What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

UFC wagering: no longer stuck with the old thread title. The window to change it is here! (8 Viewers)

As for Ralek, i have only seen highlights of his fights, but he seems to be dedicated to MMA and actually enjoy (as opposed to some of the other Gracie;s out there). I think a Hansen-Diaz parlay is the smartest way to go and i want to jump over to betus to see if i can get that in before it closes (yuck, i just put up $40 to win $20 parlaying those 2. that was the entire balance i had left at betus). I do agree Roger looked like he at least wanted to be there, but i do not think i will be too anxious to bet on him if the lines continue to be as they were for his fight with Randleman.
i won't ruin for those who didn't see the Dream event, but my boy Shiavello during Ralek's fight was :sadbanana: . he does a great job of being entertaining without being annoying
 
:shrug: I needed that Brilz win to make up for the Diego debacle. Brilz definately should have got the decision there, but he also could have done more to help his cause.

I really seem to be on the wrong end of the bad decisions most of the time. getting old, but oh well. Should feel a lot worse for Brilz who actually got robbed instead of myself who just lost some money

 
holy ####, nog won?!?

sopcast, torrent, and tvu all went out. F'in dana and his cronies figured out how to zap 'em i guess.

how could anyone watching that fight think that nog won?

 
I lost the link? Brilz lost? OMG you can't be ####### serious. What a joke
UFC going the way of boxing.
no kidding, you think silva and dana want nog to get his title shot?
it's the commissions that appoint the judges, not the UFC. Plenty of times the UFC has come out and said the judging was wrong, and i'm pretty sure they will make it up toi Brilz in some way (favorable opponent, another spot on the main card, etc.)
 
I lost the link? Brilz lost? OMG you can't be ####### serious. What a joke
UFC going the way of boxing.
no kidding, you think silva and dana want nog to get his title shot?
it's the commissions that appoint the judges, not the UFC. Plenty of times the UFC has come out and said the judging was wrong, and i'm pretty sure they will make it up toi Brilz in some way (favorable opponent, another spot on the main card, etc.)
what was Joe's reaction to the "win" for LiL Nog?
 
I lost the link? Brilz lost? OMG you can't be ####### serious. What a joke
UFC going the way of boxing.
no kidding, you think silva and dana want nog to get his title shot?
it's the commissions that appoint the judges, not the UFC. Plenty of times the UFC has come out and said the judging was wrong, and i'm pretty sure they will make it up toi Brilz in some way (favorable opponent, another spot on the main card, etc.)
what was Joe's reaction to the "win" for LiL Nog?
Thought he got robbed. so did the crowd. so did I
 
I lost the link? Brilz lost? OMG you can't be ####### serious. What a joke
UFC going the way of boxing.
no kidding, you think silva and dana want nog to get his title shot?
it's the commissions that appoint the judges, not the UFC. Plenty of times the UFC has come out and said the judging was wrong, and i'm pretty sure they will make it up toi Brilz in some way (favorable opponent, another spot on the main card, etc.)
thanks for the administrative lesson Mr Wizard, but the concept still applies. Big fights are good for the UFC, they're good for the commissions, and they're good for anyone with their hands in the coffers
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top