Please don't tell Shick!
Yeah, that's the goal. Win a championship so half of their team can retire.They have been my '06 pick to win the Super Bowl since SBXL ended.Chiefs are clearly in "win now" mode IMO
Law is an excellent tackler. He will make a great safety in the coming seasons.Guess they plan to move him to safety if he's going to play for more than 2 seasons.
Prepare yourselves. Expect a dramatic rise in warnings/suspensions/bannings tomorrow. The carnage may be horrific.Please don't tell Shick!
What is the joke? :whoosh:Prepare yourselves. Expect a dramatic rise in warnings/suspensions/bannings tomorrow. The carnage may be horrific.Please don't tell Shick!![]()
My Seahawks have a gapping hole at cornerback. I see serious issues at corner (rookie starter in Jennings) and safety (Hamelin healthy?). Frustrating when your team is on the edge of being a serious contender, but fail to make the one obvious move that could help them secure an elite defense.What is the joke? :whoosh:Prepare yourselves. Expect a dramatic rise in warnings/suspensions/bannings tomorrow. The carnage may be horrific.Please don't tell Shick!![]()
bah, pass rushers can make DBs look good. See Jets since Aaron Glenn left with Abe rushing the passer or the Giants DBs before this year.My Seahawks have a gapping hole at cornerback. I see serious issues at corner (rookie starter in Jennings) and safety (Hamelin healthy?). Frustrating when your team is on the edge of being a serious contender, but fail to make the one obvious move that could help them secure an elite defense.
Seattle lead the league in sacks last season, but I see very little chance of that happening again.bah, pass rushers can make DBs look good. See Jets since Aaron Glenn left with Abe rushing the passer or the Giants DBs before this year.My Seahawks have a gapping hole at cornerback. I see serious issues at corner (rookie starter in Jennings) and safety (Hamelin healthy?). Frustrating when your team is on the edge of being a serious contender, but fail to make the one obvious move that could help them secure an elite defense.
Plus Peterson?See Jacksonville. You don't need corners to have a shut down defense. Of course, once in a while stuff like this might happen.Seattle lead the league in sacks last season, but I see very little chance of that happening again.bah, pass rushers can make DBs look good. See Jets since Aaron Glenn left with Abe rushing the passer or the Giants DBs before this year.My Seahawks have a gapping hole at cornerback. I see serious issues at corner (rookie starter in Jennings) and safety (Hamelin healthy?). Frustrating when your team is on the edge of being a serious contender, but fail to make the one obvious move that could help them secure an elite defense.
Excellent tackler? (link courtesy of Wiener Dog)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhgcI5or5ck&search=ty%20lawLaw is an excellent tackler. He will make a great safety in the coming seasons.Guess they plan to move him to safety if he's going to play for more than 2 seasons.
Something the Chiefs needed... sleeper in the AFC...
Are saying that adding Ty Law was going to make them worse? Not only were they good enough to be a super bowl defense, they were good enough to win in the super bowl. Did they win? No. Did the embarrass the Pittsburgh offense for the majority of the game? Yes. When did they get their initial first down in that game?Shick!...elite defense? Seahawks? C'mon now...put that crackpipe down...they will return to mediocrity on defense this season.
Nope...would shore up a gaping hole on an elite defense in the making. Shick!, my opinion is the Seadogs played a little over their head on defense ;ast season...I expect them to drop a bit on defense...I think Carolina has a potential elite defense as does Washington...both team made big strides and improved their team.Are saying that adding Ty Law was going to make them worse? Not only were they good enough to be a super bowl defense, they were good enough to win in the super bowl. Did they win? No. Did the embarrass the Pittsburgh offense for the majority of the game? Yes. When did they get their initial first down in that game?Shick!...elite defense? Seahawks? C'mon now...put that crackpipe down...they will return to mediocrity on defense this season.
This must be read with some caution, but, if true, it's about what I expected (and hoped for); a good deal for the Chiefs.Good signing for my Chiefs. As stated, the full verdict can be given when the details of the contract are known.
DETAILS ON LAW DEAL
We've obtained from a league source specific information regarding the first two years of cornerback Ty Law's contract with the Chiefs.
As we suspected, it's no bell ringer.
Law got $4 million to sign, and will be paid a $1 million base salary in 2006. (As a vested veteran, his base salary is fully guaranteed if he's on the Week One roster.)
In 2007, there's a $1 million option bonus due in March, a $3 million base salary, and a $1 million roster bonus.
This leaves a whopping $25 million over the last three years of the deal -- and it's highly unlikely that Law will ever see that money.
For now, then, it's a one-year deal with a team option for year two. And kudos to the Chiefs for pushing the bigger hit in 2007 deeper into the league year. As a result, the Chiefs can choose to pay the $1 million option bonus in March and squat on Law's rights before making a decision in August as to whether he merits the remaining $4 million that he's due to receive in 2007.
The better deal for Ty would have been to require the Chiefs to fish or cut cheese on day one of the league year, via a $4 million roster or option bonus. Then, if the Chiefs had opted not to keep him, Law would have been on the free-agent market early (at which time his agents would have demanded too much money, no one would have been interested, and he would have signed another deal like this one in late July).
Still, it's not as if Law and his agents had much leverage to force the decision day into March. We're told that they made a last-ditch effort to shop the deal in search of something better, but generated no interest.
Wouldn't that require some sort of tackling?Law is a good cover guy, his tackling skills aren't the best though.Called this a long time ago![]()
Guess they plan to move him to safety if he's going to play for more than 2 seasons.
I don't know. One SportsCenter highlight of him missing a tackle doesn't out-do all the years of very solid tackling from the cornerback position.Law's always been known as the physical, rough-and-ready type who's not afraid to hit; he's not just a cover guy.Wouldn't that require some sort of tackling?
Law is a good cover guy, his tackling skills aren't the best though.
Well he certainly wouldn't downgrade the FS positionWouldn't that require some sort of tackling?Law is a good cover guy, his tackling skills aren't the best though.Called this a long time ago![]()
Guess they plan to move him to safety if he's going to play for more than 2 seasons.
Kudos to the Chiefs. That's a great move when factoring in the contract. I can't believe that's all Law got and his agent really shafted him by not bending earlier in the year when so many teams had $ available. On a sidenote I can't believe SD couldn't have offered him a better deal than this for one season. It's not like Jammer or Florence have been world beaters and they've had plenty of chances. Cromartie is a rookie and has an injury risk. A contract like this should have been a no-brainer for SD. Any one of those three guys with Law would have been a much better CB combination than any CB combination in SD since....... when was it they won the AFL title?Law got $4 million to sign, and will be paid a $1 million base salary in 2006. (As a vested veteran, his base salary is fully guaranteed if he's on the Week One roster.)In 2007, there's a $1 million option bonus due in March, a $3 million base salary, and a $1 million roster bonus.This leaves a whopping $25 million over the last three years of the deal -- and it's highly unlikely that Law will ever see that money.
So because LT2 puts an amazing move on him he's not a good tackler?Excellent tackler? (link courtesy of Wiener Dog)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhgcI5or5ck&search=ty%20lawLaw is an excellent tackler. He will make a great safety in the coming seasons.Guess they plan to move him to safety if he's going to play for more than 2 seasons.
I saw every play Law participated in last year. At least twice, thanks to TIVO. last year I didn't see a CB who was a good tackler, but he was overweight and his foot was still giving him trouble. Now that he's down to 208, and in better shape, he may improve, but last year, IMHO, he was not a good tackler. Average at best.So because LT2 puts an amazing move on him he's not a good tackler?Excellent tackler? (link courtesy of Wiener Dog)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhgcI5or5ck&search=ty%20lawLaw is an excellent tackler. He will make a great safety in the coming seasons.Guess they plan to move him to safety if he's going to play for more than 2 seasons.![]()
When he played for BB he could tackle and did. Is it a coaching prob or a too good for that attitude problem?I saw every play Law participated in last year. At least twice, thanks to TIVO. last year I didn't see a CB who was a good tackler, but he was overweight and his foot was still giving him trouble. Now that he's down to 208, and in better shape, he may improve, but last year, IMHO, he was not a good tackler. Average at best.