Interesting.
Every last one of you ignored this part of the article:
"If Donovan wasn't hurt our record would probably be better," Owens said Thursday night.
Clear case of sensationalizing a story for ESPN. TO is a clown, but it doesn't help that every writer wants to break "the story" about TO.
Sorry, I don't get why you think that's terribly important. The pertinent part of the interview is comparing the effectiveness of an injured McNabb vs. an injured Favre, and he says they'd be undefeated with an injured Favre. What does that have to do with how they'd fare with a healthy McNabb?
Irvin, an ESPN analyst, had said that the Eagles would be better off with Green Bay's Brett Favre at quarterback, and in some respects, Owens agreed.
"He's a guy, obviously, a number of commentators will say he's a warrior, he plays with injuries," Owens said of Favre. "I just feel like [with] him being knowledgable about the quarterback position, I just feel like we'd probably be in a better situation."
Owens also was asked about how Donovan McNabb's injuries have affected the Eagles' performance this season.
"Our wins and losses are really predicated on how he plays," he said of McNabb.
"Everybody can point fingers at our defense, but it doesn't matter. Even when we were 28 [points] down [against Denver], I still had in the back of my mind that we could come back had our offense gotten in sync.
"I honestly feel with playmakers like myself, L.J. [smith], and obviously Brian Westbrook, that we could've gotten back in the game, and that we did.
"It's hard to win ball games when you have turnovers, and we had a turnover right when we were about to go in to probably tie the game. That killed our momentum and killed our drive."
Owens was referring to an interception thrown in the end zone by McNabb when the Eagles had cut the Broncos' lead to 28-21.
I agree that the media, ESPN moreso that most, sensationalize... but there's simply nothing to sensationalize about T.O.'s quotes. They speak for themselves.