB is 6'3" he can 1)see over then easier2)not have his passes knocked down as easy3) See the entire field betterAnswer me this does it matter whether a qb is 6'1" or 6'3" if his lineman are all 6'5" in regards to seeing over his lineman?I think height is a bigger issue now that linemen don't average 5'10".You cannot automatically discount Smith from being potentially a good player becuase of his lack of height, however it's clearly a negative attribute. Isn't it?Another highly credible post against a BIG TEN and OSU player. What's interesting to me is that I know you probably haven't watched him play because you hate the BIG TEN and OSU. So what exactly are you basing your analisys on?Here are few more exceptions you forgot:Brees, Brunell, Flutie, Garcia, Bob Griese, Hadl, Haden, Carley Johnson, Jurgenson, Kemp, Kramer, Krieg, Layne, LeBaron, Lujack, Luckman, McMahon, Morrall, Parilli, Peete, Plum, Starr, Stewart, Tarkenton, Theismann, Thomason, Tittle, Tolliver, Tomczak, Vick, Waterfield are all guys listed 6'1" or less that played in the NFL. Some better than others. Some HOF'ers. Hardly ground breaking.Smith was more athletic, but Brees to me showed more upside because of his ability to carry Purdue.Let's put it this way, Smith might be the next Brees, but the odds are extremely stacked against him. Smith should be happy to have Shaun King's NFL career.Could you compare them coming out of college?I love the exception to the rule argument...Smith is no Brees.Seriously?~ signed, Drew Breestoo short
The real test is Isaiah Stanback - black, athletic, but also from the PAC 10Is it that you dislike black QBs who also happen to be athletic, LHUCKS?
He has some potential I'll admit that, but the only year he has been called upon, to open up the offense and get away from traditional Ohio State football was this season, and I dont think he made the most of his chances, he made quite a few dumb mistakes against UM that you wouldnt expect from someone that has been in the system that long. As for his other big game against UF, well you know the story. He's also a malcontent off the field, he got arrested for punching a woman right before he attended OSU, and he also accepted money from a booster.If the point by Lhucks is that being shorter will make it harder for him to succeed than we can all agree. But he's left the impression that he's "too short" which what he said in his first post. Clearly he has not watched Troy play. You really can't say someone is "too short" and leave it at that. You have to at least take a look at what he's doen and evaluate him from a player perspective, not height. I've provided many examples of people that have succeeded that are shorter than Troy. A few have even had HOF careers. If anyone watched all the games Troy played, as I have, then you can clearly see he's been able to overcome the height issues and play extremely well especially in big games. That doesn't mean he will be a good NFL QB although I think he will fairly well.I will go on record and say this. If Troy fails as a QB it will not be because of his height. It will be because he's not a good QB.
I dislike QBs that get by on their athleticism in college because that often translates to a bust in the NFL.I loved Leftwich and McNabb coming out of college.Is it that you dislike black QBs who also happen to be athletic, LHUCKS?
will likely not be a good pro...wouldn't touch him with a 10 foot pole unless I was changing his position.The real test is Isaiah Stanback - black, athletic, but also from the PAC 10Is it that you dislike black QBs who also happen to be athletic, LHUCKS?
It's also difficult to determine how much it Troy Smith, and how much was his teammates. Ohio State is a very talented team, and an average QB can look like a wizard behind all future NFL players.I dislike QBs that get by on their athleticism in college because that often translates to a bust in the NFL.
:XIt's also difficult to determine how much it Troy Smith, and how much was his teammates. Ohio State is a very talented team, and an average QB can look like a wizard behind all future NFL players.I dislike QBs that get by on their athleticism in college because that often translates to a bust in the NFL.
I am a Big Ten fan and I actually agree with LHUCKS. I've watched just about every OSU game and Troy Smith is not a top shelf NFL prospect. I would put a third round grade on him based on his skillset. He is not close to a Vince Young type of talent. I do like the fact that he is a big game type of player. But there are a lot of holes in his game. He will be a project for any NFL team and I would be suprised if he went earlier than the late 2nd round.What's interesting to me is that I know you probably haven't watched him play because you hate the BIG TEN and OSU. So what exactly are you basing your analisys on?![]()
I am a Lions fan and really hope they draft Drew Stanton. I think Stanton has much more NFL potential than Troy Smith. I see Stanton as having just a much potential as Brady Quinn, but with more risk.I like Sean Baca's comments on the Raiders taking Calvin Johnson and then _hoping_ Troy Smith is there in the 2nd. Actually, this is my hope for the Lions one pick later in each round. I think the Lions would be better served taking the proverbial BPA (non-QB) with the 2nd overall or even moving down a few slots if the right deal presents itself, then take Troy in the 2nd. I prefer Troy over Drew Stanton myself.. but having watched Stanton in person since he was a 10th grader.. I wouldn't mind seeing the former Harrison Hawk join the Lions either. For his sake, I hope he goes elsewhere though.![]()
I respect your opinion because you have one and at least you made an effort to say why you feel the way you do. But consider this. He's proven himself in 2 different offensive systems. Last year he was more of a scrambler while this year he was a drop back pro style passer. Seems that would bolster his chances of success, not hurt it. Clearly he can and did learn and developed his game as expected.By saying he didn't make the most of his chances, you mean by getting to the National Championship game? You mean by winning the Heisman? You mean going on the road in hostile environments such as Texas and Iowa and winning easily? You mean winning the BIG TEN outright? You mean owning Michigan, the schools arch rival for 3 years? You mean his performance in big games besides the Florida game like crushing ND? Setting school records and such? Seriously, did you actually mean to say that? Not sure what more he could do.If you want to criticize Troy for a couple og mistakes in what has been described as "The Game Of The Century", then I guess you can criticize anyone that plays because no one plays a perfect game. Especially in "The Game Of The Century".UF was 1 game and it was bad across the board. You may have also noticed that he had no time to drop back and throw. Hardly a game that defines a player's career or chances in the NFL. As for the malcontent comment, please. This is where he blew everyone away. He's demonstrated for 2 years that he has overcome "any" issues. His performance off the field has been as good as any player to ever play my friend. Sometimes people do overcome their environment. Troy has set the bar very high for all athletes. Especilly those challenged the way he was growing up. You want to say he's lacking top shelf skills and I'd say you're right. But one the things you can't argue is his character.He has some potential I'll admit that, but the only year he has been called upon, to open up the offense and get away from traditional Ohio State football was this season, and I dont think he made the most of his chances, he made quite a few dumb mistakes against UM that you wouldnt expect from someone that has been in the system that long. As for his other big game against UF, well you know the story. He's also a malcontent off the field, he got arrested for punching a woman right before he attended OSU, and he also accepted money from a booster.If the point by Lhucks is that being shorter will make it harder for him to succeed than we can all agree. But he's left the impression that he's "too short" which what he said in his first post. Clearly he has not watched Troy play. You really can't say someone is "too short" and leave it at that. You have to at least take a look at what he's doen and evaluate him from a player perspective, not height. I've provided many examples of people that have succeeded that are shorter than Troy. A few have even had HOF careers. If anyone watched all the games Troy played, as I have, then you can clearly see he's been able to overcome the height issues and play extremely well especially in big games. That doesn't mean he will be a good NFL QB although I think he will fairly well.I will go on record and say this. If Troy fails as a QB it will not be because of his height. It will be because he's not a good QB.
Troy out played in Stanton in the Elite 11 camps. Many regarded Stanton as the better QB before that camp.I like Sean Baca's comments on the Raiders taking Calvin Johnson and then _hoping_ Troy Smith is there in the 2nd. Actually, this is my hope for the Lions one pick later in each round. I think the Lions would be better served taking the proverbial BPA (non-QB) with the 2nd overall or even moving down a few slots if the right deal presents itself, then take Troy in the 2nd. I prefer Troy over Drew Stanton myself.. but having watched Stanton in person since he was a 10th grader.. I wouldn't mind seeing the former Harrison Hawk join the Lions either. For his sake, I hope he goes elsewhere though.![]()
Then you and Lhucks don't agree. No one suggested Troy was a top shelf prospect. 2nd to 3rd round is about right and where most experts expect him to go. He has some upside. If given the chance I think he could do decently. But I would be surprised somewhat if he did real well. You're right in that there's a lot to be learned at the pro level. Height isn't one of them however.I am a Big Ten fan and I actually agree with LHUCKS. I've watched just about every OSU game and Troy Smith is not a top shelf NFL prospect. I would put a third round grade on him based on his skillset. He is not close to a Vince Young type of talent. I do like the fact that he is a big game type of player. But there are a lot of holes in his game. He will be a project for any NFL team and I would be suprised if he went earlier than the late 2nd round.What's interesting to me is that I know you probably haven't watched him play because you hate the BIG TEN and OSU. So what exactly are you basing your analisys on?![]()
Stanton will be the best QB of this class.Agree with everybody who likes Stanton over Smith.
I really think both of these QB are potential steals in the 2nd round. I love Stanton's physical attributes as much as the next guy. I watched him play on Friday nights for three years at the local HS. Athletically, he reminds me very much of Mark Brunell at the same age. He played safety and, as a freshman at MSU, John L Smith took a lot of heat when Stanton was playing on the kickoff coverage team and hurt his knee. He's NOT afraid of contact and he can play a bit wreckless at times. That's what worries me about him. That, and I thought he'd do even better than he did at MSU than he did. Quite honestly, he disappointed me last year. He melted down between the ears a bit too often, but I still think - with some good coaching and the right team - he could easily be the best QB in this class. I don't doubt him for a second. MSU was just plain wretched this year. Stanton was just about the only reason that I tuned in to watch them every week. He made Michigan look as bad as Troy Smith did, especially a few years ago in the OT/Braylon Edwards game. If he didn't get hurt in that game, it's unlikely Michigan would've won.Having watched Smith play a ton, too.. I think he's got "it". I know that's cliche, but as a Wolverine fan, it pained me watching him play for the other team each Saturday. I've seen some special performances in the big house in the past twenty years and what Smith did to Michigan (and the other teams too) ranks up there with the best. What he does at the next level remains to be seen, but I like what he brings to the table and I think he'll be fine.. just fine. The essence of what I was saying originally is that I'd much rather swing for the fences with a Calvin Johnson, Adrian Peterson or even Joe Thomas and take my chances with Smith/Stanton than I would going for Quinn/Russell at the top of the first. And just being honest, I'm not sure if either one fits Mike Martz' offense perfectly, but both could be great values in the 2nd round and decent fantasy QBs some day, too.Family Matters said:Troy out played in Stanton in the Elite 11 camps. Many regarded Stanton as the better QB before that camp.Bob Henry said:I like Sean Baca's comments on the Raiders taking Calvin Johnson and then _hoping_ Troy Smith is there in the 2nd. Actually, this is my hope for the Lions one pick later in each round. I think the Lions would be better served taking the proverbial BPA (non-QB) with the 2nd overall or even moving down a few slots if the right deal presents itself, then take Troy in the 2nd. I prefer Troy over Drew Stanton myself.. but having watched Stanton in person since he was a 10th grader.. I wouldn't mind seeing the former Harrison Hawk join the Lions either. For his sake, I hope he goes elsewhere though.![]()
Solid post Bob. It's nice to see honest feedback instead of the lens colored homer hate that's been witnessed in this thread.Like you I feel both have a good chance to earn roster spots and play in the NFL. Not sure where I think either fits as a star. I can agree that both can be stars but I guess I feel that it is more likely they will do average rather than star in the NFL. I hope I'm wrong because I'd love to see both of these guys succeed. From a strategy standpoint I like your thinking. Get the star WR/OL and take a chance with one of these guys. A good QB coach can make them better. A couple of great WR's can make them better. A great line gives them a real chance at success. I'll take Thomas and Smith and over many other options available in the draft.I really think both of these QB are potential steals in the 2nd round. I love Stanton's physical attributes as much as the next guy. I watched him play on Friday nights for three years at the local HS. Athletically, he reminds me very much of Mark Brunell at the same age. He played safety and, as a freshman at MSU, John L Smith took a lot of heat when Stanton was playing on the kickoff coverage team and hurt his knee. He's NOT afraid of contact and he can play a bit wreckless at times. That's what worries me about him. That, and I thought he'd do even better than he did at MSU than he did. Quite honestly, he disappointed me last year. He melted down between the ears a bit too often, but I still think - with some good coaching and the right team - he could easily be the best QB in this class. I don't doubt him for a second. MSU was just plain wretched this year. Stanton was just about the only reason that I tuned in to watch them every week. He made Michigan look as bad as Troy Smith did, especially a few years ago in the OT/Braylon Edwards game. If he didn't get hurt in that game, it's unlikely Michigan would've won.Having watched Smith play a ton, too.. I think he's got "it". I know that's cliche, but as a Wolverine fan, it pained me watching him play for the other team each Saturday. I've seen some special performances in the big house in the past twenty years and what Smith did to Michigan (and the other teams too) ranks up there with the best. What he does at the next level remains to be seen, but I like what he brings to the table and I think he'll be fine.. just fine. The essence of what I was saying originally is that I'd much rather swing for the fences with a Calvin Johnson, Adrian Peterson or even Joe Thomas and take my chances with Smith/Stanton than I would going for Quinn/Russell at the top of the first. And just being honest, I'm not sure if either one fits Mike Martz' offense perfectly, but both could be great values in the 2nd round and decent fantasy QBs some day, too.Family Matters said:Troy out played in Stanton in the Elite 11 camps. Many regarded Stanton as the better QB before that camp.Bob Henry said:I like Sean Baca's comments on the Raiders taking Calvin Johnson and then _hoping_ Troy Smith is there in the 2nd. Actually, this is my hope for the Lions one pick later in each round. I think the Lions would be better served taking the proverbial BPA (non-QB) with the 2nd overall or even moving down a few slots if the right deal presents itself, then take Troy in the 2nd. I prefer Troy over Drew Stanton myself.. but having watched Stanton in person since he was a 10th grader.. I wouldn't mind seeing the former Harrison Hawk join the Lions either. For his sake, I hope he goes elsewhere though.![]()