What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

US Men's National Team (15 Viewers)

AAABatteries said:
Has Turner really done anything wrong for the USMNT?  I can't remember anything - at this point I'm sold and just hope he's getting minutes somewhere.
Click to expand...


The one big mistake he had in qualifying came at Canada when he did exactly what you should never do in a strong wind against you as he cleared the ball high and into the middle, where the wind killed the clearance and led directly to Canada's first goal.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
SpurrierisisGod said:
Ok ok.  You guys have convinced me to go back and watch the shot.  I'll admit I could be wrong.  I was on my 4th glass of wine... 

Yes, near post is #1 priority and he wasn't close.  To another point, yes, everybody that's played is thinking goal as an attacker. But it was from an angle that has such a ridiculously low scoring percentage that I warn my kids to cross that not shoot. Maybe that was going through whorebath's mind - no immediate threat to near post so I'll just chill.  But the way he played it gets my keeper benched the next game if not at half (granted it's high school so no sub limits).

Mud could've played a factor as movement would be limited. But IF it was a shot: 1. Kudos to the guy for recognizing in a millisecond to shoot and not cross. I mean, they are trained to look for stuff like that. 2. Boo on a national level keeper to not be in proper position.  I played for 30+ years and have coached for 26...99 times out of 100, that would be a cross. Again, I'll go rewatch and post once I figure out I was wrong (which it sounds like I will be).  Still of the belief that either way, subpar keeper moment.
Click to expand...
:goodposting:

Whether or not it was a cross or shot (looked like a shot to me), Horvath was out of position.   Cannon looked to have the cross blocked so to me it that makes the GK positioning even worse. However the mud may have been messing with his head which is why he was out.   

AAABatteries said:
Has Turner really done anything wrong for the USMNT?  I can't remember anything - at this point I'm sold and just hope he's getting minutes somewhere.
Click to expand...
Aside from moving to Arsenal?  Don't think so

BassNBrew said:
Something I've been struggling with that I would like some input on...

Which of the G's in GGG stands for GOAT?
Click to expand...
The GOAT or a goat?

 
Dani Alves will leave Barcelona when his contract expires this summer, the player confirmed on social media Wednesday.

The Brazilian right-back, 39, joined the club in November of 2021 on a free transfer and was a key part of the initial resurgence of Barcelona under Xavi Hernandez. He played in 14 LaLiga matches, scoring once with three assists upon his return to the club after six years away.

His contract was up at the end of the season and sources confirmed to ESPN that he was told on Wednesday it would not be renewed.

His six-month contract had been estimated to pay the LaLiga player minimum of 150,000 euros, in the club's efforts to stay under the league's salary cap.

Alves had previously stated his willingness to stay on for the 2022-23 season but sources have told ESPN that Barcelona are keen on signing Cesar Azpilicueta to reinforce the defence and they also have Sergino Dest at that spot.

Sources have told ESPN that Azpilicueta is keen on a move to Barca and Chelsea manager Thomas Tuchel said last month that negotiations are continuing. Barcelona are also weighing the future of Oscar Minguez and the club recently renewed the contract of Sergi Roberto.
Click to expand...

 
Steven Goff@SoccerInsider
A source familiar with the process says FIFA very likely chose Boston over Baltimore/DC for the final slot. #WorldCup2026
Click to expand...
So apparently FIFA agrees that Foxboro isn't a great venue.  I like to think Kraft > Snyder was the tie-break.

 
Dinsy Ejotuz said:
So apparently FIFA agrees that Foxboro isn't a great venue.  I like to think Kraft > Snyder was the tie-break.
Click to expand...


How was Snyder involved?  I thought the DC venue was pulled from the bid.

I don't like the choice of Foxboro over Baltimore at all.  The sport is simply more popular in that area of the country than it is up here.

The Krafts do have a certain way with people that seems to help them in these situations.

The only very minor upside here is that maybe this gives the Krafts another avenue via politicians and sponsors to get a soccer stadium built before I die.

 
NewlyRetired said:
How was Snyder involved?  I thought the DC venue was pulled from the bid.

I don't like the choice of Foxboro over Baltimore at all.  The sport is simply more popular in that area of the country than it is up here.

The Krafts do have a certain way with people that seems to help them in these situations.

The only very minor upside here is that maybe this gives the Krafts another avenue via politicians and sponsors to get a soccer stadium built before I die.
Click to expand...
DC doesn't have a venue worthy of a world cup because Dan Snyder took a crap stadium and made it worse.

Baltimore's stadium is really nice, but it just isn't a city of that caliber IMO.

I keep reading about "popular" and whatnot -- but this isn't DC United vs Cincy on a Wednesday night or Palace v Villa at 7:30am on a Saturday morning.  It's the world cup.  People are going to show up.

 
Dinsy Ejotuz said:
DC doesn't have a venue worthy of a world cup because Dan Snyder took a crap stadium and made it worse.

Baltimore's stadium is really nice, but it just isn't a city of that caliber IMO.

I keep reading about "popular" and whatnot -- but this isn't DC United vs Cincy on a Wednesday night or Palace v Villa at 7:30am on a Saturday morning.  It's the world cup.  People are going to show up.
Click to expand...


IMO, it has nothing to do with people showing up.  As you said they are always going to show up. 

For me, It is about rewarding areas of the country that have supported the sport.  Obviously FIFA does not give two ####s about such things.

 
AAABatteries said:
They didn’t even mention Bello in their write up, just listed him but then have him in the 26.  Bello was not that good in his chances but was horrible.  I’d say he was as good as Scally.  I think backup LB may be the hardest spot to pick.
Click to expand...
I agree.  I think if it was a for sure 23 man roster, then we wouldn't bring 2 left backs.  I think we do if it's a 26 man roster, but I still think Dest would be the assumed first choice backup at LB with Yedlin or Cannon(or whichever RB is chosen) playing RB if Jedi gets hurt/needs a rest etc.

 
NewlyRetired said:
IMO, it has nothing to do with people showing up.  As you said they are always going to show up. 

For me, It is about rewarding areas of the country that have supported the sport.  Obviously FIFA does not give two ####s about such things.
Click to expand...


IMO Denver got #####slapped for that pathetic Nations League game final game.  Even the Mexico fans didn't show in mass.

 
Ted Lange as your Bartender said:
i also think the high altitude was a huge factor against them.  Azteca is high altitude too but it’s unavoidable if Mexico is hosting games.  Denver isn’t unavoidable.
Click to expand...


Do you think Mexico will play one game at each of there home locations?

What do you think the turnout in Mexico will be for Cameroon v. Serbia?

 
Bryan Reynolds (remember him?) out on loan to... a newly promoted/likely bottom table team in Belgium's top flight.  Equivalent of a bad or very bad MLS team, more or less.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Roger Gonzalez

@RGonzalezCBS

Valencia, Southampton, Crystal Palace and others are after USMNT CB Chris Richards, according to our @jamesbenge.

 
Boom.  I just went to 538's datasets looking for club data and saw a file there with "intl" in the title.  Which is weird since they haven't published anything on their site re: international club ratings for a long time.

I downloaded it, and... it's current!  This will be a much better ranking system than FIFA or some of others out there.

So if Brazil is City or Liverpool, England are Spurs, the US and Mexico are good mid-table teams and Wales and Iran are lesser mid-table teams.

Something like West Ham vs Wolves on a neutral ground for our two winnable WC games.  And England are by no means out of reach for this squad.

Also, the two games vs Uruguay and Morocco show here as excellent tune ups.

  • rank name spi
  • 1 Brazil 94.26
  • 2 Spain 90.58
  • 3 Germany 90.05
  • 4 Portugal 89.34
  • 5 France 89.03
  • 6 Argentina 88.43
  • 7 Netherlands 86.89
  • 8 England 83.67
  • 9 Belgium 83.53
  • 10 Uruguay 82.64
  • 11 Denmark 81.84
  • 12 Italy 81.58
  • 13 Croatia 80.42
  • 14 Colombia 80.04
  • 15 Switzerland 78.53
  • 16 Mexico 78.17
  • 17 Morocco 77.85
  • 18 Ecuador 77.6
  • 19 USA 77.22
  • 20 Serbia 76.9
  • 27 Canada 73.52
  • 35 Wales 69.41
  • 37 Iran 69.16
  • 69 Costa Rica 54.47
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dinsy Ejotuz said:
Boom.  I just went to 538's datasets looking for club data and saw a file there with "intl" in the title.  Which is weird since they haven't published anything on their site re: international club ratings for a long time.

I downloaded it, and... it's current!  This will be a much better ranking system than FIFA or some of others out there.

  • rank name spi
  • 1 Brazil 94.26
  • 2 Spain 90.58
  • 3 Germany 90.05
  • 4 Portugal 89.34
  • 5 France 89.03
  • 6 Argentina 88.43
  • 7 Netherlands 86.89
  • 8 England 83.67
  • 9 Belgium 83.53
  • 10 Uruguay 82.64
  • 11 Denmark 81.84
  • 12 Italy 81.58
  • 13 Croatia 80.42
  • 14 Colombia 80.04
  • 15 Switzerland 78.53
  • 16 Mexico 78.17
  • 17 Morocco 77.85
  • 18 Ecuador 77.6
  • 19 USA 77.22
  • 20 Serbia 76.9
  • 27 Canada 73.52
  • 35 Wales 69.41
  • 37 Iran 69.16
  • 69 Costa Rica 54.47
Click to expand...


Don't need Italy in this list :(

 
had a meeting yesterday including our acoustical consultant from Mexico, who mentioned the word "puto".

I stopped the meeting in it's tracks and asked him directly exactly what the meaning/intent was behind the word.... because I had a Mexi-friend previously tell me the word is essentially meaningless, or the equivalent of yelling #####. He reinforced FIFA's verdict about it- ugly, hostile intent... even while saying it's something you might say to buddy to break their balls. 

tl;dr- it's the Mexican women's team's fault.

 
There is way too much to post but GGG threw out the first ball and sang at the Cubs game today.  Safe to say Watke and others are having a field day :)

 
Looks like there is some easy access streaming choices for the U20's if you don't want to watch in Spanish

====================

Brian Sciaretta

@BrianSciaretta

People have been asking about the U-20 CONCACAF tournament and TV viewing. The good news is that you can watch it. The U.S U-20’s group stages games will be streamed on CONCACAF’s Facebook page, app, and YouTube site. It will also be televised on @TUDNUSA.

 
NewlyRetired said:
Looks like there is some easy access streaming choices for the U20's if you don't want to watch in Spanish

====================

Brian Sciaretta

@BrianSciaretta

People have been asking about the U-20 CONCACAF tournament and TV viewing. The good news is that you can watch it. The U.S U-20’s group stages games will be streamed on CONCACAF’s Facebook page, app, and YouTube site. It will also be televised on @TUDNUSA.
Click to expand...
Schedule here. And viewing options.

Today at 4 vs St Kitts and Nevis is first match. 

Canada, then Cuba next.

Curious if Canada is also experiencing a tip of the iceberg for development.

 
Watching the U20 game on delay.

Some dicey reffing in the first 20. A non-foul against Caden around 10'...basically the same foul Nips was red carded on last game.

And then a US player is steamrolled in the box by a jumping opponent...clear as day foul/PK. But the ref called the foul on the US player. (Was overturned with VAR).

So far, it's what you'd expect. St Kitts looks like a rec league team doing everything in their power to stay with the pros of the US. Lacking shape, skill or fitness. But only 1-0 in the 25th.

 
Another very late VAR pk on a handball. Caden finishes (Cade finished the first one).

Cowell looks the most dangerous so far.

Also liking the holding MF/CB as well as their #16 (who's playing like a 10)

 
I am not even sure this qualifies as a light scrimmage but I guess you have to start some where. 

St Kitts does not look like they are even trying any more, although being down a TD and field goal can take the sting out of a game :)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
El Floppo said:
So far, it's what you'd expect. St Kitts looks like a rec league team
Click to expand...
The lack of sophistication is interesting. They looked like they were playing a 4-4-2, but completely flat across each line, with huge gaps everywhere, particular between the lines. The US MFs in particular seemed shocked at how much room and time they had every time they received a pass. 

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

snogger
I'm starting a new job and looking for insight on leading a team
Replies
37
Views
946
Phil Elliott
Phil Elliott
titusbramble
  • Poll Poll
2026 FIFA World Cup megathread
3 4 5
Replies
227
Views
4K
QuizGuy66
QuizGuy66
the moops
Taste test ideas
Replies
38
Views
501
bcat01
B

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 11 (members: 0, guests: 11)
Back
Top