According to nfl.com prospect profiles:What was Boldin's 40 time comming out of college? Wasn't that one of the reasons he fell so far in the draft?
CAMPUS AGILITY TESTS
4.47 in the 40-yard dash
COMBINE AGILITY TESTS
4.71 [in the 40-yard dash]
For every Boldin, there are a dozen guys who run slow and never amount to squat. I still like Jarrett. A lot of people compare him to Mike Williams, but I think he's a lot closer to Keyshawn. I expect him to be a pretty good player if he keeps his head on straight.What was Boldin's 40 time comming out of college? Wasn't that one of the reasons he fell so far in the draft?
I agree yet disagree.Superfast 40 times are overrated. Slow 40 times for skill positions are generally not.40 times are overrated...just can't be emphasized enough.
Anquan BoldinI agree yet disagree.Superfast 40 times are overrated. Slow 40 times for skill positions are generally not.40 times are overrated...just can't be emphasized enough.
There are exceptions to every rule. And he wasn't consistently slow, I don't think.Anquan BoldinI agree yet disagree.Superfast 40 times are overrated. Slow 40 times for skill positions are generally not.40 times are overrated...just can't be emphasized enough.![]()
I think it's important to recognize that 40 times don't always provide an accurate picture of game speed. Bernard Berrian plays extremely fast, but was only a 4.5 guy at the combine. Chad Johnson and Antonio Bryant were 4.6 guys. Johnnie Lee Higgins is considered one of the fastest WRs from this crop. He ran a 4.5. Running out of a track stance with track spikes and running routes with pads and football cleats on are two very different things. What's important is whether or not a guy plays fast. Jarrett doesn't play all that fast, but I think his speed is adequate.I agree yet disagree.Superfast 40 times are overrated. Slow 40 times for skill positions are generally not.40 times are overrated...just can't be emphasized enough.
I can agree with that. And I don't necessarily count 4.6 as slow. 4.7 and higher is a different matter.I think it's important to recognize that 40 times don't always provide an accurate picture of game speed. Bernard Berrian plays extremely fast, but was only a 4.5 guy at the combine. Chad Johnson and Antonio Bryant were 4.6 guys. Johnnie Lee Higgins is considered one of the fastest WRs from this crop. He ran a 4.5. Running out of a track stance with track spikes and running routes with pads and football cleats on are two very different things. What's important is whether or not a guy plays fast. Jarrett doesn't play all that fast, but I think his speed is adequate.I agree yet disagree.Superfast 40 times are overrated. Slow 40 times for skill positions are generally not.40 times are overrated...just can't be emphasized enough.
= first rounderFirst report from SC - 37" vertical...10'4" broad jump. The jump numbers are official and the first whisper on the 40 is a 4.62 but stay tuned to see if that's accurate.
= first rounderFirst report from SC - 37" vertical...10'4" broad jump. The jump numbers are official and the first whisper on the 40 is a 4.62 but stay tuned to see if that's accurate.
Borderline. If I were advising teams, I'd say don't take him before the 9th pick in the 2nd round.= first rounderFirst report from SC - 37" vertical...10'4" broad jump. The jump numbers are official and the first whisper on the 40 is a 4.62 but stay tuned to see if that's accurate.
Borderline. If I were advising teams, I'd say don't take him before the 9th pick in the 2nd round.= first rounderFirst report from SC - 37" vertical...10'4" broad jump. The jump numbers are official and the first whisper on the 40 is a 4.62 but stay tuned to see if that's accurate.![]()
In other words, I'd like him to be a Viking. Just not at 1.07.Can you picture the Vikings faithful if the team selected Adrian Peterson in the 1st and Jarrett in the 2nd. I would so totally wet myself.Borderline. If I were advising teams, I'd say don't take him before the 9th pick in the 2nd round.= first rounderFirst report from SC - 37" vertical...10'4" broad jump. The jump numbers are official and the first whisper on the 40 is a 4.62 but stay tuned to see if that's accurate.![]()
![]()
That's a big broad jump too, isn't it?BTW...that is a sweet vertical leap for Jarret's size.
yesThat's a big broad jump too, isn't it?BTW...that is a sweet vertical leap for Jarret's size.
If Jarrett falls to the 2nd i'll wet myself, but for a different reason, shock.In other words, I'd like him to be a Viking. Just not at 1.07.Can you picture the Vikings faithful if the team selected Adrian Peterson in the 1st and Jarrett in the 2nd. I would so totally wet myself.
a) That's a 1985 4.6, not a 2007 4.6.b) Just because you cited two WRs that have overcome what could be slow 40 times doesn't dispute anyone's claim that it is more difficult that slower WRs make it in the NFL, just that it isn't impossible.Lelie = 4.3Jerry Rice = 4.6![]()
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: MARCH 28At 11 a.m., Trojans coach Pete Carroll addressed all the NFL personnel present and discussed each player's strengths and weaknesses. He also showed video of wide receiver Dwayne Jarrett's catches -- the ones he made in practices, not games.The players ran on the FieldTurf practice field. For the 40-yard dash, they started from one of the goal lines and ran to the 40. The first couple of yards had a slight incline. There were some gusts of wind, but it is believed they did not affect the times.Dwayne Jarrett WR Jarrett (6-4, 214) ran his 40s in 4.67 and 4.62 seconds, the short shuttle in 4.20 and the three-cone drill in 7.28. He also had a 36½-inch vertical jump and a 10-foot-1 broad jump.
a) That's a 1985 4.6, not a 2007 4.6.b) Just because you cited two WRs that have overcome what could be slow 40 times doesn't dispute anyone's claim that it is more difficult that slower WRs make it in the NFL, just that it isn't impossible.Lelie = 4.3Jerry Rice = 4.6![]()
Agreed.You get S. Rice, I get Jarret.Just because you cited two WRs that have overcome what could be slow 40 times doesn't dispute anyone's claim that it is more difficult that slower WRs make it in the NFL, just that it isn't impossible.
Then he'll be a steal in the 2nd...I still think he goes in the first.Nope, sorry. That is NOT fast enough to keep him/move him into the first.
What were Colston's other numbers in comparison to Jarrett's numbers? .06 in the short shuttle is a rather large differanceJarrets short shuttle is .06 faster than Colston's.
Here ya go from NFLDraftscout:Marques Colston 6'4.5" 224...4.50 forty...37' vert...10'3 broad...4.44 shuttle...6.96 3 coneMike Williams 6'5 229...4.58 forty...38.5" vert...10'3 broad...4.23 shuttle...6.95 3 coneWhat were Colston's other numbers in comparison to Jarrett's numbers? .06 in the short shuttle is a rather large differanceJarrets short shuttle is .06 faster than Colston's.
LOL.... no deal!Agreed.You get S. Rice, I get Jarret.Just because you cited two WRs that have overcome what could be slow 40 times doesn't dispute anyone's claim that it is more difficult that slower WRs make it in the NFL, just that it isn't impossible.
Never said it was...just providing some food for thought.I just think the method you defended him (like the kid needs defending, he's fantastic) wasn't water tight.Agreed.You get S. Rice, I get Jarret.Just because you cited two WRs that have overcome what could be slow 40 times doesn't dispute anyone's claim that it is more difficult that slower WRs make it in the NFL, just that it isn't impossible.
I personally think it would be much better if the Bills were able to steal one of them in the 2nd round at 2.11.Agreed.You get S. Rice, I get Jarret.Just because you cited two WRs that have overcome what could be slow 40 times doesn't dispute anyone's claim that it is more difficult that slower WRs make it in the NFL, just that it isn't impossible.
So USC's LB is faster than USC's WR. Who would have thought that?Here are times according to an NFL scout in attendancewayne Jarrett: 4.62Oscar Lua: 4.85Chris McFoy: 4.67Ryan Powdrell: 4.90Dallas Sartz: 4.58
Boldin was also recovering from an injury - he ran a 4.55 before the injury.There are exceptions to every rule. And he wasn't consistently slow, I don't think.Anquan BoldinI agree yet disagree.Superfast 40 times are overrated. Slow 40 times for skill positions are generally not.40 times are overrated...just can't be emphasized enough.![]()
Exactly. Jarrett is fast enough to be productive in the NFL. Plus, he seemed to have good game speed to me. One example of this is how he consistently toasted the Michigan secondary last year. He might have trouble getting off the line of scrimmage in the pro's, but I'd be willing to bet he'll learn that.CJax was also pumped up last season after his freakish time - too much weight put into these things. If you want to argue that he won't be succesful due to his difficulty handling press coverage, fine - but a 40 time? I can't begin to agree unless you're running 4.7+
There is one difference Colston isn't fat and lazy.Santa Fe Trail said:Here ya go from NFLDraftscout:Marques Colston 6'4.5" 224...4.50 forty...37' vert...10'3 broad...4.44 shuttle...6.96 3 coneMike Williams 6'5 229...4.58 forty...38.5" vert...10'3 broad...4.23 shuttle...6.95 3 conebigreese82 said:What were Colston's other numbers in comparison to Jarrett's numbers? .06 in the short shuttle is a rather large differanceLHUCKS said:Jarrets short shuttle is .06 faster than Colston's.
I'm not sure if you are just trashing BMW, or comparing Colston to Jarrett.If the comparison to Jarrett - I don't know that it's justified considering that he hired a conditioning coach last year and noticeably added some "game speed" to his game (as seen in the second half of last year). Whoever gets this kid may end up getting a steal just because of the "average" 40 time.There is one difference Colston isn't fat and lazy.Santa Fe Trail said:Here ya go from NFLDraftscout:Marques Colston 6'4.5" 224...4.50 forty...37' vert...10'3 broad...4.44 shuttle...6.96 3 coneMike Williams 6'5 229...4.58 forty...38.5" vert...10'3 broad...4.23 shuttle...6.95 3 conebigreese82 said:What were Colston's other numbers in comparison to Jarrett's numbers? .06 in the short shuttle is a rather large differanceLHUCKS said:Jarrets short shuttle is .06 faster than Colston's.
I mentioned in the other "40 time" post, that you just don't see slow guys as elite receivers in the NFL. You just don't.I'ts not that blazing speed guarantees anything, it's just that if you don't have enough speed, it seems like you just have trouble being a truly elite receiver these days.Yeah, Boldin ran a slow 40 at the combine. So did Chad Johnson. And in both cases it caused them to slip (and made some teams look really silly). But that isn't really what we are talking about here. Johnson is a VERY fast guy. It is fairly obvious. In an interview before the combine, he was talking up his speed as a primary assett and many other evaluaters listed his speed as an assett. Boldin ran a 4.5 at his pro day I think, so he's not exactly a turtle either (to complement other talents that are somewhat unique).Jarrett knew this was an issue. You can bet that he was as prepared to run this 40 under ideal conditions (USC very fast conditions) as anyone can be. And he he pulled between a 4.6 and a 4.7. He's just not that fast.He could certainly be a complimentary receiver in the NFL, but for fantasy purposes, I will be avoiding him based on his speed.Here are the top 20 yardage guys from last year. Find me a guy as slow as Jarrett on this list:CJ (very fast)Harrison (silly fast)Roy W (yikes fast)Wayne (fast)Driver (very fast)Evans (bullet)Boldin (fast enough)Holt (very fast)Owens (fast enough - slow 40 time, but a fast guy)St. Smith (another bullet)Andre Johnson (very fast)Bruce (fast)Coles (fast)Furrey (don't honestly know)Walker (fast/very fast)Housh (fast)Galloway (silly fast even now)Glenn (very fast)Colston (decent speed)Burress (moderately fast - not a burner, but faster than Jarrett)Most of these guys have truly elite speed, and the ones that don't have DECENT speed and are spectacular in other areas.
Filled in above. No link = nfl.com, ? = questionable source.I mentioned in the other "40 time" post, that you just don't see slow guys as elite receivers in the NFL. You just don't.
I'ts not that blazing speed guarantees anything, it's just that if you don't have enough speed, it seems like you just have trouble being a truly elite receiver these days.
Yeah, Boldin ran a slow 40 at the combine. So did Chad Johnson. And in both cases it caused them to slip (and made some teams look really silly). But that isn't really what we are talking about here. Johnson is a VERY fast guy. It is fairly obvious. In an interview before the combine, he was talking up his speed as a primary assett and many other evaluaters listed his speed as an assett. Boldin ran a 4.5 at his pro day I think, so he's not exactly a turtle either (to complement other talents that are somewhat unique).
Jarrett knew this was an issue. You can bet that he was as prepared to run this 40 under ideal conditions (USC very fast conditions) as anyone can be. And he he pulled between a 4.6 and a 4.7. He's just not that fast.
He could certainly be a complimentary receiver in the NFL, but for fantasy purposes, I will be avoiding him based on his speed.
Here are the top 20 yardage guys from last year. Find me a guy as slow as Jarrett on this list:
CJ -- 4.56 combine and 4.36 private workout with Bengals
Harrison -- 4.29?
Roy W -- 4.48
Wayne -- 4.45
Driver -- 4.40?
Evans -- 4.33
Boldin -- 4.71 Combine, 4.47 Campus Agility Test
Holt -- 4.48?
Owens -- just under 4.6? or 4.42
St. Smith -- 4.45
Andre Johnson -- no combine, 4.3 Campus Agility Test
Bruce -- 4.48?
Coles -- rumors of 4.10-4.20 all over internet
Furrey -- 4.55?
Walker -- 4.38
Housh -- 4.6
Galloway -- 4.46?
Glenn -- 4.35?
Colston -- 4.5
Burress -- 4.6 and 4.37
Most of these guys have truly elite speed, and the ones that don't have DECENT speed and are spectacular in other areas.