FitzAJMossCJSmithColstonWayneWhiteJenningsBoldinpretty much no changes since preseason
What he saidWithout that one TD pass he wouldn't even be a footnote.thehornet said:Bowe deserves to be in there.
What if he had two?Without that one TD pass he wouldn't even be a footnote.thehornet said:Bowe deserves to be in there.
I could easily see taking White out of the top 10 Fantasy WR at this point. Perhaps not Talent-wise though. Two weeks in, and the impact of Gonzo in White is most certainly evident.I think Ocho and Vincent Jackson are fighting to be in that list .. not ready to demote Jennings or White or anyone else, but so far, those two look as good as most of these guys.
Well said. I like Vincent Jackson a lot but I'm not sure he'll maintain his numbers when the softer part of the schedule hits in the middle eight games. There's a lot of games that San Diego should be leading throughout. Now it's possible San Diego throws to get the lead, but even then they are unlikely to throw all game long. I guess what I'm saying is that I expect his numbers to go down when San Diego leads games. In their two games so far, they've led for fewer than 15 minutes combined.I think Ocho and Vincent Jackson are fighting to be in that list .. not ready to demote Jennings or White or anyone else, but so far, those two look as good as most of these guys.
i thought the same thing but he's still top 10 in targets, which surprised me. i just posted a thread on this. his yards are down, but 20 targets is indication that his yards will come up and his scores should be there.i think he's actually a good buy candidate right now. owners that don't pay attention to targets, especially in non-ppr leagues, may be more willing to sell him.I could easily see taking White out of the top 10 Fantasy WR at this point. Perhaps not Talent-wise though. Two weeks in, and the impact of Gonzo in White is most certainly evident.I think Ocho and Vincent Jackson are fighting to be in that list .. not ready to demote Jennings or White or anyone else, but so far, those two look as good as most of these guys.
Mimo said:Anonymous Internet User said:FitzAJMossCJSmithColstonWayneWhiteJenningsBoldinpretty much no changes since preseasonWhat he said

Odd. As the #2 receiving option, wouldn't it stand to reason that Jackson would be a big part of them leading throughout? Also, I think that assessment is overestimating the Chargers D by a wide margin.Well said. I like Vincent Jackson a lot but I'm not sure he'll maintain his numbers when the softer part of the schedule hits in the middle eight games. There's a lot of games that San Diego should be leading throughout. Now it's possible San Diego throws to get the lead, but even then they are unlikely to throw all game long. I guess what I'm saying is that I expect his numbers to go down when San Diego leads games. In their two games so far, they've led for fewer than 15 minutes combined.I think Ocho and Vincent Jackson are fighting to be in that list .. not ready to demote Jennings or White or anyone else, but so far, those two look as good as most of these guys.
I'm not sure he's #2 anymore, I'd say he's #1. I am basing my evaluation on the less than stellar offenses I see on the Chargers schedule from games 5-12 and on the premise that teams with the lead will tend to run the ball more than throw it. It's possible San Diego continues to throw, but that has not traditionally been the Norv Turner way. Last season, including the playoffs, Jackson scored five of his eight TDs in the nine Charger losses. In the nine Charger wins, Jackson scored only three TDs. One of the three TDs came in the miracle win in KC (onside kick, two TDs in the last two minutes). There's a lot of reasons that the numbers worked out that way, but that's part of the logic behind my statement. I still see Jackson top 15 but I could see TDs keeping him out of the top ten. Splitting hairs, really, as he's a guy I want on my roster in any format.Odd. As the #2 receiving option, wouldn't it stand to reason that Jackson would be a big part of them leading throughout? Also, I think that assessment is overestimating the Chargers D by a wide margin.Well said. I like Vincent Jackson a lot but I'm not sure he'll maintain his numbers when the softer part of the schedule hits in the middle eight games. There's a lot of games that San Diego should be leading throughout. Now it's possible San Diego throws to get the lead, but even then they are unlikely to throw all game long. I guess what I'm saying is that I expect his numbers to go down when San Diego leads games. In their two games so far, they've led for fewer than 15 minutes combined.I think Ocho and Vincent Jackson are fighting to be in that list .. not ready to demote Jennings or White or anyone else, but so far, those two look as good as most of these guys.
What if he had two?Without that one TD pass he wouldn't even be a footnote.thehornet said:Bowe deserves to be in there.

Jake Delhomme is the exact same QB he's always been, and Steve Smith has *ALWAYS* averaged 100 yards per game when Jake Delhomme is starting. This year looks to be no exception, as Smiff leads the league in targets with 14 a game (which would work out to an obscene 224 over a full season- don't expect that number to hold up). Delhomme's a poor NFL QB, but he has the biggest case of tunnel vision I have *EVER* seen, and he turns his #1 WR into a fantasy uberstud.ft_ball_fan said:Interesting... with a putrid Delhomme at QB I don't have Smith in the top 5--probably would put him at the bottom of the top 10... and I put Colston up there higher w/his 3 TD's and awesome QB play from Brees. Not saying this is based on talent but on prospects for a solid FF year...
I think people underestimate how good of a QB Rivers is. I think he ends up the #2 fantasy QB and Jackson will benefit and end up a top 5 WR. I look for Manningham to keep his job and be a top 10 WR. Santonio Holmes will all be a top 5 WR.Well said. I like Vincent Jackson a lot but I'm not sure he'll maintain his numbers when the softer part of the schedule hits in the middle eight games. There's a lot of games that San Diego should be leading throughout. Now it's possible San Diego throws to get the lead, but even then they are unlikely to throw all game long. I guess what I'm saying is that I expect his numbers to go down when San Diego leads games. In their two games so far, they've led for fewer than 15 minutes combined.I think Ocho and Vincent Jackson are fighting to be in that list .. not ready to demote Jennings or White or anyone else, but so far, those two look as good as most of these guys.
he has a TD each gameWithout that one TD pass he wouldn't even be a footnote.thehornet said:Bowe deserves to be in there.
Delhomme played pretty well against the Falcons this past weekend.ft_ball_fan said:Interesting... with a putrid Delhomme at QB I don't have Smith in the top 5--probably would put him at the bottom of the top 10...
I agree. He faced Balt the 1st game and the best CB in football in the 2nd. Gets much easier from here on out.thehornet said:Bowe deserves to be in there.
Your joking right? no change? Please....Colston at the top BAR none...I've been saying it, even before his 3 tds already!Colston could double his output this week!And when you have a QB who is on fire like he is, how can you not bump up Colston!Moss has no TD's and Jennings put up a 0! Granted still good but would u take either before Colston or even S. Holmes?And after WEEK 2 (which I thought this thread was), u have to do it right and throw Manningham in there!Mimo said:Anonymous Internet User said:FitzAJMossCJSmithColstonWayneWhiteJenningsBoldinpretty much no changes since preseasonWhat he said
![]()
i think Brees spreads the ball around to much, Colston only has 15 targets in 2 games but he is catching 78% of his targets. I think he is top 10 not top 5Your joking right? no change? Please....Colston at the top BAR none...I've been saying it, even before his 3 tds already!Colston could double his output this week!And when you have a QB who is on fire like he is, how can you not bump up Colston!Moss has no TD's and Jennings put up a 0! Granted still good but would u take either before Colston or even S. Holmes?And after WEEK 2 (which I thought this thread was), u have to do it right and throw Manningham in there!Mimo said:Anonymous Internet User said:FitzAJMossCJSmithColstonWayneWhiteJenningsBoldinpretty much no changes since preseasonWhat he said
![]()
Is that the same Matt Moore who QB'd the last three games of the 2007 season, in which Steve Smith went 22-257-1?Or is that a different Matt Moore?Leaving off S. Smith Carolina because they could well be 1-7 or 2-6 at the halfway point of the season, and switch to Moore at QB. That will kill Smith's value.
Top Fantasy Recievers 20091. Coleson2. R. Wayne3. AJ4. S. Holmes5. V. Jackson6. R. Moss7. Fritz8. CJ9. Smtih10. Manningham
After 2 games, you're going to crown Colston #1???Maybe he has cracked the top 10, but number 1??!!!And Manningham doesn't belong there just yet, lets see if he can keep it up first.Wasnt that the Question?Read before you post!Top Fantasy Recievers 2009
1. Coleson
2. R. Wayne
3. AJ
4. S. Holmes
5. V. Jackson
6. R. Moss
7. Fritz
8. CJ
9. Smtih
10. Manningham![]()
After 2 games, you're going to crown Colston #1???
Maybe he has cracked the top 10, but number 1??!!!
And Manningham doesn't belong there just yet, lets see if he can keep it up first.
I think Brees is going to throw for 5000 yards and around 35 TDs with Colston being the first guy he looks at. This is not about being the most talented in the NFL, this is about scoring fantasy points. I think Colston, V Jackson, S. Holmes, and Manningham's stocks have sky rocketed.After 2 games, you're going to crown Colston #1???Maybe he has cracked the top 10, but number 1??!!!And Manningham doesn't belong there just yet, lets see if he can keep it up first.
Doesn't matter which Matt Moore it is. As long as John Fox is still the coach and Delhomme has the ridiculous contract, Delhomme is the starting QB. if he's healthy. 2-6, 6-2, 4-4. Doesn't matter. Not saying Fox won't pull him mid game if he puts up another 4 pick disaster, but he'll roll him right back out there the following week. Fox's ### is on the line to win. I doubt very highly that if someone put a gun to his head and told him "Win, or we pull the trigger!" that he'd pick Matt Moore or A.J. Feeley over Jake.As mentioned....I don't think there's a QB with a harsher case of tunnel vision for his #1 target than Delhomme.Is that the same Matt Moore who QB'd the last three games of the 2007 season, in which Steve Smith went 22-257-1?Or is that a different Matt Moore?Leaving off S. Smith Carolina because they could well be 1-7 or 2-6 at the halfway point of the season, and switch to Moore at QB. That will kill Smith's value.
Top Fantasy Recievers 2009
1. Coleson
2. R. Wayne
3. AJ
4. S. Holmes
5. V. Jackson
6. R. Moss
7. Fritz
8. CJ
9. Smtih
10. Manningham
First off AJ is #1..PERIOD!, Next you gotta take Fitz, then Id say Wayne, THEN I can see a case for COLSTON maybe at #4. I like VJax and he's on a tear but he's doing great with avg targets. I think he's #1 in yds/rec if you compare to any other WR that has at least 4 catches a game..? Here's my assumption after 2 weeks:1. AJWow... one bad game and Moss is out of the Top 10?Andre JohnsonReggie WayneGreg JenningsMarques ColstonCalvin JohnsonRoddy WhiteVincent JacksonDwayne BoweSantonio HolmesLarry Fitzgerald
Moss is #11 on my board currently. Don't get me wrong, I don't have him at 37th or anything. I'll admit, 11 could be several notches too low. Wouldn't raise an eyebrow if he finished top 5. For whatever reason, Brady isn't "right" yet. Merely an acknowlegement of that fact.Wow... one bad game and Moss is out of the Top 10?Andre JohnsonReggie WayneGreg JenningsMarques ColstonCalvin JohnsonRoddy WhiteVincent JacksonDwayne BoweSantonio HolmesLarry Fitzgerald
Especially if you get points for return yardage/TDs or if you are in a big-play league.DeSean Jackson is knocking on the door
You're right, Moore did well with Smith the last three games of 2007. I had Smith that year, and missed the playoffs, so those games didn't stick in my memory. It was the 9 weeks of Carr/Testaverde holding Smith to the constant 4-40-0 lines that burned in memory.Smith will be fine with any half-competent QB, you're right.The Jerk said:Is that the same Matt Moore who QB'd the last three games of the 2007 season, in which Steve Smith went 22-257-1?Or is that a different Matt Moore?Sylira21 said:Leaving off S. Smith Carolina because they could well be 1-7 or 2-6 at the halfway point of the season, and switch to Moore at QB. That will kill Smith's value.
Smith will be fine with any half-competent QB, you're right.
The scary part is that I had to think about who in Carolina is up to that designation. 
Boldin is not top 10 right now, Steve Smith is, though.I think there is a lot of overreacting in here thus far. I can't believe how low the Cardinals WRs are.1.Fitzgerald2.Calvin3.AJ4.Wayne5.Boldin6.Colston7.Jennings8.Moss9.White10.V-JaxJust missed: Smith, DeSean, Bowe
No KC receiver should be in there with their QB situation.Bowe deserves to be in there.
Both Fitz and Boldin in the top 5 this year is an absolute PIPE DREAM. The Cards defense is improved, their running game will "be improved" and Kurt Warner is old. The Cards passing game you see right now is it. There are no 400 yd. 4-5 TD aces up the sleeve here. Warner at QB 14 is the reality of this situation at almost the best case scenario. And that's not an overreaction to two weeks, I've felt that way since May.travdogg said:I think there is a lot of overreacting in here thus far. I can't believe how low the Cardinals WRs are.1.Fitzgerald2.Calvin3.AJ4.Wayne5.Boldin6.Colston7.Jennings8.Moss9.White10.V-JaxJust missed: Smith, DeSean, Bowe
Bounce Calvin Johnson way the hell out of there too then.bcr8f said:No KC receiver should be in there with their QB situation.Bowe deserves to be in there.
DeSean Jackson is knocking on the door

He's in with Kolb. With McNabb?
You're saying McNabb is a downgrade? Both TDs from Kolb were mid-range catch and runs. Pretty sure he can do that with anyone.The two best games of his career have come with Kolb in back to back games. That's what I'm saying. With the exception of TO, receivers running routs for McNabb have been worthless. Granted, most of them have sucked, but the list of receivers with receptions in a McNabb game is typically ten deep, and he typically doesn't throw for 350-400 yards like Kolb is doing. The nature of Jackson's TD catches doesn't mean anything. I hope Jackson flourishes with McNabb, I just don't have as much confidence that he will. If you told me Kolb was going to behind center for year, I'd say Jackson has a very strong chance to be in the top ten at the end of the year because they've shown in two consecutive weeks something that Jackson and McNabb have never really shown save for a few flashes.He's in with Kolb. With McNabb?You're saying McNabb is a downgrade? Both TDs from Kolb were mid-range catch and runs. Pretty sure he can do that with anyone.